油脂含量和电发酵电压对含油餐厨垃圾厌氧消化产甲烷的影响

岳良辰; 俞苗; 程军; 刘可亮; 花俊杰; 郭浩

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202407022

油脂含量和电发酵电压对含油餐厨垃圾厌氧消化产甲烷的影响

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407022

岳良辰^1,2,
俞苗^1, ,,
程军²,
刘可亮¹,
花俊杰²,
郭浩²

1. 西子清洁能源装备制造股份有限公司, 杭州 310021;
2. 浙江大学能源清洁利用国家重点实验室, 杭州 310027

详细信息

作者简介:
岳良辰(1994-),男,博士后研究员,主要研究方向为废弃物高效转化利用及清洁能源与储能技术。3120104713@zju.edu.cn

通讯作者:
俞苗(1972-),男,本科,高级工程师,主要研究方向为清洁能源与储能技术。yu.miao@xizice.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 32
- HTML全文浏览量: 4
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-07-12
- 网络出版日期: 2024-12-02

INFLUENCE OF LIPID CONTENT AND ELECTRIC FERMENTATION VOLTAGE ON METHANE PRODUCTION FROM FOOD WASTE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION

1. Xizi Clean Energy Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310021, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

摘要

摘要: 现有餐厨垃圾处理过程中存在油脂包裹厌氧消化菌群的状况,经提油后,仍有大量油脂进入发酵体系,对发酵稳定性造成一定危害。为缓解此问题,研究了通电预处理对于含油餐厨的厌氧消化促进作用。采用0.8 V电预处理的含油(50%)餐厨垃圾甲烷产率,较未处理组,由(780.43±4.49) mL/g TVS提升了6.5%,达到(831.06±13.85) mL/g TVS。而最高产甲烷速率由(35.84±0.64) mL/(g TVS·d)提升了20.3%,达到(43.11±0.72) mL/(g TVS·d)。达到峰值速率的时间由20 d大幅缩减至14 d。研究表明,在一定的外加油脂添加范围(0~50%)内,随着油脂含量的提升,电预处理对于厌氧消化的促进作用越强。微观图像表明,在0.8 V电压下,电极表面附着大量微生物,而未处理组无可见微生物附着。根据三维荧光光谱测试结果,0.8 V电压下微生物对于腐殖酸等代谢底物的利用明显提升。电压对于含油餐厨垃圾的厌氧消化促进作用可能从3个方面进行解释:加强微生物与电极的接触,促进油脂的酸化降解,提高乙酸化和甲烷化途径的电子传递。
- 含油餐厨 /
- 厌氧消化 /
- 电预处理 /
- 甲烷
Abstract: At present, in the process of food waste treatment, the situation that anaerobic digestion microorganisms coated by lipids often occurs. After lipids extraction, a large amount of lipids still enters the digestion system, which causes certain harm to the stability of the system. To alleviate this problem, the promoting effect of electric pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of high lipid content food waste was studied in this research. Compared with the untreated group, the methane yield of food waste (50% of lipids) treated with 0.8 V increased by 6.5% from (780.43±4.49) mL/g TVS to (831.06±13.85) mL/g TVS. The peak methane production rate increased by 20.3%, from (35.84±0.64) mL/(g TVS·d) to (43.11±0.72) mL/(g TVS·d). The time to reach the peak rate was reduced from 20 days to 14 days. The results showed that in a certain range of added lipids (0 to 50%), with the increase of lipids content, electric pretreatment demonstrated a better promoting effect on anaerobic digestion. Microscopic images showed that a large number of microorganisms were attached to the electrode surface at a voltage of 0.8 V, while no microorganisms were observed in the untreated group. According to the results of the three-dimensional fluorescence spectrum test, utilization of metabolic substrates such as humic acid was significantly improved at a voltage of 0.8 V. The promoting effect of voltage on the anaerobic digestion of high lipid content food waste can be explained from three aspects: enhancing the contact between microorganisms and electrodes, promoting the acidification and degradation of lipids, and improving the electron transfer through acetoxylation and methanation pathways.
- high lipid content food waste /
- anaerobic digestion /
- electric pretreatment /
- methane

HTML全文

参考文献(32)

[1]	CHHANDAMA M V L, CHETIA A C, SATYAN K B, et al. Valorisation of food waste to sustainable energy and other value-added products: a review[J]. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2022, 17: 100945.
[2]	FISGATIVA H, TREMIER A, DABERT P. Characterizing the variability of food waste quality: a need for efficient valorisation through anaerobic digestion[J]. Waste Management, 2016, 50: 264-274.
[3]	NG H S, KEE P E, YIM H S, et al. Recent advances on the sustainable approaches for conversion and reutilization of food wastes to valuable bioproducts[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020, 302: 122889.
[4]	DINESH G K, CHAUHAN R, CHAKMA S. Influence and strategies for enhanced biohydrogen production from food waste[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 92: 807-822.
[5]	CARRÈRE H, DUMAS C, BATTIMELLI A, et al. Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 183: 1-15.
[6]	KARTHIKEYAN O P, TRABLY E, MEHARIYA S, et al. Pretreatment of food waste for methane and hydrogen recovery: a review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 249: 1025-1039.
[7]	LIU W J, XU Z, ZHAO D, et al. Efficient electrochemical production of glucaric acid and H₂ via glucose electrolysis[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11.
[8]	MOGGIA G, KENIS T, DAEMS N, et al. Electrochemical oxidation of d-glucose in alkaline medium: impact of oxidation potential and chemical side reactions on the selectivity to d-Gluconic and d-Glucaric acid[J]. Chem Electro Chem, 2019, 7: 86-95.
[9]	TAO Z, WANG D, YAO F, et al. Influence of low voltage electric field stimulation on hydrogen generation from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge[J]. Science of the Total Environment 2020, 704: 135849.
[10]	YANG G, WANG J, ZHANG H, et al. Applying bio-electric field of microbial fuel cell-upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor catalyzed blast furnace dusting ash for promoting anaerobic digestion[J]. Water Research, 2019, 149: 215-224.
[11]	MENG Y, LI S, YUAN H, et al. Evaluating biomethane production from anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of food waste and floatable oil (FO) skimmed from food waste[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 185: 7-13.
[12]	ZHANG W, LANG Q, FANG M, et al. Combined effect of crude fat content and initial substrate concentration on batch anaerobic digestion characteristics of food waste[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 232: 304-312.
[13]	LI Y, JIN Y, BORRION A, et al. Influence of feed/inoculum ratios and waste cooking oil content on the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste[J]. Waste Management, 2018, 73: 156-64.
[14]	LIU P, JI J, WU Q, et al. Klebsiella pneumoniae sp. LZU10 degrades oil in food waste and enhances methane production from co-digestion of food waste and straw[J]. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2018, 126: 28-36.
[15]	孙通, 李明兴, 李丽, 等. 餐厨油脂与低热值污泥联合厌氧消化产气[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017, 11:3989-3906.
[16]	MENG Y, LUAN F, YUAN H, et al. Enhancing anaerobic digestion performance of crude lipid in food waste by enzymatic pretreatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 224: 48-55.
[17]	曹蒙, 缪恒锋, 赵明星, 等. 脂肪酶强化水解餐厨油脂促进厌氧消化[J]. 食品与生物技术学报, 2018, 37(9):977-986.
[18]	YUE L, CHENG J, HUA J, et al. Improving fermentative methane production of glycerol trioleate and food waste pretreated with ozone through two-stage dark hydrogen fermentation and anaerobic digestion[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 203: 112225.
[19]	CHENG J, YUE L, HUA J, et al. Hydrothermal alkali pretreatment contributes to fermentative methane production of a typical lipid from food waste through co-production of hydrogen with methane[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2020 306: 123164.
[20]	Yue L, Cheng J, Hua J, et al. A sodium percarbonate/ultraviolet system generated free radicals for degrading capsaicin to alleviate inhibition of methane production during anaerobic digestion of lipids and food waste[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 761: 143269.
[21]	岳良辰, 程军, 张海华, 等. 水热/臭氧预处理促进餐厨垃圾中典型废弃油脂厌氧发酵产甲烷[J]. 环境科学学报, 2021, 41:1449-1457.
[22]	DONG H, YUE L, CHENG J, et al. Microbial electrochemical degradation of lipids for promoting methane production in anaerobic digestion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 345: 126467.
[23]	CHENG J, YUE L, HUA J, et al. Hydrothermal heating with sulphuric acid contributes to improved fermentative hydrogen and methane co-generation from Dianchi Lake algal bloom[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 192: 282-291.
[24]	LIN R, CHENG J, MURPHY J D. Unexpectedly low biohydrogen yields in co-fermentation of acid pretreated cassava residue and swine manure[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 151: 553-561.
[25]	CHENG J, YUE L, DING L, et al. Improving fermentative hydrogen and methane production from an algal bloom through hydrothermal/steam acid pretreatment[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44: 5812-5820.
[26]	XIA A, CHENG J, LIN R, et al. Comparison in dark hydrogen fermentation followed by photo hydrogen fermentation and methanogenesis between protein and carbohydrate compositions in Nannochloropsis oceanica biomass[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 138: 204-213.
[27]	CHENG J, DING L, LIN R, et al. Fermentative biohydrogen and biomethane co-production from mixture of food waste and sewage sludge: effects of physiochemical properties and mix ratios on fermentation performance[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 184: 1-8.
[28]	YU H, QU F, SUN L, et al. Relationship between soluble microbial products (SMP) and effluent organic matter (EfOM): characterized by fluorescence excitation emission matrix coupled with parallel factor analysis[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 121: 101-109.
[29]	BERETTA G, MASTORGIO A F, PEDRALI L, et al. The effects of electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields on microorganisms in the perspective of bioremediation[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 2019, 18: 29-75.
[30]	ADEVA-Andany M M, CARNEIRO-Freire N, SECO-Filgueira M, et al. Mitochondrial β-oxidation of saturated fatty acids in humans[J]. Mitochondrion, 2019, 46: 73-90.
[31]	LIN R, CHENG J, DING L, et al. Improved efficiency of anaerobic digestion through direct interspecies electron transfer at mesophilic and thermophilic temperature ranges[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 350: 681-691.
[32]	YU H, QU F, ZHANG X, et al. Development of correlation spectroscopy (COS) method for analyzing fluorescence excitation emission matrix (EEM): a case study of effluent organic matter (EfOM) ozonation[J]. Chemosphere, 2019, 228: 35-43.