微生物改性肥槽回填土试验

胡建伟; 陈学龙; 张衡; 刘昊东; 庞成立; 李登峰

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202403022

微生物改性肥槽回填土试验

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403022

1. 中冶武勘工程技术有限公司, 武汉 430080;
2. 长江大学, 湖北荆州 434000;
3. 中国五冶集团有限公司, 成都 610031

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(51978545)

道路桥梁与结构工程湖北省重点实验室开放基金(DQJJ202109)

详细信息

作者简介:
胡建伟(1988-),男,高级工程师,主要研究方向为岩土工程设计、施工及地质灾害治理。411088120@qq.com

通讯作者:
胡建伟(1988-),男,高级工程师,主要研究方向为岩土工程设计、施工及地质灾害治理。411088120@qq.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 58
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-08-30
- 网络出版日期: 2024-05-31

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON BACKFILLING OF MICROBIAL MODIFIED FERTILIZER TANK

1. WSGRI Engineering and Surveying Incorporation Limited, Wuhan 430080, China;
2. School of Urban Construction, Jingzhou 434000, China;
3. China MCC5 Group Corp., Ltd., Chengdu 610031, China

摘要

摘要: 现代城市建设中,狭长且超深的基坑肥槽因作业空间受限回填质量普遍偏低,肥槽回填土后期易产生不均匀沉降、渗水以及抗浮等问题,亟待采取新型有效的措施提高肥槽回填质量。微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积(MICP)作为一种新型加固技术,可用于提高回填土强度并降低回填土渗透。为探究MICP技术应用于肥槽回填土的改性效果,以室内试验为先导,探讨2种改性方法在不同菌液细胞浓度、胶结干粉施加比例及胶结液浓度的配比下的改性效果,再将最佳配比的改性方法应用于实际工程验证。结果表明:2种改性方法中渗流法相较于拌制法胶结质量可控、改性效果更好。渗流法最优添加物配比为10倍稀释的菌液及低浓度0.5 mol/L∶0.5 mol/L(尿素与氯化钙浓度比例)的胶结液。现场验证试验改性后肥槽回填土相较于常规措施回填土,无侧限抗压强度提升174.2％~772.7％,压缩系数值减小0.09~0.41,孔隙比减小0.08~0.5,渗透系数降低1~4个数量级。改性后肥槽回填土对比常规措施回填土不均匀沉降基本消除,阻隔地下水渗流能力增强,回填质量显著提高。
- MICP /
- 土体改性 /
- 狭长深 /
- 肥槽回填土 /
- 回填质量
Abstract: In modern urban construction, deep and large foundation pits, and narrow and ultra-deep fertilizer tanks are becoming more and more common. Due to the limited working space, the backfill quality of such fertilizer tanks is generally low, resulting in uneven settlement, water seepage, and anti-floating problems of soil around the fertilizer tanks in the later stage. New and effective measures are urgently needed to improve the backfill quality of fertilizer tanks. Microbial induced calcium carbonate deposition (MICP), as a new reinforcement technique, can be used to improve the strength of backfill and reduce the permeability of backfill. In this paper, laboratory experiments were conducted to discuss the modification effect of the two modification methods under different cell concentrations of the bacterial solution, the proportion of cementing dry powder applied, and the proportion of cementing liquid concentration. Then, the modification method with the best ratio was applied to practical projects for verification. The results showed that, compared with the unmodified sample, the permeability coefficient of the mixing method was significantly reduced by 2 to 4 orders of magnitude. Both the seepage method and the mixing method can effectively improve the quality of the backfill. Compared with the mixing method, the seepage method had a better modification effect and controllable cementation quality. The optimal additive ratio of the percolation method was 10 times diluted bacterial solution and low concentration 0.5 mol/L∶0.5 mol/L (concentration ratio of urea to Call₂)of cemented solution. Field verification test showed that the unconfined compressive strength of the modified fertilizer tank backfill was increased by 174.2% to 772.7%, compared with the conventional measure. The compressibility coefficient of the modified fertilizer tank backfill was smaller than that of the conventional backfill, and the medium compressible soil became low compressible soil. The porosity ratio and permeability coefficient of modified fertilizer tank backfill were obviously lower than those of conventional backfill. After the test, the non-uniform settlement of the backfill in the fertilizer tank was basically eliminated, the ability to block groundwater seepage was enhanced, and the quality of the backfill was significantly improved.
- MICP /
- soil modification /
- narrow, long and deep /
- backfilling soil in foundation trench /
- backfill quality

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	王英军,黄昌乾.肥槽回填土常见工程问题与处理方法[J].岩土工程技术,2019,33(2):84-88.
[2]	郑洪流.基坑肥槽积水对构筑物地下室的危害[J].中国煤炭地质,2013,25(5):40-42.
[3]	熊柱红,王子沁,郭亮,等.基坑肥槽回填土渗透性试验研究[J].四川建筑科学研究,2021,47(6):52-57.
[4]	孟志山.肥槽回填土质量控制措施[J].河北建筑工程学院学报,2009,27(1):26-27.
[5]	刘汉龙,肖鹏,肖杨,等.微生物岩土技术及其应用研究新进展[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文),2019,41(1):1-14.
[6]	孙道胜,许婉钰,刘开伟,等.MICP在建筑领域中的应用进展[J].材料导报,2021,35(11):11084-11091.
[7]	王欣文,苏超.产脲酶微生物矿化修复铜污染溶液效果研究[J].环境工程,2023,41(增刊2):651-655,639.
[8]	吴跃东,闾文,岳昌盛,等.钢渣碳酸化及微生物矿化提升技术的理论研究与应用探索[J].环境工程:1-8[2023-10-22 ]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/detail/11.2097.X.20230802.1212.004.html.
[9]	赵晓婉,吕进,王梅花,等.微生物及水泥固化砂土的力学特性对比试验研究[J].工业建筑,2020,50(12):15-18 ,49.
[10]	梁仕华,戴君,李翔,等.不同固化方式对微生物固化砂土强度影响的研究[J].工业建筑,2017,47(2):82-86.
[11]	徐宏殷,练继建,闫玥.多试验因素耦合下 MICP 固化砂土的试验研究[J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版),2020,53(5):517-526.
[12]	PAASSEN L A V, GHOSE R, LINDEN T J M V D, et al. Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis:large-scale biogrout experiment[J]. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(12):1721-1728.
[13]	BURBANK M B, WEAVER T J, GREEN T L, et al. Precipitation of calcite by indigenous microorganisms to strengthen liquefiable soils[J]. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2011, 28(4):301-312.
[14]	周杨,张家铭,朱纪康,等.基于原生微生物 MICP 的土体加固试验研究[J].长江科学院院报,2022,39(5):132-139.
[15]	段宇,徐国宾,杨德锋,等.MICP矿化产物中钙离子利用率的影响因素及微观物相分析[J].化工进展, 2019, 38(5):8.
[16]	刘建兴,李金柱,谢新宇,等.MICP固化淤泥土的强度试验研究[J].低温建筑技术,2020,42(5):17-20.
[17]	刘汉龙,马国梁,肖杨,等.微生物加固岛礁地基现场试验研究[J].地基处理,2019,1(1):26-31.