IMPACT OF EXTERNAL WATER INFLOW ON FLOODING RISK IN URBAN AREAS AND OPTIMIZATION SCHEMES
-
摘要: 为评估建成区外客水汇入对山东省某市城区管网排水压力的影响,基于InfoWorks ICM构建一维、二维耦合雨洪模型,在不同模拟条件下分析城区管网排水能力及内涝积水情况,并基于模型结果提出优化方案。结果表明:建成区外客水汇入是导致该市主城区管网超负荷、节点溢流及内涝积水的主要原因;在2 a、3 a一遇2 h设计降雨下,客水汇入时超过1/2管道超负荷运行,溢流节点分别占1.38%和3.1%;在20 a、30 a一遇24 h设计降雨下,淹水面积占城区研究区域面积的35.9%及38.7%,其中9.60%及9.94%为高风险积水区;综合考虑经济性及有效性,采用建设地表方涵、排洪沟的方式截流地表径流客水的方式以缓解城区管网排水压力。经验证,优化方案能有效削减客水汇入对城区内涝积水的影响,对高风险积水区面积削减最明显。在20 a、30 a一遇24 h设计降雨下,研究区域高风险积水区面积优化后比优化前削减了75%、71%,最大积水深度下降至1 m以下。
-
关键词:
- 客水 /
- 排水能力 /
- 内涝风险 /
- InfoWorks ICM模型
Abstract: To evaluate the impact of the external water inflow on the urban drainage pressure in a city in Shandong Province, a one-dimensional and two-dimensional combined model was established on InfoWorks ICM to analyze the drainage capacity and flooding distribution in the urban under different rainfall conditions. Then the optimization schemes were proposed. The results showed that the inflow of external water was the main reason for the drainage pipe network overloading, nodes overflowing, and flooding in the main urban area of the city. More than half of the pipes were overloaded under the design rainfall recurrence of 2 a and 3 a with a duration of 2 h, and the overflow nodes accounted for 1.38% and 3.1%, respectively. The proportion of flooded areas was 35.9% and 38.7% under the design rainfall recurrence of 20 a and 30 a with a duration of 24 h, respectively, among which 9.60% and 9.94% of the area were posted at high risk. Considering both economy and effectiveness, the construction of surface culverts and flood discharge ditches was adopted to intercept surface runoff and alleviate the drainage pressure of urban pipeline networks. The optimized plan can effectively reduce the flooded areas in urban under external water inflow, especially for high-risk areas. The high-risk area was reduced by 75% and 71% under the design rainfall recurrence of 20 a and 30 a with a duration of 24 h, respectively, and the maximum flooding depth decreased to 1 meter below.-
Key words:
- external water /
- drainage capacity /
- flooding risk /
- InfoWorks ICM model
-
[1] 王向东,刘卫东.中国空间规划体系:现状、问题与重构[J].经济地理,2012,32(5):7-15,29. [2] 刘昌明,张永勇,王中根,等.维护良性水循环的城镇化LID模式:海绵城市规划方法与技术初步探讨[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(5):719-731. [3] 张庭伟.1990年代中国城市空间结构的变化及其动力机制[J].城市规划,2001(7):7-14. [4] 陈伟,赵杨,杨正,等.基于洪涝风险分析的纽约市城市绿地规划设计及其对中国的启示[J].环境工程,2020,38(4):16-20. [5] 孙铮,王建龙,张长鹤,等.基于SWMM模型的城市已建区排水防涝提标改造途径探讨[J].环境工程,2022,40(9):199-207. [6] 叶婉露,郭海斌,韦明杰.基于精准客水划定的城市下凹桥防涝规划[J].给水排水,2022,58(增刊1):738-742. [7] 王诗婧.全过程内涝防治体系对缓解城市内涝的效果分析[J].环境工程,2020,38(4):108-113. [8] 陈文龙,徐宗学,宋利祥,等.基于流域系统整体观的城市洪涝治理研究[J].水利学报,2021,52(6):659-672. [9] 封天雨,雷晓辉,王家彪,等.基于Infoworks ICM模型的沿海城市暴雨内涝分析[J].水电能源科学,2023,41(6):64-68. [10] 黄国如,王欣,黄维.基于InfoWorks ICM模型的城市暴雨内涝模拟[J].水电能源科学,2017,35(2):66-70,60. [11] 廖如婷,徐宗学,叶陈雷,等.基于SWMM和InfoWorks ICM模型的大红门排水区暴雨内涝模拟[J].水资源保护,2023,39(3):109-117. [12] 吴彦成,丁祥,杨利伟,等.基于InfoWorks ICM模型的陕西省咸阳市排水系统能力及内涝风险评估[J].地球科学与环境学报,2020,42(4):552-559. [13] 住房城乡建设部.室外排水设计标准:GB 50014—2021[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2021. [14] 俞露,荆燕燕,许拯民.辅助排水防涝规划编制的设计降雨雨型研究[J].中国给水排水,2015,31(19):141-145. [15] 叶陈雷,徐宗学,雷晓辉,等.基于SWMM和InfoWorks ICM的城市街区洪涝模拟与分析[J].水资源保护,2023,39(2):87-94. [16] CHEN Y,HOU H,LI Y,et al.Urban inundation under different rainstorm scenarios in Lin’an City,China[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2022,19(12):7210. [17] 王建龙,张长鹤,席广朋.基于多目标遗传算法的城市内涝调蓄池规模优化方法研究[J].环境工程,2023,41(6):166-173. [18] 叶陈雷,徐宗学,雷晓辉,等.基于InfoWorks ICM的城市洪涝模拟及其风险分析:以福州市白马河片区为例[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,57(6):784-793. [19] CHEN W,HUANG G,Zhang H,et al.Urban inundation response to rainstorm patterns with a coupled hydrodynamic model:a case study in Haidian Island,China[J].Journal of Hydrology,2018,564:1022-1035. [20] 黄国如,罗海婉,陈文杰,等.广州东濠涌流域城市洪涝灾害情景模拟与风险评估[J].水科学进展,2019,30(5):643-652. [21] 王俊佳,王川涛,曾胜.基于情景模拟的城市排水能力及内涝风险评估[J].中国给水排水,2020,36(17):115-120. [22] 许萍,任恒阳,徐慧纬,等.LID与传统开发模式下雨水管渠运行状态对比研究[J].中国给水排水,2018,34(15):127-132. [23] 住房城乡建设部.城镇内涝防治技术规范:GB 51222—2017[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2017.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 90
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 6
- 被引次数: 0