Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
MA Ye-shu, YAO Jun-qin, WANG Xi-yuan, LUO Yuan-shuang, ZHANG Meng, CHEN Yin-guang. MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE IN OXIDATION DITCH PROCESS IN ARID AND COLD REGION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 58-62,50. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003010
Citation: MA Ye-shu, YAO Jun-qin, WANG Xi-yuan, LUO Yuan-shuang, ZHANG Meng, CHEN Yin-guang. MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE IN OXIDATION DITCH PROCESS IN ARID AND COLD REGION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 58-62,50. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003010

MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE IN OXIDATION DITCH PROCESS IN ARID AND COLD REGION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003010
  • Received Date: 2019-06-21
  • To understand the microbial community structure of activated sludge wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in arid and cold regions of Xinjiang, illumina high throughput sequencing technology was used to analyze the microbial community structure of activated sludge from five WWTPs in northern Xinjiang. The results showed that all of the WWTPs could basically reach their respective effluent standards, and three of them occurred filamentous sludge bulking. Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Chloroflexi were the dominant bacterial phyla of activated sludge, comprising 30.65%~43.12%, 21.15%~33.64% and 5.02%~14.36% of the total abundance, respectively. The relative abundance of Actinobacteria was 2.97%~6.17% in non~bulking sludge and was 11.69%~15.64% in bulking sludge. The relative abundance of Microthrix and Flavobacterium in seasonally bulking sludge showed seasonal changes. Saprospiraceae_norank was the dominant genus in the perennial bulking sludge, with the relative abundance reaching 17.48%~18.30%. Ascomycota was the dominant fungal phylum in filamentous sludge bulking, with a relative abundance of 56.60%~72.68%. The research results could provide theoretical support for the operation regulation of WWTPs in arid and cold regions.
  • SAUNDERS A M, ALBERTSEN M, VOLLERTSEN J, et al. The activated sludge ecosystem contains a core community of abundant organisms[J]. ISME Journal, 2016, 10(1):11-20.
    GAO P, XU W L, SONTAG P, et al. Correlating microbial community compositions with environmental factors in activated sludge from four full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants in Shanghai, China[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2016, 100(10):4663-4673.
    QIN H, JI B, ZHANG S F, et al. Study on the bacterial and archaeal community structure and diversity of activated sludge from three wastewater treatment plants[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2018, 135:801-807.
    张琼, 包鹏, 彭永臻, 等. 低温条件对SBR工艺亚硝酸氧化菌种群结构的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(3):75-81.
    ZHANG H, FENG J, CHEN S, et al. Disentangling the drivers of diversity and distribution of fungal community composition in wastewater treatment plants across spatial scales[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9:1291.
    彭永臻, 郭建华. 活性污泥膨胀机理、成因及控制[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2012.
    郭泓利, 李鑫玮, 任钦毅, 等. 全国典型城市污水处理厂进水水质特征分析[J]. 给水排水, 2018, 44(6):12-15.
    ZHANG B, XU X Y, ZHU L. Structure and function of the microbial consortia of activated sludge in typical municipal wastewater treatment plants in winter[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1):17930.
    LIU T, LIU S F, ZHENG M S, et al. Performance assessment of full-scale wastewater treatment plants based on seasonal variability of microbial communities via High-Throughput Sequencing[J]. Plos One, 2016, 11(4): 152998.
    ZHANG B, YU Q W, YAN G Q, et al. Seasonal bacterial community succession in four typical wastewater treatment plants: correlations between core microbes and process performance[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 4566.
    WANG P, YU Z S, QI R, et al. Detailed comparison of bacterial communities during seasonal sludge bulking in a municipal wastewater treatment plant[J]. Water Research, 2016, 105: 157-166.
    端正花, 潘留明, 陈晓欧, 等. 低温下活性污泥膨胀的微生物群落结构研究[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(3): 1070-1074.
    李松亚, 费学宁, 焦秀梅. 污泥膨胀关键菌-微丝菌的研究进展[J]. 水处理技术, 2018, 44(3): 11-16.
    YANG Q X, ZHAO H L, DU B B. Bacteria and bacteriophage communities in bulking and non-bulking activated sludge in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment systems[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 119: 101-111.
    PURNOMO A S, PUTRA S R, SHIMIZU K, et al. Biodegradation of heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide-contaminated soils by white-rot fungal inocula[J]. Environmental Science Pollution Research International, 2014, 21(19): 11305-11312.
    WEI Z Y, LIU Y Y, FENG K, et al. The divergence between fungal and bacterial communities in seasonal and spatial variations of wastewater treatment plants[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018: 969-978.
    NIU L H, LI Y, XU L L, et al. Ignored fungal community in activated sludge wastewater treatment plants: diversity and altitudinal characteristics[J]. Environmental Science Pollution Research, 2017, 24(4): 4185-4193.
    洪颖, 姚俊芹, 马斌, 等. 基于高通量测序的SBR反应器丝状膨胀污泥菌群分析[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(7): 3279-3285.
    张崇淼, 牛全睿, 徐丽梅, 等. 膨胀污泥中丝状菌的分离鉴定与特性分析[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(6): 2477-2485.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]HUANG Wenhui, GAO Jiaqi, LI Xiang, HUANG Yong, XU Peiling, YE Jiahong. EFFECT OF NITROGEN LOAD ON NOB INHIBITION IN PARTIAL NITROSATED ACTIVATED SLUDGE SYSTEM UNDER MAINSTREAM CONDITIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 25-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403003
    [2]ZHAO Jinan, LIU Siyun, SHAN Yingqi, LIU Chang, TIAN Mengyuan, LI Bolin. RAPID START-UP AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY ANALYSIS OF A SULFUR AUTOTROPHIC DENITRIFICATION COUPLED ANAEROBIC AMMONIA OXIDATION DENITRIFICATION SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 9-16. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406002
    [3]DAN Aojiang, YAO Junqin, JIA Yangyang, ZHAO Xinwei, CHEN Yinguang. EFFECT OF ADDING METHANOL ON MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES AND ARGs IN A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT OF AN INDUSTRIAL PARK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 124-131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409012
    [4]BAO Meiling, HU Zhiquan, ZHANG Qiang, HONG Hui, DENG Jun, PEI Yunxia, LI Bingtang. CONSTRUCTION OF A SHORTCUT NITROGEN REMOVAL SYSTEM FOR ALGAL-BACTERIAL SYMBIOSIS AND ANALYSIS OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 35-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408005
    [5]JIN Tao, ZHOU Hong, QU Peng, FENG Jiazi, CHEN Zhengrui, ZHANG Shi, YIN Linlin, ZHANG Jun, DONG Jiankai. TEMPERATURE RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS OF FERMENTATION FLORA IN WASTE INCINERATION POWER PLANTS IN SEVERE COLD AREAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 79-85,107. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304011
    [6]MEN Yan, LIU Lingjie, ZHU Yaxin, BI Yanmeng, MENG Fansheng, YU Jingjie, WANG Shaopo. EFFECT OF ORGANIC MATTER CONCENTRATION VARIATION ON NITROGEN REMOVAL PERFORMANCE AND BACTERIA COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN A HYBRID SBR ANAMMOX SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 83-90. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308011
    [7]LIU Chao, ZHANG Xuemeng, CHEN Chuang, YIN Yue, HUANG Haining, CHEN Yinguang. BIOLOGICAL MECHANISM OF AMMONIA INHIBITION DURING ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 156-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309019
    [8]YAN Duosen, YANG Wen, LI Shanshan, JIAO Yan, ZHANG Guodong, CHEN Qinghua, LI Yun. EFFECT OF SULFAMETHOXAZOLE ON NITROGEN REMOVAL AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY OF SEQUENCING BATCH BIOREACTORS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 15-23,70. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210003
    [9]LI Zhanpeng, YUAN Huizhou, KE Shuizhou, YUAN Jiajia, ZHU Jia. EFFECTS OF DIMETHYL PHTHALATE ON VEGETATION-ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS AND ITS REMOVAL PERFORMANCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 202-210. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212027
    [10]NIU Yongjian, DONG Kun, NIU Hongliang, XIN Mingxing, LI Weiwei, SUN Hongwei. EFFECT OF FREE AMMONIA ON PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN AN EBPR SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 24-31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210004
    [11]YAO Chuang, LIU Jianxin, ZHAO Ziling, LIN Guoying, LIU Hui. EFFECTS OF CARBON RESOURCE ADDITON STRATEGIES ON PHOSPHORUS AND NITROGEN REMOVAL AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN AN A2/O SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 21-26,223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201004
    [12]YIN Hao-shuai, HUANG Kai, WANG Qing-qing, LI Shi-feng. ANALYSIS ON CHANGE OF MICROBIAL COMMUNITY IN AAO BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEM OF A SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT UNDER HIGH SALINITY ENVIRONMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 68-74. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103010
    [13]LIU Xin-yuan, HU Wen-jia, OUYANG Fan, NIE Jia-min, WU Nan, YANG Fan, KONG Si-fang. BIOGAS PRODUCTION AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY SUCCESSION DURING SEQUENCING BATCH ACCLIMATIZATION OF DIGESTED SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 136-141,188. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103019
    [14]HAN Yu-lin, SHI Ling-dong, ZHAO He-ping. RESEARCH ON PROMOTION OF SELENIUM REDUCTION BY DENITRIFYING BACTERIA IN WASTEWATER AND ITS APPLICATION EXPLORATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 62-68,88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111007
    [15]ZHAO Min-juan, SHEN Yuan-yuan, GAO Tian-peng, YAN Jia-cong, YANG Ji-huan. EFFECT OF BROMINATED FLAME RETARDANT ON BIOLOGICAL NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 49-53,111. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012009
    [16]ZHANG Shuang-shuang, LI Zhi-hua, BEI Yuan, YANG Cheng-jian. SHUTTLE CHARACTERISTICS OF LNA AND HNA BACTERIA DURING DENITRIFICATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 78-84. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011013
    [17]CHEN Jin-yuan, LIU Xue-wen, LV Ju-feng, LV Bo-sheng, WEI Xiu-zhen. EFFECT OF BIOCHAR ON COMPOSITION OF SMP AND EPS IN ACTIVATED SLUDGE AND NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 133-138,207. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009022
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 旦澳江,姚俊芹,贾阳阳,赵新伟,陈银广. 投加甲醇对工业园区污水处理厂菌群及ARGs的影响. 环境工程. 2024(09): 124-131 . 本站查看
    2. 关莹,刘润,秦品珠,张瑞敏. 二乙二醇丁醚好氧污泥微生物群落结构及降解途径分析. 工业水处理. 2024(12): 86-93 .
    3. 张萌,赵亚妮,张李凌,邬静娅,李淑萍,朱光灿,孙丽伟. 高海拔地区与低海拔地区污水处理系统中微生物群落特征分析对比. 环境工程. 2022(03): 66-73 . 本站查看
    4. 肖飞,王维红. 悬浮填料对干旱寒冷地区A~2/O工艺脱氮过程强化研究. 环境监测管理与技术. 2022(02): 64-67 .
    5. 周康,王贞凯,张桂成,陈新安,程艳,罗刚,孙胜鹏. MBBR及UVC高级氧化技术深度处理典型医药品微污染物效能. 环境工程. 2022(05): 37-43 . 本站查看
    6. 杨红,白文龙,梅小乐,邬冉琨,于淑玉,沈倩青. 寒冷地区冬季脱氮除磷工艺调控及效果分析. 中国给水排水. 2021(06): 107-111 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.4 %FULLTEXT: 9.4 %META: 88.0 %META: 88.0 %PDF: 2.6 %PDF: 2.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.6 %其他: 8.6 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %China: 1.6 %China: 1.6 %Seattle: 0.2 %Seattle: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 5.8 %上海: 5.8 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 6.5 %北京: 6.5 %南京: 1.6 %南京: 1.6 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %大同: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %天津: 1.0 %天津: 1.0 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %威海: 0.2 %威海: 0.2 %宁波: 0.3 %宁波: 0.3 %宜昌: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.2 %常州: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %张家口: 2.1 %张家口: 2.1 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %德州: 0.2 %德州: 0.2 %怀化: 0.2 %怀化: 0.2 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %昌吉: 0.5 %昌吉: 0.5 %晋城: 0.3 %晋城: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济源: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %深圳: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 0.2 %漯河: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %玉林: 1.0 %玉林: 1.0 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %纽约: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 29.5 %芒廷维尤: 29.5 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 1.0 %苏州: 1.0 %菏泽: 0.2 %菏泽: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 21.4 %西宁: 21.4 %西安: 1.1 %西安: 1.1 %贵港: 0.2 %贵港: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长春: 0.5 %长春: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阜新: 0.2 %阜新: 0.2 %阜阳: 0.2 %阜阳: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.6 %阳泉: 0.6 %青岛: 0.5 %青岛: 0.5 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %驻马店: 0.5 %驻马店: 0.5 %其他其他ChinaSeattleUnited States[]上海东莞临汾保定兰州北京南京南通台州大同天津太原威海宁波宜昌常州常德广州廊坊张家口徐州德州怀化成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦昆明昌吉晋城朝阳杭州武汉洛阳济源深圳湖州漯河烟台玉林石家庄福州纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州菏泽蚌埠衢州西宁西安贵港贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙长治阜新阜阳阳泉青岛马鞍山驻马店

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (542) PDF downloads(17) Cited by(10)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return