doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.201909025

Volume 37 Issue 9

Sep. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2019 > 37(9): 138-143+107

PDF( 0 KB)

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201909025

Received Date: 2019-01-09
Available Online: 2023-11-24
Publish Date: 2019-09-30

Abstract

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	李锦时,朱卫兵,周金哲,等.喷雾干燥半干法烟气脱硫效率主要影响因素的实验研究[J].化工学报,2014,65(2):724-730.
[2]	刘定平,张亚曦,周俊.旋流雾化脱硫塔除尘效果试验研究[J].环境工程,2017,35(2):68-71 ,132.
[3]	李少华,马文娥,王虎.喷嘴角度对循环流化床脱硫工艺塔内流动特性影响的数值模拟[J].化工进展,2014,33(3):590-594.
[4]	李少华,王虎,刘大任.循环流化床烟气脱硫喷嘴角度布置的试验研究[J].化工自动化及仪表,2013,40(2):190-195.
[5]	Ganji D D, Gorji-Bandpy M, Hosseinizadeh S F,et al.International communications in heat and mass transfer[J].International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer,2015,67:51-58.
[6]	渠亚东史长林,华玉芝.石灰湿法脱硫过程反应机理的研究[J].环境工程,2002,20(5):35-37.
[7]	Wang X,Li Y J,Zhu T Y,et al. Simulation of the heterogeneous semi-dry flue gas desulfurization in a pilot CFB riser using the twofluid model[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2015,264:479-486.
[8]	郭宏伟.惰性粒子流化床半干法烟气脱硫研究[D].南京:东南大学,2010.
[9]	周勇,高凯歌,李海念,等.超细颗粒流化聚团尺寸的预测模型[J].中国粉体技术,2017,23(5):8-13.
[10]	陆厚根.粉体技术导论[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1998:42-50.
[11]	张文斌,祁海鹰,由长福,等.碰撞诱发颗粒团聚及破碎的力学分析[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2002,42(12):1639-1643.
[12]	李晓光,徐德龙,范海宏.大颗粒流化床中颗粒受力的数值模拟[J].西安交通大学学报,2006,40(7):837-840.
[13]	孙铭阳,韦鲁滨,朱学帅,等.液固分选流化床内颗粒动力学方程的简化及应用[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,49(6):1307-1314.
[14]	Zhou G W,Zhong W Q,Zhou Y Q,et al. 3D simulation of sintering flue gas desulfurization and denitration in a bubbling gas absorbing tower[J]. Powder Technology,2017,314:412-426.
[15]	林军,王凡,张凡,等.烟气分布器对半干法脱硫塔流场的影响[J].中国环境科学,2006,26(2):129-132.
[16]	李鹏飞,朱晓华,李睿,等.烟气脱硫脱硝流化床反应器入口导流板的数值模拟与优化[J].环境工程,2017,35(8):76-80.
[17]	Makarytchev S V,Langrish T A G,Fletcher D F. CFD analysis of spinning cone columns:prediction of unsteady gas flow and pressure drop in a dry column[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal,2002,87:301-311.

Relative Articles

[1]	DUAN Huabo, ZHOU Jijiao, ZHAO Nana, LAN Xiaofeng, ZHENG Ruiying, FU Xingrui, CHEN Ying, SUN Jianming. A DIGITAL MANAGEMENT PLATFORM FOR SUPPORTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE CLASSIFICATION: AN APPLICATION CASE OF HUZHOU, ZHEJIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 230-238. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402027
[2]	GAO Shudan, ZHANG Tingxue, TENG Xiao, REN Jing, ZHANG Jinran, GAO Chenqi, NIU Yating, BIAN Rongxing, SUN Yingjie. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM WASTE DISPOSAL UNITS AND THEIR REDUCTION POTENTIAL: A CASE STUDY IN QINGDAO[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 253-259. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310029
[3]	LU Huimin, CHEN Zhuo, NI Xinye, WU Yinhu, HU Hongying. ANALYSIS OF WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE IN JAPAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 237-242. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303032
[4]	SU Yue-huan, ZHANG Yu, DUAN Hua-bo, LI Qiang-feng. RESEARCH ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND EMISSION REDUCTION POTENTIAL OF METRO CONSTRUCTION: A CASE STUDY IN SHENZHEN, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 184-192,236. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205027
[5]	HAN Kun, LIU Ruhai, XU Hongxia, WANG Yan, SHAO Long, LIU Xiaoyu. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCES APPORTIONMENT OF WATER-SOLUBLE IONS IN DUSTFALL IN QINGDAO[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 111-117,193. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203017
[6]	XU Chong-ping, YUE Qiang, ZHANG Yu-jie, WANG Huan-yu. EVALUATION OF OPTIMIZATION POTENTIAL OF URBAN METABOLIC SYSTEM DRIVEN BY “ZERO-WASTE CITY”: A CASE STUDY IN PANJIN, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 224-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209030
[7]	GAO Shuai-qiang, SHAO Hui-huang, BAI Chun-yin, HU Xing-bao, YU Guang-wei, CHONG Yun-xiao, LI Feng-min, HU Hong-ying. THE CAUSE OF FILAMENTOUS ALGAE OUTBREAK IN THE WATER BODIES SUPPLIED BY RECLAIMED WATER: A CASE STUDY ON A SOUTH CHINA RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 7-12,91. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104002
[8]	ZHANG Kuo, ZHANG Yong-bin, LI Cheng-ming, DAI Zhao-xin. SEASONAL DIFFERENCE ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PM_2.5 AND LAND USE: A CASE STUDY OF WEIFANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 72-78. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104012
[9]	NIU Yue, GAO Yi, WANG Di-di, ZHANG Jing-bing, CHEN Jia-bo, WANG Hong-chen. WASTEWATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY FLUCTUATION CHARACTERISTICS OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN TUANDAO, QINGDAO[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 18-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112003
[10]	XU Ao, WU Yin-hu, CHEN Zhuo, CUI Qi, BAI Yu, LI Kui-xiao, SHI Yu-long, GAO Qiang, HU Hong-ying. MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION IN BEIJING:STATE-OF-THE-ART AND FUTURE POTENTIAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 1-6,47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109001
[19]	Zhang Li Sun Jian, . THE ANALYSIS OF THE COUPLING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE URBAN SYSTEM AND CLIMATE CHANGE: TAKING NANJING AS AN EXAMPLE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 71-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506016

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(15)

1.	宋炉生，孙振洲，胡晶，邓清海. 废弃铁矿及下游农田土壤重金属污染特征及来源解析. 环境工程. 2024(10): 155-164 . 本站查看
2.	杨晨晨，胡晏玮，迟明慧，张铮. 三峡库区澎溪河上游段沉积物重金属分布特征及风险评价. 防化研究. 2024(06): 45-52 .
3.	周超凡，矫新明，董冰洁，张晓昱，吕赢，郑江鹏. 如东滩涂近岸海域沉积物重金属分布特征及风险评价. 环境监控与预警. 2022(02): 25-31 .
4.	黄恒粤，陈垚，刘臻，陈人瑜，袁绍春. 基于知识图谱的三峡库区水环境研究热点与展望. 人民长江. 2022(05): 53-61 .
5.	马涛，宋江敏，刘群群，盛彦清. 不同方式处置的疏浚沉积物重金属生态风险评价对比. 环境工程. 2021(02): 141-146+152 . 本站查看
6.	杨槟榕，付川，李波，王茂清，吴彦，平巍，黄炼旗，况薇. 铁修饰的污泥生物炭对污泥脱水性能的改善效果. 环境工程学报. 2021(06): 2046-2053 .
7.	吕卫星，吕享宇. 攀枝花钒钛磁铁矿尾矿对土壤环境影响调查与分析. 环境影响评价. 2021(04): 70-74 .
8.	朱学韬，林海英，冯庆革，赵博涵，朱奕帆，蓝文陆，李天深. 广西北部湾表层沉积物重金属污染水平、生态风险评价和源分析. 环境工程. 2021(08): 69-76 . 本站查看
9.	钟银海，付川，潘杰，闫彬，王珏巧，王欢，屈渝洋. 三峡水库万州段消落区沉积物重金属迁移转化特征. 环境科学与技术. 2021(12): 81-89 .
10.	郑睿，谌书，王彬，李函珂，文新宇. 三峡库区香溪河沉积物重金属含量分布及风险评价. 生态环境学报. 2020(01): 192-198 .
11.	温泉，赵艳民，曹伟，杨晨晨，张雷，张国宇，冯军坡. 潮白河中游沉积物中重金属分布、来源及生态风险评估. 环境科学研究. 2020(03): 599-607 .
12.	许新瑶，蒲晓，刘训良，张瑞宁，张玉虎，高静，董雪，王子康. 潮白河密云段水体溶解性有机碳和重金属时空变化特征. 生态与农村环境学报. 2020(09): 1177-1184 .
13.	张显强，谌金吾，孙敏. 三峡库区消落带土壤重金属污染及植物富集特征. 环境化学. 2020(09): 2490-2497 .
14.	吴启豪，江新权，马晓利，陈平，陈敬润. 污灌区土壤中重金属污染状况与磁化率的相关性分析. 环境工程. 2020(09): 231-235+174 . 本站查看
15.	刘翔，郭建明，樊海龙，张生银，张顺存，雷天柱，王建丰. 刘家峡水库西南部水域表层沉积物重金属污染评价. 沉积与特提斯地质. 2020(04): 1-10 .