ESTABLISHMENT OF QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE GENERATED IN UNDERGROUND PIPELINE GALLERY CONSTRUCTION

LOU Dai; ZHANG Guang-zhi; REN Fu-min; XI Cheng-gang

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202003002

Volume 38 Issue 3

Jun. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2020 > 38(3): 9-14,38

LOU Dai, ZHANG Guang-zhi, REN Fu-min, XI Cheng-gang. ESTABLISHMENT OF QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE GENERATED IN UNDERGROUND PIPELINE GALLERY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 9-14,38. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003002

Citation:

LOU Dai, ZHANG Guang-zhi, REN Fu-min, XI Cheng-gang. ESTABLISHMENT OF QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE GENERATED IN UNDERGROUND PIPELINE GALLERY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 9-14,38. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003002

Citation:

LOU Dai, ZHANG Guang-zhi, REN Fu-min, XI Cheng-gang. ESTABLISHMENT OF QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE GENERATED IN UNDERGROUND PIPELINE GALLERY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 9-14,38. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003002

PDF( 8662 KB)

ESTABLISHMENT OF QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE GENERATED IN UNDERGROUND PIPELINE GALLERY CONSTRUCTION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003002

1. Hongrun Construction Group Co., Ltd, Ningbo 315000, China;
2. Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;
3. Zhonglu Gaoke Traffic Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd, Beijing 100088, China

Received Date: 2019-11-27

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, the construction of the underground pipe gallery in Ningbo, Zhejiang province was taken as the research object. Based on the field investigation and the tracking of the construction progress, the quantitative prediction models of three kinds of construction wastes, including engineering slag, waste concrete and engineering slurry, were established. The predicted results showed that 83891.21 m³ of waste soil, 4837.34 m³ of waste concrete and 11435.27 m³ of engineering mud were expected to be produced. Compared with the real value, the relative errors of the model were 8.6%, 4.9%, 3.5% respectively, which were all lower than 20%. Thus, three kinds of construction waste prediction models were proved to be effective.
- underground pipe gallery,
- construction waste,
- resource,
- classification,
- prediction model

FullText(HTML)

References(9)

References

陈家珑, 孙丽蕊. 关于对我国建筑垃圾资源化利用现状若干问题的思考[C]//第二届机制砂石生产与应用技术论坛, 2012.

罗家强. 德国建筑垃圾资源化回收利用研究[J]. 环境与发展, 2018(5):52.

兰聪, 卢佳林, 陈景. 我国建筑垃圾资源化利用现状及发展分析[J]. 江西建材, 2018(8):23-25.

唐蓉, 李如燕. 建筑垃圾的危害及资源化[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2007, 25(11):25-27.

何福云, 柯烨珍, 陈龙. 建筑施工对环境的影响及其应对策略[J]. 江西建材, 2019(4):132-133.

巩柏含, 呼国立, 于洲洋. 用多元线性回归分析建筑垃圾的低碳经济[J]. 金融经济月刊, 2015(1):158-160.

周豪奇, 张云宁, 赵杰. 基于灰色预测模型GM(1,1)的建筑垃圾产量研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2016, 38(5):612-615.

张红玉, 杨飞华, 李国学,等. 基于ARIMA模型的北京市朝阳区建筑垃圾产量分析与预测[J]. 环境工程, 2014(增刊1):696-699.

住房和城乡建设部,国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 化工企业总图运输设计规范:GB 50489—2009[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2009.

Relative Articles

[1]	LI Yunqing, LI Haiyan, LIU Zhaoying, ZHANG Yihui, JIAN Meipeng, WU Liyuan, LI Kun. RECYCLED BRICK AND CONCRETE AGGREGATES FROM CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE MIXED AS SUBSTRATES IN CONSTRUCTED WETLAND FOR TREATMENT OF MICRO-POLLUTED WATER AND ITS APPLICATIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 120-128. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407013
[2]	YANG Mengxia, SHEN Pengfei, CHEN Xiaohuan. ANALYSIS AND SUGGESTION OF PRODUCT-ORIENTED ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF KITCHEN WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 140-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410017
[3]	JI Hongying, LI Huan, ZHANG Dongying, GAO Zhongguo, LI Jianlin, XIN Yajun. ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND CEMENTATION PROPERTIES ON CONSTRUCTION WASTE FILLING SPECIMENS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 187-195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404022
[4]	CHU Yangyang, LI Hui, ZHU Yanping, HAN Xiaomeng, SHU Shihu. A REVIEW OF RESEARCH PROGRESS OF PREDICTION MODELS FOR DISINFECTION BY-PRODUCTS: EMPIRICAL MODELS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 38-48. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407004
[5]	ZHANG Hongyu, LIU Zhangqiang, CHEN Xingzhao, YANG Xiaobin, DING Jieran. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ORGANIC RESOURCE UTILIZATION FROM LANDFILL LEACHATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 43-53. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406006
[6]	ZHENG Xingcan, XIA Qiongqiong, SHANG Wei, SUN Yongli, LI Pengfeng. CONSIDERATIONS AND KEY POINTS OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR RESOURCE AND ENERGY RECOVERY FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER (T/CUWA 70052-2023)[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 174-180. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309021
[7]	JIA Jinming, REN Fumin, HU Shuxin, GUO Changhong, LIU Junshi, MA Li, LU Tong, CUI Can, LIU Guotao, ZHANG Boyu. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION RISK ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE IN MAJOR URBAN CLUSTERS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 98-105. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302014
[8]	WU Kunlun, GONG Zhiqi, WU Jia. DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION OF LAYOUT OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE RECYCLING FACILITIES: A CASE STUDY OF XINING, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 194-201,258. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306026
[9]	YUAN Ye, GAO Jun, ZHANG Lulu, CHEN Tianming, DING Cheng. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON INFLUENCING FACTORS AND THEIR PREDICTION MODELS OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE GENERATION IN MUNICIPAL SEWAGE PIPELINES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(11): 69-77. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202311013
[10]	GUO Li-heng, GUAN Xiao-hong, LIU Hui-ling, DAI Xiao-hu. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON HARMLESS AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION OF FERMENTATION RESIDUE OF STEROIDAL DRUGS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 244-250. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205034
[11]	YANG Guodong, LAN Tian, SONG Mengzhu, DU Yufeng, LIU Mengdan, SONG Yingchun, JIANG Jianguo. ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF A DRY-WET PRESS SEPARATION-HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION TECHNOLOGY FOR FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 53-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212008
[12]	CUI Can, REN Fumin, HU Shuxin, JIA Jinming, MA Li, SI Han, GUO Zhanghong, LU Tong, LIU Junshi, LIU Guotao, ZHANG Boyu. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION RISK ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE AND ITS RECYCLED PRODUCTS IN SHANGQIU[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 191-196,149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208027
[13]	LIU Hang-yi, YAN Bei-bei, LIN Fa-wei, WANG Yuan, WANG Xu-tong, CHEN Guan-yi. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TWO KINDS OF FOOD WASTE RECYCLING SCHEMES FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LCA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 169-175. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109024
[14]	JIAO Xu-dong, WU Jia, WANG Tao, WU Na, FENG Qiang, FU Ze-qiang, DU Huan-zheng. RESEARCH ON SOLID WASTE CLASSIFICATION AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION BASED ON LIFE CYCLE MANAGEMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 201-206,170. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110029
[15]	WU Fan, NIU Dong-jie. REVIEW ON PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE PRODUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 128-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104020
[16]	REN Ya-qi, ZHAO Wen-ji, LI Xiao-xiu, JIN Jian-nan, WANG Li-li, WU Gao-feng, WU Zhi-hong. DISCUSSION ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DUST FALL AND DISTANCE FROM SOURCE IN A BEIJING CONSTRUCTION WASTE DUMP IN SPRING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 33-38. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003006
[17]	WANG Ruo-fei, ZHANG Guang-zhi, WANG Ning, REN Fu-min, CHEN Rui, XI Cheng-gang. ANALYSIS ON DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE RELATED STANDARDS AND PATENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 27-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003005
[18]	WANG Yu-guo, LI Ling-zhi, DING Yao. PREDICTION OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE PRODUCTION AND ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL-TEMPORAL CHARACTERISTICS: A CASE STUDY OF NANJING JIANGBEI NEW AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 15-21. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003003
[19]	ZENG Guang, LI Fang-fang, TANG Tang, LU Guan-you, LEI Guo-yuan. CONSTRUCTION WASTE REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY BASED ON CLEAN PRODUCTION CONCEPT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 138-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005024