聚吡咯改性电极强化MFC驱动铀污染土壤的电动修复研究

王永东; 袁野; 刘欣媛; 李梦婷; 刘骞; 王津华; 马建洪

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202402022

聚吡咯改性电极强化MFC驱动铀污染土壤的电动修复研究

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402022

王永东^1,2,
袁野^1,2,
刘欣媛^1,2,
李梦婷^1,2,
刘骞^1,2,
王津华^1,2,
马建洪^1,2, ,

1. 南华大学资源环境与安全工程学院, 湖南衡阳 421001;
2. 南华大学铀矿冶生物技术国防重点学科实验室, 湖南衡阳 421001

基金项目:

湖南省自然科学基金(2022JJ30491)

湖南省教育厅重点项目(22A0308)

湖南省自然科学基金青年项目(2021JJ40466)

详细信息

作者简介:
王永东(1980-),男,博士研究生,副教授,主要研究方向为铀矿冶生物技术。10137961@qq.com

通讯作者:
马建洪(1992-),女,博士研究生,高级实验师,主要研究方向为铀污染环境修复。jianhongma25@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 55
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-02-02
- 网络出版日期: 2024-04-28

PPy-MODIFIED ELECTRODE ENHANCING MFC-DRIVEN ELECTROKINETIC REMEDIATION OF URANIUM CONTAMINATED SOIL

WANG Yongdong^1,2,
YUAN Ye^1,2,
LIU Xinyuan^1,2,
LI Mengting^1,2,
LIU Qian^1,2,
WANG Jinhua^1,2,
MA Jianhong^{1,2
, ,}

1. School of Resource Environment and Safety Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China;
2. Key Discipline Laboratory for National Defense for Biotechnology in Uranium Mining and Hydro Metallurgy, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China

摘要

摘要: 为探究聚吡咯(PPy)改性电极强化微生物燃料电池(MFC)驱动铀污染土壤的电动修复研究,利用PPy对碳毡电极进行改性,研究不同比例PPy改性电极对MFC的产电性能及其驱动铀污染土壤电动修复效果的影响。结果表明:PPy改性电极增强了MFC的产电性能,CP100最大电压164 mV,最大功率密度18.92 mW/m²,比原始碳毡电极分别提升了29.13%和43.12%;PPy作为MFC阴极增强了土壤中铀的去除效果,其中CP50相较于原始碳毡电极铀的吸附率提升了约13倍;以MFC作为电源能够有效驱动土壤中的铀从阳极向阴极的迁移,其中CP50实验组近阳极区域土壤中铀的最大去除率高达56.42%。综上所述,PPy改性电极对微生物燃料电池的产电能力和铀的去除均具有明显的强化作用。
- 电动修复 /
- 微生物燃料电池 /
- 聚吡咯 /
- 土壤污染 /
- 铀
Abstract: To investigate the performance of polypyrrole(PPy) modified electrodes in enhancing the electrokinetic remediation of uranium contaminated soil driven by a microbial fuel cell(MFC), PPy was used to modify the carbon felt electrodes, to investigate the effect of different ratios of PPy modified electrode on the electrical production performance of MFC, as well as the electrokinetic remediation performance on uranium contaminated soil. The results showed that the PPy-modified electrodes enhanced the power generation performance of MFC. The maximum voltage of CP100 reached 164 mV, and the maximum power density was 18.92 mW/m², which was 29.13% and 43.12% higher than the original carbon felt electrodes, respectively; PPy, as an MFC cathode, enhanced the removal of uranium from soil, and the adsorption rate of uranium in CP50 was about 13 times higher than that in the original carbon felt electrode; MFC, as a power source, effectively drove the migration of uranium from the anode to the cathode in the soil. The maximum removal rate of uranium near the anode of the CP50 experimental group was as high as 56.42%. PPy-modified electrodes can significantly enhance the power generation capacity of microbial fuel cells and uranium removal.
- electrokinetic remediation(EKR) /
- microbial fuel cell(MFC) /
- polypyrrole /
- soil pollution /
- uranium

HTML全文

参考文献(41)

[1]	CARMO R,TRINDADE O,DELGADO J,et al.Radiometric signature as an indicator of radiological pollution on Rio Doce after the disaster in tailings dam[J].Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry,2020,323(2):741-747.
[2]	CASPAH K,MANNY M,MORGAN M.An Assessment of radiological hazards from gold mine tailings in the Province of Gauteng in South Africa[J].International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2016,13(1):138-147.
[3]	WAN X,LEI M,CHEN T.Review on remediation technologies for arsenic-contaminated soil[J].Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering,2019,14(2):134-143.
[4]	KIM S S,HAN G S,KIM G N,et al.Advanced remediation of uranium-contaminated soil[J].Journal of Environmental Radioactivity,2016,164:239-244.
[5]	ABDULAZIZ A,ANFAL I,OMAR A.Estimation of radiostrontium,radiocesium and radiobarium transfer from arid soil to plant:a case study from Kuwait[J].Nuclear Engineering and Technology,2020,53(3):960-966.
[6]	薛成杰,方战强.土壤修复产业碳达峰碳中和路径研究[J].环境工程,2022,40(8):231-238.
[7]	SONG J S,SHIN S S,KIM S I.A study on the assessment of treatment technologies for efficient remediation of radioactively-contaminated soil[J].Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology,2016,14(3):245-251.
[8]	MANUEL L,YUICHI O,JUNKO T,et al.Radiocesium concentrations in soil and leaf after decontamination practices in a forest plantation highly polluted by the Fukushima accident[J].Environmental Pollution,2018,239:448-456.
[9]	PURKIS J M,WARWICK P E,GRAHAM J,et al.Towards the application of electrokinetic remediation for nuclear site decommissioning[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2021,413:125274.
[10]	WEN D,FU R,LI Q.Removal of inorganic contaminants in soil by electrokinetic remediation technologies:a review[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2021,401:123345.
[11]	WU M S,XU X,ZHAO Q,et al.Simultaneous removal of heavy metals and biodegradation of organic matter with sediment microbial fuel cells[J].RSC Advances,2017,7(84):53433-53438.
[12]	ASIM A Y,MOHAMAD N M I,SUSANA R.Development and modification of materials to build cost-effective anodes for microbial fuel cells (MFCs):an overview[J].Biochemical Engineering Journal,2020,164:107779-110792.
[13]	鹿钦礼,李亮,刘金亮,等.微生物燃料电池的应用研究进展[J].环境工程,2019,37(8):95-100.
[14]	ZHANG J,CAO X,WANG H,et al.Simultaneous enhancement of heavy metal removal and electricity generation in soil microbial fuel cell[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2020,192(C):110314.
[15]	ZHANG J,LIU Y,SUN Y,et al.Effect of soil type on heavy metals removal in bioelectrochemical system[J].Bioelectrochemistry,2020,136:107596.
[16]	SAJJAD S,JAVAD F,LEO S,et al.Electroactive nanostructured scaffold produced by controlled deposition of PPy on electrospun PCL fibres[J].Research on Chemical Intermediates,2017,43(2):1235-1251.
[17]	HUANG J,LIU Z,HUANG D,et al.Efficient removal of uranium (Ⅵ) with a phytic acid-doped polypyrrole/carbon felt electrode using double potential step technique[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2022,433:128775.
[18]	郭延凯,郭金燕,赵娟,等.电沉积制备PMo_(12)/rGO/PPy阳极及其在微生物燃料电池中的应用[J].环境工程,2022,40(3):147-153.
[19]	赵婷,邱峥辉,郑纪勇,等.聚吡咯基改性碳刷电极在微生物燃料电池中的应用研究[J].现代化工,2021,41(10):186-195.
[20]	梁宁.聚吡咯及其复合材料的制备与性能研究[D].镇江:江苏科技大学,2012.
[21]	KOU X,YAO X,QIU J.Carbon nanofibers/polypyrrole nano metacomposites[J].Journal of Polymer Science Part B:Polymer Physics,2017,55(23):1724-1729.
[22]	王亮.聚吡咯基磁性复合材料的制备及对Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附研究[D].桂林:桂林理工大学,2021.
[23]	LIU P,WANG X,LI H.Facile preparation of string-like composite of hollow PPy nanospheres decorated on the carbon nanotubes[J].Synthetic Metals,2014,189:173-176.
[24]	WANG X,CHENG S,FENG Y,et al.Use of carbon mesh anodes and the effect of different pretreatment methods on power production in microbial fuel cells[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2009,43(17):6870-6873.
[25]	ZHAO N,MA Z,SONG H,et al.Enhancement of bioelectricity generation by synergistic modification of vertical carbon nanotubes/polypyrrole for the carbon fibers anode in microbial fuel cell[J].Electrochimica Acta,2019,296:69-74.
[26]	汤占肃.聚吡咯复合材料在微生物燃料电池中的产电和脱色性能研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2020.
[27]	杜雅楠.聚苯胺-聚吡咯复合水凝胶在微生物燃料电池中的性能研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2021.
[28]	齐立娟.聚吡咯复合水凝胶的制备及其在微生物燃料电池中的性能研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2021.
[29]	王辉.微生物燃料电池(MFC)对典型土壤污染物的去除作用与机理[D].南京:东南大学,2018.
[30]	MESHACK I S,FELIX U A,MOHAMAD A,et al.Polarization and power density trends of a soil-based microbial fuel cell treated with human urine[J].International Journal of Energy Research,2020,44(7):5968-5976.
[31]	JUNG S,REGAN J M.Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2007,77(2):393-402.
[32]	尹亚琳,高崇洋,赵阳国,等.好氧-厌氧混合污泥启动微生物燃料电池产电性能及微生物群落动态特征[J].微生物学报,2014,54(12):1471-1480.
[33]	MA J,NI H,SU D,et al.Bioelectricity generation from pig farm wastewater in microbial fuel cell using carbon brush as electrode[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2016,41(36):16191-16195.
[34]	SMITA S K,VIVEK K,VEERA G G,et al.Alkalinity and salinity favor bioelectricity generation potential of Clostridium,Tetrathiobacter,and Desulfovibrio consortium in microbial fuel cells (MFC) treating sulfate-laden wastewater[J].Bioresource Technology,2020,306:123110.
[35]	SANATH K,SANG-HOON L,HEE-DEUNG P,et al.Specific enrichment of different Geobacter sp.in anode biofilm by varying interspatial distance of electrodes in air-cathode microbial fuel cell (MFC)[J].Electrochimica Acta,2020,331(C):135388.
[36]	ZHANG S H,QIU C H,FANG C F,et al.Characterization of bacterial communities in anode microbial fuel cells fed with glucose,propyl alcohol,and methanol[J].Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology,2017,53(2):250-257.
[37]	ISILAY U,ANATOLI D.Electricity generation in microbial fuel cell systems with Thiobacillus ferrooxidans as the cathode microorganism[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,43(2):1171-1178.
[38]	ZHANG J,LIU Y,SUN Y,et al.Effect of soil type on heavy metals removal in bioelectrochemical system[J].Bioelectrochemistry,2020,136:107596.
[39]	XIAO J,ZHOU S,CHU L,et al.Electrokinetic remediation of uranium(Ⅵ)-contaminated red soil using composite electrolyte of citric acid and ferric chloride[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2020,27(4):4478-4488.
[40]	ANKISHA V,AMITAP K,MEENU C,et al.Microbial fuel cell for simultaneous removal of uranium (Ⅵ) and nitrate[J].Chemical Engineering Journal,2020,388(C):124157.
[41]	XIAO J,ZHOU S.Effect of electrode materials on electro kinetic remediation of uranium contaminated soil[J].IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2019,300(3):32074.