Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 3
Jun.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(3): 168-173
ELI Anwar, EZIZ Mamattursun, JIN Wan-gui, LI Xin-guo. ENVIRONMENTAL CAPACITY OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS IN YANQI BASIN, XINJIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 168-173. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003028
Citation: ELI Anwar, EZIZ Mamattursun, JIN Wan-gui, LI Xin-guo. ENVIRONMENTAL CAPACITY OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS IN YANQI BASIN, XINJIANG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 168-173. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003028
shu

ENVIRONMENTAL CAPACITY OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS IN YANQI BASIN, XINJIANG

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003028

  • 1. College of Geographical Science and Tourism, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China;

  • 2. Xinjiang Laboratory of Lake Resources and Environment in Arid Zone, Xinjiang Normal University, Urumqi 830054, China

  • Received Date: 2019-06-28
    Abstract
  • For the further understanding of soil environmental capacity, a total of 191 farmland soil samples were collected from Yanqi Basin, and the concentrations of seven heavy metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) were identified. The characteristics and spatial distribution of heavy metal environmental capacity of farmland soils were analyzed based on GIS technology and the comprehensive capacity index. Results showed that: 1) the average concentrations of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in farmland soils in Yanqi Basin was under the limits of the risk values of National Standard of Agricultural Land Contamination (GB 15618—2018); 2) the average values of single environmental capacity index of heavy metals in farmland soils were ranked as: As > Cr > Ni > Cu > Pb > Cd > Zn. The environmental capacity of As was classified into the high capacity level, while Ni, Cr, Cu, Pb, Cd, and Zn into the medium capacity level; 3) the spatial distribution patterns of environmental capacity of seven heavy metals were different. The proportion of areas with different capacity was ranked as: medium capacity area > high capacity area > low capacity area > super capacity area > warning capacity area. Results of this study will provide scientific basis for protection and management of agricultural soil environmental quality in similar area.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(33)
  • 孙超,陈振楼,毕春娟,等. 上海市崇明岛农田土壤重金属的环境质量评价[J]. 地理学报,2009,64(5):619-628.
    张小敏,张秀英,钟太洋,等. 中国农田土壤重金属富集状况及其空间分布研究[J]. 环境科学,2014,35(2):692-703.
    阿吉古丽·马木提,麦麦提吐尔逊·艾则孜,艾尼瓦尔·买买提. 新疆喀什市城乡交错带耕地土壤重金属污染风险评价[J]. 环境工程,2018,36(4):160-164.
    杨俊,吕府红,宋永伟,等. 典型重金属污染地区蔬菜中重金属含量及健康风险[J]. 环境污染与防治,2017,39(9):952-956.
    况琴,黄庭,向京,等. 鄂西北某农田保护区土壤重金属分布特征及生态风险评价[J]. 环境工程,2019,37(5):45-49

    ,55.
    冯军. 不同农田黑土铜、锌迁移特征[D]. 哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2010.
    黄静,靳孟贵,程天舜. 论土壤环境容量及其应用[J]. 安徽农业科学,2007,35(25):7895-7896.
    姜军. 山东省经济开发区土壤重金属环境质量现状及潜在生态风险评价[D]. 济南:山东师范大学,2014.
    吴先亮,黄先飞,全文选,等. 黔西煤矿区周边土壤重金属形态特征、污染评价及富集植物筛选[J]. 水土保持通报,2018,38(5):313-321.
    于光金. 山东省主要土壤类型重金属环境容量研究[D]. 济南:山东师范大学,2009.
    张宇峰,夏阳,崔志强,等. 基于长江三角洲地表水典型土壤铜、锌环境容量探究[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2010,29(12):2305-2311.
    周杰,裴宗平,靳晓燕,等.浅论土壤环境容量[J]. 环境科学与管理,2006,31(2):74-76.
    廖金凤. 广东省南海市农业土壤中铜锌镍的环境容量[J]. 土壤与环境,1999,8(1):15-18.
    吴葵霞. 山东省土壤环境容量研究[D]. 济南:山东大学,2009.
    叶嗣宗. 土壤环境背景值在容量计算和环境质量评价中的应用[J].中国环境监测,1993,9(3):52-54.
    杜金辉,王菁,王学珍,等. 崂山风景区土壤重金属元素环境容量的计算[J]. 中国环境管理干部学院学报,2007,17(1):27-30.
    张丽娜. 山东省基本农田土壤重金属含量分布特征及其环境容量研究[D]. 济南:山东师范大学,2010.
    马辉英,杨晓东,吕光辉. 精河县重金属土壤环境容量及近百年趋势预测[J]. 新疆农业科学,2016,53(8):1521-1532.
    麦麦提吐尔逊·艾则孜,阿吉古丽·马木提,艾尼瓦尔·买买提,等. 博斯腾湖流域绿洲农田土壤重金属污染及潜在生态风险评价[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(9):142-156.
    陈洪. 焉耆盆地中新生代构造抬升与热演化研究[D]. 西安:西北大学,2006.
    杨美临. 博斯腾湖多代用指标(侧重硅藻)记录的全新世气候变化模式[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2008.
    ZULPIYA M, HAMID Y, MAMATTURSUN E, et al. Analysis of the ecology-economy coordination degree in Yanqi Basin,Xinjiang,China[J]. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 2013, 25(16):9034-9040.
    中华人民共和国农业部,中国标准化管理委员会. 农田土壤环境质量监测技术规范:NY/T 395-2000[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2000.
    中华人民共和国环境保护总局. 土壤环境监测技术规范:HJ/T 166-2004[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2004.
    生态环境部,国家市场监督管理总局. 土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准(施行):GB 15618-2018[S]. 中国标准出版社,2018.
    陈江,毕京博,吴杰,等. 湖州土壤重金属污染趋势预测及环境容量评价[J]. 地球与环境,2011,39(4):531-535.
    许芳,梁合诚,樊娟,等. 福州地区农业用地土壤重金属环境容量评价[J]. 安全与环境工程,2009,16(4):6-8.
    麦麦提吐尔逊·艾则孜,艾尼瓦尔·买买提,阿吉古丽·马木提,等. 新疆焉耆盆地农田土壤重金属污染及健康风险评价[J]. 生态毒理学报,2018,13(2):171-181.
    BORUVKA L, VACEK O, JEHLICKA J. Principal component analysis as a tool to indicate the origin of potentially toxic elements in soils[J]. Geoderma, 2005, 128(3/4):289-300.
    GUAN T X, HE H B, ZHANG X D, et al. Cu fractions, mobility and bioavailability in soil-wheat system after Cu-enriched livestock manure applications[J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 82(2):215-222.
    王余丁,赵国先,卢艳敏,等. 微量元素锌与畜禽营养研究进展[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2002,25(1):110-114.
    吴国英,贾秀英,郭丹,等. 蚯蚓对猪粪重金属Cu、Zn的吸收及影响因素研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2009,28(6):1293-1297.
    吴二社,张松林,刘焕萍,等. 农村畜禽养殖与土壤重金属污染[J]. 中国农学通报,2011,27(3):285-288.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]SONG Lusheng, SUN Zhenzhou, HU Jing, DENG Qinghai. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED IRON ORE AND DOWNSTREAM FARMLAND SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 155-164. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410019
    [2]ZHOU Ziyan, HUANG Xiang, GU Jinchuan, XUE Jia, WU Yi, YONG Yi. PASSIVATION OF ZINC, LEAD AND CADMIUM CONTAMINATED SOIL BY INORGANIC SALT MODIFIED BENTONITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 150-158. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307021
    [3]ZHI Liehui, ZHANG Zhe, BAI Junhong, LI Xiaowen. RESEARCH ON THE CARRYING CAPACITY OF TOURISM ENVIRONMENT IN THE YELLOW RIVER DELTA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 132-140,163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301016
    [4]LI Yan-xue, ZHANG Meng-zhu, SHU Sha-sha, ZOU Jun-han, JIAO Wei, ZHOU Jun-yu. QUANTITATIVE IDENTIFICATION OF ANTHROPOGENIC HEAVY METAL SOURCES IN FARMLAND SOIL BASED ON ENRICHMENT FACTOR AND MLR-APCS MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 173-177,232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209023
    [5]YANG Yang, HE Wen-qing. RESEARCH STATUS AND PROGRESS OF MICROPLASTIC POLLUTION IN FARMLAND SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 156-164,15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105022
    [6]ZHENG Ying-yi, LIU Jie, JIANG Ping-ping, YOU Shao-hong, ZHOU Shu-lin, YU Guo. POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS AROUND AN ABANDONED SMELTER IN HECHI, CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 238-245. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105033
    [7]DOU Wei-qiang, AN Yi, QIN Li, LIN Da-song, DONG Ming-ming. CHARACTERISTICS OF VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION AND MIGRATION OF HEAVY METALS IN FARMLAND SOILS AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 166-172. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102027
    [8]ZHOU Li-wei, WANG Hang, LIU Yang-sheng. EFFECT OF ELECTRODE-ORIENTATED ELECTROKINETIC ENHANCEMENT ON PHYTOREMEDIATION ON ARSENIC CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 228-233. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010036
    [9]LU Xiu-guo, WU Jin-jin, ZHENG Yu-jia. PASSIVATION OF CADMIUM IN SOIL BY WALNUT SHELL BIOCHAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 196-202. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011032
    [15]Tang Xiaolan, Lin Jiquan. THE STUDY ABOUT ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENTAL CAPACITY IN THE TROPICAL ISLAND REGION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 112-115. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506025
    [16]Lu Sufen, Song Bo, Meng Dongliu, Yu Yuanyuan, Huang Yufei, Yuan Zhennan, Zhong Xuemei. HEAVY METAL CONTENTS IN SOIL AND VEGETABLES OF A TAILING SPILL IN HUANJIANG AND HUMAN HEALTH RISKS ASSESSMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 130-134. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510029
    [17]Fan Shuanxi. POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOIL AROUND A SMELTER IN CHANGQING TOWN OF BAOJI CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 121-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504026
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 严丽萍，谢先明，汤振华. 基于物质来源解析的汕头市土壤重金属环境容量研究. 地学前缘. 2024(04): 403-416 .
    2. 唐莹影，刘楠，陈盟，潘泳兴，程亚平. 典型铅锌矿流域土壤重金属生态风险评价及环境容量预测. 科学技术与工程. 2024(20): 8813-8823 .
    3. 尹婷婷，蔡海生，张学玲，何庆港，刘瑛. 江西宜春袁州农用地富硒土壤分布及重金属环境容量研究. 中国土壤与肥料. 2024(06): 35-44 .
    4. 吴健芳，王红梅，李宇婷. 土壤环境容量理论、核算方法及其应用进展. 生态经济. 2023(06): 182-188+227 .
    5. 刘海，魏伟，宋阳，潘杨. 霍邱县城湖泊沉积物重金属环境容量评价与预测. 环境科学. 2023(11): 6106-6115 .
    6. 王宁，麦麦提吐尔逊·艾则孜，娜珠盼·斯德克江，李新国. 乌鲁木齐市沿城市化梯度带土壤重金属环境容量评估. 环境科学与技术. 2023(12): 171-179 .
    7. 张鸿. 大凌河河道生态水环境容量修复技术研究. 水利科学与寒区工程. 2022(05): 55-58 .
    8. 范俊楠，田文娟，张钰，郭丽，杜维，熊晶，宋国强，张明杰. 区域土壤背景重金属Cd环境容量分析与预测. 环境科学与技术. 2022(S1): 241-246 .
    9. 李延雪，张梦竹，舒莎莎，邹君晗，焦伟，周峻宇. 基于富集因子法与MLR-APCS模型应用的农田土壤重金属人为来源定量识别. 环境工程. 2022(09): 173-177+232 . 本站查看
    10. 安文超，王艳玲，汪进生，王发园，张书武. 青岛市农用地土壤重金属背景值研究与土壤环境容量的计算. 广西大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(06): 1662-1669 .
    11. 史常明，柳洋，张富荣，赵云飞，肖锦锦，汪霞. 焉耆盆地绿洲农田不同类型土壤有机碳空间分布特征及储量估算. 干旱区研究. 2021(03): 672-681 .
    12. 郑影怡，刘杰，蒋萍萍，游少鸿，周树林，俞果. 河池市某废弃冶炼厂周边农田土壤重金属污染特征及风险评价. 环境工程. 2021(05): 238-245 . 本站查看
    13. 张琳，刘继柱. 基于物元分析法的河道生态水环境容量修复技术研究. 水利规划与设计. 2021(08): 86-89 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 19.0 %FULLTEXT: 19.0 %META: 79.3 %META: 79.3 %PDF: 1.7 %PDF: 1.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.8 %其他: 14.8 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %上海: 1.2 %上海: 1.2 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %乌鲁木齐: 0.7 %乌鲁木齐: 0.7 %北京: 1.7 %北京: 1.7 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南宁: 0.7 %南宁: 0.7 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %台州: 5.5 %台州: 5.5 %合肥: 1.0 %合肥: 1.0 %咸阳: 0.5 %咸阳: 0.5 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %广州: 0.2 %张家口: 6.9 %张家口: 6.9 %徐州: 0.7 %徐州: 0.7 %成都: 0.5 %成都: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 4.5 %杭州: 4.5 %武汉: 1.9 %武汉: 1.9 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %洛阳: 0.2 %济宁: 0.7 %济宁: 0.7 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %淮南: 0.5 %淮南: 0.5 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 5.0 %湖州: 5.0 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %纽约: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 25.5 %芒廷维尤: 25.5 %芝加哥: 1.7 %芝加哥: 1.7 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %衢州: 2.9 %衢州: 2.9 %西宁: 7.4 %西宁: 7.4 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %西雅图: 0.7 %西雅图: 0.7 %运城: 1.7 %运城: 1.7 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %铁岭: 0.7 %铁岭: 0.7 %镇江: 0.5 %镇江: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %鞍山: 0.5 %鞍山: 0.5 %香港: 0.2 %香港: 0.2 %其他China上海临汾乌鲁木齐北京南京南宁南通台州合肥咸阳大同天津宣城常州常德广州张家口徐州成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉沈阳洛阳济宁济源淮南温州湖州漯河潍坊烟台石家庄纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安西雅图运城遵义邯郸重庆铁岭镇江长沙长治鞍山香港

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (332) PDF downloads(8) Cited by(19)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return