基于混合生命周期评价的小型灌溉泵站碳排放核算方法研究

张婉君; 陈丹; 胡乐; 孙浩; 季巍

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202402025

基于混合生命周期评价的小型灌溉泵站碳排放核算方法研究

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402025

张婉君¹,
陈丹^1, ,,
胡乐²,
孙浩²,
季巍³

1. 河海大学农业科学与工程学院, 南京 210098;
2. 江苏省农村水利科技发展中心, 南京 210029;
3. 南通市水利局, 江苏南通 226007

基金项目:

江苏省水利科技项目(2022046)

安徽省自然科学基金水科学联合基金重点项目(2208085US09)

详细信息

作者简介:
张婉君(1999-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事水土资源规划与管理研究。1783508840@qq.com

通讯作者:
陈丹(1979-),男,教授,博士,主要从事水土资源管理与生态灌区方面研究。23543458@qq.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 91
- HTML全文浏览量: 15
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-03-08
- 网络出版日期: 2024-04-28

STUDY ON A CARBON EMISSION METHOD FOR SMALL IRRIGATION PUMPING STATIONS BASED ON HYBRID LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT THEORY

ZHANG Wanjun¹,
CHEN Dan^{1
, ,},
HU Le²,
SUN Hao²,
JI Wei³

1. College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;
2. Jiangsu Rural Water Conservancy Science and Technology Development Center, Nanjing 210029, China;
3. Water Conservancy Bureau of Nantong, Nantong 226007, China

摘要

摘要: 小型灌溉泵站是农田灌溉的重要基础设施,单座规模较小但数量庞大,从“双碳”角度对其开展全生命周期的碳排放核算分析对实现其可持续发展和促进高效供水具有重要意义。基于碳足迹理论,采用混合生命周期分析法,将灌溉泵站全生命周期分为材料设备生产、材料设备运输、建设施工、运行维护和拆除报废5个阶段,分析了灌溉泵站在建设、运行、管理整个过程中的碳排放规律,构建了小型灌溉泵站碳排放模型核算方法,包括核算原理、研究思路、计算流程和核算公式等。选择了6处不同地区小型灌溉泵站开展了碳排放核算方法的实例分析,结果显示:6处灌溉泵站的碳排放总量分别为402.87,34.30,849.37,140.93,1645.56,312.89 t CO₂e,年单位灌溉面积的碳排放系数分别为331,147,681,144,202,126 kg CO₂e/(hm²·a);各个阶段的碳排放量具有较大差异,总体来看运行维护阶段(62.57%)和材料设备生产阶段(26.64%)排放量最大,建设施工阶段(5.32%)、拆除报废阶段(4.78%)、材料设备运阶段输(0.69%)的排放量相对较小;碳排放受地域提水灌溉特点、泵站规模、灌溉面积、灌溉作物及其用水量、抽水扬程、供电方式等因素影响,表现出一定的差异性;供电方式表现出较大的差异性,相比之下单独太阳能光伏供电比统一电网供电的碳排放量更低,且前者是在建设施工阶段(56.67%)排放量最大,其次是运行维护阶段(19.04%);参数的不确定性分析显示,构筑物寿命年限取值对碳排放核算的敏感性最强,在测算时应结合实际和规范综合考虑进行合理取值;针对不同类型灌溉泵站在不同阶段的碳排放特点提出了针对性的减碳措施。研究结果可为科学核算灌溉泵站碳足迹、建设绿色节约型水利基础设施、促进农村水利低碳发展提供技术参考。
- 灌溉泵站 /
- 碳排放 /
- 混合生命周期评价方法
Abstract: As an important infrastructure for the irrigation of farmland in plain regions, small irrigation pumping stations are small in scale but large in number. This paper analyzes the full life cycle carbon emission accounting of the irrigation pumping stations from the perspective of ‘dual carbon', which is of great significance for achieving its sustainable development and promoting efficient of water extraction. Based on the carbon footprint theory, this paper adopts a hybrid life cycle assessment method, and divides the whole life cycle of an irrigation pumping station into five stages: material and equipment production, material and equipment transportation, construction, operation and maintenance, and demolition. This study analyzes the carbon emission law of irrigation pumping stations in the whole process of construction, operation, and management, and establishes a carbon emission model accounting method, including the accounting principle, research ideas, calculation process, and the accounting formula, etc. The results show that the total carbon emissions of the six irrigation pumping stations are 402.87, 34.30, 849.37, 140.93, 1645.56, 312.89 t CO₂e, and the annual carbon emission coefficients per unit of irrigated area are 331, 147, 681, 144, 202, 126 kg CO₂e/(hm²·a)), respectively; the carbon emissions of each stage vary greatly, with the largest emissions coming from the operation and maintenance phase(62.57%) and the material and equipment production phase(26.64%), while emissions from the construction phase(5.32%), the dismantling and scrapping phase(4.78%) and the material and equipment transportation phase(0.69%) are relatively smaller. Carbon emissions are influenced by the characteristics of irrigation, pumping station size, irrigation area, irrigated crops, and their water consumption, pumping head, power supply method, etc., and show some variability; the power supply method shows greater variability, with solar PV alone showing lower carbon emissions than uniform grid power supply in comparison, and the former type has the highest emissions during the construction phase(56.67%), followed by the operation and maintenance phase(19.04%). The uncertainty analysis of the parameters shows that the value of the lifetime of the structure is the most sensitive to the carbon emission accounting, and should be considered in the measurement of the actual and comprehensive consideration of the norms to make reasonable values. This has led to targeted carbon reduction measures for different types of irrigation pumping stations at different stages of their carbon emission characteristics. The research results provide a technical reference for scientific accounting of the carbon footprint of irrigation pumping stations, building green and economical water infrastructure, and promoting low-carbon development in rural water resources.
- irrigation pumping station /
- carbon emission /
- hybrid life cycle assessment method

HTML全文

参考文献(29)

[1]	IPCC.Climate change 2022:mitigation of climate change[M/OL].https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3.2022-10-31.
[2]	张强,韩永翔,宋连春.全球气候变化及其影响因素研究进展综述[J].地球科学进展,2005(9):990-998.
[3]	MEINRENKEN C J,CHEN D,ESPARZA R A,et al.The Carbon Catalogue,carbon footprints of 866 commercial products from 8 industry sectors and 5 continents[J].Scientific Data,2022,9(1):87.
[4]	TIAN P,LU H,HEIJUNGS R,et al.Patterns of carbon footprints of main grains production in China:a comparison between main and non-main producing areas[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2022,29(16):23595-23606.
[5]	JIANG R,WU C K,SONG Y Z,et al.Estimating carbon emissions from road use,maintenance and rehabilitation through a hybrid life cycle assessment approach:a case study[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,277:123276.
[6]	计军平,马晓明.碳足迹的概念和核算方法研究进展[J].生态经济,2011(4):76-80.
[7]	LI Z,ZHANG L Y,WANG W J,et al.Assessment of carbon emission and carbon sink capacity of China's marine fishery under carbon neutrality target[J].Journal of Marine Science and Engineering,2022,10(9):1179.
[8]	GAO P,YUE S J,CHEN H T.Carbon emission efficiency of China's industry sectors:from the perspective of embodied carbon emissions[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,283:124655.
[9]	黄跃群,刘耀儒,许文彬,等.水利水电工程全生命周期碳排放研究:以犬木塘工程为例[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2022,62(8):1366-1373.
[10]	杜海龙.金沙江大型水电站碳足迹的生命周期分析研究[D].重庆:中国科学院大学(中国科学院重庆绿色智能技术研究院),2017.
[11]	CHU Y W,PAN Y L,ZHAN H Y,et al.Systems accounting for carbon emissions by hydropower plant[J].Sustainability,2022,14(11):6939.
[12]	赵允亮.基于生命周期评价的引水工程碳排放模型研究[J].东北水利水电,2017,35(2):50-52.
[13]	魏琦,白保华,何继江,等.能源与水利结合模式探索:以南水北调西线光伏天河工程为例[J].工程科学与技术,2022,54(1):16-22.
[14]	ZHANG Q F,KARNEY B,MACLEAN H L,et al.Life-cycle inventory of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for two hydropower projects in China[J].Journal of Infrastructure Systems,2007,13(4):271-279.
[15]	SONG C H,GARDNER K H,KLEIN S J W,et al.Cradle-to-grave greenhouse gas emissions from dams in the United States of America[J].Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews,2018,90:945-956.
[16]	FIROUZABADI A G,SEYEDAN S M,JOVZI M,et al.Study on the efficiency and energy consumption of electric and diesel pumping stations[J].Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Energy,2022:1-10.
[17]	王微,林剑艺,崔胜辉,等.碳足迹分析方法研究综述[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(7):71-78.
[18]	王长波,张力小,庞明月.生命周期评价方法研究综述:兼论混合生命周期评价的发展与应用[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(7):1232-1242.
[19]	冯卫民.水泵及水泵站[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2016.
[20]	李琪,许建中,李端明,等.中国灌溉排水泵站的发展与展望[J].中国农村水利水电,2015 (12):6-10.
[21]	蒋晓红.大型灌区续建配套与节水改造规划设计相关技术与方法研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2009.
[22]	ZHANG Y,GE M,ZHANG Q,et al.What did irrigation modernization in China bring to the evolution of water-energy-greenhouse gas emissions?[J].Agricultural Water Management,2023,282:108283.
[23]	水利部水利水电规划设计总院.水利建设项目经济评价规范:SL72—2013[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2013.
[24]	蔡向荣,王敏权,傅柏权.住宅建筑的碳排放量分析与节能减排措施[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2010,30(增刊1):428-431.
[25]	住房和城乡建设部.建筑碳排放计算标准:GB/T 51366—2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
[26]	马燕宾,蔡亮,王洁月.生命周期内混合动力燃气热泵碳排放研究[J].制冷学报,2013,34(6):52-58.
[27]	YANG J,OLSSON A,YAN J,et al.A hybrid life-cycle assessment of CO₂ emissions of a PV water pumping system in China[J].Energy Procedia,2014,61(C):2871-2875.
[28]	赵荣钦,秦明周.中国沿海地区农田生态系统部分碳源/汇时空差异[J].生态与农村环境学报,2007 (2):1-6,11.
[29]	FOLLETT R F.Soil management concepts and carbon sequestration in cropland soils[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2001,61(1/2):77-92.