CARBON NEUTRAL POTENTIAL OF WHOLE PROCESS OF CO-DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE AND SLUDGE
-
摘要: 在我国积极推进碳中和的背景下,厨余垃圾(FW)与污泥共消化是一项具有潜力的低碳处理模式。然而,针对共消化对污水厂潜在环境影响的相关研究较为匮乏。此外,共消化上清液中氮含量较高,低碳工艺短程硝化厌氧氨氧化(PN/A)可实现低能耗和自养脱氮。因此,利用Biowin软件模拟了FW和污泥共消化,并采用侧流PN/A处理上清液的处理方式,重点探究了FW与污泥共消化的碳中和潜力和可持续性。结果表明:共消化的产甲烷量比FW单独消化高109.5%,系统整体能量回收提高1.3倍,碳中和率可达132.2%。敏感性分析显示,FW与污水厂结合实现碳中和的重要发展方向在于低能耗运行、高效能源资源回收。该研究旨在为构建面向碳中和的协同处理方式提供参考,为FW和污水污泥的可持续处理提供理论依据和实践支撑。Abstract: In the context of China’s active promotion of carbon neutrality, co-digestion of food waste (FW) and sludge is a potential low-carbon treatment model. However, few studies have been conducted on the potential effect of co-digestion on wastewater treatment plants. In addition, the nitrogen content in the co-digested supernatant is high, and the low-carbon process of partial nitrification and anammox (PN/A) allows for low energy consumption and autotrophic nitrogen removal. Therefore, the co-digestion process of food waste and sludge was introduced in this study, and the supernatant was subjected to sidestream PN/A treatment, focusing on the carbon neutral potential and sustainability of food waste and sludge co-digestion. The findings indicated that the methane production of co-digestion was 109.5% higher than that of food waste digestion alone, the system could enhance the overall energy recovery by 1.3 times and achieve a carbon neutral state rate of 132.2%. Additionally, sensitivity analysis highlighted that low-energy operation and efficient energy resource recovery are crucial directions for combining food waste and wastewater treatment to accomplish carbon neutrality. The objective of this study is to provide a reference for the establishment of carbon-neutral collaborative treatment models, and provide both theoretical groundwork and practical assistance for the sustainable treatment of food waste and sludge.
-
Key words:
- food waste /
- sewage sludge /
- sidestream PN/A /
- life cycle assessment /
- energy balance /
- carbon neutral potential
-
[1] ZAHNG H, LIU G, XUE L, et al. Anaerobic digestion-based waste-to-energy technologies can halve the climate impact of China’s fast-growing food waste by 2040[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 277: 123490. [2] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food Wastage Footprint—Impacts on Natural Resources—Summary[R]. Italy, 2023. [3] ZAN F X, IQBAL A, GUO G, et al. Integrated food waste management with wastewater treatment in Hong Kong: transformation, energy balance and economic analysis[J]. Water Research, 2020, 184: 116155. [4] LIU X M, HUANG H, IQBAL A, et al. Sustainability analysis of implementing sludge reduction in overall sludge management process: where do we stand?[J]. Waste Management, 2022, 152: 80-93. [5] IQBAL A, EKAMA G.A, Potential for co-disposal and treatment of food waste with sewage: a plant-wide steady-state model evaluation[J]. Water Research, 2020, 184: 116175. [6] 宋新新, 刘杰, 林甲, 等.碳中和时代下我国能量自给型污水处理厂发展方向及工程实践[J].环境科学学报,2022, 42(4): 53-63. [7] IACOVIDOU E, VOULVOULIS N. A multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework: development and application in comparing two food waste management options using a UK region as a case study[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2018, 25(36): 35821-35834. [8] IQBAL A, ZAN F X, LIU X M, et al. Net zero greenhouse emissions and energy recovery from food waste: manifestation from modelling a city-wide food waste management plan[J]. Water Research, 2023, 244: 120481. [9] ZAN F, DAI J, HONG Y, et al. The characteristics of household food waste in Hong Kong and their implications for sewage quality and energy recovery[J]. Waste Management, 2018, 74: 63-73. [10] CAO Y, van LOOSDRECHT M C, DAIGGER G T. Mainstream partial nitritation-anammox in municipal wastewater treatment: status, bottlenecks, and further studies[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2017, 101(4): 1365-1383. [11] LU D, IQBAL A, ZAN F X, et al. Integrated life cycle assessment with data envelopment analysis for enhancing medical waste management during a public health crisis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 426:139074. [12] LIU X M, DAI J, NG T L, et al. Evaluation of potential environmental benefits from seawater toilet flushing[J]. Water Research, 2019, 162:505-515. [13] IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis[R/OL]. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/. [14] IPCC. 2019 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories[EB/OL]. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html. [15] 深圳市统计局. 深圳市第七次全国人口普查公报[EB/OL]. http://www.sz.gov.cn/zfgb/2021/gb1199/content/post_8806392.html. [16] MELCER H, DOLD P L, JONES R M. Methods for wastewater characterization in activated sludge modelling[M].Water Environment Research Foundation, 2003. [17] YOSHIDA H, CHRISTENSEN T H, GUILDAL T, et al. A comprehensive substance flow analysis of a municipal wastewater and sludge treatment plant[J]. Chemosphere, 2015, 138: 874-882. [18] HAO X, CHEN Q, van LOOSDRECHT M C M, et al. Sustainable disposal of excess sludge: incineration without anaerobic digestion[J]. Water Research, 2020, 170: 115298. [19] 生态环境部. 城镇污水处理厂污泥处理处置污染防治最佳可行技术指南(试行)[EB/OL]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201003/t20100310_186655.htm. [20] 梁华杰, 王杰, 孟建国, 等.浅析污泥低温干化设备生产运行表现:以某市经济开发区污水处理厂为例[J]. 智能城市, 2019, 5(15): 131-132. [21] 国家发改委. 陆上交通运输企业温室气体排放核算方法与报告指南(试行)[EB/OL]. https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/201511/t20151111_963496.html. [22] YANG N, ZHANG H, CHEN M, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from MSW incineration in China: impacts of waste characteristics and energy recovery[J]. Waste Management, 2012, 32(12): 2552-2560. [23] IQBAL A, ZAN F, LIU X, et al. Integrated municipal solid waste management scheme of Hong Kong: a comprehensive analysis in terms of global warming potential and energy use[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 225: 1079-1088. [24] 广东省生态环境厅. 广东省市县(区)温室气体清单编制指南(试行)[EB/OL]. http://gdee.gd.gov.cn/shbtwj/content/post_3019513.html. [25] 郝晓地, 王向阳, 曹达啟, 等.污水有机物中化石碳排放CO2辨析[J]. 中国给水排水, 2018, 34(2): 13-17. [26] 生态环境部. 2019年度减排项目中国区域电网基准线排放因子[EB/OL]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/ydqhbh/wsqtkz/202012/t20201229_815386.shtml. [27] FAHIMI A, FEDERICI S, DEPERO L E, et al. Evaluation of the sustainability of technologies to recover phosphorus from sewage sludge ash based on embodied energy and CO2 footprint[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 289:125762. [28] 郝晓地, 于晶伦, 刘然彬, 等.剩余污泥焚烧灰分磷回收及其技术进展[J].环境科学学报, 2020, 40 (4): 1149-1159. [29] 陈舜, 逯非, 王效科.中国氮磷钾肥制造温室气体排放系数的估算[J].生态学报,2015, 35(19): 6371-6383. [30] BUBALO A, VOUK D, STIRMER N, et al. Use of sewage sludge ash in the production of innovative bricks: an example of a circular economy[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(16):1-18. [31] 深圳市生态环境局. 2021年度深圳市生态环境状况公报[EB/OL]. http://meeb.sz.gov.cn/xxgk/tjsj/ndhjzkgb/content/post_9843705.html. [32] 刘荣杰, 邓舟, 梁卫坤, 等. 深圳市政污水厂对家庭厨余垃圾粉碎直排的耐受分析[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018, 26(4): 43-47. [33] YOSHIDA H, MONSTER J, SCHEUTZ C. Plant-integrated measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from a municipal wastewater treatment plant[J]. Water Research, 2014, 61: 108-118. [34] EVANGELISTI S, LETTIERI P, BORELLO D, et al. Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study[J]. Waste Management, 2014, 34(1): 226-237. [35] WANG Z Y, MIN Z, DUAN H R, et al. A 20-year journey of partial nitritation and anammox (PN/A): from sidestream toward mainstream[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2022, 56(12): 7522-7531. [36] LIU X M, IQBAL A, HUANG H, et al. Life cycle assessment of deploying sludge minimization with (sulfidogenic-)oxic-settling-anaerobic configurations in sewage-sludge management systems[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 335: 125266. [37] GUVEN H, ERSAHIN M E, DERELI R K, et al. Energy recovery potential of anaerobic digestion of excess sludge from high-rate activated sludge systems co-treating municipal wastewater and food waste[J]. Energy, 2019, 172: 1027-1036. [38] CELEBI E B, AKSOY A, SANIN F. Maximizing the energy potential of urban sludge treatment: an experimental study and a scenario-based energy analysis focusing on anaerobic digestion with ultrasound pretreatment and sludge combustion[J]. Energy, 2021, 221, 119876. [39] 次瀚林, 王先恺, 董滨.不同污泥干化焚烧技术路线全链条碳足迹分析[J]. 净水技术, 2021, 40(6): 77-82, 99.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 9
- HTML全文浏览量: 0
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0