CFB锅炉钙基飞灰的雾化喷水悬浮式脱硫特性

刘传亮

doi:DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207012

CFB锅炉钙基飞灰的雾化喷水悬浮式脱硫特性

doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207012

刘传亮

上海发电设备成套设计研究院有限责任公司, 上海 200240

基金项目:

国家电投统筹科研课题(202106306H)

详细信息

作者简介:
刘传亮(1984-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要研究方向为能源与动力工程。liuchuanliang@speri.com.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 152
- HTML全文浏览量: 22
- PDF下载量: 5
- 被引次数: 15
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-11-21
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-02

PERFORMANCE OF ATOMIZED SPRAYING SUSPENDED DESULFURIZATION OF FLY ASH IN CFB BOILER

LIU Chuanliang

Shanghai Power Equipment Research Institute Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200240, China

摘要

摘要: 以循环流化床(CFB)锅炉钙基飞灰为原料,实验研究了不同条件下飞灰的雾化喷水悬浮式脱硫工艺技术特性。结果表明:增湿飞灰具有良好的低温脱硫能力,其脱硫过程分为快速、慢速反应2个阶段,增湿前后脱硫剂的总钙利用率从41%提高到70%左右。飞灰颗粒的增湿效果与反应温度是影响硫盐化速率的主要因素。采用50 μm雾化水粒径、增湿水分级喷入方式,可使飞灰颗粒获得更好的增湿效果,并延长快速反应的持续时间,使反应更充分;反应温度对增湿脱硫同时存在促进与抑制2方面作用,最佳反应温度在80℃左右;SO₂浓度对脱硫的影响不显著;飞灰经过雾化喷水活化后,颗粒表面的孔隙、裂缝增多,改善的微观结构促进了气固传质和脱硫反应。
- 脱硫 /
- 钙基吸收剂 /
- 飞灰 /
- 雾化喷水 /
- 水活化 /
- 循环流化床
Abstract: Using the atomized spraying of humidification method to hydrate the calcium-based fly ash of the circulating fluidized bed (CFB),the performance of fly ash suspended desulfurization was experimentally studied under different conditions.The results showed that the hydrated fly ash had a good desulfurization capability at low temperature,which could be divided into two reaction stages,fast and slow phase,and enhanced the efficiency of total calcium utilization from an initial value of 41% to around 70%.The particle humidification effect and the reaction temperature were the main factors affecting the desulphurization ability.The atomization water-drop size closed to 50 μm and the staged spray-water method made a better humidification effect,and extended the duration of fast reaction to make the reaction more complete.The reaction temperature had two side functions of promotion and inhibition to the humidification and desulfurization,and the optimum temperature was around 80℃.The SO₂ concentration was not remarkable to the desulphurization.After fly ash activated by atomized water spray,the microstructure on the particle surface was promoted with increased pores and cracks which would contribute to the gas-solid transfer and desulfurization reaction.
- desulphurization /
- calcium-based sorbent /
- fly ash /
- atomized water spray /
- hydration /
- circulating fluidized bed

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

[1]	NEWBY R A, KEAIRNS D L. Alternatives to calcium-based SO₂ sorbents for fluidized-bed combustion:concetial evaluation[R]. EPA Report EPA-600/7-78-005, 1978.
[2]	ANTHONY E J, GRANATSTEIN D L. Sulfation phenomena in fluidized bed combustion system[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2001, 27:215-236.
[3]	ITALO W L, SAMUEL J M, MOISES B N, et al. Effect of additives to improve calcium-based sorbents in semi-dry flue gas desulphurization[J]. Emission Control Science and Technology, 2020, 6:105-112.
[4]	JIA L, HAN F, LI Z P, et al. Influence mechanism of additives on the crystal structure and desulfurization performance of magnesium slag[J].Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2021, 23:1114-1125.
[5]	WANG J S, WU Y H. Reactivation of FBC ash sulphur sorbent:hydration and sulphation studies[C]//18^th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Combustion, Toronto, Canada, 2005.
[6]	LAURSEN K, DUO W, GRACE J R, et al. Sulfation and reactivation characteristics of nine limestones[J]. Fuel, 2000, 79:153-163.
[7]	ZHANG J, ZHAO S W, YOU C F, et al. Rapid hydration preparation of calcium-based sorbent made from lime and fly ash[J]. Industrial&Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(16):5340-5345.
[8]	MARQUIS D L. Reactivation of spent CFB Limestone by hydration, masters thesis submitted to the department of chemical engineering[D]. New Brunewick:University of New Brunswick,1992.
[9]	GUENTER S, NEVIN S. Design of a 2×160 MWe CFB boiler utilizing high sulfur turkish lignite[C]//17^th International Fluidized Bed Combustion Conference, Jacksonville, Florida USA, 2003.
[10]	石林,陈定盛,汪碧容,等.提高LIFAC法脱硫效率的工程实例[J].环境污染治理技术与设备, 2005, 6(11):92-94.
[11]	CURRAN R A, TANG J T, CAPAN S F, et al. Cold-side desulfurization by humidification of fly ash in CFB boilers[J]. Fluidized Bed Combustion, 1995, 2:851-857.
[12]	ZHAI M, GUO L, SUN L, et al. Desulfurization performance of fly ash and CaCO₃ compound absorbent[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 305:553-561.
[13]	QIN L B, HAN J, CHEN W S, et al. Enhancing SO₂ removal efficiency by lime modified with sewage sludge in a novel integrated desulfurization progress[J]. Environment Protection Engineering, 2017, 43(4):17-27.
[14]	XIAO Y J, XIA Y D, JIANG A P, et al. Research on optimization of coal slime fluidized bed boiler desulfurization cooperative operation[J]. Process, 2021, 10.3390:9010075.
[15]	高翔,刘海蛟,滕斌,等.循环悬浮式烟气半干法脱硫技术的实验研究[J].动力工程,2006,26(5):720-725.
[16]	KOECH L, RUTTO H, LEROTHOLI L, et al. Spray drying absorption for desulphurization:a review of recent developments[J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2021, 23:1665-1686.
[17]	刘传亮,王勤辉.循环流化床锅炉脱硫飞灰的水活化实验研究[J].能源工程,2014(2):41-46.
[18]	陈美玲,夏雯,卢平.操作参数对改性钙基吸收剂同时脱硫脱硝特性的影响[J].环境工程,2015,33(11):88-91.
[19]	王晓晨,赵兵涛,叶琦.静态旋流强化湿法烟气脱硫研究进展[J].环境工程,2020,38(3):128-134.
[20]	YOON H, STOUFFER M R, ROSENBOOVER W A, et al. Pilot process variable study of cool-side desulfurization[J]. Environmental Progress, 1988, 7(2):104-111.
[21]	RUHLAND F, KIND R, WEISS S. The kinetics of the absorption of sulfur dioxide in calcium hydroxide suspension[J]. Chemical, Engineering, Science, 1991, 46(4):934-946.
[22]	滕斌,高翔,骆仲泱,等.分级喷水增湿对半干法烟气脱硫效率的影响[J].电力环境保护, 2006, 22(3):22-25.
[23]	王勤辉,蔡毅,程乐鸣,等.循环流化床锅炉飞灰增湿低温悬浮脱硫特性[J].化工学报,2014,65(2):684-691.

施引文献

期刊类型引用(12)

1.	文玉玲，王加俊. 陈腐垃圾掺烧对生活垃圾焚烧厂飞灰稳定化的影响研究. 清洗世界. 2024(04): 47-50 . 百度学术
2.	王湘徽，朱悦，陈润生. 填埋场陈腐垃圾筛上物热值及掺烧对焚烧炉运行工况影响研究——以云南省某市陈腐垃圾掺烧为例. 环境卫生工程. 2024(02): 53-62 . 百度学术
3.	张效刚，齐添，宋树祥，陈彬荣，张玉飞，陈晓强，张乐，李慈花，李一鸣. 我国南方某生活垃圾填埋场存量垃圾开挖作业案例分析. 环境工程. 2024(05): 90-97 . 本站查看
4.	唐剑云，肖信彤. 陈腐垃圾资源化技术研究. 环境保护与循环经济. 2024(06): 4-7 . 百度学术
5.	李敏，魏亮. 生活垃圾填埋场陈腐垃圾资源化利用研究进展. 中国资源综合利用. 2024(06): 162-164 . 百度学术
6.	曾武清，王予，卜庆国，马硕，白东明，张宗建，张鹏，马丹丹，王圣博，王润其，武丽雯，刘晨，马洪亭. 陈腐垃圾掺烧对垃圾炉焚烧特性的影响. 化工进展. 2024(08): 4642-4653 . 百度学术
7.	黄静颖，焦学军，龙吉生. 垃圾焚烧发电项目碳排放计算对比. 浙江大学学报(工学版). 2024(11): 2338-2346 . 百度学术
8.	杨旭，余昭胜，何玉荣，宾衍辉，马晓茜. 垃圾焚烧炉中城市生活垃圾掺烧高热值工业固废的数值模拟. 洁净煤技术. 2023(09): 98-108 . 百度学术
9.	李水江，张效刚，谈强，陈晓强，李耀晃，刘金海，张乐，张楠. 我国南方某生活垃圾填埋场存量垃圾直接开挖掺烧中试. 环境工程. 2023(08): 196-201 . 本站查看
10.	孙子维，张雨轩，唐玉婷，王思琪，唐杰洪，马晓茜. 城市生活垃圾与陈腐垃圾掺烧的燃烧特性与反应动力学分析. 环境卫生工程. 2023(06): 1-10 . 百度学术
11.	朱浩，喻武，薛浩，马晓玲. 垃圾焚烧炉排炉掺烧工业有机固废运行优化调控研究. 环境卫生工程. 2023(06): 11-15 . 百度学术
12.	李德波，陈兆立，陈智豪，冯永新，黄梓淦，韦琛，马晓茜. 垃圾焚烧炉掺烧陈腐垃圾及其配风优化的数值模拟. 环境工程. 2022(11): 113-119 . 本站查看