Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
XUE Tong-lai, ZHAO Dong-hui, HAN Fei. SVR WATER QUALITY PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON GA OPTIMIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 123-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003021
Citation: WANG Ning, LOU Dai, CHEN Da-qing, YANG Bing, GUO Hong-zhi, REN Fu-min. PRELIMINARY STUDY ON THE INTEGRATION CONTROL PLATFORM OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE BASED ON “BIM+GIS” TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 46-50. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003008

PRELIMINARY STUDY ON THE INTEGRATION CONTROL PLATFORM OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE BASED ON “BIM+GIS” TECHNOLOGY

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003008
  • Received Date: 2019-11-07
  • In recent years, the output of construction waste in China has been increasing. About 70% of more than 600 large and medium-sized cities in China are surrounded by waste, of which the contribution rate of construction waste reaches 40%. Compared with some developed countries, China is in short of real-time monitoring and intelligent control of the whole process of construction waste. In this paper, the popular "BIM+GIS" technology was introduced into the field of construction waste supervision. Based on this technology, a real-time monitoring and intelligent management and control information management platform for construction waste was established, so as to achieve accurate management and control of construction waste.
  • 韦巍. 基于BIM+GIS技术的智慧城市之路[C]//中国智慧城市建设技术研讨会, 2015.
    顾嘉臻, 钱俊谕, 王珊, 等. 建筑工程中BIM+GIS集成技术的应用研究[J]. 中国房地产业, 2017(6):173.
    赵有仓, 薛斌, 古贵陆, 等. 城市建筑垃圾处理现状及资源化利用研究[J]. 科学技术创新, 2019(5):138-139.
    陈雅芝. 国内外建筑垃圾资源化利用政策的比较研究[J]. 建筑技术, 2019,50(3):342-345.
    刘永志, 胡才梦, 包从望, 等. 建筑垃圾资源化利用研究分析[J]. 科技与创新, 2017(17):79-80.
    秦风明, 李红岩. 推动建筑垃圾再生利用助力美丽城市建设[J]. 前进论坛, 2019(8):31-31.
    杨娅. 浅谈PPP模式在建筑垃圾处理服务中的应用[J]. 居业, 2019(8):122-123.
    刘俊琴, 舒怀珠, 朱晓刚. 基于信息扩散近似推理的义乌市建筑垃圾产生量预测研究[J]. 南方农机, 2019(11):151-151.
    王廷魁, 罗春燕, 张仕廉, 等. 基于BIM的建筑垃圾决策管理系统架构研究[J]. 施工技术, 2016, 45(6):58-62.
    卞贝, 张子筠, 李昭夏, 等. BIM在建筑垃圾管理中的应用[J]. 山西建筑, 2017(26):198-199.
    罗春燕. 基于BIM的拟拆除建筑垃圾决策管理系统研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2015.
    王武祥. 建筑垃圾的循环利用[J]. 建材发展导向, 2005, 3(1):67-71.
    曾鸿, 毛晓丽. BIM在建筑垃圾管理中的应用研究[J]. 山西建筑, 2013, 39(19):184-185.
    赵俊, 钟世云, 王小冬. 建筑垃圾的减量化与资源化[J]. 粉煤灰, 2001(2):3-6.
    于媛, 白伟伟, 袁登科, 等. 建筑垃圾资源化再生混凝土研究现状分析[J]. 科技资讯, 2019,17(2):94-97.
    张宇, 李宏魁, 胡冉冉. 建筑垃圾的分类及其利用研究[J]. 明日风尚, 2018(13):314-314.
    王淮. 建筑垃圾问题和合理利用的思考[J]. 居业, 2018(5):240-243.
    兰聪, 卢佳林, 陈景, 等. 我国建筑垃圾资源化利用现状及发展分析[J]. 江西建材, 2018(8):19.
    郝粼波, 张波, 齐艳丽. 浅析建筑垃圾预处理技术的发展及影响[J]. 中国环保产业, 2018(7):63-66.
    杜庆宏. 建筑垃圾应用于高速公路路基中的施工要点[J]. 山西建筑, 2018(16):89-90.
    王凯楠. 北京市大兴区建筑垃圾资源化工程设计[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2018(3):71-74.
    荆成云. 建筑垃圾源头治理的经济性探究[J]. 山西建筑, 2018,44(17):204-206.
    高佳勇. 绿色施工框架下的建筑垃圾减量管理研究[J]. 工程技术(文摘版):18400184.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]DUAN Huabo, ZHOU Jijiao, ZHAO Nana, LAN Xiaofeng, ZHENG Ruiying, FU Xingrui, CHEN Ying, SUN Jianming. A DIGITAL MANAGEMENT PLATFORM FOR SUPPORTING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE CLASSIFICATION: AN APPLICATION CASE OF HUZHOU, ZHEJIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 230-238. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402027
    [2]ZHU Yixin, YE Zhen, REN Lingwei, ZHONG Yuchi, ZHOU Wenjun. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSTRUCTION WASTE TO BURN CERAMICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 206-212,130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312025
    [3]JIA Jinming, REN Fumin, HU Shuxin, GUO Changhong, LIU Junshi, MA Li, LU Tong, CUI Can, LIU Guotao, ZHANG Boyu. REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION RISK ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE IN MAJOR URBAN CLUSTERS IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 98-105. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302014
    [4]ZHAO Tianrui, LIU Yiming, LÜ Pengzhao, LI Yanliang, TANG Xiaomi, GUO Wei, ZHANG Jun, TIAN Yu. CONSTRUCTION OF LightGBM WASTE PRODUCTION PREDICT MODEL IN A SCENARIO OF ZERO-WASTE CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 210-215. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303028
    [5]XU Chong-ping, YUE Qiang, ZHANG Yu-jie, WANG Huan-yu. EVALUATION OF OPTIMIZATION POTENTIAL OF URBAN METABOLIC SYSTEM DRIVEN BY “ZERO-WASTE CITY”: A CASE STUDY IN PANJIN, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 224-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209030
    [6]YANG Guodong, LAN Tian, SONG Mengzhu, DU Yufeng, LIU Mengdan, SONG Yingchun, JIANG Jianguo. ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF A DRY-WET PRESS SEPARATION-HYDROTHERMAL CARBONIZATION TECHNOLOGY FOR FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 53-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212008
    [7]YANG Tao, LIU Peng-yu, XU Ya-qiang, CHEN Dai-jie, JING Mei-ying, CHU Xiao-he. PILOT STUDY ON TREATMENT OF ACARBOSE RESIDUE BY A MULTI-STAGE ANAEROBIC SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 123-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104019
    [8]YU Jin-tao, MA Xiao-yu, ZHANG Chang-bo. AN EFFICIENT SCREENING SYSTEM OF CLAY SOIL PARTICLES IN THE SOIL WASHING REMEDIATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 160-166. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106024
    [9]ZHAO Xi, WU Shan-shan, LU Ke-ding. DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING CONSTRUCTION LEVEL IN OPERATION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT PARK FOR ZERO-WASTE CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 136-140,15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102022
    [10]YANG Shu-jun, ZHANG Chen, HE Jun, XIONG Jian-ying, LI Xue-ting, HUANG Xiao-wen. ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF NANOFILTRATION & THREE-LEVELS REDUCTION OF NANOFILTRATION CONCENTRATE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADVANCED TREATMENT OF LANDFILL LEACHATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 81-87,114. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006013
    [11]WANG Ruo-fei, ZHANG Guang-zhi, WANG Ning, REN Fu-min, CHEN Rui, XI Cheng-gang. ANALYSIS ON DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE RELATED STANDARDS AND PATENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 27-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003005
    [12]QI Guo-ping, LI Wei-wei, NIU Yong-jian, NING Gao-yang, SUN Hong-wei. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON REDUCTION OF OXYTETRACYCLINE RESIDUE BY ALKALINITY OF NaOH’s DOSAGES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 140-144,151. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011023
    [13]ZENG Guang, LI Fang-fang, TANG Tang, LU Guan-you, LEI Guo-yuan. CONSTRUCTION WASTE REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY BASED ON CLEAN PRODUCTION CONCEPT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 138-143. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005024
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(25)

    1. 陈肖,陈峰. 基于HLCMEA-SWRELM的水体pH值预测. 计算机应用与软件. 2024(02): 123-129 .
    2. 王彩玲,张国浩. 结合光谱降维的IPSO-SVR水体总磷浓度预测模型. 水土保持通报. 2024(02): 196-204 .
    3. 杜先君,柴俊伟. 基于优化特征选择的污水处理过程BOD神经网络软测量模型. 兰州理工大学学报. 2024(06): 85-91 .
    4. 倪浩然,张坤,陈曦,白晓波,郑守磊. 基于遗传-支持向量回归算法的计量标准稳定性预测研究. 计量与测试技术. 2024(12): 102-105+108 .
    5. 胡龙元,刘黎志. 基于改进鲸鱼算法优化GRU-CNN的溶解氧预测. 环境工程学报. 2024(10): 2957-2964 .
    6. 杨坪宏,胡奥,崔东文,杨杰. 基于数据处理与若干群体算法优化的 GRU/LSTM水质时间序列预测. 水资源与水工程学报. 2023(04): 45-53 .
    7. 罗学刚,吕俊瑞. 基于张量特征-GRU和多头自注意力机制的水质预测模型方法. 攀枝花学院学报. 2023(05): 89-96 .
    8. 吴瑞姣. 基于BP-SVR混合模型的古田水库总磷浓度遥感反演. 福建地质. 2023(03): 224-230 .
    9. 许浩然,陈中举,杨兆前,房梦婷,詹炜. 基于Prophet模型的湖北省月降水量预测. 节水灌溉. 2022(02): 7-12+20 .
    10. 董陈超,田明昊,赵伟朝. 基于GA优化的RF-Softmax水质预测模型研究. 湖北农业科学. 2022(07): 60-65+82 .
    11. 王昱文,杜震洪,戴震,刘仁义,张丰. 基于复合神经网络的多元水质指标预测模型. 浙江大学学报(理学版). 2022(03): 354-362+375 .
    12. 石翠翠,刘媛华,陈昕. 基于粒子群算法优化支持向量回归的水质预测模型. 信息与控制. 2022(03): 307-317 .
    13. 李俊禹,刘书明,吴雪,谢涛,金晔. 基于动态剪枝的城市供水管网优化调度算法. 环境工程. 2022(06): 226-232+153 . 本站查看
    14. 白雯睿,杨毅强,朱雪芹. 基于VMDLSTNet的水质预测模型. 科学技术与工程. 2022(22): 9881-9889 .
    15. 史利涛. 基于数据挖掘的城市人居环境河流水质变化监测模型设计. 四川环境. 2022(04): 219-224 .
    16. 白雯睿,杨毅强,郭辉,朱雪芹. 基于VMD-CNN-LSTM的珠江流域水质多步预测模型研究. 四川轻化工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(04): 66-74 .
    17. 白雯睿,杨毅强,李强. 引入小波分解的Seq2Seq水质多步预测模型研究. 现代电子技术. 2022(17): 100-105 .
    18. 盛家豪,钱进,王一桂,黄凤启. 基于GA-SVR的循环流化床锅炉床温预测. 智能计算机与应用. 2022(09): 105-109 .
    19. 凌从高,穆溪,许敏,王思晨,赵秋雨,江鹏. 湿地生态系统实际蒸散发数据驱动估算模型研究. 安徽农业大学学报. 2022(05): 771-779 .
    20. 曹斐,周彧,王春晓,任梦宇,周峰. 一种改进的支持向量回归的混凝土强度预测方法. 硅酸盐通报. 2021(01): 90-97 .
    21. 孟滔. 改进粒子群算法优化SVR水质预测模型研究. 农业与技术. 2021(03): 33-36 .
    22. 孟滔. 支持向量回归水质预测模型的研究进展. 绿色科技. 2021(08): 77-79 .
    23. 王旭生,王昕,孙晓川. 改进RVM预测海水水质. 计算机工程与设计. 2021(12): 3562-3568 .
    24. 梁小林,秦欢,陈敏茹,许奇,梁曌. 基于Adaboost-SVR模型的我国碳排放强度分析与预测. 经济数学. 2020(03): 167-174 .
    25. 何山,尹心安. 不同入流类型对生态流量管理效果的影响. 环境工程. 2020(10): 76-82 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(23)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 13.3 %FULLTEXT: 13.3 %META: 82.3 %META: 82.3 %PDF: 4.4 %PDF: 4.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 16.2 %其他: 16.2 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %Canton: 0.3 %Canton: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Dallas: 0.3 %Dallas: 0.3 %Macau: 0.6 %Macau: 0.6 %上海: 2.9 %上海: 2.9 %东莞: 4.1 %东莞: 4.1 %临汾: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %乌鲁木齐: 0.3 %乌鲁木齐: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %北京: 5.0 %北京: 5.0 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南京市建邺区: 0.3 %南京市建邺区: 0.3 %南通: 0.9 %南通: 0.9 %台北: 0.6 %台北: 0.6 %台州: 0.9 %台州: 0.9 %哈密尔顿: 0.3 %哈密尔顿: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %喀什: 0.3 %喀什: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.9 %嘉兴: 0.9 %大同: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %大连: 1.2 %大连: 1.2 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %宁波: 0.3 %宁波: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %安康: 0.3 %宿迁: 0.3 %宿迁: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.3 %布兰普顿: 0.3 %布兰普顿: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.9 %杭州: 0.9 %柳州: 0.3 %柳州: 0.3 %桂林: 0.3 %桂林: 0.3 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %永州: 1.5 %永州: 1.5 %江门: 0.3 %江门: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.3 %济源: 0.6 %济源: 0.6 %深圳: 0.9 %深圳: 0.9 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %湘潭: 0.6 %湘潭: 0.6 %漯河: 0.9 %漯河: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %秦皇岛: 0.6 %秦皇岛: 0.6 %绵阳: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.3 %肇庆: 0.6 %肇庆: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 25.7 %芒廷维尤: 25.7 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %荆州: 0.9 %荆州: 0.9 %菏泽: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %衢州: 1.2 %衢州: 1.2 %西宁: 7.7 %西宁: 7.7 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 2.7 %运城: 2.7 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.6 %郑州: 1.8 %郑州: 1.8 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %门尼菲: 0.6 %门尼菲: 0.6 %青岛: 0.9 %青岛: 0.9 %其他其他CantonChinaDallasMacau上海东莞临汾乌鲁木齐保定北京南京南京市建邺区南通台北台州哈密尔顿哈尔滨喀什嘉兴大同大连天津太原宁波安康宿迁密蘇里城布兰普顿常德广州张家口成都拉贾斯坦邦晋城朝阳杭州柳州桂林武汉永州江门洛阳济源深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河石家庄秦皇岛绵阳肇庆芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州菏泽衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治门尼菲青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (413) PDF downloads(21) Cited by(48)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return