电炉炼钢二噁英控制:活性炭吸附技术

于双江; 朱俊杰; 范驰; 姚群; 陈建军; 李俊华

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202409024

电炉炼钢二噁英控制:活性炭吸附技术

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409024

于双江^1,2,
朱俊杰³,
范驰^2,3,
姚群³,
陈建军^1,2, ,,
李俊华^1,2

1. 清华大学盐城环境工程技术研发中心, 江苏盐城 224000;
2. 清华大学环境学院大气污染物与温室气体协同控制国家工程研究中心, 北京 100084;
3. 中钢集团天澄环保科技股份有限公司, 武汉 430205

基金项目:

湖北省重点研发计划项目(2023BCB037)

详细信息

作者简介:
于双江(1992-),男,工程师,主要研究方向为烟气多污染物控制技术。865681295@qq.com

通讯作者:
陈建军(1981-),男,副研究员,主要研究方向为烟气多污染物控制和碳减排与资源化技术。chenjianjun@tsinghua.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 26
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-11-15
- 网络出版日期: 2024-12-02

CONTROL OF DIOXINS IN ELECTRIC STEELMAKING: ADSORPTION TECHNOLOGY BY ACTIVATED CARBON

YU Shuangjiang^1,2,
ZHU Junjie³,
FAN Chi^2,3,
YAO Qun³,
CHEN Jianjun^{1,2
, ,},
LI Junhua^1,2

1. Yancheng Environmental Engineering Technology Research and Development Center, Tsinghua University, Yancheng 224000, China;
2. National Engineering Research Center for Synergetic Control of Air Pollutants and Greenhouse Gases, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3. Sinosteel Tiancheng Environmental Protection & Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430205, China

摘要

摘要: 随着电炉炼钢在我国钢铁生产领域的占比不断增大,炼钢过程所带来的二噁英污染问题也日益严峻。活性炭吸附技术是目前电炉炼钢企业脱除烟气中二噁英的主要手段。围绕适用于二噁英吸附的活性炭制备开展了一系列研究,结果表明:1)羟丙基甲基纤维素(HPMC)与低熔点玻璃粉(ST880)可作为新型绿色黏结剂用于活性炭成型,避免了煤焦油和沥青的使用,减少了活性炭生产过程中污染物的产生。HPMC为水溶性纤维素醚类衍生物,主要用来提高活性炭在高温活化前的耐磨强度;低熔点玻璃粉作为无机功能材料,具有优异的热稳定性和高温黏结性,保证了活性炭在高温活化过程不会破碎成粉、高温活化后仍具有较好的耐磨强度。2)根据二噁英吸附对活性炭孔结构参数的要求,采用简单的水蒸气活化法对成型活性炭进行了定向孔结构改造。适宜的液态水流量不仅关系到样品的产率,还会影响样品的孔隙性质。提高液态水流量,或在液态水总量一定时延长活化时间均有利于水蒸气在活性炭内部的扩散以及与碳原子的反应,容易得到中孔率较高的活性炭。在950 ℃下通入180 mL/h的液态水活化4 h,活性炭收率为50.1%,中孔体积为0.36 cm³/g,所得样品对二噁英的脱除效率为90.9%。
- 电炉炼钢 /
- 二噁英 /
- 活性炭成型 /
- 水蒸气活化 /
- 羟丙基甲基纤维素 /
- 低熔点玻璃粉
Abstract: With the increasing proportion of electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking in the field of steel production in China, the problem of dioxin pollution caused by the steelmaking process is getting worse. Activated carbon adsorption technology is considered to be the most promising strategy for removing dioxins from flue gas in the EAF steelmaking industry. In this paper, a systematic study was carried out on the preparation of activated carbon suitable for dioxin adsorption, and the main conclusion includes: 1) hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) and low-melting-point glass powder (ST880) can be used as a new type of green binder for activated carbon molding, avoiding the use of coal tar and asphalt, and reducing the production of pollutants in the process of activated carbon production. HPMC are water-soluble cellulose ether derivatives, which are mainly used to improve the abrasive resistance of activated carbon before high-temperature activation. As inorganic functional materials, low-melting-point glass powder has excellent thermal stability and high-temperature adhesion, ensuring that the formed activated carbon will not be broken into powder in the process of high-temperature activation, and still has a certain abrasive resistance after high-temperature activation. 2) According to the requirements of dioxin adsorption on pore structure parameters of the activated carbon, the directional pore structure of formed activated carbon was modified by a simple water vapor activation strategy. The appropriate liquid water flow rate is not only related to the yield of the sample but also affects the pore properties. The improved liquid water flow and the improved activation time when the total amount of liquid water is constant are conducive to the diffusion of water vapor inside the activated carbon and the reaction with carbon atoms, and it is easy to obtain activated carbon with a high mesoporous ratio. The activated carbon was activated with 180 mL/h of water vapor at 950 ℃ for 4 hours, the yield was 50.1%, and the mesopore volume was 0.36 cm³/g. The removal efficiency of dioxin in activated carbon products was 90.9%.
- electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking /
- dioxin /
- activated carbon molding /
- water vapor activation strategy /
- hydroxypropyl methylcellulose /
- low-melting-point glass powder

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

[1]	余刚, 黄俊, 张彭义. 持久性有机污染物:倍受关注的全球性环境问题[J]. 环境保护, 2001(4): 37-39.
[2]	SHEN J, YANG L L, LIU G R, et al. Occurrence, profiles, and control of unintentional POPs in the steelmaking industry: a review[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 773: 145692.
[3]	SONG A M, LI H R, LIU M Y, et al. Polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins/furans (PBDD/Fs) in soil around municipal solid waste incinerator: a comparison with polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/furans (PCDD/Fs)[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2022, 293: 118563.
[4]	林海鹏, 于云江, 李琴, 等. 二噁英的毒性及其对人体健康影响的研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2009, 32(9): 93-97.
[5]	YANG L L, SHEN J, ZHENG M H, et al. Occurrence of chlorinated and brominated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from electric arc furnace for steelmaking[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2022, 294: 118663.
[6]	龙红明, 丁龙, 钱立新, 等. 烧结烟气中NO_x和二噁英的减排现状及发展趋势[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(7): 3865-3876.
[7]	张斌, 罗渝东, 任佳. 电炉烟气二噁英减排技术现状及发展趋势[J]. 低碳世界, 2017(16): 96-97.
[8]	环境保护部,国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 炼钢工业大气污染物排放标准:GB 28664—2012[S]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012.
[9]	贾汉忠, 宋存义, 戴振中, 等. 烧结过程中二噁英的产生机理和控制[J]. 烧结球团, 2008(1): 25-30.
[10]	CHANG Y M, HUNG C Y, CHEN J H, et al. Minimum feeding rate of activated carbon to control dioxin emissions from a large-scale municipal solid waste incinerator[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 161(2/3): 1436-1443.
[11]	KARADEMIR A, BAKOGLU M, TASPINAR F, et al. Removal of PCDD/Fs from flue gas by a fixed-bed activated carbon filter in a hazardous waste incinerator[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(4): 1201.
[12]	杨洪楠. 兰炭制备活性炭的方法研究[D]. 马鞍山:安徽工业大学, 2017.
[13]	付亚利. 非沥青基煤质活性炭/焦的特性及其低温脱除NO_x的研究[D]. 太原:太原理工大学, 2016.
[14]	朱钰. 非焦油新型复合黏结剂用于制备烟煤柱状活性炭研究[D]. 徐州:中国矿业大学(江苏),2021.
[15]	环境保护部. 固体废物二噁英类的测定同位素稀释高分辨气相色谱-高分辨质谱法:HJ 77.3—2008[Z]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2008.
[16]	周旭健. 多孔碳材料对二噁英吸附特性的机理研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2017.
[17]	王锐, 陈华, 刘守新. CMC粘接法制备柱状成型活性炭[J]. 林产化学与工业, 2011, 31(5): 6-10.
[18]	董子龙, 吴镇伸, 李梦珂, 等. 褐煤基活性炭制备研究进展[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2023, 29(2): 55-66.
[19]	张乾, 薛建明, 吴春华, 等. 碳基多孔材料脱除烟气中二噁英的研究进展[J]. 烧结球团, 2021, 46(5): 65-72.
[20]	马显华. 活性炭吸附垃圾焚烧二恶英影响因素实验研究[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2013.
[21]	刘皓, 邓保炜, 陈娟, 等. 兰炭基中孔活性炭的制备及性能表征[J]. 材料导报, 2016, 30(10): 87-90.
[22]	ZHOU X J, LI X D, MA X H, et al. Adsorption of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans vapors on activated carbon[J]. Environmental Engineering Science, 2014, 31(12): 664-670.