汞氧化催化剂研究进展

史建强; 王兵; 陈建军; 王建成; 李俊华

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202409022

汞氧化催化剂研究进展

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409022

史建强^1,2,
王兵¹,
陈建军²,
王建成^1,3,,
李俊华^2,

1. 太原理工大学省部共建煤基能源清洁高效利用国家重点实验室煤科学与技术教育部重点实验室, 太原 030024;
2. 清华大学环境学院, 北京 100084;
3. 太原理工大学环境科学与工程学院, 太原 030024

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金“纳米铜掺杂锰氧分子筛活性位点调控及其天然气湿气脱汞和再生性能研究”(22078225)

详细信息

作者简介:
史建强(1995-),男,博士研究生,主要研究方向为气相汞污染控制。shijianqiang2020@126.com

通讯作者:
王建成(1978-),男,教授,主要研究方向为煤转化过程中污染物控制和固废资源化利用研究。wangjiancheng@tyut.edu.cn

李俊华(1970-),男,教授,主要研究方向为大气污染控制化学及关键控制技术。lijunhua@tsinghua.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 19
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-03-23
- 网络出版日期: 2024-12-02

RESEARCH PROGRESS OF MERCURY OXIDATION CATALYSTS

1. State Key Laboratory of Clean and Efficient Coal Utilization, Key Laboratory of Coal Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China;
2. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China

摘要

摘要: 在全球环境问题日益突出,尤其是对大气汞污染控制的高度重视下,科研人员在针对燃煤烟气及其他工业排放中单质汞(Hg⁰)脱除技术的研究上取得了显著进步。其中,Hg⁰氧化催化剂扮演着核心角色,通过催化转化Hg⁰为易于捕集和处理的二价汞化合物,有效降低了大气中汞排放。尽管该方面已有一定的研究成果,但设计与开发新型高效、稳定且适应复杂工况条件的Hg⁰氧化催化剂,当前仍面临诸多挑战。系统梳理了Hg⁰控制技术和几种主要的Hg⁰氧化催化剂类型(包括分子筛、钙钛矿、贵金属催化剂、过渡金属氧化物和钒基SCR催化剂)、特性和优缺点。并深入探讨了Hg⁰氧化过程的可能机理,包括均相和多相氧化机制,以及影响Hg⁰氧化性能的关键因素。该研究结果丰富了汞污染防治的理论基础,也为未来设计更加高效实用的Hg⁰氧化催化剂提供了参考。
- 元素汞 /
- 控制技术 /
- 催化氧化 /
- 工业烟气 /
- 反应机理
Abstract: With the increasingly prominent global environmental issues, especially the high attention paid to controlling atmospheric mercury pollution, researchers have made significant progress in research on the removal technology of elemental mercury (Hg⁰) from coal-fired flue gas and other industrial emissions. Among them, mercury oxidation catalysts play a core role, effectively reducing atmospheric mercury emissions by catalyzing the conversion of Hg⁰ into divalent mercury compounds that are easy to capture and treat. Although there have been certain research achievements, the design and development of new efficient, stable, and adaptable Hg⁰ oxidation catalysts still face many challenges presently. This article systematically reviews Hg⁰ control technology and several main types of Hg⁰ oxidation catalysts, including molecular sieves, perovskites, precious metal catalysts, transition metal oxides, and vanadium-based SCR catalysts. A detailed description of the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of various Hg⁰ oxidation catalysts is given. In addition, the article delves into the possible mechanisms of mercury oxidation, including homogeneous and multiphase oxidation mechanisms, as well as key factors affecting mercury oxidation performance. This review not only enriches the theoretical foundation of mercury pollution prevention and control, but also provides guidance for more efficient and practical Hg⁰ oxidation catalysts design in the future.
- elemental mercury /
- control technology /
- catalytic oxidation /
- industrial flue gas /
- reaction mechanism

HTML全文

参考文献(94)

[1]	GAO Y, ZHANG Z, WU J, et al. A critical review on the heterogeneous catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in flue gases[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(19): 10813-10823.
[2]	LIU T, XIONG Z, NI P, et al. Review on adsorbents in elemental mercury removal in coal combustion flue gas, smelting flue gas, and natural gas[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 454: 140095.
[3]	MCNUTT M. Mercury and health[J]. Science, 2013, 341(6153): 1430.
[4]	WANG C, ZHANG X, MEI J, et al. Outstanding performance of magnetically separable sulfureted MoO₃/Fe-Ti spinel for gaseous Hg⁰ recovery from smelting flue gas: mechanism and adsorption kinetics[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(12): 7659-7668.
[5]	MACKEY T K, CONTRERAS J T, LIANG B A. The minamata convention on mercury: attempting to address the global controversy of dental amalgam use and mercury waste disposal[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 472: 125-129.
[6]	OBRIST D, AGNAN Y, JISKRA M, et al. Tundra uptake of atmospheric elemental mercury drives Arctic mercury pollution[J]. Nature, 2017, 547(7662): 201-204.
[7]	冯新斌, 史建波, 李平, 等. 我国汞污染研究与履约进展[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(11): 1344-1350.
[8]	UNEP. Global Mercury Assessment 2018[M]. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme Chemicals and Health Branch,2019.
[9]	WU Q, WANG S, LI G, et al. Temporal trend and spatial distribution of speciated atmospheric mercury emissions in China during 1978—2014[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(24): 13428-13435.
[10]	HONG Q, XU H, LI J, et al. Adsorption of gaseous mercury for engineering optimization: from macrodynamics to adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics[J]. ACS ES&T Engineering, 2021, 1(5): 865-873.
[11]	SU J, YANG J, ZHANG M, et al. Mechanism of Mo and Sb species improving Hg⁰ oxidation performance of V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalyst: density function theory study[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2023, 617: 156612.
[12]	YANG Z, LI H, YANG J, et al. Nanosized copper selenide functionalized zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (CuSe/ZIF-8) for efficient immobilization of gas-phase elemental mercury[J]. Advance Functional Materials, 2019, 29(17): 1807191.
[13]	YANG Y, LIU J, ZHANG B, et al. Mechanistic studies of mercury adsorption and oxidation by oxygen over spinel-type MnFe₂O₄[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 321: 154-161.
[14]	YANG Y, XU W, HUANG R, et al. Enhancement of Hg⁰ adsorption performance at high temperature using Cu-Zn bimetallic sulfide with elevated thermal stability[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 431: 134028.
[15]	JIANG Z, HU Y, WANG R, et al. Elemental mercury removal over MnO-CoO-modified HZSM-5 adsorbents: performance and characterizations[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2023, 111: 101394.
[16]	ZHU Y, LI C, LYU Y, et al. Insight into the effect of SO₂ on the Hg⁰ removal performance over a 1V-8Ce/AC sorbent at low temperatures[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 402: 123502.
[17]	ZHOU Z, LIU X, HU Y, et al. An efficient sorbent based on CuCl₂ loaded CeO₂-ZrO₂ for elemental mercury removal from chlorine-free flue gas[J]. Fuel, 2018, 216: 356-363.
[18]	ZHAO S, PUDASAINEE D, DUAN Y, et al. A review on mercury in coal combustion process: content and occurrence forms in coal, transformation, sampling methods, emission and control technologies[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2019, 73: 26-64.
[19]	LIU D, XU K, MA J, et al. Advances in rational design of catalysts for efficient Hg⁰ removal[J]. Fuel, 2023, 331: 125922.
[20]	LIU Y, LIU L, WANG Y. A critical review on removal of gaseous pollutants using sulfate radical-based advanced oxidation technologies[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(14): 9691-9710.
[21]	XU H, HONG Q, LI J, et al. Heterogeneous reaction mechanisms and functional materials for elemental mercury removal from industrial flue gas[J]. ACS ES&T Engineering, 2021, 1(10): 1383-1400.
[22]	PEI H, LI X, SONG Y, et al. LaFeO₃ perovskite nanoparticles for efficient capture of elemental mercury from coal-fired flue gas[J]. Fuel, 2022, 309: 122134.
[23]	XU H, MA Y, ZHAO S, et al. Enhancement of Ce_1-xSn_xO₂ support in LaMnO₃ for the catalytic oxidation and adsorption of elemental mercury[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(68): 63559-63567.
[24]	CHEN H, HUO Q, WANG Y, et al. Upcycling coal liquefaction residue into sulfur-rich activated carbon for efficient Hg⁰ removal from coal-fired flue gas[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2020, 206.
[25]	LO'PEZ-ANTO'N M A, M DI'AZ-SOMOANO, MARTI'NEZ-TARAZONA M R. Retention of elemental mercury in fly ashes in different atmospheres[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21: 99-103.
[26]	THOMAS K G, LANIB B W, OFFEN G R. Mechanisms governing the fate of mercury in coal-fired power systems[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 89(2): 139-151.
[27]	ZHOU Q, DUAN Y, CHEN M, et al. Effect of flue gas component and ash composition on elemental mercury oxidation/adsorption by NH₄Br modified fly ash[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 345: 578-585.
[28]	SERRE S D, SILCOX G D. Adsorption of elemental mercury on the residual carbon in coal fly ash[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2000, 39(6): 1723-1730.
[29]	LIU H, CHEN H, WANG S, et al. Synergistic catalytic oxidation of Hg⁰ and NH₃-SCR of NO over MnCeTiO_x catalyst in flue gas[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(3): 107574.
[30]	WANG S X, ZHANG L, LI G H, et al. Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired power plants in China[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2010, 10: 1183-2010.
[31]	王青峰, 王丹, 刘越, 等. 湿法烟气脱硫系统中氧化态汞的还原和影响机制综述[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(8): 8488.
[32]	LIU Y, WANG Y, WANG Q, et al. A study on removal of elemental mercury in flue gas using Fenton solution[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 292: 164-172.
[33]	KRZYŻYŃSKA R, HUTSON N D, ZHAO Y, et al. Mercury removal and its fate in oxidant enhanced wet flue gas desulphurization slurry[J]. Fuel, 2018, 211: 876-882.
[34]	CHANG L, ZHANG Y, LIU H, et al. Migration and identification of mercury species in wet flue gas desulfurization system using temperature programmed decomposition[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 276: 124211.
[35]	DRANGA B A, LAZAR L, KOESER H. Oxidation catalysts for elemental mercury in flue gases: a review[J]. Catalysts, 2012, 2(1): 139-170.
[36]	SHI J, CHEN J, XIONG S, et al. Structure-directing role of support on Hg⁰ oxidation over V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalyst revealed for NO_x and Hg⁰ simultaneous control in an SCR reactor[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2022, 56(13): 9702-9711.
[37]	WANG C, HONG Q, MA C, et al. Novel promotion of sulfuration for Hg⁰ conversion over V₂O₅-MoO₃/TiO₂ with HCl at low temperatures: Hg⁰ adsorption, Hg⁰ oxidation, and Hg²⁺ adsorption[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(10): 7072-7081.
[38]	ZHANG X, FANG B, CUI L, et al. Effects of HCl and O₂ on Hg⁰ oxidation in the SCR catalyst[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2021, 35(14): 11382-11392.
[39]	ZHANG X, GAO C, WANG Z, et al. Co₃O₄ with ordered pore structure derived from wood vessels for efficient Hg⁰ oxidation[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2022, 50: 215-221.
[40]	WANG D, CHEN Q, ZHANG X, et al. Multipollutant control (MPC) of flue gas from stationary sources using SCR technology: a critical review[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(5): 2743-2766.
[41]	WANG Y, SI W, PENG Y, et al. Investigation on removal of NO and Hg⁰ with different Cu species in Cu-SAPO-34 zeolites[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2019, 119: 91-95.
[42]	WANG T, LIU J, YANG Y, et al. Catalytic conversion of mercury over Ce doped Mn/SAPO-34 catalyst: sulphur tolerance and SO₂/SO₃ conversion[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 381: 120986.
[43]	LIU X, MI J, SHI L, et al. In situ modulation of A-site vacancies in LaMnO_3.15 perovskite for surface lattice oxygen activation and boosted redox reactions[J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021, 60(51): 26747-26754.
[44]	WANG Z, LIU J, YANG Y, et al. Insights into the catalytic behavior of LaMnO₃ perovskite for Hg⁰ oxidation by HCl[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 383: 121156.
[45]	XU H, QU Z, ZHAO S, et al. Enhancement of heterogeneous oxidation and adsorption of Hg⁰ in a wide temperature window using SnO₂ supported LaMnO₃ perovskite oxide[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 292: 123-129.
[46]	XU H, QU Z, ZONG C, et al. Catalytic oxidation and adsorption of Hg⁰ over low-temperature NH₃-SCR LaMnO₃ perovskite oxide from flue gas[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 186: 30-40.
[47]	YANG J, NA Y, HU Y, et al. Granulation of Mn-based perovskite adsorbent for cyclic Hg⁰ capture from coal combustion flue gas[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 459: 141679.
[48]	MHATRE D, BHATIA D. Insights into the adsorption, alloy formation, and poisoning effects of Hg on monometallic and bimetallic adsorbents[J]. Langmuir, 2022, 38(22): 6841-6859.
[49]	HUO Q, YUE C, WANG Y, et al. Effect of impregnation sequence of Pd/Ce/gamma-Al₂O₃ sorbents on Hg⁰ removal from coal derived fuel gas[J]. Chemosphere, 2020, 249: 126164.
[50]	LIM D H, ABOUD S, WILCOX J. Investigation of adsorption behavior of mercury on Au(111) from first principles[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(13): 7260-7266.
[51]	LIU Z, SRIRAM V, LI C, et al. Mechanistic and kinetic studies of elemental mercury oxidation over a RuO₂/rutile TiO₂ catalyst[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2017, 7(20): 4669-4679.
[52]	YAN N, CHEN W, CHEN J, et al. Significance of RuO₂ modified SCR catalyst for elemental mercury oxidation in coal-fired flue gas[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(13): 5725-5730.
[53]	YANG Y, LIU J, WANG Z, et al. A complete catalytic reaction scheme for Hg⁰ oxidation by HCl over RuO₂/TiO₂ catalyst[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 373: 660-670.
[54]	ZHAO L, LI C, ZHANG X, et al. A review on oxidation of elemental mercury from coal-fired flue gas with selective catalytic reduction catalysts[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2015, 5(7): 3459-3472.
[55]	LI H, WU C Y, LI Y, et al. Superior activity of MnO_x-CeO₂/TiO₂ catalyst for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury at low flue gas temperatures[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2012, 111-112: 381-388.
[56]	YANG Y, MIAO S, LIU J, et al. Cost-effective manganese ore sorbent for elemental mercury removal from flue gas[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(16): 9957-9965.
[57]	LI B, HOU Y, GAO J, et al. Rational amelioration of redox equilibrium by constructing hollow nanotube Co-Mn/TiO₂ catalyst to boost simultaneous removal of NO and Hg⁰[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2024, 341: 123353.
[58]	LI C, YUE E, WU J, et al. Copper-based sorbents and catalysts for elemental mercury removal from gas stream: a review[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, 62(33): 12829-12844.
[59]	LI H, WU S, LI L, et al. CuO-CeO₂/TiO₂ catalyst for simultaneous NO reduction and Hg⁰ oxidation at low temperatures[J]. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2015, 5(12): 5129-5138.
[60]	WANG H, WANG B, ZHOU J, et al. CuO modified vanadium-based SCR catalysts for Hg⁰ oxidation and NO reduction[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 239: 17-22.
[61]	YAMAGUCHI A, AKIHO H, ITO S. Mercury oxidation by copper oxides in combustion flue gases[J]. Powder Technology, 2008, 180(1/2): 222-226.
[62]	MEI Z, SHEN Z, ZHAO Q, et al. Removing and recovering gas-phase elemental mercury by Cu_xCo_3-xO₄ (0.75≤x≤2.25) in the presence of sulphur compounds[J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 70(8): 1399-1404.
[63]	SRIRAM V, LI C, LIU Z, et al. Reaction kinetic study of elemental mercury vapor oxidation with CuCl₂[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 343: 244-257.
[64]	KONG F, QIU J, LIU H, et al. Catalytic oxidation of gas-phase elemental mercury by nano-Fe₂O₃[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2011, 23(4): 699-704.
[65]	WANG D, YAO Q, LIU S, et al. Effect of support on simultaneous removal of NO and Hg⁰ over Cu and Fe catalysts[J]. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2019, 92(6): 1852-1863.
[66]	LI H, WU C Y, LI Y, et al. Impact of SO₂ on elemental mercury oxidation over CeO₂-TiO₂ catalyst[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013, 219: 319-326.
[67]	LI H, WU C Y, LI Y, et al. CeO₂-TiO₂ catalysts for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in low-rank coal combustion flue gas[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(17): 7394-7400.
[68]	CHANG H, WU Q, ZHANG T, et al. Design strategies for CeO₂-MoO₃ catalysts for deNO_x and Hg⁰ oxidation in the presence of HCl: the significance of the surface acid-base properties[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(20): 12388-12394.
[69]	WANG Y, SHEN B, HE C, et al. Simultaneous removal of NO and Hg⁰ from flue gas over Mn-Ce/Ti-PILCs[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(15): 9355-9363.
[70]	CHEN C, JIA W, LIU S, et al. Simultaneous NO removal and Hg⁰ oxidation over CuO doped V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalysts in simulated coal-fired flue gas[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(6): 7025-7034.
[71]	MEI J, SUN P, XIAO X, et al. Influence mechanism of the compositions in coal-fired flue gas on Hg⁰ oxidation over commercial SCR catalyst[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2019, 75: 130-137.
[72]	SHIN D, KIM M H, HAN J W. Structure-activity relationship of VO_x/TiO₂ catalysts for mercury oxidation: a DFT study[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2021, 552: 149462.
[73]	YANG Y, XU W, WANG J, et al. New insight into simultaneous removal of NO and Hg⁰ on CeO₂-modified V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalyst: a new modification strategy[J]. Fuel, 2019, 249: 178-187.
[74]	LIU R, XU W, TONG L, et al. Mechanism of Hg⁰ oxidation in the presence of HCl over a commercial V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ SCR catalyst[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 36: 76-83.
[75]	ZHAO H, EZEH C I, YIN S, et al. MoO₃-adjusted δ-MnO₂ nanosheet for catalytic oxidation of Hg⁰ to Hg²⁺[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 263: 117829.
[76]	ZHAO L, LI C, LI S, et al. Simultaneous removal of elemental mercury and NO in simulated flue gas over V₂O₅/ZrO₂-CeO₂ catalyst[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 198: 420-430.
[77]	LI C, BREWE D, LEE J Y. Effects of impregnation sequence for Mo-modified V-based SCR catalyst on simultaneous Hg⁰ oxidation and NO reduction[J]. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2020, 270: 118854.
[78]	SHAN W, YU Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Theory and practice of metal oxide catalyst design for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH₃[J]. Catalysis Today, 2021, 376: 292-301.
[79]	SHI J, CHEN J, WANG J, et al. Vanadium-density-dependent reactivity for simultaneous removal of NO_x and Hg⁰ over V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalyst[J]. Fuel, 2023, 332: 126189.
[80]	LI C, SRIRAM V, LEE J Y. A kinetic study of Hg⁰ oxidation over Mo-promoted V-based SCR catalyst[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 427: 131864.
[81]	YEO W, SHIN D, KIM M H, et al. Change in the electronic environment of the VO_x active center via support modification to enhance Hg oxidation activity[J]. ACS Catalysis, 2023, 13: 3775-3787.
[82]	SU J, YANG J, ZHANG M, et al. Improvement mechanism of Ru species on Hg⁰ oxidation reactivity over V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalyst: a density functional theory study[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2023, 274: 118689.
[83]	ZHAO L, LI C, ZHANG J, et al. Promotional effect of CeO₂ modified support on V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst for elemental mercury oxidation in simulated coal-fired flue gas[J]. Fuel, 2015, 153: 361-369.
[84]	ZHAO L, LI C, LI S, et al. Simultaneous removal of Hg⁰ and NO in simulated flue gas on transition metal oxide M' (M'=Fe₂O₃, MnO₂, and WO₃) doping on V₂O₅/ZrO₂-CeO₂ catalysts[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2019, 483: 260-269.
[85]	WANG H, WANG B, SUN Q, et al. New insights into the promotional effects of Cu and Fe over V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ NH₃-SCR catalysts towards oxidation of Hg⁰[J]. Catalysis Communications, 2017, 100: 169-172.
[86]	CHEN C, JIA W, LIU S, et al. Catalytic performance of CuCl₂-modified V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂ catalyst for Hg⁰ oxidation in simulated flue gas[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 35(3): 637-644.
[87]	ZHAO L, HE Q S, LI L, et al. Research on the catalytic oxidation of Hg⁰ by modified SCR catalysts[J]. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology, 2015, 43(5): 628-634.
[88]	杨子文, 佟莉, 左朋莱, 等. 不同烟气组分对Cu₂O改性V₂O₅-MoO₃/TiO₂脱硝催化剂汞氧化性能的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2022, 16(9): 2911-2920.
[89]	SHI J, WANG Z, MI J, et al. To be support or promoter: the mode of introducing ceria into commercial V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalyst for enhanced Hg⁰ oxidation[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2023, 454: 131489.
[90]	LIU R, XU W, TONG L, et al. Role of NO in Hg⁰ oxidation over a commercial selective catalytic reduction catalyst V₂O₅-WO₃/TiO₂[J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015, 38: 126-132.
[91]	WANG Z, LIU J, ZHANG B, et al. Mechanism of heterogeneous mercury oxidation by HBr over V₂O₅/TiO₂ catalyst[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(10): 5398-5404.
[92]	CHIU C H, HSI H C, LIN HP, et al. Effects of properties of manganese oxide-impregnated catalysts and flue gas condition on multipollutant control of Hg⁰ and NO[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 291: 1-8.
[93]	YANG J, SU J, CHEN L, et al. Mercury removal using various modified V/Ti-based SCR catalysts: a review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 436: 129115.
[94]	SUAREZ NEGREIRA A, WILCOX J. DFT study of Hg oxidation across vanadia-titania SCR catalyst under flue gas conditions[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(4): 1761-1772.