碳捕获-厌氧消化耦合技术回收城市污水能源研究进展

杨媛; 邓伟航; 胡以松; 陈荣; 王晓昌

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202305028

碳捕获-厌氧消化耦合技术回收城市污水能源研究进展

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305028

杨媛^1,2,
邓伟航¹,
胡以松^1,2, ,,
陈荣^1,2,
王晓昌^1,2

1. 西安建筑科技大学环境与市政工程学院西北水资源与环境生态教育部重点实验室, 西安 710055;
2. 国家城市非传统水资源开发利用国际科技合作基地, 西安 710055

基金项目:

陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2022JM-237)

中国博士后科学基金(2021MD703870)

详细信息

作者简介:
杨媛(1991-),女,博士,主要研究方向为膜法污水处理与资源化。383842205@qq.com

通讯作者:
胡以松(1986-),男,副教授,主要研究方向为MBR污水处理技术。jeffsion414@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 71
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-05-27

RESEARCH PROGRESS ON COUPLED CARBON CAPTURE-ANAEROBIC DIGESTION TECHNOLOGY FOR ENERGY RECOVERY FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER

YANG Yuan^1,2,
DENG Weihang¹,
HU Yisong^{1,2
, ,},
CHEN Rong^1,2,
WANG Xiaochang^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Northwest Water Resource, Environment and Ecology (Ministry of Education), School of Environment and Municipal Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China;
2. International Science and Technology Cooperation Center for Urban Non-conventional Water Resources Development and Utilization, Xi'an 710055, China

摘要

摘要: 在"双碳"战略驱动下,城市污水处理模式逐渐从"以能耗换水质"转变为"能源资源回收利用"。污水中富含蛋白质、脂质、多糖等有机物,通过物化/生化方式进行碳捕获,可获得富含有机物的浓缩产物,有效提升后续厌氧消化的能源回收效率。概述了典型碳捕获工艺[高负荷活性污泥(HRAS)法、化学强化一级处理(CEPT)和膜分离技术等]的捕获机制,从COD去除率、碳捕获率、污水浓缩程度等角度对典型碳捕获工艺进行了比较与总结,分析了碳捕获产物性质和能源回收途径,探讨了富碳浓缩产物的厌氧产甲烷效能及其影响因素,并通过解析工程化应用案例展示了"碳捕获-厌氧消化"耦合技术的优势和前景。最后,指出了工程应用中存在的问题、挑战及未来展望。
- 能源回收 /
- 高负荷活性污泥法 /
- 化学强化一级处理 /
- 膜分离 /
- 碳捕获-厌氧消化
Abstract: Driven by the "carbon peak and neutrality" strategy, the treatment paradigm of municipal wastewater (MWW) is gradually changing from "energy consumption for water quality" to "energy and resources recovery". MWW is rich in proteins, lipids, polysaccharides and other organic matter. Carbon capture via physicochemical/biochemical methods can obtain concentrated products rich in organic matter, which can effectively improve the energy recovery efficiency of subsequent anaerobic digestion. The capture mechanism, COD capture rate and research progress of typical carbon capture processes (high-rate activated sludge (HRAS) process, chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) process and membrane separation technology, etc.) are analyzed and compared. In addition, the properties of MWW concentrate and downstream energy recovery technologies are illustrated. The anaerobic methanogenic efficiency of MWW concentrate and its affecting factors are discussed, with the advantages and prospects of carbon capture-anaerobic digestion coupled technology demonstrated through an engineering case study. At last, the issues, challenges and future prospects for widespread engineering application of coupled carbon capture-anaerobic digestion technology are pointed out.
- energy recovery /
- high-rate activated sludge process /
- chemically enhanced primary treatment /
- membrane separation /
- carbon capture-anaerobic digestion

HTML全文

参考文献(66)

[1]	郝晓地, 方晓敏, 李季, 等. 污水碳中和运行潜能分析[J]. 中国给水排水,2018,34(10):11-16.
[2]	GUVEN H, DERELI R K, OZGUN H, et al. Towards sustainable and energy efficient municipal wastewater treatment by up-concentration of organics[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2019,70: 145-168.
[3]	LU L, GUEST J S, PETERS C A, et al. Wastewater treatment for carbon capture and utilization[J]. Nature Sustainability. Nature Publishing Group, 2018,1(12): 750-758.
[4]	孙意忱. 温度对高负荷活性污泥工艺的影响研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学, 2020.
[5]	LIANG M X, LU X T, LIU P B, et al. Tapping the energy potential from wastewater by integrating high-rate activated sludge process with anaerobic membrane bioreactor[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 333: 130071.
[6]	DOLEJŠ P, VARGA Z, LUZA B, et al. Maximizing energy recovery from wastewater via bioflocculation-enhanced primary treatment: a pilot scale study[J]. Environmental Technology, 2021, 42(14): 2229-2239.
[7]	CARRERA J, CARBÓ O, DOÑATE S, et al. Increasing the energy production in an urban wastewater treatment plant using a high-rate activated sludge: pilot plant demonstration and energy balance[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 354: 131734.
[8]	WAN J F, GU J, ZHAO Q, et al. COD capture: A feasible option towards energy self-sufficient domestic wastewater treatment[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 1-9.
[9]	HE Q, WANG H, XU C, et al. Feasibility and optimization of wastewater treatment by chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT): a case study of Huangshi[J]. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability, 2016, 28(1/2/3/4): 209-215.
[10]	LEE C S, ROBINSON J, CHONG M F. A review on application of flocculants in wastewater treatment[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. Institution of Chemical Engineers, 2014: 489-508.
[11]	HAMEED Y T, IDRIS A, HUSSAIN S A, et al. A tannin-based agent for coagulation and flocculation of municipal wastewater as a pretreatment for biofilm process[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 182: 198-205.
[12]	PATRICIA M F, PURWONO, BUDIHARDJO M A. Dose of biocoagulant-mixing rate combinations for optimum reduction of COD in wastewater[C]//E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2018, 31: 03018.
[13]	MUNIZ G L, BORGES A C, DA SILVA T C F, et al. Chemically enhanced primary treatment of dairy wastewater using chitosan obtained from shrimp wastes: optimization using a Doehlert matrix design[J]. Environmental Technology (United Kingdom), 2022, 43(2): 237-254.
[14]	VERMA M, NARESH KUMAR R. Can coagulation-flocculation be an effective pre-treatment option for landfill leachate and municipal wastewater co-treatment?[J]. Perspectives in Science, 2016, 8: 492-494.
[15]	郭超然, 黄勇, 朱文娟, 等. 城市污水有机物回收:捕获技术研究进展[J]. 化工进展, 2020, 40(3): 1619-1633.
[16]	NACHEVA P M, BUSTILLOS L T, CAMPEROS E R, et al. Characterization and coagulation-flocculation treatability of Mexico City wastewater applying ferric chloride and polymers[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1996,34(3/4): 235-247.
[17]	BEZIRGIANNIDIS A, PLESIA-EFSTATHOPOULOU A, NTOUGIAS S, et al. Combined chemically enhanced primary sedimentation and biofiltration process for low cost municipal wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 2019, 54(12): 1227-1232.
[18]	BHUPTAWAT H, FOLKARD G K, CHAUDHARI S. Innovative physico-chemical treatment of wastewater incorporating Moringa oleifera seed coagulant[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 142(1/2): 477-482.
[19]	MOORE C, GAO W, FATEHI P. Cationic lignin polymers as flocculant for municipal wastewater[J]. Polymers, 2021, 13(22): 3871.
[20]	MERIç S, GUIDA M, ANSELMO A, et al. Microbial and COD removal in a municipal wastewater treatment plant using coagulation flocculation process[J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 2002, 37(8): 1483-1494.
[21]	ZHENG L, FENG H, LIU Y Q, et al. Chemically enhanced primary treatment of municipal wastewater with ferrate(Ⅵ)[J]. Water Environment Research, 2021, 93(6): 817-825.
[22]	FAUST L, TEMMINK H, ZWIJNENBURG A, et al. High loaded MBRs for organic matter recovery fromsewage: effect of solids retention time on bioflocculation and on the role of extracellular polymers[J]. Water Research, 2014, 56: 258-266.
[23]	AKANYETI I, TEMMINK H, REMY M, et al. Feasibility of bioflocculation in a high-loaded membrane bioreactor for improved energy recovery from sewage[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2010, 61(6): 1433-1439.
[24]	WANG Z W, ZHENG J J, TANG J X, et al. A pilot-scale forward osmosis membrane system for concentrating low-strength municipal wastewater: performance and implications[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 1-11.
[25]	XIONG J Q, YU S C, HU Y S, et al. Applying a dynamic membrane filtration (DMF)process for domestic wastewater preconcentration: organics recovery and bioenergy production potential analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 680: 35-43.
[26]	万立国, 林巧, 张丽君, 等. 溶解氧对HLB-MR反应器内有机物的生物絮凝影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(8): 3340-3346.
[27]	DAI W C, XU X C, YANG F L. High-rate contact stabilization process-coupled membrane bioreactor for maximal recovery of organics from municipal wastewater[J]. Water, 2018, 10(7): 878.
[28]	ODEY E A, WANG K J, LI Z F, et al. Optimization of the enhanced membrane coagulation reactor for sewage concentration efficiency and energy recovery[J]. Environmental Technology, 2018, 39(24): 3149-3158.
[29]	GONG H, JIN Z Y, XU H, et al. Redesigning C and N mass flows for energy-neutral wastewater treatment by coagulation adsorption enhanced membrane (CAEM)-based pre-concentration process[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 342: 304-309.
[30]	GONG H, JIN Z Y, XU H, et al. Enhanced membrane-based pre-concentration improves wastewater organic matter recovery: Pilot-scale performance and membrane fouling[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 206: 307-314.
[31]	TABOADA-SANTOS A, RIVADULLA E, PAREDES L, et al. Comprehensive comparison of chemically enhanced primary treatment and high-rate activated sludge in novel wastewater treatment plant configurations[J]. Water Research, 2020, 169: 115258.
[32]	BEZIRGIANNIDIS A, CHATZOPOULOS P, TSAKALI A, et al. Renewable energy recovery from sewage sludge derived from chemically enhanced precipitation[J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 162: 1811-1818.
[33]	JANG H M, SHIN J, CHOI S, et al. Fate of antibiotic resistance genes in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) sludge[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 244: 433-444.
[34]	ZHUANG H C, AMY TAN G Y, JING H D, et al. Enhanced primary treatment for net energy production from sewage: the genetic clarification of substrate-acetate-methane pathway in anaerobic digestion[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 431:133416.
[35]	JETTEN M S M, HORN S J, van LOOSDRECHT M C M. Towards a more sustainable municipal wastewater treatment system[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 35(9): 171-180.
[36]	CHENG H, LI Y M, GUO G Z, et al. Advanced methanogenic performance and fouling mechanism investigation of a high-solid anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for the co-digestion of food waste and sewage sludge[J]. Water Research, 2020, 187: 116436.
[37]	NIE Y, CHEN R, TIAN X, et al. Advanced methanogenic performance ands on the bioenergy recovery from sewage treatment by anaerobic membrane bioreactor via a comprehensive study on the response of microbial community and methanogenic activity[J]. Energy, 2017, 139: 459-467.
[38]	GAIKWAD V T, MUNAVALLI G R. Turbidity removal by conventional and ballasted coagulation with natural coagulants[J]. Applied Water Science, 2019, 9(5): 1-9.
[39]	GAO Y, FANG Z, LIANG P, et al. Anaerobic digestion performance of concentrated municipal sewage by forward osmosis membrane: focus on the impact of salt and ammonia nitrogen[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 276: 204-210.
[40]	GAO Y, FANG Z, LIANG P, et al. Direct concentration of municipal sewage by forward osmosis and membrane fouling behavior[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 247: 730-735.
[41]	FAUST L, TEMMINK H, ZWIJNENBURG A, et al. Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on the bioflocculation process in high loaded MBRs[J]. Water Research, 2014, 66: 199-207.
[42]	YANG Y, HU Y S, DUAN A, et al. Characterization of preconcentrated domestic wastewater toward efficient bioenergy recovery: applying size fractionation, chemical composition and biomethane potential assay[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 319: 124144.
[43]	CAGNETTA C, SAERENS B, MEERBURG F A, et al. High-rate activated sludge systems combined with dissolved air flotation enable effective organics removal and recovery[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019, 291: 121833.
[44]	DIAMANTIS V, VERSTRAETE W, EFTAXIAS A, et al. Sewage pre-concentration for maximum recovery and reuse at decentralized level[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2013, 67(6): 1188-1193.
[45]	CHUN M, KIM ·hyoungho, BAE ·hyokwan. Biochemical methane potential of chemically enhanced primary treatment sludge for energy-independence of sewage treatment plants[J]. Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 2020, 36(4): 322-331.
[46]	ANSARI A J, HAI F I, PRICE W E, et al. Assessing the integration of forward osmosis and anaerobic digestion for simultaneous wastewater treatment and resource recovery[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 260: 221-226.
[47]	蒋柱武, 方骁, 张亚雷, 等. 生活污水厌氧处理研究进展[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 33(4):489-493.
[48]	JIN Z Y, GONG H, TEMMINK H, et al. Efficient sewage pre-concentration with combined coagulation microfiltration for organic matter recovery[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 292: 130-138.
[49]	KIMURA K, YAMAKAWA M, HAFUKA A. Direct membrane filtration (DMF) for recovery of organic matter in municipal wastewater using small amounts of chemicals and energy[J]. Chemosphere, 2021, 277: 130244.
[50]	HAFUKA A, TAKAHASHI T, KIMURA K. Anaerobic digestibility of up-concentrated organic matter obtained from direct membrane filtration of municipal wastewater[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 161: 107692.
[51]	FERRARI F, BALCAZAR J L, RODRIGUEZ-RODA I, et al. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor for biogas production from concentrated sewage produced during sewer mining[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 670: 993-1000.
[52]	TUYET N T, DAN N P, VU N C, et al. Laboratory-scale membrane up-concentration and co-anaerobic digestion for energy recovery from sewage and kitchen waste[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2016, 73(3): 597-606.
[53]	JIMENEZ J, MILLER M, BOTT C, et al. High-rate activated sludge system for carbon management - Evaluation of crucial process mechanisms and design parameters[J]. Water Research, 2015, 87: 476-482.
[54]	WETT B, BUCHAUER K, FIMML C. Energy self-sufficiency as a feasible concept for wastewater treatment systems[C]//IWA Leading Edge Technology Conference. Sing-pore: Asian Water, 2007, 21:21-24.
[55]	HAO X D, LIU R B, HUANG X. Evaluation of the potential for operating carbon neutral WWTPs in China[J]. Water Research, 2015, 87: 424-431.
[56]	VERSPRILLE A I, STEIN T. The A-B process: a novel tow stage wastewater treatment system[J]. Water science and technology, 1985, 17(2/3): 235-246.
[57]	JU F, WANG Y B, LAU F T K, et al. Anaerobic digestion of chemically enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) sludge and the microbial community structure[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016, 100(20): 8975-8982.
[58]	HARLEMAN D R F, MURCOTT S. The role of physical-chemical wastewater treatment in the mega-cities of the developing world[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1999,40: 75-80.
[59]	REN Z J, PAGILLA K. Pathways to Water Sector Decarbonization, Carbon Capture and Utilization[M]. London: IWA Publishing, 2022.
[60]	耿丹丹, 雅锶. 污水厂变身城市花园[N]. 中国政府采购报, 2021-11-02(08).
[61]	SANCHO I, LOPEZ-PALAU S, ARESPACOCHAGA N, et al. New concepts on carbon redirection in wastewater treatment plants: a review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,647: 1373-1384.
[62]	LOTTI T, KLEEREBEZEM R, HU Z, et al. Pilot-scale evaluation of anammox-based mainstream nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater[J]. Environmental Technology, 2015, 36(9): 1167-1177.
[63]	REARDON R. Separate or combined sidestream treatment: that is the question[J]. Fla. Water Resour. J. 2014:52-58.
[64]	VENKATESH G, BRATTEBØ H. Environmental impact analysis of chemicals and energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants: case study of Oslo, Norway[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2011, 63(5): 1018-1031.
[65]	张婧怡, 高嵩, 宫徽, 等. 国外典型地下污水处理厂空间设计与节能措施案例分析[J]. 给水排水, 2018, 44(3): 136-142.
[66]	郝晓地, 赵梓丞, 李季, 等. 污水处理厂的能源与资源回收方式及其碳排放核算: 以芬兰Kakolanmäki污水处理厂为例[J]. 环境工程学报, 2021, 15(9): 2849-2858.