Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
WANG Xing-run, LI Lei, YANG Xiang-hua, TIAN Yong-qiang. PROGRESS IN REMEDIATION OF CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 1-8,23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006001
Citation: SUN Zhao-dong, SONG Hong-qing, XING Yi, LI Jie, LU Yu-chen, WANG Jiu-long. SIMULATION OF INFILTRATION AND HEAVY METAL POLLUTANTS MIGRATION FOR PERMEABLE BRICK PAVEMENT SYSTEM FOR SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 46-52,100. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004009

SIMULATION OF INFILTRATION AND HEAVY METAL POLLUTANTS MIGRATION FOR PERMEABLE BRICK PAVEMENT SYSTEM FOR SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004009
  • Received Date: 2020-01-22
  • The infiltration characteristics in permeable brick pavement system (PBPS) of sponge city construction is its key factors, which influence the runoff producing time and the removal of heavy metals from runoff. Through the seepage test, the soil-water characteristic curves of PBPS soil layers were constructed, and then the infiltration model and the mathematical model for runoff heavy metal pollutant migration of PBPS was established. Finally, the effect of leveling layer soil particle size and base to cushion layer thickness ratio on the runoff producing time and the removal of heavy metals from runoff were illustrated. The results showed that with comprehensive consideration of the PBPS's ability in delaying runoff generation time and removal of heavy metal pollutants, medium sand was the best choice for leveling layer soil; according to the concentration of heavy metal pollutants in the effluent of the structure layer, when the ratio of base to cushion layer thickness ratio was 15∶4, PBPS had the highest adsorption efficiency and good effect on removing heavy metal pollutants in runoff.
  • 王兴桦, 侯精明, 李丙尧, 等. 多孔透水砖下渗衰减规律试验研究[J]. 给水排水, 2019,55(增刊1):68-71.
    王俊岭, 魏江涛, 王雪明, 等. 透水混凝土铺装基层3种骨料对典型径流污染物吸附效果比较[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017,17(3):303-309.
    CAI R Z, MANDULA, CHAI J Y. Research on the performance of sand-based environmental-friendly water permeable bricks[J]. Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 113(1):012136.
    BENTARZI Y, GHENAIM A, TERFOUS A, et al. Hydrodynamic behaviour of a new permeable pavement material under high rainfall conditions[J]. Urban Water Journal, 2016,13(7):687-696.
    ZHANG Z Y, LI Z F, ZHANG X R, et al. Systematically investigated the influences of permeable pavement materials on the water quality of runoff:batch and column experiments[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2018, 229(5):155.
    王维早, 许强, 郑海君. 特大暴雨诱发平缓浅层滑坡堆积土饱和与非饱和水力学参数试验研究:以王正塝滑坡为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2017,36(1):202-207.
    吴珺华, 杨松. 滤纸法测定干湿循环下膨胀土基质吸力变化规律[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017,33(15):126-132.
    VAN GENUCHTEN M T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils 1[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980,44(5):892-898.
    孙召东, 宋洪庆, 张海龙, 等. 海绵城市透水砖铺装雨水入渗模型及产流分析[J]. 环境工程, 2019,37(7):39-46.
    WEBER T K, IDEN S C, DURNER W. Unsaturated hydraulic properties of Sphagnum moss and peat reveal trimodal pore-size distributions[J]. Water Resources Research, 2017,53(1):415-434.
    XIANG B, FAN W, YI X W, et al. Dithiocarbamate-modified starch derivatives with high heavy metal adsorption performance[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2016,136:30-37.
    SOUNTHARARAJAH D P, LOGANATHAN P, KANDASAMY J, et al. Removing heavy metals using permeable pavement system with a titanate nano-fibrous adsorbent column as a post treatment[J]. Chemosphere, 2017,168:467-473.
    ZHAO H T, LI X Y, WANG X M, et al. Grain size distribution of road-deposited sediment and its contribution to heavy metal pollution in urban runoff in Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 183(1/2/3):203-210.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]CHEN Yating, ZHAO Xinyu, LI Yanhong, ZHANG Chuanyan, DANG Qiuling, XI Beidou. ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR AND RESTORATION PROGRESS OF EMERGING CONTAMINANTS IN CONTAMINATED SITES IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 166-176. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401022
    [2]ZHANG Wei, TANG Yifan, WANG Chen, CHAI Senyou, ZUO Qiting. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON SOIL REPLACEMENT MEDIUM IN BIOLOGICAL RETENTION FACILITIES FOR SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 277-285. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308035
    [3]CHEN Zhikang, LIU Liujun, YIN Lipu, YUE Rui, MAO Xuhui. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE HEATING FOR SOIL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 224-234,243. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204032
    [4]HUANG Xuan, GUO Bao-man, GU Ai-liang, ZHANG Yun, TIAN Tian, CENG Yue-chun. RESEARCH ADVANCES AND APPLICATION OF HORIZONTAL REMEDIATION WELLS IN SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 262-269. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209035
    [5]HUANG Guoxin, LIU Ruiping, YANG Ruijie, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Qiulei, WANG Xiahui, TIAN Zi, WANG Yipeng. RESEARCH PROCESS OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL AND THEIR APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FARMLAND SOIL HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 216-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201031
    [6]WU Fan, NIU Dong-jie. REVIEW ON PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE PRODUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 128-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104020
    [7]LENG Guo-qin, TAO Tian-yi, YANG Yi-fan, CHEN Bo-li, SUN Zhi, HUANG Zhao-hui. INDIUM RECOVERY PROCESSES DEVELOPMENT FROM VARIOUS In-CONTAINING WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 142-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105020
    [8]LIANG Jing, WANG Shi-jie, ZHANG Wen-yu, ZHANG Dan, ZHANG Yuan, ZOU Hui. REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 173-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026
    [9]HUANG Kai-you, SHEN Ying-jie, WANG Xiao-yan, WANG Xing-run, YUAN Wen-yi, ZHANG Cheng-long, BAI Jian-feng, WANG Jing-wei. REVIEW ON PREPARATION OF BIO-CARBON LOADED NANO ZERO-VALENT IRON AND ITS APPLICATION IN REMEDIATING Cr(Ⅵ)-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 203-210,195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011033
    [10]GUO Li-li, KANG Shao-guo, WANG Qi, XIONG Jing, LI Shu-peng, KONG Jiao-yan. PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION:AN OVERVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 9-15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006002
    [11]YANG Wen-xiao, ZHANG Li, BI Xue, LI Huan-ru, GU Qian. RESEARCH ADVANCEMENT OF STABILIZATION MATERIALS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM(Ⅵ) CONTAMINATED SITE SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 16-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006003
    [12]ZHANG Ruo-shi, TIAN Yong-qiang. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF BIOSORPTION REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 187-195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011031
    [13]SUN Zeng-zhi, YANG Bao-shuai, GUAN Bo-wen, GAO Si-qi, DENG Chen-ji, CHEN Yu-hong. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RECYCLED CONCRETE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 221-227. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006036
    [14]FENG Chao, WANG Yu, KONG Ling-rong, YUE Chang-sheng, YAO De-jun, WANG Zhi-qiao. ADVANCES OF SUPERCRITICAL WATER REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ORGANIC POLLUTANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 140-145. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010022
    [15]Deng Yirong, Lin Ting, Xiao Rongbo, Zhao Lu, Han Cunliang. RECENT ADVANCES IN THE APPLICATION OF EKR-PRB IN CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 152-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510034
    [16]Yao Yuping Liu Hanxiao Zhu Shaoping, . STUDY ON PARTICULATE MATTER GRAVIMETRIC METHOD AT LOW CONCENTRATION FOR COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 139-142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510031
    [17]Zhang Hongzhong, Huo Jing, Ma Chuang, Zhao Jihong, Liu Huanjia. THE PROGRESS OF RESEACH ON THE APPLICATION OF URBAN SLUDGE COMPOST FOR LAWN SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 92-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502020
    [18]Yang Yang Song Naiping Liu Bingru He Tonghui An Hui, . THE CURRENT STATUS AND PROGRESSES OF CHANGES IN LAND USE PATTERN ON AGRO-PASTORAL ECOTONE OF CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 158-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503031
    [19]Yin Zhen, Zhang Junchao, Liao Shulin, Ma Qiang, Wang Qingguo, Zhang Jinfeng. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF THE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 159-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501037
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 于嘉璐,卢美霞,何苗苗,魏玉珍,蔡立群,潘占东,孛永明,李旭春. 生物炭和凹凸棒土负载纳米零价铁去除水中六价铬的性能与机理研究. 环境科学学报. 2024(07): 127-136 .
    2. 王雷,李红霞,崔兴兰,史新悦,郑鹏,孙英春,杨晓莉. 某高原区典型铬污染场地人体健康风险评价. 铜业工程. 2024(06): 18-24 .
    3. 徐汝悦,王子霄,沈禄,吴蓉蓉,姚芳婷,谭中原,刘恒蔚,张文超. Cr(Ⅵ)的生物修复技术研究进展. 生物技术通报. 2023(06): 49-60 .
    4. 邱沙,宋景鹏,陈志国,白鹤,曹文庆,刘艺芸. 原位化学还原技术修复铬污染土壤及其工程应用. 环境科学与技术. 2021(04): 131-139 .

    Other cited types(9)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.0 %FULLTEXT: 9.0 %META: 91.0 %META: 91.0 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.0 %其他: 8.0 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 1.2 %China: 1.2 %Japan: 0.1 %Japan: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Tuen Mun San Hui: 0.3 %Tuen Mun San Hui: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 5.5 %上海: 5.5 %东莞: 1.1 %东莞: 1.1 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临沂: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %丽江: 0.1 %丽江: 0.1 %乌兰察布: 0.1 %乌兰察布: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.4 %佛山: 0.4 %保定: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %凉山彝族自治州: 0.1 %凉山彝族自治州: 0.1 %北京: 11.5 %北京: 11.5 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 3.5 %南京: 3.5 %南充: 0.3 %南充: 0.3 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 1.1 %南昌: 1.1 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南通市崇川区: 0.1 %南通市崇川区: 0.1 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台北: 0.3 %台北: 0.3 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %合肥: 1.2 %合肥: 1.2 %吉林: 0.4 %吉林: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %天津: 2.9 %天津: 2.9 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安庆: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜春: 0.6 %宜春: 0.6 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %宫城: 0.1 %宫城: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %常州: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 1.2 %广州: 1.2 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %张家口: 1.3 %张家口: 1.3 %德州: 0.1 %德州: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %成都市双流区: 0.1 %成都市双流区: 0.1 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %抚州: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %新乡: 0.3 %新乡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 3.9 %杭州: 3.9 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %株洲: 1.0 %株洲: 1.0 %桂林: 0.4 %桂林: 0.4 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 2.6 %武汉: 2.6 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %河源: 0.1 %河源: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 1.3 %济南: 1.3 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淄博: 0.4 %淄博: 0.4 %淮北: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.0 %石家庄: 1.0 %福州: 0.8 %福州: 0.8 %绍兴: 0.3 %绍兴: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.4 %绵阳: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芝加哥: 1.1 %芝加哥: 1.1 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %西宁: 4.7 %西宁: 4.7 %西安: 1.5 %西安: 1.5 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %赣州: 0.2 %赣州: 0.2 %达州: 0.3 %达州: 0.3 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %郑州: 1.7 %郑州: 1.7 %鄂州: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %重庆: 2.0 %重庆: 2.0 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %锦州: 0.4 %锦州: 0.4 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 3.2 %长沙: 3.2 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %陇南: 0.1 %陇南: 0.1 %青岛: 2.5 %青岛: 2.5 %韶关: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.3 %香港特别行政区: 0.3 %鹰潭: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄石: 0.6 %黄石: 0.6 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaJapanSaitamaTuen Mun San HuiUnited States[]上海东莞中山临汾临沂丽水丽江乌兰察布乐山佛山保定信阳兰州凉山彝族自治州北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌南通南通市崇川区厦门台北台州合肥吉林呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨唐山嘉兴大同天津太原威海娄底宁波安庆安康安顺宜昌宜春宝鸡宣城宫城巴中常州常德平顶山广州廊坊延安张家口德州德阳惠州成都成都市双流区扬州抚州拉萨拉贾斯坦邦攀枝花新乡无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州枣庄株洲桂林榆林武汉汕头沈阳河源泸州洛阳济南济源海口淄博淮北深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河潍坊潮州濮阳烟台眉山石家庄福州绍兴绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州葫芦岛衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安贵阳赣州达州运城遵义邯郸邵阳郑州鄂州重庆金华银川锦州镇江长春长沙长治阜新阳泉陇南青岛韶关香港特别行政区鹰潭黄冈黄石齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (214) PDF downloads(8) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return