Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
WANG Si-si, WANG Rong, SU Yi, GONG Yong-wei. ANALYSIS OF BEIJING GREEN SPACE SOIL PERMEABILITY MODEL AND ITS IMPACT ON RAINFALL-RUNOFF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 83-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004015
Citation: WANG Si-si, WANG Rong, SU Yi, GONG Yong-wei. ANALYSIS OF BEIJING GREEN SPACE SOIL PERMEABILITY MODEL AND ITS IMPACT ON RAINFALL-RUNOFF[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 83-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004015

ANALYSIS OF BEIJING GREEN SPACE SOIL PERMEABILITY MODEL AND ITS IMPACT ON RAINFALL-RUNOFF

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004015
  • Received Date: 2019-11-08
  • Soil permeability was one of the key factors affecting rainwater infiltration, and also an important prerequisite for analyzing the ability of soil to storage rainwater. In view of the current situation that the measured data of urban green space soil permeability was missing, the evaluation method was rare, and the index was insufficient, this paper obtained the data of soil permeable rate, void ratio and moisture content of different urban functional areas by using the actual measurement method. Correlation analysis, factor analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the main factors affecting the soil permeability of urban communities, and exploded to establish a soil permeability evaluation model with higher precision, less data demand and shorter calculation time. This model was used to obtain the infiltration capacity of urban green space rainwater in Beijing, establish the relationship between soil and rainfall-runoff, and get the measured data-oriented, closer to the actual runoff coefficient. The results showed that the soil permeability of the three functional areas in experimental plots were in order of residential area > cultural and educational area > commercial area, and the measured infiltration curves were all consistent with the Horton model. The void ratio, initial moisture content and initial infiltration rate of the internal factors of the soil were closely related to each other. The degree of vegetation coverage in the external factors had a strong negative correlation with human disturbance. Considering the combined effect of internal and external factors, the initial infiltration rate could establish a preliminary linear relationship with initial moisture content and vegetation coverage (R2>0.9). As the proportion of rainfall and impervious area ratio increased, the infiltration amount had smaller impact on runoff coefficient. The ratio of infiltration to rainfall corresponding to the total annual runoff control rate was between 37.6% and 58.2%, and it was negatively correlated with rainfall. The research could provide a theoretical reference for the modeling of sponge city and the design optimization of underlying surface.
  • 朱永杰, 毕华兴, 霍云梅, 等. 北京地区下凹式绿地土壤渗透能力及蓄水对土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2015, 13(1):106-110.
    张金龙, 张志政. 下凹式绿地蓄渗能力及其影响因素分析[J]. 节水灌溉, 2012(1):44-47.
    刘青柏, 刘明国, 王玉涛, 等. 不同林型立地土壤水分性状及其持水能力的比较[J]. 干旱区研究, 2011, 28(5):775-779.
    王玲, 冯茂松, 洪志刚, 等. 兴文县香椿人工林土壤物理性质研究[J]. 土壤, 2014,46(3):512-517.
    丁海晶, 姜姜, 张金池. 土壤渗透性的区域变化规律及因子分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(1):51-56.
    石亚芳, 赵允格, 李晨辉, 等. 踩踏干扰对生物结皮土壤渗透性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017,28(10):3227-3234.
    聂发辉, 李田, 姚海峰. 上海市城市绿地土壤特性及对雨洪削减效应的影响[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2008,30(2):49-52.
    于冰沁, 车生泉, 严巍, 等. 上海城市现状绿地雨洪调蓄能力评估研究[J]. 中国园林, 2017,33(3):62-66.
    车生泉, 于冰沁, 严巍. 海绵城市研究与应用:以上海城乡绿地建设为例[M]. 上海:上海交通大学出版社, 2015.
    JAMES C Y G, URBONAS B. Volume-based runoff coefficients for urban catchments[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2014, 140(2):1-5.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 海绵城市建设技术指南:低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
    马秀梅.北京城市不同绿地类型土壤及大气环境研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2007.
    邹明珠, 王艳春, 刘燕. 北京城市绿地土壤研究现状及问题[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012(3):1-6.
    包昱峰, 高甲荣, 高阳. 密云水库北京集水区典型植被土壤入渗特征研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2007, 14(4):176-179.
    赵景波, 陈颖, 曹军骥, 等. 青海湖西北部土壤入渗规律研究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,39(3):90-96.
    郭晓朦, 何丙辉, 秦伟, 等. 不同坡长条件扰动地表下土壤入渗与贮水特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015,29(2):198-203.
    黄延林, 马学尼. 水文学[M]. 4版. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
    黄祺, 何丙辉, 秦伟, 等. 自然降雨条件下扰动地表土壤入渗性能变化特征[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(1):91-95.
    陈三雄, 沈义. 黄浦江源头区主要植被类型土壤入渗特征及模拟分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016,23(6):59-63.
    张一璇, 史常青, 杨浩, 等. 永定河流域官厅水库南岸典型林分土壤饱和导水率研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(18):1-8.
    王思思, 王榕, 宫永伟, 等. 基于运动波计算模型的北京城市土壤渗透性对雨量径流系数的影响分析[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(7):25-29.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Haicheng, CHENG Cheng, CHEN Zhenglin, YANG Lixia, LUO Shenglian. SULFIDE ION DOPING PROMOTES EFFICIENT PHOTOCATALYTIC DEGRADATION OF TOLUENE BY WO3 NANOWIRES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 201-210. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409019
    [2]CHEN Acong, WEI Tuo, QIN Zhi, CHEN Yao, XU Rui, WU Haizhen, WEI Chaohai. SHIELDING EFFECT OF ZINC SULFATE ON CYANIDE COMPLEX DURING THIOCYANIDE DETECTION FOR COKING WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 134-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305018
    [3]ZHOU Lichang, LI Zhaoling, CHEN Lei, LIN Ya'nan, GONG Zhiwei, LIN Qingshan, MA Jie, WANG Zongping, GUO Gang. SHORT-TERM EFFECT OF THIOSULFATE ON COMPETITION BETWEEN SULFUR BACTERIA AND GLYCOGEN ACCUMULATING ORGANISMS IN SULFUR-CONTAINING WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 26-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308004
    [4]ZHANG Kui, WANG Xuemei, LI Yuhuan, ZHANG Yu, LIU Mengjuan, JIANG Xueping, JI Hongbing. HIGH EFFICIENCY ADSORPTION OF Hg2+ BY SULFUR-MODIFIED COW MANURE BIOCHAR AND ITS MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 79-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204012
    [5]DONG Wan-tao, WANG Ya-jun, LI Li, ZHANG Xing. REACTION KINETICS STUDY ON H2O2 AND Na2FeO4 REMOVING TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON FROM SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 178-184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110025
    [6]WANG Yan, ZOU Lv-xi, MAO Lin-feng, CHEN Ya-li, LI Ji. EFFICIENCY AND MECHANISM OF UV/O3-Na2S2O8 IN TREATING ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION CONDENSATE WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007006
    [11]Zhang Jun, Xu Junyang, Wang Dunqiu, Yang Huiping, Wu Xiaohui. EFFECTS OF TYPES AND CONCENTRATIONS OF SULFUR SUBSTRATE ON BIOLEACHING HEAVY METALS FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 39-43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504009
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 郭磊,黄黎明,韦振祖,刘艇安,王靓,吴玮. 非均匀边界条件下SCR脱硝系统数值模拟及改造效果分析. 洁净煤技术. 2024(S2): 272-278 .
    2. 张起,张福祥,李盛平,景浩林,杨锐涵,董志强,杨祖旺,田桦. 660 MW燃煤机组脱硝系统优化改造. 能源与节能. 2023(02): 99-104 .
    3. 韩冰,李清方,刘海丽,于惠娟,张舒漫,王辉. 百万吨级CO_2捕集烟气集成处理塔流场模拟及优化. 石油工程建设. 2022(04): 7-11+34 .
    4. 封例忠,丛日强,刘怡,齐艳芳. 基于CFD的某330MW燃煤机组SCR脱硝系统混合器优化与验证. 环境工程. 2022(10): 156-161 . 本站查看
    5. 韦振祖,赵宁波,李明磊,刘瑞敬,谢新华,周健,卢承政. 非均匀入口条件下SCR脱硝系统流场优化改造技术研究. 锅炉技术. 2021(04): 74-80 .
    6. 陶莉,肖育军. SCR区域喷氨的NH_3分布与均匀性调整. 环境工程技术学报. 2021(04): 663-669 .
    7. 张云雷,孙仲超,梁大明,熊银伍,李艳芳. 活性焦烟气净化反应器研究进展. 洁净煤技术. 2020(04): 21-30 .
    8. 王为,朱召平,张楚城,陈牧,苏寅彪,郑晓盼. 高温除尘脱硝一体化技术开发及流场模拟研究. 洁净煤技术. 2020(04): 154-161 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 6.5 %FULLTEXT: 6.5 %META: 93.5 %META: 93.5 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.5 %其他: 17.5 %Bulgaria: 0.5 %Bulgaria: 0.5 %Canada: 1.4 %Canada: 1.4 %China: 1.4 %China: 1.4 %Germany: 0.5 %Germany: 0.5 %Greece: 0.5 %Greece: 0.5 %Italy: 0.5 %Italy: 0.5 %Netherlands: 0.5 %Netherlands: 0.5 %Portugal: 0.9 %Portugal: 0.9 %Saudi Arabia: 0.5 %Saudi Arabia: 0.5 %Sweden: 0.9 %Sweden: 0.9 %United States: 4.1 %United States: 4.1 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %佛罗里达: 0.9 %佛罗里达: 0.9 %保定: 1.4 %保定: 1.4 %北京: 12.0 %北京: 12.0 %十堰: 0.5 %十堰: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常德: 0.9 %常德: 0.9 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %晋城: 0.9 %晋城: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %欧文: 0.5 %欧文: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %泰安: 0.5 %泰安: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.5 %漯河: 1.8 %漯河: 1.8 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 22.1 %芒廷维尤: 22.1 %芝加哥: 3.7 %芝加哥: 3.7 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %萍乡: 0.5 %萍乡: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 5.1 %西宁: 5.1 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 3.7 %运城: 3.7 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 0.9 %郑州: 0.9 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %其他BulgariaCanadaChinaGermanyGreeceItalyNetherlandsPortugalSaudi ArabiaSwedenUnited States临汾佛罗里达保定北京十堰台州大同天津宣城常德广州张家口成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦晋城朝阳杭州欧文沈阳泰安济源温州湘潭漯河石家庄纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州萍乡衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铜陵长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (239) PDF downloads(4) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return