Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201909036
  • Received Date: 2019-02-05
    Available Online: 2023-11-24
  • Publish Date: 2019-09-30
  • [1]
    王丰,朱文俊.青岛市产业结构优化调整分析[J].合作经济与科技,2018(11):44-45.
    [2]
    周迎雪.基于TOPSIS-RBF模型的土地生态安全评价及预测[D].泰安:山东农业大学,2017.
    [3]
    刘胜华.我国土地生态安全问题及其立法[J].国土资源科技管理,2004,21(2):53-56.
    [4]
    许国平.中国土地资源安全评价研究进展及展望[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(2):276-279.
    [5]
    Hughcy K F D,Cullen R,Kerr G N,et al. Application of the pressure-state-response framework to perceptions reporting of the state of the New Zealand environment[J]. Journal of Environment Management,2001,70(1):85-93.
    [6]
    焦红,汪洋.基于PSR模型的佳木斯市土地生态安全综合评价[J].中国农业资源与区划,2016,37(11):29-36.
    [7]
    潘润秋,刘瑛慧,孙焕芳.人口城市化与经济发展的耦合分析:以河南省县(市、区)为例[J].测绘与空间地理信息,2016,39(3):85-89.
    [8]
    徐国金.青岛市生态环境质量综合评价及改善对策研究[D].青岛:青岛大学,2017.
    [9]
    姜楠,姜丽燕,李梅芳.山东省各地市环境污染及经济因素的聚类分析[J].资源节约与环保,2015(12):166,168.
    [10]
    王树德.城市土地生态安全评价:以青岛市为例[C]∥青岛市科学技术协会.青岛市第十届学术年会论文集.青岛市科学技术协会:山东省科学技术协会,2012:5.
    [11]
    秦梦,孙毅.青岛市生态文明与产业结构优化的耦合研究[J].中共青岛市委党校.青岛行政学院学报,2018(1):120-126.
    [12]
    李玉平,蔡运龙.河北省土地生态安全评价[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2007,43(6):784-789.
    [13]
    李茜.区域土地生态环境安全评价及生态重建研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2007.
    [14]
    邓楚雄.武冈市土地资源生态安全评价研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2006.
    [15]
    汤洁,朱云峰,李昭阳,等.东北农牧交错带土地生态环境安全指标体系的建立与综合评价:以镇赉县为例[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,26(1):119-124.
    [16]
    左伟,周慧珍,王桥.区域生态安全评价指标体系选取的概念框架研究[J].土壤,2003,35(1):2-7.
    [17]
    汪磊,张觉文.基于主成分聚类分析的山东省土地生态安全评价及其影响因素分析[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(17):246-250.
    [18]
    穆学英,任建兰.新型城镇化背景下山东省土地生态安全空间格局研究[J].中国环境管理干部学院学报,2016,26(3):28-32.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]DUAN Huabo, ZHOU Jijiao, ZHAO Nana, LAN Xiaofeng, ZHENG Ruiying, FU Xingrui, CHEN Ying, SUN Jianming. A DIGITAL MANAGEMENT PLATFORM FOR SUPPORTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE CLASSIFICATION: AN APPLICATION CASE OF HUZHOU, ZHEJIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 230-238. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402027
    [2]GAO Shudan, ZHANG Tingxue, TENG Xiao, REN Jing, ZHANG Jinran, GAO Chenqi, NIU Yating, BIAN Rongxing, SUN Yingjie. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM WASTE DISPOSAL UNITS AND THEIR REDUCTION POTENTIAL: A CASE STUDY IN QINGDAO[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(10): 253-259. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202310029
    [3]LU Huimin, CHEN Zhuo, NI Xinye, WU Yinhu, HU Hongying. ANALYSIS OF WATER RECLAMATION AND REUSE IN JAPAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 237-242. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303032
    [4]SU Yue-huan, ZHANG Yu, DUAN Hua-bo, LI Qiang-feng. RESEARCH ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND EMISSION REDUCTION POTENTIAL OF METRO CONSTRUCTION: A CASE STUDY IN SHENZHEN, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 184-192,236. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205027
    [5]HAN Kun, LIU Ruhai, XU Hongxia, WANG Yan, SHAO Long, LIU Xiaoyu. CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCES APPORTIONMENT OF WATER-SOLUBLE IONS IN DUSTFALL IN QINGDAO[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 111-117,193. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203017
    [6]XU Chong-ping, YUE Qiang, ZHANG Yu-jie, WANG Huan-yu. EVALUATION OF OPTIMIZATION POTENTIAL OF URBAN METABOLIC SYSTEM DRIVEN BY “ZERO-WASTE CITY”: A CASE STUDY IN PANJIN, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 224-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209030
    [7]GAO Shuai-qiang, SHAO Hui-huang, BAI Chun-yin, HU Xing-bao, YU Guang-wei, CHONG Yun-xiao, LI Feng-min, HU Hong-ying. THE CAUSE OF FILAMENTOUS ALGAE OUTBREAK IN THE WATER BODIES SUPPLIED BY RECLAIMED WATER: A CASE STUDY ON A SOUTH CHINA RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 7-12,91. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104002
    [8]ZHANG Kuo, ZHANG Yong-bin, LI Cheng-ming, DAI Zhao-xin. SEASONAL DIFFERENCE ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PM2.5 AND LAND USE: A CASE STUDY OF WEIFANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 72-78. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104012
    [9]NIU Yue, GAO Yi, WANG Di-di, ZHANG Jing-bing, CHEN Jia-bo, WANG Hong-chen. WASTEWATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY FLUCTUATION CHARACTERISTICS OF DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN TUANDAO, QINGDAO[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 18-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112003
    [10]XU Ao, WU Yin-hu, CHEN Zhuo, CUI Qi, BAI Yu, LI Kui-xiao, SHI Yu-long, GAO Qiang, HU Hong-ying. MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION IN BEIJING:STATE-OF-THE-ART AND FUTURE POTENTIAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 1-6,47. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109001
    [19]Zhang Li Sun Jian, . THE ANALYSIS OF THE COUPLING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE URBAN SYSTEM AND CLIMATE CHANGE: TAKING NANJING AS AN EXAMPLE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 71-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506016
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. 宋炉生,孙振洲,胡晶,邓清海. 废弃铁矿及下游农田土壤重金属污染特征及来源解析. 环境工程. 2024(10): 155-164 . 本站查看
    2. 杨晨晨,胡晏玮,迟明慧,张铮. 三峡库区澎溪河上游段沉积物重金属分布特征及风险评价. 防化研究. 2024(06): 45-52 .
    3. 周超凡,矫新明,董冰洁,张晓昱,吕赢,郑江鹏. 如东滩涂近岸海域沉积物重金属分布特征及风险评价. 环境监控与预警. 2022(02): 25-31 .
    4. 黄恒粤,陈垚,刘臻,陈人瑜,袁绍春. 基于知识图谱的三峡库区水环境研究热点与展望. 人民长江. 2022(05): 53-61 .
    5. 马涛,宋江敏,刘群群,盛彦清. 不同方式处置的疏浚沉积物重金属生态风险评价对比. 环境工程. 2021(02): 141-146+152 . 本站查看
    6. 杨槟榕,付川,李波,王茂清,吴彦,平巍,黄炼旗,况薇. 铁修饰的污泥生物炭对污泥脱水性能的改善效果. 环境工程学报. 2021(06): 2046-2053 .
    7. 吕卫星,吕享宇. 攀枝花钒钛磁铁矿尾矿对土壤环境影响调查与分析. 环境影响评价. 2021(04): 70-74 .
    8. 朱学韬,林海英,冯庆革,赵博涵,朱奕帆,蓝文陆,李天深. 广西北部湾表层沉积物重金属污染水平、生态风险评价和源分析. 环境工程. 2021(08): 69-76 . 本站查看
    9. 钟银海,付川,潘杰,闫彬,王珏巧,王欢,屈渝洋. 三峡水库万州段消落区沉积物重金属迁移转化特征. 环境科学与技术. 2021(12): 81-89 .
    10. 郑睿,谌书,王彬,李函珂,文新宇. 三峡库区香溪河沉积物重金属含量分布及风险评价. 生态环境学报. 2020(01): 192-198 .
    11. 温泉,赵艳民,曹伟,杨晨晨,张雷,张国宇,冯军坡. 潮白河中游沉积物中重金属分布、来源及生态风险评估. 环境科学研究. 2020(03): 599-607 .
    12. 许新瑶,蒲晓,刘训良,张瑞宁,张玉虎,高静,董雪,王子康. 潮白河密云段水体溶解性有机碳和重金属时空变化特征. 生态与农村环境学报. 2020(09): 1177-1184 .
    13. 张显强,谌金吾,孙敏. 三峡库区消落带土壤重金属污染及植物富集特征. 环境化学. 2020(09): 2490-2497 .
    14. 吴启豪,江新权,马晓利,陈平,陈敬润. 污灌区土壤中重金属污染状况与磁化率的相关性分析. 环境工程. 2020(09): 231-235+174 . 本站查看
    15. 刘翔,郭建明,樊海龙,张生银,张顺存,雷天柱,王建丰. 刘家峡水库西南部水域表层沉积物重金属污染评价. 沉积与特提斯地质. 2020(04): 1-10 .

    Other cited types(9)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402468
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 10.4 %FULLTEXT: 10.4 %META: 89.6 %META: 89.6 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 7.4 %其他: 7.4 %China: 4.4 %China: 4.4 %北京: 1.5 %北京: 1.5 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %芒廷维尤: 48.9 %芒廷维尤: 48.9 %苏州: 0.7 %苏州: 0.7 %西宁: 33.3 %西宁: 33.3 %重庆: 0.7 %重庆: 0.7 %阳泉: 0.7 %阳泉: 0.7 %其他China北京南京杭州漯河芒廷维尤苏州西宁重庆阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (180) PDF downloads(0) Cited by(24)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return