Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 3
Jun.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(3): 148-153
WANG Xiao-fang, GAO Jian-ming, GUO Yan-xia, CHENG Fang-qin. DIFFERENCE OF IRON REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES FROM CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED FLY ASH AND PULVERIZED COAL FLY ASH BY MAGNETIC SEPARATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 148-153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003025
Citation: WANG Xiao-fang, GAO Jian-ming, GUO Yan-xia, CHENG Fang-qin. DIFFERENCE OF IRON REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES FROM CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED FLY ASH AND PULVERIZED COAL FLY ASH BY MAGNETIC SEPARATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 148-153. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003025
shu

DIFFERENCE OF IRON REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES FROM CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED FLY ASH AND PULVERIZED COAL FLY ASH BY MAGNETIC SEPARATION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003025

  • State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization Technology of Coal Waste Resources, Institute of Resources and Environment Engineering, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

  • Received Date: 2019-06-26
    Abstract
  • Iron oxide in fly ash is the main impurity for its high value utilization process. Efficient removal of iron impurities is of great significance for the high value utilization of fly ash. In this paper, the wet magnetic separation method was used to remove iron from circulating fluidized bed fly ash (CFB ash), carbonthermal reduction circulating fluidized bed fly ash (R-CFB ash) and pulverized coal furnace fly ash (PC ash). Research and comparison of the existence forms of iron in different types of fly ash were studied and compared, and finally the removal of iron and recovery of aluminum in fly ash were examined. The results showed that the iron removal efficiency of CFB ash using direct magnetic separation method was only 17.6%, and the iron removal efficiency of PC ash using direct magnetic separation method could reach 55.8%. The iron in CFB mainly existed in the form of hematite, while iron was mainly related to the existence of magnetite in PC ash. The hematite in CFB ash was converted to magnetite after carbonthermal reduction, and the iron removal of R-CFB ash was 64.7%, with a magnetic field strength of 400 mT, magnetic separation 3 times and liquid-solid ratio of 20:1. The iron content was reduced from 3.4% to 1.2%, and the recovery of aluminum was 78.6%. Compared with the iron removal of PC ash, the carbonthermal reduction CFB ash could achieve higher iron removal efficiency.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(24)
  • LI J, ZHUANG X G, LEIVA C, et al. Potential utilization of FGD gypsum and fly ash from a Chinese power plant for manufacturing fire-resistant panels[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 95:910-921.
    FARWA M, MUHAMMAD Z, IJAZ A B, et al. Possible applications of coal fly ash in wastewater treatment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 240:27-46.
    YAO Z T, XIA M S, SARKER P K, et al. A review of the alumina recovery from coal fly ash, with a focus in China[J]. Fuel, 2014, 120:74-85.
    DING J, MA S H, SHEN S, et al. Research and industrialization progress of recovering alumina from fly ash:a concise review[J]. Waste Management, 2016,60:375-387.
    李超, 王丽萍, 郭昭华,等. 粉煤灰中锂提取技术研究进展[J]. 有色金属(冶炼部分), 2018(4):46-50.
    王凯,孙菱翎,邱广明,等. 粉煤灰基沸石的制备及对橙黄G吸附性能研究[J]. 功能材料, 2019, 50(2):2133-2138.
    熊林. 粉煤灰基多孔陶瓷材料的研制[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2008.
    刘自亮. 粉煤灰制备铝硅合金过程中预处理除铁工艺研究[D]. 昆明:昆明理工大学, 2016.
    李素平. Fe2O3和TiO2等杂质在矾土基Sialon转型过程中的变化及作用[D]. 郑州:郑州大学, 2004.
    SEIDEL A, ZIMMELS Y. Mechanism and kinetics of aluminum and iron leaching from coal fly ash by sulfuric acid[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(22):3835-3852.
    郭强. 粉煤灰酸法提取氧化铝的工艺研究进展[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2015, 21(5):115-118

    ,122.
    MOLINA A, POOLE C. A comparative study using two methods to produce zeolites from fly ash[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2004, 17(2):167-173.
    WANG M H, ZHAO H, LIU Y, et al. Removal of Fe from fly ash by carbon thermal reduction[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2017, 245:133-137.
    孙少博, 张永锋, 崔景东,等. 粉煤灰高值化利用中的除铁工艺[J]. 化工新型材料, 2015,43(1):223-225.
    KUTCHKO B G, KIM A G. Fly ash characterization by SEM-EDS[J]. Fuel, 2006, 85(17/18):2537-2544.
    王恩. 煤粉炉粉煤灰与循环流化床粉煤灰矿物学性质比较[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2016, 22(4):26-29.
    刘芳, 顾国维, 韩作振. 锅炉类型与粉煤灰的物相特征[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 31(8):990-994.
    VASSILEV S V, MENENDEZ R, ALVAREZ D, et al. Phase-mineral and chemical composition of coal fly ashes as a basis for their multicomponent utilization. 1. Characterization of feed coals and fly ashes[J]. Fuel, 2003, 82(14):1793-1811.
    WANG T, YANG H R, WU Y X, et al. Experimental study on the effects of chemical and mineral components on the attrition characteristics of coal ashes for fluidized bed boilers[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(2):990-994.
    裴亚利. 循环流化床粉煤灰的特征及其综合利用研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2006.
    李解, 李保卫, 张邦文. Fe2O3转变为Fe3O4粉末的微波碳热还原[J]. 北京科技大学学报, 2011, 33(9):1127-1132.
    UWADIALE G G O O, WHEWELL R J. Effect of temperature on magnetizing reduction of agbaja iron ore[J]. Metallurgical Transactions B, 1988, 19(5):731-735.
    MENDRELA E, OSADNIK Z, STASZAK J, et al. High capacity magnetic separator for volatile dust[J]. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 1983, 19(3):1476-1479.
    宫振宇, 王明华, 王凤栾,等. 磁选法去除粉煤灰中磁性铁的研究[J]. 材料与冶金学报, 2011, 10(4):257-259.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]HE Miao, ZHANG Zhenyu, CHEN Liudong, TANG Jiayi, CHEN Yijing, YANG Zhendong. EXPLORING TREASURE IN FLY ASH: THE STATUS QUO AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT PATH OF RARE EARTH ELEMENT RECOVERY TECHNOLOGY IN FLY ASH[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 121-131. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410015
    [5]Yan Jiaping Shen Haonan Fan Tingyu Gu Deming Cheng Fangkui, . STUDY ON NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS ADSORPTION KINETICS OF FLY ASH WITH DIFFERENT DUMPING TIME[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 85-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510019
    [6]Wang Qiong, Wang Ping, Fu Hongyuan, He Zhongming. ADSORPTION OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM IN WASTEWATER BY MODIFIED FLY ASH DOPING PYRITE CINDER FLY ASH DOPING PYRITE CINDER WASTEWATER/WASTE TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 1-4. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510001
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 亓占丰，高瑞，郭秀丽，李贯诚. 粉煤灰基催化材料提升电子迁移率的制备机理. 功能材料. 2024(07): 7122-7131 .
    2. 武飞乐，李世春. 粉煤灰中铝、镓、锂回收技术研究进展. 中国有色冶金. 2023(02): 116-125 .
    3. 胡荣建，乔波，杨朝刚，张美霞，刘鹏，张慧月，范卉娟. 粉煤灰研磨-磁选制备蒸压加气混凝土砌块研究. 新型建筑材料. 2022(04): 104-106 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 13.0 %FULLTEXT: 13.0 %META: 86.1 %META: 86.1 %PDF: 0.9 %PDF: 0.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 18.7 %其他: 18.7 %Central District: 0.4 %Central District: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %Hong Kong, China: 0.9 %Hong Kong, China: 0.9 %Korea Republic of: 1.3 %Korea Republic of: 1.3 %东莞: 0.4 %东莞: 0.4 %临汾: 0.9 %临汾: 0.9 %丽水: 0.4 %丽水: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %北京: 10.0 %北京: 10.0 %南京: 1.7 %南京: 1.7 %博伊西: 2.6 %博伊西: 2.6 %台州: 0.4 %台州: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %大同: 0.4 %大同: 0.4 %天津: 1.3 %天津: 1.3 %太原: 0.4 %太原: 0.4 %宜春: 0.4 %宜春: 0.4 %宿迁: 0.4 %宿迁: 0.4 %常州: 0.9 %常州: 0.9 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %徐州: 0.4 %徐州: 0.4 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.9 %扬州: 0.9 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.4 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.4 %晋城: 0.9 %晋城: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 1.7 %杭州: 1.7 %格兰特县: 0.4 %格兰特县: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %济源: 0.9 %济源: 0.9 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 28.7 %芒廷维尤: 28.7 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.9 %衢州: 0.9 %西宁: 4.8 %西宁: 4.8 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %西雅图: 0.9 %西雅图: 0.9 %贵阳: 0.4 %贵阳: 0.4 %运城: 2.6 %运城: 2.6 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.9 %邯郸: 0.9 %郑州: 1.3 %郑州: 1.3 %铁岭: 0.9 %铁岭: 0.9 %铜仁: 1.3 %铜仁: 1.3 %长沙: 1.7 %长沙: 1.7 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %香港: 0.4 %香港: 0.4 %其他Central DistrictChinaHong Kong, ChinaKorea Republic of东莞临汾丽水保定北京南京博伊西台州合肥嘉兴大同天津太原宜春宿迁常州常德张家口徐州成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦晋城朝阳杭州格兰特县武汉济源深圳湖州石家庄芒廷维尤苏州衢州西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州铁岭铜仁长沙长治香港

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (197) PDF downloads(2) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return