城镇排水管道原位固化修复工程碳排放计算与分析

马涛; 郭跃华; 王蔚蔚; 曹井国

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202311011

城镇排水管道原位固化修复工程碳排放计算与分析

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311011

1. 天津科技大学化工与材料学院, 天津 300457;
2. 中交一航局生态工程有限公司, 广东深圳 518107;
3. 中国城市建设研究院有限公司, 北京 100120

详细信息

作者简介:
马涛(1998-),男,硕士,主要研究方向为管道非开挖修复碳排放。271374417@qq.com

通讯作者:
曹井国(1980-),男,教授,主要研究方向为管道非开挖修复技术及材料、水务标准化。cjg@tust.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 109
- HTML全文浏览量: 15
- PDF下载量: 22
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-08-28
- 网络出版日期: 2023-12-25

CARBON EMISSION CALCULATION AND ANALYSIS FOR CURED-IN-PLACE REHABILITATION OF URBAN DRAINAGE PIPELINE

1. College of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, China;
2. CCCC-FHEC Ecological Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518107, China;
3. China Urban Construction Design &. Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100120, China

摘要

摘要: 从可持续发展战略角度考虑，降低市政设施的碳排放量是生态文明发展的重要一步。非开挖管道修复方式节能环保、绿色低碳，是管道修复行业升级转型的大趋势。结合四川省射洪市管网修复案例，对修复管道材料生产阶段、材料与设备运输阶段、施工阶段进行了碳足迹追踪。结果表明：材料生产阶段碳排放量为11263.14 kg CO₂e，运输阶段碳排放量为134.78 kg CO₂e，施工阶段碳排放量为539.12 kg CO₂e，分别约占总碳排放量的94.35%、1.13%和4.52%。材料生产阶段碳排放量最大，是控制翻转式原位固化修复碳排放量的关键。对施工过程中材料与能源进行敏感性分析，发现树脂的敏感性最强，其次是无纺布，优化这2种材料或控制其使用量，将对降低翻转式原位固化工程的碳排放有重要作用。
- 碳排放 /
- 管道原位固化 /
- 非开挖修复技术 /
- 生命周期 /
- 敏感性分析
Abstract: From a sustainable development perspective, reducing the carbon emissions of municipal facilities is an important step towards the development of ecological civilization. Trenchless pipeline rehabilitation, which is energy-saving, environmentally friendly, and low-carbon, represents a major trend in the pipeline repairing industry. In this paper, based on a case of pipeline network repairment in Shehong City, Sichuan Province, carbon footprint tracking of the pipeline repair material production stage, material and equipment transportation stage, and construction stage was conducted. The results showed that the carbon emissions during the production stage were 11263.14 kg CO₂e, while those during the transportation and construction stages were 134.78 kg CO₂e and 539.12 kg CO₂e, respectively, accounting for approximately 94.35%, 1.13%, and 4.52% of the total carbon emissions. Material production was found to be the largest carbon emissions stage, and thus it is the key to carbon emissions controlling in the CIPP process. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on the materials and energy used during the production. The resin was found to be the most sensitive, followed by non-woven fabric. Optimizing and controlling their usage will be important for reducing carbon emissions in cured-in-place rehabilitation of urban drainage pipeline.
- carbon emission /
- cured-in-place pipe rehabilitation /
- trenchless rehabilitation techniques /
- lifecycle /
- emotional analysis

HTML全文

参考文献(14)

[1]	GUAN Y R, SHAN Y L, HUANG Q, et al.Assessment to China's recent emission pattern shifts[J].Earths Future, 2021, 9(11).
[2]	国家发展改革委发布"碳达峰十大行动"进展报告[J].资源再生, 2023(5):60-71.
[3]	卫佳, 许怀奥, 方帅, 等.非开挖修复技术用于大口径截污管道改造工程[J].中国给水排水, 2023, 39(10):126-132.
[4]	李旦罡, 遆仲森.城市地下管线非开挖修复更新技术的探讨[J].城市勘测, 2018(增刊1):247-250.
[5]	KAUSHAL V, NAJAFI M, SERAJIANTEHRANI R.Environmental impacts of conventional open-cut pipeline installation and trenchless technology methods:state-of-the-art review[J].Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2020, 11(2):1-9.
[6]	曹俊, 崔熙, 刘利, 等.非开挖管道修复技术的碳足迹分析[J].石油管材与仪器, 2023, 9(1):23-27.
[7]	刘沐宇, 欧阳丹.桥梁工程生命周期碳排放计算方法[J].土木建筑与环境工程, 2011, 33(增刊1):125-129.
[8]	赵苏苏, 朱建国, 王泽, 等.基于LCA的建筑碳排放计算及减排策略研究:以某住宅工程为例[J].建筑经济, 2023, 44(增刊1):371-378.
[9]	田琪, 叶建州, 闻雪, 等.《城镇排水管道原位固化修复用内衬软管》团标解读[J].中国给水排水, 2022, 38(8):108-113.
[10]	赵年花, 周翔, 董锋.涤纶纺织品的碳足迹评估[J].印染, 2012, 38(14):42-45.
[11]	ALSADI A, MATTHEWS J C, MATTHEWS E.Environmental impact assessment of the fabrication of pipe rehabilitation materials[J].Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2020, 11(1):1-7.
[12]	曹井国, 石东优, 张文宁, 等.城镇排水管渠原位固化修复材料工程示范[J].给水排水, 2020, 56(1):115-119.
[13]	ALSADI A A, MATTHEWS J C.Evaluation of carbon footprint of pipeline materials during installation, operation, and disposal phases[J].Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2020, 11(2):1-13.
[14]	陈进杰, 王兴举, 王祥琴, 等.高速铁路全生命周期碳排放计算[J].铁道学报, 2016, 38(12):47-55.