EFFECTS OF AEROBIC/ANAEROBIC ENVIRONMENTS ON MICROBIAL DEGRADATION EFFICIENCY OF TYPICAL MICROPLASTICS
-
摘要: 室温条件下,对比了3种典型微塑料:聚羟基脂肪酸酯(Polyhydroxyalkanoate,PHA)、聚乳酸酯(Polylactic acid,PLA)和聚氯乙烯(Polyvinyl chloride,PVC)在好氧和厌氧环境中被微生物降解的效能。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、差示扫描热分析仪(DSC)、傅里叶红外光谱(FTIR)、平均质量及微生物作用占比实验分析结果表明:PHA在好氧和厌氧环境中的微生物降解速率相似,均约为25.72 mg C/d,降解后的PHA表面均会出现明显的沟壑和裂痕,且酯基等官能团的丰度、结晶度和平均质量均降低;PLA虽为可生物降解微塑料但结晶度高,同自身结构稳定的难降解微塑料PVC,均未能被降解。PHA降解产物的变化特征和碳平衡核算结果表明,PHA中的碳主要转化为CH3COOH、CH4和生物质中的碳,但在好氧和厌氧环境中产物占比差异明显,分别为5.23% vs. 0.27%、4.28% vs. 12.24%、87.05% vs. 82.50%,这可能与好氧和厌氧环境中参与PHA降解的微生物丰度和关键酶活性不同有关。系统评估了3种典型微塑料在好氧和厌氧环境中降解速率和降解产物的差异,可为全面评价微塑料的环境风险提供重要理论指导。Abstract: This study evaluated the degradation efficiency of three typical microplastics (PHA (polyhydroxyalkanoate), PLA (polylactic acid), and PVC (polyvinyl chloride)) under different aerobic and anaerobic environments in ambient temperatures. The experimental results of scanning electron microscope (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), average mass, and microbial activity ratio analysis showed that PHA exhibited similar degradation rates in both aerobic and anaerobic environments, approximately 25.72 mg C/d. The surface of PHA microplastic exhibited prominent grooves and cracks, along with decreased ester group abundance, crystallinity, and average mass. On the other hand, PLA and PVC practically did not degrade due to their intrinsic structural stability and great crystallinity. Calculations of the carbon balance when PHA was degraded showed that the carbon was predominantly broken down into CH3COOH, CH4, and carbon in biomass. The proportions of these three products in aerobic and anaerobic environments differed significantly, namely 5.23% vs. 0.27%, 4.28% vs. 12.24%, and 87.05% vs. 82.50%, respectively. This may be due to different microbial numbers and critical enzyme activity involved in PHA breakdown between the aerobic and anaerobic environments. This study investigated the effects of aerobic and anaerobic settings on degradation rates and product variations of microplastics in detail, which may help formulate important theoretical guidelines for determining the environmental risk of microplastics.
-
[1] WANG J, QIN X, GUO J, et al. Evidence of selective enrichment of bacterial assemblages and antibiotic resistant genes by microplastics in urban rivers[J]. Water Research, 2020, 183:116113. [2] AZIZI S M M, HAFFIEZ N, ZAKARIA B S, et al. Thermal hydrolysis of sludge counteracts polystyrene nanoplastics-induced stress during anaerobic digestion[J]. ACS ES&T Engineering, 2022, 2(7):1306-1315. [3] CESARO A, PIROZZI F, ZAFIRAKOU A, et al. Microplastics in sewage sludge destined to anaerobic digestion: the potential role of thermal pretreatment[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 309:136669. [4] 张胜威. 微塑料对活性污泥系统及微生物菌群的影响研究[D].西安:西安理工大学, 2022. [5] KOELMANS A A, MOHAMED NOR N H, HERMSEN E, et al. Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: critical review and assessment of data quality[J]. Water Research, 2019, 155:410-422. [6] WRIGHT R J, ERNI-CASSOLA G, ZADJELOVIC V, et al. Marine plastic debris: a new surface for microbial colonization[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(19):11657-11672. [7] CHANG X, FANG Y, WANG Y, et al. Microplastic pollution in soils, plants, and animals: a review of distributions, effects and potential mechanisms[J]. Science of the Total Environment 2022, 850:157857. [8] SOL D, LACA A, LACA A, et al. Approaching the environmental problem of microplastics: importance of WWTP treatments[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 740:140016. [9] ESTAHBANATI S, FAHRENFELD N L. Influence of wastewater treatment plant discharges on microplastic concentrations in surface water[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 162:277-284. [10] MURPHY F, EWINS C, CARBONNIER F, et al. Wastewater treatment works (WWTW) as a source of microplastics in the aquatic environment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(11):5800-5808. [11] BRETAS ALVIM C, BES-PIÁ M A, MENDOZA-ROCA J A. Separation and identification of microplastics from primary and secondary effluents and activated sludge from wastewater treatment plants[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 402:126293. [12] LEE H, KIM Y. Treatment characteristics of microplastics at biological sewage treatment facilities in Korea[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2018, 137:1-8. [13] SU Y, ZHANG Z, WU D, et al. Occurrence of microplastics in landfill systems and their fate with landfill age[J]. Water Research, 2019, 164:114968. [14] EMADIAN S M, ONAY T T, DEMIREL B. Biodegradation of bioplastics in natural environments[J]. Waste Management, 2017, 59:526-536. [15] ZHAO J, WANG D, LIU Y, et al. Novel stepwise pH control strategy to improve short chain fatty acid production from sludge anaerobic fermentation[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 249:431-438. [16] MA J, LIU H, ZHANG C, et al. Joint response of chemistry and functional microbial community to oxygenation of the reductive confined aquifer[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 720:137587. [17] MA J, GONG Z, WANG Z, et al. Elucidating degradation properties, microbial community, and mechanism of microplastics in sewage sludge under different terminal electron acceptors conditions[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 346:126624. [18] 牟文. 氯化汞对水生生物的毒性效应研究[D]. 武汉:华中师范大学, 2010. [19] 刘婷婷. 塑料地膜对微生物群落构建和演替的影响及塑料降解菌(群)筛选[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2021. [20] NIU L, WANG Y, LI Y, et al. Occurrence, degradation pathways, and potential synergistic degradation mechanism of microplastics in surface water: a review[J]. Current Pollution Reports, 2023, 9(2):312-326. [21] NARANCIC T, VERSTICHEL S, REDDY CHAGANTI S, et al. Biodegradable plastic blends create new possibilities for end-of-life management of plastics but they are not a panacea for plastic pollution[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(18):10441-10452. [22] NIU L, CHEN Y, LI Y, et al. Diversity, abundance and distribution characteristics of potential polyethylene and polypropylene microplastic degradation bacterial communities in the urban river[J]. Water Research, 2023, 232:119704. [23] 邓子昂. 微塑料污染的红外和拉曼光谱检测研究[D].昆明:云南师范大学, 2021. [24] CHIENG B, IBRAHIM N, YUNUS W, et al. Poly(lactic acid)/poly(ethylene glycol) polymer nanocomposites: effects of graphene nanoplatelets[J]. Polymers, 2014, 6(1):93-104. [25] AMOBONYE A, BHAGWAT P, SINGH S, et al. Plastic biodegradation: frontline microbes and their enzymes[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 759:143536. [26] BUCKNALL D G. Plastics as a materials system in a circular economy[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2020, 378(2176):20190268. [27] WANG D, ZHAO J, ZENG G, et al. How does poly(hydroxyalkanoate) affect methane production from the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(20):12253-12262. [28] WANG Q, SUN J, ZHANG C, et al. Polyhydroxyalkanoates in waste activated sludge enhances anaerobic methane production through improving biochemical methane potential instead of hydrolysis rate[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1). [29] LEE Y K, MURPHY K R, HUR J. Fluorescence signatures of dissolved organic matter leached from microplastics: polymers and additives[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(19):11905-11914.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 33
- HTML全文浏览量: 26
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0