基于AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS的污染场地修复技术筛选方法研究

田员; 吴志军; 谷庆宝; 许端平; 冯肖杰

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202405015

基于AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS的污染场地修复技术筛选方法研究

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202405015

1. 辽宁工程技术大学环境科学与工程学院, 辽宁阜新 123000;
2. 中国环境科学研究院土壤与地下水研究所, 北京 100012

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划“东北重工业区场地复合污染综合治理技术与集成工程示范”(2019YFC1803800)

详细信息

作者简介:
田员(1999-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为土壤污染修复技术研究。2072637033@qq.com

通讯作者:
吴志军(1979-),讲师,主要研究方向为土壤污染修复技术研究。wuzhijun_fuxin@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 36
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-07-18
- 网络出版日期: 2024-07-11

RESEARCH ON METHOD SELECTION OF POLLUTED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY BASED ON AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS

1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Groundwater Research, Chinese Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China

摘要

摘要: 污染场地修复技术筛选是一个多目标决策过程,需要综合考虑决策者的主观偏好与修复技术特征。分析了我国近年开展的596个污染场地修复案例,建立修复技术筛选指标体系与分级量化标准,将层次分析法(AHP)与熵值法(Entropy)结合,确定筛选指标组合权重,运用逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)筛选修复技术。以沈阳市某化工有限公司退役场地为例,分别以AHP法、Entropy法、AHP-Entropy组合法计权,筛选最适修复技术,比较其综合评价结果。结果表明:3种计权模式下,各指标的相对重要性显著不同,组合计权法既体现了决策者偏好,又反映了系统信息的贡献,具有较高的实用性和可行性。AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS筛选出的修复技术与该场地实际应用技术一致。
- 污染场地 /
- 修复 /
- AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS法 /
- 筛选指标体系
Abstract: The screening of remediation technologies is a multi-objective decision-making process, that requires considering not only the preferences of decision makers, but also the performance of remediation technology. Based on 596 site cases remediated in China in recent years, this research constructed a screening index system for remediation technology as well as a quantitative approach for these indices. Moreover, the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and entropy method were combined to determine index weights, and the TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) was conducted to rank remediation technologies. An organic contaminated site in Shenyang was selected as the study area. To compare their performance, the AHP method, the Entropy method, and the AHP-Entropy combination method were carried out respectively to calculate the index weights, and then the optimal remediation technology was screened. Results showed that the index weights calculated by the three weighting approaches were significantly different, and the AHP-Entropy combination method can balance the subjective preference of the decision makers and the contribution of system information. The applicable remediation technology screened by AHP-Entropy TOPSIS is consistent with what was applied at the site.
- contaminated site /
- remediation /
- AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS method /
- screening index system

HTML全文

参考文献(38)

[1]	BERGIUS K, OBERG T. Initial screening of contaminated land: a comparison of US and Swedish methods[J]. Environmental Management,2007,39(2):226-234.
[2]	FAISAL I KHAN TAHIR, HUSAIN RAMZI HEJAZI. An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies[J]. Journal Environmental Management,2004,71:95-122.
[3]	United States Environmental Protection Agency. Superfund Remedy Report (Fourteenth Edition)[EB/OL]. http://www.epa.gov/superfund/Remedytech/srr/2013-11-30.
[4]	CAEPI 1—2015,污染场地修复技术筛选指南[S].中国环境保护产业协会,2015.
[5]	BAI L P, LUO Y, SHI D R, et al. TOPSIS-based screening method of soil remediation technology for contaminated sites and its application[J]. Soil & Sediment Contamination an International Journal,2015,24(4):386-397.
[6]	TIAN J P, HUO Z, MA F J, et al. Application and selection of remediation technology for OCPs-contaminated sites by decision-making methods[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2019,28,16(11):1888.
[7]	罗程钟,易爱华,张增强, 等.POPs污染场地修复技术筛选研究[J].环境工程学报,2008,2(4):569-573.
[8]	张倩,蒋栋,谷庆宝, 等.基于AHP和TOPSIS的污染场地修复技术筛选方法研究[J].土壤学报,2012,49(6):1088-1094.
[9]	罗云.基于TOPSIS的污染场地土壤修复技术筛选方法及应用研究[D].上海:上海师范大学,2013.
[10]	刘锋平,孙宁,呼红霞, 等.基于AHP-TOPSIS的在产企业地下水铁锰污染修复技术比选[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(5):1572-1579.
[11]	李安婕,全向春,王龑, 等.基于PROMETHEEⅡ法的污染场地土壤修复技术筛选及应用[J].环境工程学报,2012,6(10):3767-3773.
[12]	汪应洛. 系统工程[M].3版. 北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
[13]	GAO Z K, JIANG Y T, HE J Y, et al. An AHP-based regional COVID-19 vulnerability model and its application in China[J].Modeling Earth Systems and Environment,2022,8:2525-2538.
[14]	郑洪振.基于Web GIS的污染场地修复辅助决策系统的设计与实现[D].烟台:中国科学院大学(中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所),2018.
[15]	CHEWNING EUGENE G, HARRELL ADRIAN M. The effect of information load on decision makers' cue utilization levels and decision quality in a financial distress decision task[J].Organizations and Society,1990,15(6):527-542.
[16]	邵国荷.试论决策对信息量与质的需求[J].农业信息探索,1993(2):1-3.
[17]	MA Z J, QIN S W, CAO C, et al. The influence of different knowledge-driven methods on landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in the chang bai mountain area[J]. Northeast China. Entropy (Basel),2019,21(4):372.
[18]	孟庆生.信息论[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1989.
[19]	邱宛华.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
[20]	BAI H M, FENG F, WANG J, et al. A combination prediction model of long-term ionospheric foF2 based on entropy weight method[J]. Entropy (Basel), 2020,14,22(4):442.
[21]	LI W W, YI P T, ZHANG D N. Sustainability evaluation of cities in northeastern china using dynamic TOPSIS-entropy methods[J].Sustainability, 2018, 10(12):4542.
[22]	SHEN Z Y, ZHAO Q Q, et al. Analysis of green traffic development in Zhoushan based on entropy weight TOPSIS[J].Sustainability,2021,13(14):8109-8116.
[23]	张新莉.基于TOPSIS的中国低碳城市评价研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2017.
[24]	姜燕松,李忠武,黄金权,等.基于标识指数与敏感性分析的洞庭湖滨湖区地下水重金属污染评价[J].环境科学研究,2013,26(7):736-742.
[25]	YU X, SUNTRAYUTH S, SU J F.A comprehensive evaluation method for industrial sewage treatment projects based on the improved Entropy-TOPSIS[J].Sustainability,2020,12(17):6734.
[26]	张亚青,王相,孟凡荣,等.基于熵值和层次分析法的VOCs处理技术综合评价[J].中国环境科学,2021,41(6):2946-2955.
[27]	李帅,魏虹,倪细炉,等.基于层次分析法和熵值法的宁夏城市人居环境质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(9):2700-2708.
[28]	刘大海,宫伟,邢文秀,等.基于AHP-熵值法的海岛海岸带脆弱性评价指标权重综合确定方法[J].海洋环境科学,2015,34(3):462-467.
[29]	XIAO K, TAMBORSKI J, WANG X,et al. A coupling methodology of the analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight theory for assessing coastal water quality[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2022,29(21):31217-31234.
[30]	PISHYAR S, KHOSRAVI H, TAVILI A, et al. A combined AHP- and TOPSIS-based approach in the assessment of desertification disaster risk[J].Environmental Modeling & Assessment,2020,25(2):219-229.
[31]	白利平,罗云,刘俐,等.污染场地修复技术筛选方法及应用[J].环境科学,2015,36(11):4218-4224.
[32]	徐文华,陈海燕,张育平,等.一种基于中介真值程度度量的模糊综合评价方法[J].计算机科学,2016,43(2):204-209.
[33]	中华人民共和国环境保护部.污染场地修复技术应用指南[S].北京: 中国标准出版社,2014.
[34]	陈强,杨晓华.基于熵值的TOPSIS法及其在水环境质量综合评价中的应用[J].环境工程,2007,25(4):75-77 ,5.
[35]	SAATY T L. The analytic hierarchy process planning priority set ting resource allocation[D]. New York: McGraw-Hill,1980.
[36]	郭金维,蒲绪强,高祥,等.一种改进的多目标决策指标权重计算方法[J].西安电子科技大学学报,2014,41(6):118-125.
[37]	赵晶晶.基于熵值法和TOPSIS法的海洋生态环境评价[C]//海南:海南省自然资源和规划厅,三亚市人民政府,海南热带海洋学院,中国海洋大学,宁波大学.2019中国海洋经济论坛论文集.海洋出版社,2019:8.
[38]	CHEN C H. A novel multi-criteria decision-making model for building material supplier selection based on Entropy-AHP weighted TOPSIS[J].Entropy (Basel), 2020, 22(2):259.