Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 4
Apr.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(4): 53-58
WANG Xing-run, LI Lei, YANG Xiang-hua, TIAN Yong-qiang. PROGRESS IN REMEDIATION OF CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 1-8,23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006001
Citation: GUO Xiao-peng, LI Jun-qi. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FROST RESISTANCE PERFORMANCE OF PERMEABLE BRICK PAVEMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 53-58. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004010
shu

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FROST RESISTANCE PERFORMANCE OF PERMEABLE BRICK PAVEMENT

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004010

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China;

  • 2. National Water Environment Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China

  • Received Date: 2019-11-20
    Abstract
  • Permeable pavement is one of the key technologies for stormwater runoff emission reduction, of which the frost heaving damage in cold area is an urgent problem. Permeable bricks are widely used pervious pavement materials. The frost resistance of permeable pavement surface in different porosity, water saturation and permeable base thickness was studied through the freeze-thaw cycle experiments. The results showed that the porosity of the surface layer had a negative correlation with its frost resistance, and the higher porosity, the worse frost resistance of the surface layer. There was a negative correlation between the surface water saturation and its frost resistance, also. The frost resistance descended as the water saturation increased. The critical value of the surface water saturation for frost heave damage was 90%. When the water saturation of the surface layer was lower than 90%, the frost resistance was less damaged; when the water saturation of the surface layer was higher than 90%, the frost resistance got obviously worse. The thickness of permeable base had little effect on the frost resistance of permeable pavement. The three main influencing factors on the frost resistance of permeable pavement surface were in the extent sequence of water saturation > porosity > thickness of permeable base.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(12)
  • LAI Y M, ZHANG S M, YU W B. A new structure to control frost boiling and frost heave of embankments in cold regions[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2012, 79/80:53-66.
    VANCURA M, MACDONALD K, KHAZANOVICH L. Microscopic analysis of paste and aggregate distresses in pervious concrete in a wet, hard freeze climate[J]. Cement & Concrete Composites, 2011, 33(10):1080-1085.
    LI W, POUR-GHAZ M, CASTRO J, et al. Water absorption and critical degree of saturation relating to freeze-thaw damage in concrete pavement joints[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2011, 24(3):299-307.
    FAGERLUND G. The critical degree of saturation method of assessing the freeze/thaw resistance of concrete[J]. Materials and Structures, 1977, 10(4):217-229.
    马悦因. 多孔混凝土透水基层材料设计研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2008.
    薛冬杰, 谭文菁. 透水性生态混凝土的抗冻研究[J].山西建筑, 2015, 41(32):119-120.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 普通混凝土长期性能和耐久性实验方法标准:GB/T 50082-2009[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.透水砖路面技术规程:CJJ/T 188-2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
    LITVAN G G. Pore structure and frost susceptibility of building materials[J]. Res Pap, 1973:17-30.
    李俊奇, 张哲, 王耀堂, 等. 透水铺装设计与维护管理的关键问题分析[J]. 给水排水, 2019,45(6):26-31.
    SUTTER L, VAN DAM T, PETERSON K R, et al. Long-term effects of magnesium chloride and other concentrated salt solutions on pavement and structural portland cement concrete[J]. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006, 1979(1):60-68.
    LEECH C, LOCKINGTON D, HOOTON R D, et al. Validation of Mualem's conductivity model and prediction of saturated permeability from sorptivity[J]. ACI Materials Journal, 2008, 105(1):44.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]CHEN Yating, ZHAO Xinyu, LI Yanhong, ZHANG Chuanyan, DANG Qiuling, XI Beidou. ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR AND RESTORATION PROGRESS OF EMERGING CONTAMINANTS IN CONTAMINATED SITES IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 166-176. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401022
    [2]ZHANG Wei, TANG Yifan, WANG Chen, CHAI Senyou, ZUO Qiting. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON SOIL REPLACEMENT MEDIUM IN BIOLOGICAL RETENTION FACILITIES FOR SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 277-285. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308035
    [3]CHEN Zhikang, LIU Liujun, YIN Lipu, YUE Rui, MAO Xuhui. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE HEATING FOR SOIL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 224-234,243. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204032
    [4]HUANG Xuan, GUO Bao-man, GU Ai-liang, ZHANG Yun, TIAN Tian, CENG Yue-chun. RESEARCH ADVANCES AND APPLICATION OF HORIZONTAL REMEDIATION WELLS IN SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(9): 262-269. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202209035
    [5]HUANG Guoxin, LIU Ruiping, YANG Ruijie, ZHANG Tao, ZHANG Qiulei, WANG Xiahui, TIAN Zi, WANG Yipeng. RESEARCH PROCESS OF RISK MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL AND THEIR APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FARMLAND SOIL HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 216-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201031
    [6]WU Fan, NIU Dong-jie. REVIEW ON PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE PRODUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 128-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104020
    [7]LENG Guo-qin, TAO Tian-yi, YANG Yi-fan, CHEN Bo-li, SUN Zhi, HUANG Zhao-hui. INDIUM RECOVERY PROCESSES DEVELOPMENT FROM VARIOUS In-CONTAINING WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 142-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105020
    [8]LIANG Jing, WANG Shi-jie, ZHANG Wen-yu, ZHANG Dan, ZHANG Yuan, ZOU Hui. REVIEW ON CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE USA AND THEIR REVELATION TO CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 173-178. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106026
    [9]HUANG Kai-you, SHEN Ying-jie, WANG Xiao-yan, WANG Xing-run, YUAN Wen-yi, ZHANG Cheng-long, BAI Jian-feng, WANG Jing-wei. REVIEW ON PREPARATION OF BIO-CARBON LOADED NANO ZERO-VALENT IRON AND ITS APPLICATION IN REMEDIATING Cr(Ⅵ)-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 203-210,195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011033
    [10]GUO Li-li, KANG Shao-guo, WANG Qi, XIONG Jing, LI Shu-peng, KONG Jiao-yan. PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION:AN OVERVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 9-15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006002
    [11]YANG Wen-xiao, ZHANG Li, BI Xue, LI Huan-ru, GU Qian. RESEARCH ADVANCEMENT OF STABILIZATION MATERIALS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM(Ⅵ) CONTAMINATED SITE SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 16-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006003
    [12]ZHANG Ruo-shi, TIAN Yong-qiang. RESEARCH PROGRESS OF BIOSORPTION REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED SITES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 187-195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011031
    [13]SUN Zeng-zhi, YANG Bao-shuai, GUAN Bo-wen, GAO Si-qi, DENG Chen-ji, CHEN Yu-hong. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RECYCLED CONCRETE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 221-227. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006036
    [14]FENG Chao, WANG Yu, KONG Ling-rong, YUE Chang-sheng, YAO De-jun, WANG Zhi-qiao. ADVANCES OF SUPERCRITICAL WATER REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ORGANIC POLLUTANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 140-145. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010022
    [15]Deng Yirong, Lin Ting, Xiao Rongbo, Zhao Lu, Han Cunliang. RECENT ADVANCES IN THE APPLICATION OF EKR-PRB IN CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 152-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510034
    [16]Yao Yuping Liu Hanxiao Zhu Shaoping, . STUDY ON PARTICULATE MATTER GRAVIMETRIC METHOD AT LOW CONCENTRATION FOR COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 139-142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510031
    [17]Zhang Hongzhong, Huo Jing, Ma Chuang, Zhao Jihong, Liu Huanjia. THE PROGRESS OF RESEACH ON THE APPLICATION OF URBAN SLUDGE COMPOST FOR LAWN SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 92-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502020
    [18]Yang Yang Song Naiping Liu Bingru He Tonghui An Hui, . THE CURRENT STATUS AND PROGRESSES OF CHANGES IN LAND USE PATTERN ON AGRO-PASTORAL ECOTONE OF CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 158-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503031
    [19]Yin Zhen, Zhang Junchao, Liao Shulin, Ma Qiang, Wang Qingguo, Zhang Jinfeng. RESEARCH AND APPLICATION OF THE REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 159-162. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501037
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 于嘉璐，卢美霞，何苗苗，魏玉珍，蔡立群，潘占东，孛永明，李旭春. 生物炭和凹凸棒土负载纳米零价铁去除水中六价铬的性能与机理研究. 环境科学学报. 2024(07): 127-136 .
    2. 王雷，李红霞，崔兴兰，史新悦，郑鹏，孙英春，杨晓莉. 某高原区典型铬污染场地人体健康风险评价. 铜业工程. 2024(06): 18-24 .
    3. 徐汝悦，王子霄，沈禄，吴蓉蓉，姚芳婷，谭中原，刘恒蔚，张文超. Cr(Ⅵ)的生物修复技术研究进展. 生物技术通报. 2023(06): 49-60 .
    4. 邱沙，宋景鹏，陈志国，白鹤，曹文庆，刘艺芸. 原位化学还原技术修复铬污染土壤及其工程应用. 环境科学与技术. 2021(04): 131-139 .

    Other cited types(9)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.0 %FULLTEXT: 9.0 %META: 91.0 %META: 91.0 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.0 %其他: 8.0 %其他: 0.1 %其他: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %Central District: 0.1 %China: 1.2 %China: 1.2 %Japan: 0.1 %Japan: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.1 %Tuen Mun San Hui: 0.3 %Tuen Mun San Hui: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %[]: 0.6 %[]: 0.6 %上海: 5.5 %上海: 5.5 %东莞: 1.1 %东莞: 1.1 %中山: 0.1 %中山: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %临沂: 0.3 %临沂: 0.3 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %丽江: 0.1 %丽江: 0.1 %乌兰察布: 0.1 %乌兰察布: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %乐山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.4 %佛山: 0.4 %保定: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %信阳: 0.1 %信阳: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %凉山彝族自治州: 0.1 %凉山彝族自治州: 0.1 %北京: 11.5 %北京: 11.5 %十堰: 0.1 %十堰: 0.1 %南京: 3.5 %南京: 3.5 %南充: 0.3 %南充: 0.3 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 1.1 %南昌: 1.1 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南通市崇川区: 0.1 %南通市崇川区: 0.1 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %台北: 0.3 %台北: 0.3 %台州: 0.6 %台州: 0.6 %合肥: 1.2 %合肥: 1.2 %吉林: 0.4 %吉林: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.1 %嘉兴: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %天津: 2.9 %天津: 2.9 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %威海: 0.1 %威海: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %娄底: 0.1 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安庆: 0.1 %安庆: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安康: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %安顺: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜春: 0.6 %宜春: 0.6 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宝鸡: 0.1 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %宫城: 0.1 %宫城: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %巴中: 0.1 %常州: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 1.2 %广州: 1.2 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %张家口: 1.3 %张家口: 1.3 %德州: 0.1 %德州: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 1.3 %成都: 1.3 %成都市双流区: 0.1 %成都市双流区: 0.1 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %抚州: 0.1 %抚州: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %拉萨: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %攀枝花: 0.1 %新乡: 0.3 %新乡: 0.3 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 3.9 %杭州: 3.9 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %株洲: 1.0 %株洲: 1.0 %桂林: 0.4 %桂林: 0.4 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 2.6 %武汉: 2.6 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %河源: 0.1 %河源: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %泸州: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 1.3 %济南: 1.3 %济源: 0.1 %济源: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %淄博: 0.4 %淄博: 0.4 %淮北: 0.1 %淮北: 0.1 %深圳: 0.7 %深圳: 0.7 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %湘潭: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.1 %漯河: 0.7 %漯河: 0.7 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %潮州: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %濮阳: 0.1 %烟台: 0.3 %烟台: 0.3 %眉山: 0.1 %眉山: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.0 %石家庄: 1.0 %福州: 0.8 %福州: 0.8 %绍兴: 0.3 %绍兴: 0.3 %绵阳: 0.4 %绵阳: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芒廷维尤: 5.9 %芝加哥: 1.1 %芝加哥: 1.1 %苏州: 0.6 %苏州: 0.6 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %襄阳: 0.1 %襄阳: 0.1 %西宁: 4.7 %西宁: 4.7 %西安: 1.5 %西安: 1.5 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %赣州: 0.2 %赣州: 0.2 %达州: 0.3 %达州: 0.3 %运城: 0.9 %运城: 0.9 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %邵阳: 0.1 %郑州: 1.7 %郑州: 1.7 %鄂州: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %重庆: 2.0 %重庆: 2.0 %金华: 0.1 %金华: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %银川: 0.1 %锦州: 0.4 %锦州: 0.4 %镇江: 0.1 %镇江: 0.1 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 3.2 %长沙: 3.2 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.1 %陇南: 0.1 %陇南: 0.1 %青岛: 2.5 %青岛: 2.5 %韶关: 0.1 %韶关: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.3 %香港特别行政区: 0.3 %鹰潭: 0.1 %鹰潭: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄冈: 0.1 %黄石: 0.6 %黄石: 0.6 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.1 %其他其他Central DistrictChinaJapanSaitamaTuen Mun San HuiUnited States[]上海东莞中山临汾临沂丽水丽江乌兰察布乐山佛山保定信阳兰州凉山彝族自治州北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌南通南通市崇川区厦门台北台州合肥吉林呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨唐山嘉兴大同天津太原威海娄底宁波安庆安康安顺宜昌宜春宝鸡宣城宫城巴中常州常德平顶山广州廊坊延安张家口德州德阳惠州成都成都市双流区扬州抚州拉萨拉贾斯坦邦攀枝花新乡无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州枣庄株洲桂林榆林武汉汕头沈阳河源泸州洛阳济南济源海口淄博淮北深圳温州湖州湘潭漯河潍坊潮州濮阳烟台眉山石家庄福州绍兴绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州葫芦岛衡水衡阳衢州襄阳西宁西安贵阳赣州达州运城遵义邯郸邵阳郑州鄂州重庆金华银川锦州镇江长春长沙长治阜新阳泉陇南青岛韶关香港特别行政区鹰潭黄冈黄石齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (253) PDF downloads(7) Cited by(13)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return