降雨特征对赣江南昌段河流断面不同水期的水质影响分析

刘文强; 郁达伟; 李昆; 郑利兵; 朱利英; 桂双林; 魏源送

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202308012

降雨特征对赣江南昌段河流断面不同水期的水质影响分析

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308012

刘文强^1,2,3,
郁达伟^2,3, ,,
李昆¹,
郑利兵^2,3,
朱利英^2,3,
桂双林⁴,
魏源送^1,2,3,5,4

1. 南昌大学资源与环境学院, 南昌 330031;
2. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心环境模拟与污染控制国家重点联合实验室, 北京 100085;
3. 中国科学院生态环境研究中心水污染控制实验室, 北京 100085;
4. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100049;
5. 江西省科学院, 南昌 330096

基金项目:

长江生态环境保护修复“一市一策”驻点跟踪研究(二期)(2022-LHYJ-02-0505-01)

详细信息

作者简介:
刘文强(1996-),男,硕士,主要研究方向为城市水环境。1804088197@qq.com

通讯作者:
郁达伟(1982-),男,博士,副研究员,主要研究方向为数据模拟与优化。dwyu@rcees.ac.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 77
- HTML全文浏览量: 5
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-06-20
- 网络出版日期: 2023-11-15

EFFECTS OF RAINFALL CHARACTERISTICS ON RIVER WATER QUALITY IN DIFFERENT WATER PERIODS: A CASE STUDY OF NANCHANG SECTION IN THE GANJIANG RIVER

LIU Wenqiang^1,2,3,
YU Dawei^{2,3
, ,},
LI Kun¹,
ZHENG Libing^2,3,
ZHU Liying^2,3,
GUI Shuanglin⁴,
WEI Yuansong^1,2,3,5,4

1. School of Resources & Environment, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;
2. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
3. Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;
4. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
5. Jiangxi Academy of Sciences, Nanchang 330096, China

摘要

摘要: 针对赣江南昌段水环境质量问题,以赣江南昌段周坊国考断面为研究对象,采用Mann-Kendall检验、相关性分析等方法分析了赣江南昌段不同水期的降雨特征,并考察了降雨特征对该断面水质的影响。结果表明:1)赣江南昌段该断面COD和NH₃-N浓度全年基本符合GB 3838—2002《地表水环境质量标准》Ⅲ类标准,但TP浓度主要在涨水期、其次为枯水期超过GB 3838—2002 Ⅲ类标准,TN浓度除在2019-08—2020-02外,均超过GB 3838—2002 Ⅲ类标准。2)断面TN和TP的日内时平均变异系数较小(<15%),而COD、NH₃-N和浊度的日内时平均变异系数>15%。3)NH₃-N浓度通常在年内第1个降雨量较大的月份出现峰值,TP和流量显著相关(R²=0.728,P＜0.01)。4)在涨水期和洪水期,该断面水质超标的现象多发生在强降雨后;当枯水期发生强降雨后,水质参数随着降雨均有明显上升。当枯水期发生强降雨后,水质参数随降雨均有明显上升,存在超标的可能性。
- 降雨特征 /
- 赣江南昌段 /
- 不同水期 /
- 水质分析
Abstract: In this paper, we analyzed the rainfall characteristics of different water periods in Nanchang section of the Ganjiang River by Mann-Kendall test and correlation analysis, and investigated the influence of rainfall characteristics on the water quality of this section, taking the Zhoufang national examination section in Nanchang section as the object. The results showed that: 1) COD and ammonia nitrogen concentrations at this section of Nanchang section basically met the surface water category Ⅲ standard in all hourly periods throughout the year, but TP concentrations mainly exceeded the surface water category Ⅲ standard during the high water period, followed by the dry water period, and TN concentrations exceeded the surface water category Ⅲ standard except in 2019-08 to 2020-02; 2) the intra-day time-averaged coefficients of variation of TN and TP at the cross sections were small (<15%), while the intra-day time-averaged coefficients of variation of COD, ammonia nitrogen and turbidity were greater than 15%; 3) the concentration of ammonia nitrogen tended to peak in the first month of the year when rainfall was higher, and TP and flow were significantly correlated (R²=0.728, P<0.01); 4) in the high water period and flood period, the section water quality exceeding the standard mostly occurred after strong rainfall; when the dry period occurred after strong rainfall, water quality parameters with rainfall had a significant increase.
- rainfall characteristics /
- Nanchang section of the Ganjiang River /
- different water stage /
- water quality analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	周怀东,彭文启,杜霞,等.中国地表水水质评价[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2004,2(4):255-264.
[2]	彭秋志,康慕谊,廖剑宇,等.河段水质压力目标管理模式的概念与方法[J].环境科学学报,2012,32(10):2625-2632.
[3]	TONG W,BUDDHI W,JIA Z L,et al.Re-thinking classical mechanistic model for pollutant build-up on urban impervious surfaces[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,651(Part 1):114-121.
[4]	马超.徐州市某河流水质变化与水期相关性分析[J].环境科技,2021,34(2):61-63 ,78.
[5]	汪心雯,刘子琦,郭琼琼,等.贵州黄洲河流域水质时空分布特征及污染源解析[J].环境工程,2021,39(9):69-75.
[6]	戴君,刘硕,韩金凤,等.污染负荷多情景变化下河流水质响应关系研究[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(2):776-783.
[7]	黄冬凌,倪兆奎,赵爽,等.基于湖泊与出入湖水质关联性研究:以鄱阳湖为例[J].环境科学,2019,40(10):4450-4460.
[8]	欧阳小军,盛文涛.赣江对鄱阳湖氮浓度影响及相关性分析[J].当代化工研究,2021(22):49-53.
[9]	杨威,刘琪,张婷婷,等.赣江中下游浮游植物群落结构及其水质生物学评价[J].水生态学杂志,2020,41(2):68-76.
[10]	肖妮娜,张萌,冯兵等.丰水期赣江流域着生藻类群落结构及其与水环境因子的关系[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(4):900-910.
[11]	胡锋平,侯娟,罗健文,等.赣江南昌段污染负荷及水环境容量分析[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(12):192-195 ,205.
[12]	刘佳丽,徐满清,黄学平,等.赣江(南昌段)沿岸水污染源的调查与研究[J].水利水电技术,2010,41(4):13-18.
[13]	王鹏,齐述华,陈波.赣江流域土地利用方式对河流水质的影响[J].生态学报,2015,35(13):4326-4337.
[14]	王昊.土地利用变化对赣江流域河流水量水质的影响[D].南昌:南昌工程学院,2020.
[15]	南昌市统计局.南昌市2021统计年鉴[EB/OL].2022.http://tjj.nc.gov.cn/zbft/front/tjjnjnew/2021/mobile/index.html.
[16]	万一帆,刘卫林,刘丽娜,等.南昌市城市化进程对极端降水的影响[J].水力发电,2020,46(8):27-31.
[17]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会国家气象中心.降水量等级:GB/T 28592—2012[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
[18]	李云良,姚静,张小琳,等.鄱阳湖水体垂向分层状况调查研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(6):915-924.
[19]	陈明,刘正芳,刘友存,等.赣江上游河道氮污染分析评价[J].有色金属科学与工程,2021,12(2):79-89.
[20]	候林丽,邹武,徐鹏,等.赣江吉安河段水质变化及其趋势分析[J].人民长江,2020,51(11):58-63.