扎赉诺尔露天煤矿排土场复垦与土壤微生物反馈响应

王育光; 王诺; 李一依; 周咏春; 包妮沙; 赵鑫

doi:DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207007

扎赉诺尔露天煤矿排土场复垦与土壤微生物反馈响应

doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207007

王育光¹,
王诺²,
李一依¹,
周咏春¹,
包妮沙^1,3,
赵鑫^1,3, ,

1. 东北大学资源与土木工程学院, 沈阳 110819;
2. 沙河市自然资源和规划局, 河北沙河 054100;
3. 东北大学智慧水利与资源环境科技创新中心, 沈阳 110819

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(52074063)

"十三五"国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1907204)

详细信息

作者简介:
王育光(1996-),男,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为固废资源化及矿山修复。2467211768@qq.com

通讯作者:
赵鑫(1982-),男,副教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为水污染控制与废弃物资源化。zhaoxin@mail.neu.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 119
- HTML全文浏览量: 15
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-06-28
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-02

DUMP RECLAMATION IN JALAI NUR OPEN-PIT COAL MINE AND FEEDBACK RESPONSE OF SOIL MICROBIOME

1. School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China;
2. Natural Resources and Planning Bureau of Shahe, Shahe 054100, China;
3. Science and Technology Innovation Center for Smart Water Conservancy and Resources and Environment, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China

摘要

摘要: 以扎赉诺尔露天煤矿排土场边坡与平台区域的复垦土壤为研究对象,通过对土壤理化性质测定、土壤菌群结构分析,以及与环境因子相关性分析,将其与未复垦的土壤进行比较,探究排土场复垦与土壤微生物的反馈响应。研究发现:复垦土壤的理化性质差异主要与试验区域土壤深度有关,深度为0~10 cm的土壤相比10~20 cm的土壤理化性质变化更大,其中土壤容重、机械组成和pH对复垦土壤的影响作用明显高于土壤有机碳、土壤总氮和碳氮比,对照组土壤的pH为8.87和8.76,远高于复垦土壤的pH。排土场复垦前后土壤菌群结构差异大,复垦有助于改善土壤微生物菌群结构,且土壤中有机碳和总氮含量增加对其有促进作用。
- 排土场复垦 /
- 土壤微生物 /
- 露天煤矿 /
- 扎赉诺尔 /
- 反馈响应
Abstract: The reclaimed soil of the side slope and platform of the dumpsite in Jalai Nur Open-pit Coal Mine was selected as the research object.The soil's physical and chemical properties were determined,the soil microbial communities were analyzed,the correlation between soil microbial diversities and environmental factors was analyzed and compared with the non-reclaimed soil,and the feedback response of dumping site reclamation and soil microorganisms were also explored.The experimental results indicated that differences in physical and chemical properties of the reclaimed soil were mainly related to the soil depth.Compared with the soil of 10~20 cm,the physicochemical properties of 0~10 cm soil changed more greatly.Effects of soil bulk density,mechanical composition,and pH on the reclaimed soil were significantly higher than that of soil organic carbon,soil total nitrogen,and C/N ratio.The pH of the control soil was 8.87 and 8.76,much higher than the pH of the reclaimed soil.The microbial communities of the reclaimed soil were significantly different from the non-reclaimed soil.Reclamation was beneficial in improving the soil microbial communities with the soil organic carbon and total nitrogen content increasing.
- dump site reclamation /
- soil microorganisms /
- open-pit coal mine /
- Jalai Nur /
- feedback response

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	何伟民.宝日希勒露天煤矿矿区水资源处理和优化分配研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学. 2018.
[2]	WANG J M, YANG R X, FENG Y, et al. Spatial variability of reconstructed soil properties and the optimization of sampling number for reclaimed land monitoring in an opencast coal mine[J].Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 10(2):46.
[3]	LEE S H, SORENSEN J W, GRADY K L, et al. Divergent extremes but convergent recovery of bacterial and archaeal soil communities to an ongoing subterranean coal mine fire[J].The ISME journal, 2017, 11(6):1447-1459.
[4]	李旭,董炜灵,宋阿琳,等.秸秆添加量对土壤生物固氮速率和固氮菌群落特征的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2021, 54(5):980-991.
[5]	MIDER A I, FERNNDEZ S B, MARTÍNEZ R C, et al. Colonization patterns of woody species on lands mined for coal in Spain:preliminary insights for forest expansion[J]. Land Degradation&Development, 2013, 24:39-46.
[6]	VIVIANE D R, TATIANA T T, LAURA M M O, et al. Bacterial diversity assessment in soil of an active Brazilian copper mine using high-throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons[J].Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2014, 106(5):879-890.
[7]	ARVYDAS P, AURELIJA R, STEFANIJAte M, et al. Efficiency of drainage practices for improving water quality in Lithuania[J]. Transactions of the Asabe, 2018, 61(1):179-196.
[8]	杨彦明,刘景辉,杨汉宏,等.不同植被对黑岱沟露天煤矿复垦土壤微生物数量的影响[J].露天采矿技术, 2018, 33(1):106-109.
[9]	杜青松.内蒙古排土场环境保护与生态修复研究[J].环境生态学, 2020, 2(7):56-60.
[10]	CUI Y X, FANG L C, GUO X B, et al. Responses of soil bacterial communities, enzyme activities, and nutrients to agricultural-to-natural ecosystem conversion in the Loess Plateau, China[J].Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2019, 19:1427-1440.
[11]	许蕊.呼伦贝尔能源矿产集中开采区矿山地质环境调查与研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2014.
[12]	杨朝云.不同降雨条件下银山矿百岭湾排土场边坡稳定性分析[D].衡阳:南华大学, 2019.
[13]	鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M]. 3版.北京:中国农业出版社, 1999.
[14]	郭洋楠.半干旱草原煤矿沉陷区复垦植被土壤微生物多样性及特征[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古大学, 2020.
[15]	王榕.建筑与小区绿地土壤物理性质和微地形对降雨产流的影响研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学, 2020.
[16]	何家乐.不同尿素类型与土壤pH对农田氨排放的影响及相关因子分析[D].长沙:湖南农业大学, 2019.
[17]	张月沛.生物炭对黑土土壤有机碳库及细菌多样性的影响[D].哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2020.
[18]	骆占斌.黄土高原矿区采煤扰动后土壤微生物群落结构变化及驱动机制研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学, 2019.
[19]	LIU J, JIA X Y, YAN W M, et al. Changes in soil microbial community structure during long-term secondary succession[J]. Land Degradation&Development, 2020,31(9):1151-1166.
[20]	LAUBER C L, HAMADY M, KNIGHT R, et al. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale[J].Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(15):5111-5120.
[21]	XU Y L, SESHADRI B, SARKAR B, et al. Biochar modulates heavy metal toxicity and improves microbial carbon use efficiency in soil[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 621:148-159.
[22]	YAO M J, RUI J P, LI J B, et al. Rate-specific responses of prokaryotic diversity and structure to nitrogen deposition in the Leymus chinensis steppe[J]. Soil Biology&Biochemistry, 2014, 79:81-90.
[23]	DELGADO B M, REICH P B, KHACHANE A N, et al. It is elemental:soil nutrient stoichiometry drives bacterial diversity[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2016, 19(3):1176.