进水C/N对A<sup>2</sup>/O低氧短程硝化反硝化除磷脱氮性能的影响

卢宝光; 薛世玉; 吴传栋; 孙雪莹; 陈晨咏; 王钟铅; 温慧芳; 云玉攀; 苗志加

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202412012

进水C/N对A²/O低氧短程硝化反硝化除磷脱氮性能的影响

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412012

1. 河北地质大学河北省高校生态环境地质应用技术研发中心, 石家庄 050031;
2. 广东粤海水务投资有限公司, 广东深圳 518020;
3. 哈尔滨工业大学水资源国家工程研究中心有限公司, 哈尔滨 150096

基金项目:

国家自然基金联合基金(U21A2023)

大学生创新创业计划资助项目

河北省自然科学基金面上基金(C2021403002)

河北地质大学教学改革与实践项目(2022J22)

河北地质大学博士科研启动基金资助项目(BQ2024027)

河北省研究生创新能力培养项目(CXZZSS2023132)

河北省高校生态环境地质应用技术研发中心开放基金资助项目(JSYF-202401)

详细信息

作者简介:
卢宝光(1971-),男,高级工程师,主要研究方向为污水处理及资源化利用。lubaoguang@gdhwater.com

通讯作者:
苗志加(1984-),男,教授,主要研究方向为污水处理及资源化利用。zhijia_miao@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 12
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-01-23
- 网络出版日期: 2025-01-18

EFFECT OF INFLUENT C/N RATIO ON PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN REMOVAL BY PARTIAL NITRIFICATION-DENITRIFICATION IN A²/O PROCESS WITH LOW DISSOLVED OXYGEN CONCENTRATION

1. Hebei Center for Ecological and Environmental Geology Research, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China;
2. Guangdong Yuehai Water Group Investment Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518020, China;
3. National Engineering Research Center for Resources of Harbin Institute of Technology Co., Ltd., Harbin 150096, China

摘要

摘要: 研究重点考察了低氧条件下(0.5 mg/L),A²/O处理不同C/N污水(2.5~7.0)的短程硝化反硝化除磷脱氮性能。实验结果表明,进水中80%的COD在厌氧区被去除,主要用于合成PHA。当进水C/N<4.5,出水COD会随进水出现较大波动。水体中TN去除主要通过短程硝化、内源反硝化、反硝化除磷等过程来实现。当进水C/N为2.5、3.5,TN去除率均维持在80%左右;当进水C/N为4.5、5.0时,亚硝酸盐有明显积累,平均积累率分别为24.4%、31.9%,出水TN可以稳定达到10 mg/L以下,去除率最高可达到85.3%。因此,适当提高进水C/N能有效提高TN去除效果。水体中磷主要通过反硝化除磷过程被去除。当进水C/N为2.5时,系统磷平均去除率为65%左右,除磷效果较差。当C/N提高至3.5,系统除磷效果达到最佳,出水PO^3-₄-P平均浓度为0.3 mg/L,去除率达到92.1%,缺氧吸磷占比为74.6%。另外,当进水C/N为5.0~7.0时,系统内反硝化除磷、内源反硝化、短程硝化、好氧吸磷过程能够有效耦合运行,实现有机物、磷、氮的同步高效去除,COD、TN、PO^3-₄-P 去除率可分别最高达84%、85%和85%以上。经16S rDNA高通量测序分析,系统中起脱氮除磷作用的微生物主要为聚糖菌——Candidatus Competibacter,反硝化细菌——Azospira,硝化细菌——Nitrospira、Nitrosomonas及反硝化聚磷菌——Hyphomicrobium、Candidatus Accumulibacter等。
- C/N /
- 反硝化除磷 /
- 内源反硝化 /
- 短程硝化 /
- 低氧条件
Abstract: The phosphorus and nitrogen removal by partial nitrification-denitrification of A²/O with different C/N ratios (2.5~7.0), were investigated under a low dissolved oxygen condition (0.5mg/L). Results showed that 80% of the influent COD was used for synthesizing PHA in the anaerobic zone. When the C/N ratio was below 4.5, the effluent COD fluctuated with the influent. TN was mainly removed by partial nitrification, endogenous denitrification, and denitrifying phosphorus removal process. When the C/N ratio was 2.5 and 3.5, the TN removal both remained at a level of 80%. The average accumulation rate of nitrite reached 24.4% and 31.9% respectively, under a C/N ratio of 4.5 and 5.0. The effluent TN stably reached 10 mg/L below with a maximum removal rate of 85.3%. Therefore, Increasing the influent C/N appropriately could effectively improve TN removal. Phosphorus was mainly removed through the denitrifying phosphorus removal process. When the C/N ratio was 2.5, the phosphorus removal rate was reduced to 65%. When the C/N ratio was 3.5, the effluent phosphorus concentration was 0.3 mg/L, achieving the best phosphorus removal rate of 92.1%. The anoxic phosphorus uptake took up 74.6% of the total removal. It was found that when the influent C/N of the system was within 5.0 to 7.0, the coupled operation of denitrifying phosphorus removal, endogenous denitrification, partial nitrification, and aerobic phosphorus absorption in the system effectively achieved synchronous and efficient removal of organic matter, phosphorus, and nitrogen, with a removal rate of 84%, 85%, and 90%, respectively. Through the 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing analysis, the microorganisms that play a role in nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the A²/O system were mainly polysaccharide bacterium, Candidatus Competitor, denitrifying bacteria, Azospira, Nitrobacteria, Nitrospira, Nitrosomonas, and denitrifying phosphorus accumulating bacteria, Hypomicrobium and Candidatus Accumulibacter.
- C/N /
- denitrifying phosphorus removal /
- endogenous denitrification /
- partial nitrification /
- low dissolved oxygen condition

HTML全文

参考文献(30)

[1]	华云洁,胡金财,施昱,等.Orbal 氧化沟工艺改造对脱氮效果的影响分析[J].环境工程,2023,41(增刊2):71-78.
[2]	岳志芳,李正,王彦隽.内蒙古某城镇污水处理厂提标改造工程实例[J].水处理技术,2024,50(4):144-147.
[3]	李志平,郭玉梅,邢美容,等. 昆明某污水处理厂Carrousel氧化沟硝化作用分析及升级改造[J].水处理技术,2014,40(10):123-127.
[4]	贾莉.池州市城东污水厂A²/O氧化沟工艺的运行分析[J].中国给水排水,2014,30(9):121-124.
[5]	崔涛,李胜,田敏,等.氧化沟型A²O工艺脱氮除磷性能评价[J].中国给水排水,2023,39(22):75-79.
[6]	乔海兵,赵志太,李帅军,等.污水厂氧化沟改造为A²O+MBBR+O₃工艺提标设计[J].中国给水排水,2022,38(7):60-65.
[7]	MANSE R R,GUJER W, SIEG R H,et al.Consequences of mass transfer effects on the kinetics of nitrifiers[J].Water Research,2005,39 (19): 4633-4642.
[8]	张杰,杨杰,李冬. AOA后置短时低氧曝气实现短程硝化反硝化除磷[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2023,56(6):1-7.
[9]	甄建园,于德爽,王晓霞,等. 低C/N(<3)条件下SNEDPR系统启动及其脱氮除磷特性研究[J]. 中国环境科学,2018, 38(8): 2960-2967.
[10]	BAI X Y, MICHELLE M, MCKNIGHT B, et al. Nitrogen removal pathways during simultaneous nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus removal under low temperature and dissolved oxygen conditions[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022,354: 127177.
[11]	李炳荣,曹特特,王林,等. 低氧条件下 A²/O 工艺对城市污水脱氮处理的中试研究[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(1):134-140.
[12]	任丽芳,李晓庆,孙洪伟. 不同温度 An/A/O-SBR反硝化除磷及N₂O释放特性[J].环境工程,2023,41(12):107-115.
[13]	吕利平,李航,庞飞,等. 交替好氧/缺氧短程硝化反硝化工艺处理低 C/N 城市污水[J].环境工程学报,2020,14(6):1529-1536.
[14]	国家环境保护局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社,2002: 252-354.
[15]	张淼, 彭永臻, 张建华, 等.进水 C/N 对 A²/O-BCO 工艺反硝化除磷特性的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2016,36(5):1366-1375.
[16]	PENG Y, GE S. Enhanced nutrient removal in three types of step feeding process from municipal wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(11):6405-6413.
[17]	ZHANG M, PENG Y Z, WANG C, et al. Optimization denitrifying phosphorus removal at different hydraulic retention times in a novel anaerobic anoxic oxic-biological contact oxidation process[J].Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2016,106:26-36.
[18]	KUBA T, SMOLDERS G, LOOSDRECHT M C M, et al. Biological phosphorus removal from wastewater by anaerobic-anoxic sequencing batch reactor[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1993, 27(5/6):241-252.
[19]	REN S Q, LIU Y R, HE Y Y, et al. Mathematical modeling of the dynamic effect of denitrifying glycogen-accumulating organisms on nitrous oxide production during denitrifying phosphorus removal[J] Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023,453:1-12.
[20]	CHUNG T S, ZHANG S, WANG K Y, et al. Forward osmosis processes: yesterday, today and tomorrow[J]. Desalination,2012,287(2):78-81.
[21]	HANAKI K, WANTAWIN C, OHGAKI S. Nitrification at low-levels of dissolved-oxygen with and without organic loading in a suspended-growth reactor[J]. Water Research, 1990, 24(3):297-302.
[22]	CAMEJO P Y, OWEN B R, Martirano J, et al. Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis clades enriched under cyclic anaerobic and microaerobic conditions simultaneously use different electron acceptors[J]. Water Research, 2016, 102:125-137.
[23]	SKENNERTON C T, BARR J J, SLATER F R, et al. Expanding our view of genomic diversity in Candidatus Accumulibacter clades: metabolic plasticity in Accumulibacter clades[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2015, 17(5):1574-1585.
[24]	LEE D S, JEON C O, PARK J M. Biological nitrogen removal with enhanced phosphate uptake in a sequencing batch reactor using single sludge system[J]. Water Research, 2001, 35(16):3968-3976.
[25]	RIBERA-GUARDIA A, MARQUES R, ARANGIO C, et al. Distinctive denitrifying capabilities lead to differences in N₂O production by denitrifying polyphosphate accumulating organisms and denitrifying glycogen accumulating organisms[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 219:106-113.
[26]	LI C, ZHANG J, LIANG S, et al. Nitrous oxide generation in denitrifying phosphorus removal process: main causes and control measures[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20(8):5353-5360.
[27]	MIAO Z J, LI D, GUO S, et al. Effect of Free nitrous acid on nitrous oxide production and denitrifying phosphorus removal by polyphosphorus-accumulating organisms in wastewater treatment[J]. BioMed Research International, 2018, 26:9192607.
[28]	WINKLER M, BASSIN J P, KLEEREBEZEM R, et al. Selective sludge removal in a segregated aerobic granular biomass system as a strategy to control PAO-GAO competition at high temperatures[J]. Water Research, 2011, 45(11):3291-3299.
[29]	ZENG W, BAI X L, ZHANG L M, et al. Population dynamics of nitrifying bacteria for nitritation achieved in Johannesburg (JHB) process treating municipal wastewater[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 162:30-37.
[30]	GU X, LENG J T, ZHU J T, et al. Influence mechanism of C/N ratio on heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification process[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 343:126116.