Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201704012
  • Publish Date: 2017-04-29
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LU Jinsuo, MA Xinting, JIANG Hao, YU Mengzhu, SONG Guang, CHEN Xingdu. REMOVAL PERFORMANCE AND DEGRADATION MECHANISM OF PARTICULATE MATTER AND H2S GAS BY SOLUTION ABSORPTION-ELECTRO-FENTON PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(12): 155-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202412019
    [2]TANG Haoting, LONG Jing, JIANG Kuansheng, LIU Wenru, SHEN Yaoliang. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON INSTABILITY MECHANISMS AND IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES OF AEROBIC GRANULAR SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 96-106. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309012
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 张彦平,郑松超,孙雪萌,李芬,李一兵. 热改性给水污泥联合酸提液调理促进剩余污泥脱水. 中国给水排水. 2023(13): 39-46 .
    2. 吕航,李佳旭,熊巧,吴旭. 不同调理方法对含铅工业污泥机械抽滤减量化效果的影响. 广东化工. 2022(04): 139-142+161 .
    3. 兰兵兵,金若菲,刘彦松,柳广飞,周集体. 高碘酸钠与APAM联合调理对污泥脱水的影响. 环境工程. 2020(07): 122-126 . 本站查看
    4. 陈静涵,何岩,乔赵超,黄民生,盛宸. 不同调理方法强化污水厂污泥脱水性能的对比. 环境工程. 2019(02): 84-89 . 本站查看
    5. 卢友志,王军正,黄润均,袁爱群. 含油污泥脱水技术及装备的研究进展. 化工技术与开发. 2019(03): 28-31 .
    6. 武亚军,林哲鑫,胡挺,陈广,康磊. 芬顿试剂改性市政污泥真空固结模型试验研究. 东南大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(04): 796-803 .
    7. 裘湛. 大型污泥厌氧消化系统泥质特性变化研究. 中国给水排水. 2018(01): 31-35 .
    8. 杨文锋,张庆芳,杨期勇,朱琼. 市政污泥脱水及生物淋滤调理技术综述. 工业水处理. 2018(04): 11-16 .
    9. 张亚通,常朝,刘锦源,王美陵,朱鹏毅,李立. γ-Al_2O_3负载型Fenton催化剂制备及降解苯酚研究. 工业水处理. 2018(12): 73-75 .

    Other cited types(18)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.3 %FULLTEXT: 18.3 %META: 81.7 %META: 81.7 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 15.1 %其他: 15.1 %上海: 7.9 %上海: 7.9 %东莞: 1.6 %东莞: 1.6 %丽水: 0.8 %丽水: 0.8 %北京: 0.8 %北京: 0.8 %南京: 1.6 %南京: 1.6 %南通: 1.6 %南通: 1.6 %厦门: 0.8 %厦门: 0.8 %台州: 1.6 %台州: 1.6 %嘉兴: 0.8 %嘉兴: 0.8 %扬州: 2.4 %扬州: 2.4 %杭州: 0.8 %杭州: 0.8 %泉州: 0.8 %泉州: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %渭南: 0.8 %渭南: 0.8 %漯河: 2.4 %漯河: 2.4 %珠海: 0.8 %珠海: 0.8 %芒廷维尤: 32.5 %芒廷维尤: 32.5 %苏州: 1.6 %苏州: 1.6 %衢州: 7.1 %衢州: 7.1 %西宁: 15.9 %西宁: 15.9 %贵阳: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %其他上海东莞丽水北京南京南通厦门台州嘉兴扬州杭州泉州深圳渭南漯河珠海芒廷维尤苏州衢州西宁贵阳重庆

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (137) PDF downloads(50) Cited by(27)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return