CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS OF CARBON EMISSION IN CONSTRUCTION STAGE OF LOESS TUNNEL
-
摘要: 为提供黄土隧道施工阶段碳排放数据,寻求黄土隧道碳减排路径,助力实现黄土隧道低碳建设,开展黄土隧道施工阶段碳排放计算与分析意义重大。以SJ黄土隧道为研究对象,采用生命周期评价理论计算施工阶段碳排放,从碳排放源、时间和空间3个层面分析并总结了黄土隧道施工阶段碳排放特点,提出了黄土隧道施工阶段碳减排建议。结果表明:1) SJ黄土隧道施工阶段碳排放为267.69万t,碳排放强度为60.16 t CO2eq/m;2)材料生产与加工阶段碳排放最高,水泥和钢筋是黄土隧道关键碳排放源,二次衬砌、围岩支护、临时支护是施工阶段碳排放排前3的分部工程;3)黄土隧道碳排放强度高于岩石隧道,两种隧道材料能源、分部工程的碳排放分布情况类似。Abstract: In order to provide the carbon emission data of the loess tunnel construction stage, seek the carbon emission reduction path of loess tunnel, and help realize the low-carbon construction of loess tunnel, we carry out the calculation and analysis of carbon emission during the construction stage of loess tunnel, which is of great significance. Taking the SJ Loess Tunnel as the research object, a life cycle assessment was used to calculate the carbon emission during the construction stage, the carbon emission characteristics were analyzed and summarized from the three aspects of the carbon emission source, time and space, and suggestions on carbon emissions reduction during the loess tunnel construction stage were put forward. The results showed that:1) carbon emission in the construction stage of SJ Loess Tunnel was 2.6769 million tons and carbon emission intensity was 60.16 t CO2eq/m; 2) carbon emissions were highest in the stage of material production and processing. Cement and reinforcement were the key sources of carbon emissions in loess tunnels. Secondary lining, surrounding rock support, and temporary support were the top three subprojects in terms of carbon emissions in the construction stage. 3) The carbon emission intensity of loess tunnel was higher than that of the rock tunnel, and the carbon emission distribution of material energy and sub-projects was similar.
-
Key words:
- loess tunnel /
- life cycle assessment /
- carbon emission intensity /
- carbon emission reduction /
-
[1] LIU Y Y, WANG Y Q, LI D, et al.Life cycle assessment for carbon dioxide emissions from freeway construction in mountainous area:primary source, cut-off determination of system boundary[J].Resources Conservation & Recycling, 2019, 140:36-44. [2] 交通运输部.2022年交通运输行业发展统计公报[EB/OL].https://xxgk.mot.gov.cn/2020/jigou/zhghs/202306/t20230615_3847023.html. [3] RODRÍGUEZ R, PÉREZ F.Carbon foot print evaluation in tunneling construction using conventional methods[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 108:103704. [4] SUN H, PARK Y.CO2 emission calculation method during construction process for developing BIM-based performance evaluation system[J].Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(16):5587. [5] 郭春, 郭亚林, 陈政.交通隧道工程碳排放核算及研究进展分析[J].现代隧道技术, 2023, 60(1):1-10. [6] 李伟, 陈刚, 曹太波, 等.地铁盾构渣土利用与处置碳排放强度与减碳潜力研究[J].环境工程, 2023, 41(7):53-60. [7] MAHMOOD A, VARABUNTOONVIT V, MUNGKALASIRI J, et al.A tier-wise method for evaluating uncertainty in life cycle assessment[J].Sustainability, 2022, 14(20):1-9. [8] 徐丽笑, 王亚菲.我国城市碳排放核算:国际统计标准测度与方法构建[J].统计研究, 2022, 39(7):12-30. [9] YANG Y, HEIJUNGS R, BRANDAO M.Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) does not necessarily yield more accurate results than process-based LCA[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 150(MAY1):237-242. [10] UNFCCC.Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)[J].FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1, 1997. [11] 王梦林, 程梦雨, 康皓, 姜立.变电建筑碳排放计算方法研究与低碳案例实践[J].智能建筑与智慧城市, 2023(4):98-100. [12] 张孝存.建筑碳排放量化分析计算与低碳建筑结构评价方法研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2018. [13] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 国家市场监督管理总局.建筑碳排放计算标准:GB/T 51366-2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2019. [14] 汪慧颖.广西高速公路建设期碳排放计算及预测研究[D].南宁:广西大学, 2022. [15] 龚志起, 张智慧.水泥生命周期中物化环境状况的研究[J].土木工程学报, 2004, 37(5):86-91. [16] 黄旭辉.地铁土建工程物化阶段碳排放计量与减排分析[D].广州:华南理工大学, 2019. [17] 粟月欢, 张宇, 段华波, 等.地铁建设环境影响评估及减排效益研究:以深圳市为例[J].环境工程, 2022, 40(5):184-192, 236. [18] SHAN Y, GUAN D, ZHENG H, et al.Data Descriptor:China CO2 emission accounts 1997-2015[J].Scientific DATA, 2018. [19] LIU M H, JIA S Y, HE X T.A quota-based GHG emissions quantification model for the construction of subway stations in China[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 198:847-858. [20] LLOYD S M, RIES R.Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment:a survey of quantitative approaches[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2007, 11(1):161-179. [21] ANSAH M K, CHEN X, YANG H X, et al.Developing a tier-hybrid uncertainty analysis approach for lifecycle impact assessment of a typical high-rise residential building[J].Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 167:105424. [22] KHAN S A, ALAM T, KHAN M S, et al.Life cycle assessment of embodied carbon in buildings:background, approaches and advancements[J].Buildings, 2022, 12(11):1944. [23] YU B, LIU Q, GU X Y, et al.Data quality and uncertainty assessment methodology for pavement LCA[J].International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2018, 19(516):519-525. [24] YOO W, OZER H, HAM Y.System-level approach for identifying main uncertainty sources in pavement construction life-cycle assessment for quantifying environmental impacts[J].Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 2019, 145(2):04018137. [25] 王贤卫, 吴灵生, 杨东援.高速公路建设CO2排放计算分析[J].公路交通科技, 2014, 31(2):150-158. [26] 郭春, 徐建峰, 张佳鹏.隧道建设碳排放计算方法及预测模型[J].隧道建设(中英文), 2020, 40(8):1140-1146. [27] XU J F.Influence of lining design parameters on the greenhouse gas emissions of chinese highway tunnel construction[J].Transportation Research Record, 2021, 2675(11):685-698. [28] XU J F, GUO C, CHEN X F, et al.Emission transition of greenhouse gases with the surrounding rock weakened:a case study of tunnel construction[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 209(FEB.1):169-179. [29] SEO Y, KIM S M.Estimation of materials-induced CO2 emission from road construction in Korea[J].Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 26:625-631. [30] HUANG L Z, BOHNE R A, BRULAND A, et al.Life cycle assessment of Norwegian road tunnel[J].The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20(2):174-184.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 109
- HTML全文浏览量: 18
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0