ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL ATTRIBUTES AND RESOURCE ATTRIBUTES OF TYPICAL SOLID WASTE IN NON-FERROUS MINING, BENEFICIATION AND METALLURGY
-
摘要: 有色金属采选冶固废产量大,通常含有多种重金属,兼具环境风险性和资源利用性。通过改进的层次分析法与Topsis计算方法,建立了采选冶固废资源环境属性解析方案,结合对15种典型固废的组成结构特征分析,可量化得到固废属性分值并指导其处理途径。结果表明:采矿废石和选矿尾矿等固废的资源属性强于环境属性,且建材化利用方向分值>0.5,表明其偏向建材化利用;污酸中和渣等硅钙基冶炼固废的环境属性强于资源属性,表明其环境污染风险较大,必须进行无害化处理;针铁矿渣等冶炼固废富含Fe、Zn等有价金属,且当前金属提取的经济技术可行性较高,资源属性强于环境属性,表明其偏向金属提取的资源化途径。其所建立的资源环境属性解析方法可为有色采选冶固废的处理和处置途径选取提供指导。Abstract: The production of solid waste from non-ferrous metal mining and smelting is large, usually containing multiple heavy metals, which have both environmental risks and resource utilization value. This article established a solution for analyzing the environmental attributes and resource attributes of solid waste through an improved analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the Topsis calculation method. Combined with the analysis of the composition and structural characteristics of 15 typical solid wastes, the solid waste attribute scores can be quantified, and their treatment paths can be guided. The results showed that the resource attributes of solid waste, such as mining waste and beneficiation tailings were stronger than environmental attributes, and the score of building materials utilization direction was greater than 0.5, indicating a bias towards building materials utilization; the environmental attribute of smelting solid waste, such as waste acid neutralizing slag was stronger than the resource attributes, indicating that its environmental pollution risk was high and must be treated harmlessly; smelting solid waste, such as goethite were rich in valuable metals such as Fe and Zn, and the economic and technological feasibility of metal extraction was high. The resource attributes were stronger than the environmental attributes, indicating its resource utilization approach for metal extraction. The established resource and environmental attributes analysis method can provide important guidance for the treatment and disposal of solid waste from non-ferrous mining, beneficiation, and metallurgy.
-
[1] 宋明媚,张海亮,董洋.国际有色金属价格波动对中国产业链的传导机制与效应——基于双层复杂网络模型[J].资源科学,2023,45(4):812-826. [2] 张光玉,尹振香,路家超.有色金属冶炼行业发展及近况探讨[J].中国金属通报,2019(6):15,17. [3] 易娟. 再生铅炉渣资源化利用工艺研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学,2021. [4] ZHANG P P, MUHAMMADA F, YU L,et al. Self-cementation solidification of heavy metals in lead-zinc smelting slag through alkali-activated materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2020,249:118756. [5] ZHANG L M, LIU S B, SONG D S. Effect of the content of micro-active copper tailing on the strength and pore structure of cementitious materials[J]. Materials,2019,12(11):1861. [6] 王健.环境资源也具有商品性[J].中国环境管理,1990(3):19-20. [7] GU J. Considerations on some problems of population, resources, and environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Population Science,1995,7(2):19-26. [8] 鲁安怀.矿物学研究从资源属性到环境属性的发展[J].高校地质学报,2000,6(2):245-251. [9] 黄文博,李金惠,曾现来.固体废物无害化精准定量评估及科学启示:以典型工业废物为例[J].科学通报,2022,67(7):685-696. [10] 辛宝平,王佳.涉重危废概念的提出及其资源化利用[J].环境工程学报,2022,16(1):1-9. [11] 辛宝平,王佳.涉重危废资源化利用理论体系[J].环境工程学报,2022,16(3):705-713. [12] 辛宝平,王佳.涉重危废三维属性及其精细化分级分类体系[J].环境工程学报,2022,16(2):355-362. [13] PIATAK N. Environmental characteristics and utilization potential of metallurgical slag[M]. 2018, Chapter 19. [14] MIN X B, XIE X D, CHAI L Y, et al. Environmental availability and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in zinc leaching residue[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China,2013,23(1):208-218. [15] ISTERI V, OHENOJA K, HANEIN T, et al. Production and properties of ferrite-rich CSAB cement from metallurgical industry residues[J]. The Science of the total Environment,2020,712:136208. [16] PUEYO M, MATEU J, RIGOL A, et al. Use of the modified BCR three-step sequential extraction procedure for the study of trace element dynamics in contaminated soils[J]. Environmental Pollution,2008,152(2):330-341. [17] HAKANSON L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: a sedimentological approach[J].Water Research,1980,14(8):975-1001. [18] 唐巾尧,王云燕,徐慧,等.铜冶炼多源固废资源环境属性的解析[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2022,53(10):3811-3826. [19] CHEN X T, LI M Y, LIANG Z F, et al. An AHP-based evaluation system applied for phytoremediation method selection in heavy metal contaminated farmland[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances,2022,7:100-138. [20] 王永祥,魏佳轩,周娟,等.基于GIS和AHP方法的藏东南生态敏感性研究:以林芝地区为例(英文)[J].Journal of Resources and Ecology,2023,14(1):158-166. [21] 李勤,李文龙,崔凯.基于改进TOPSIS法的民用建筑再生利用方案决策[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2022,55(2):160-167. [22] 白贵琪,傅开彬,谌书,等.建设用地重金属污染修复技术筛选模型构建[J/OL].中国环境科学:1-7[2023-06-28].
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 105
- HTML全文浏览量: 18
- PDF下载量: 4
- 被引次数: 0