APPLICATION STATUS AND EVALUATION OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANTS IN BEIJING LID FACILITIES

LONG Jia; WANG Si-si; FENG Meng-ke

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202004016

Volume 38 Issue 4

Apr. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2020 > 38(4): 89-95

LONG Jia, WANG Si-si, FENG Meng-ke. APPLICATION STATUS AND EVALUATION OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANTS IN BEIJING LID FACILITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 89-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004016

Citation:

LONG Jia, WANG Si-si, FENG Meng-ke. APPLICATION STATUS AND EVALUATION OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANTS IN BEIJING LID FACILITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 89-95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004016

Citation:

PDF( 5226 KB)

APPLICATION STATUS AND EVALUATION OPTIMIZATION OF THE PLANTS IN BEIJING LID FACILITIES

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004016

LONG Jia¹,
WANG Si-si^{1,2
,
,},
FENG Meng-ke^1,3

1. Key Laboratory of Urban Stormwater System and Water Environment, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China;
2. Beijing Jiangong Architectural Design and Research Institute, Beijing 100044, China;
3. Beijing Taining Kechuang Rainwater Utilization Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing 100044, China

Received Date: 2020-01-10

Abstract

Abstract

Plants are the basic constituent units of sponge facilities, and their growth and application status greatly affects the function and performance of sponge facilities. This article took the plant landscape of 72 low impact development (LID) facilities in 21 sponge city projects in Beijing as research objects and conducted post-completion evaluation. Through field survey, the species and applying frequency of plants in LID facilities, configuration mode, ornamental characteristics, growth status and existing problems were summarized; analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was used to construct an LID facility plant landscape evaluation system from three aspects, plant ecological habits, rainwater functionality and ornamental properties; the constructed evaluation system was used to rate 10 plant communities for typical LID facilities in Beijing. Based on the results of the evaluation and analysis, the plant configuration with high comprehensive benefits and optimization approaches were proposed, to provide a reference for the plant landscape improvement of LID facilities in Beijing and northern China.
- low impact development facilities,
- plant landscape,
- application frequency,
- analytic hierarchy process

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

HUNT W F, LORD B, LOH B, et al.Plant selection for bioretention systems and stormwater treatment practices[M]. Singapore:Centre for Urban Greenery & Ecology, 2015.

王佳, 王思思, 车伍, 等. 雨水花园植物的选择与设计[J]. 北方园艺, 2012(19):77-81.

MORASH J, WRIGHT A, LEBLEU C, et al. Increasing sustainability of residential areas using rain gardens to improve pollutant capture, biodiversity and ecosystem resilience[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(12):3269-3287.

RYCEWICZ-BORECKI M, MCLEAN J E, DUPONT R R. Nitrogen and phosphorus mass balance, retention and uptake in six plant species grown in stormwater bioretention microcosms[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2017, 99:409-416.

李畅, 王思思, FANG X, 等. 下沉式绿地对雨水径流污染物的削减效果及影响因素分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2018,18(11):215-224.

GONG Y W, HAO Y, LI J Q,et al. The effects of rainfall runoff pollutants on plant physiology in a bioretention system based on pilot experiments[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(22):6402-6418.

MUERDTER C P, WONG C K, LEFEVRE G H. Emerging investigator series:the role of vegetation in bioretention for stormwater treatment in the built environment:pollutant removal, hydrologic function, and ancillary benefits[J]. Environmental Science:Water Research & Technology, 2018, 4(5):592-612.

HOUDESHEL C D, HULTINE K R, JOHNSON N C,et al. Evaluation of three vegetation treatments in bioretention gardens in a semi-arid climate[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015, 135:62-72.

张哲, 潘会堂. 园林植物景观评价研究进展[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(6):962-967.

冯梦珂. 低影响开发设施的植物景观评价与优化研究[D]. 北京:北京建筑大学, 2019.

郭凤, 陈建刚, 杨军,等. 植草沟对北京市道路地表径流的调控效应[J].水土保持通报, 2015, 35(3):176-181.

艾丽皎, 冯义龙, 谭兴晏. 重庆地区屋顶绿化现状调查与分析[J]. 中国园林, 2015, 31(11):27-30.

孙明, 杜小玉, 杨炜茹. 北京市公园绿地植物景观评价模型及其应用[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(增刊1):163-167.

曾凤, 李许文, 胡晓敏,等. 广州白云山典型景区园林植物群落景观评价[J]. 中国园林, 2014, 30(8):97-101.

李继光, 孙慧, 唐政,等. 小兴安岭小叶章湿地植物群落的物种丰富度研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(21):352-356.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHAO Xi, WEI Si. DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR RANKING QUANTITATIVE DETECTION LIST FROM NONTARGET SCREENING OF EMERGING POLLUTANTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 81-87. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407008
[2]	DONG Yihua, ZHANG Xueying, ZHANG Xinyue, LI Liang. EVALUATION OF FARMLAND NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY IN LIAOHE RIVER BASIN BASED ON AHP-FCE METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 150-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312018
[3]	YIN Hao, ZHAN Ya, ZHANG Liu, LIU Gui-jian. SUITABILITY EVALUATION OF RIPARIAN ZONE OF CLEAR WATER GALLERY BASED ON AHP[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 193-196,250. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205028
[4]	CAO Wen-ping, LIU Xi-kun, ZHAO Tian-qing, TIAN Li, LIU Yong. EVALUATION OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OF PAN'AN LAKE WETLAND BASED ON PRESSURE-STATE-RESPONSE (PSR) MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 231-237,245. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105032
[5]	ZHAO Xi, WU Shan-shan, LU Ke-ding. DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING CONSTRUCTION LEVEL IN OPERATION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT PARK FOR ZERO-WASTE CITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 136-140,15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102022
[6]	LIU Tong-li, ZHAO Li-xin, MENG Hai-bo, YAO Zong-lu, ZHANG Xi-rui, HUO Li-li. RESEARCH AND OPTIMIZATION OF EVALUATION METHODS FOR STRAW ENERGY UTILIZATION TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 195-200. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008032
[7]	YAN Xiao-wen, LI Jun-qi, GUO Xiao-peng. SELECTION AND DESIGN OF ADAPTIVE PLANTS FOR GREEN STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 170-175,251. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006028
[11]	Shen Lei Zhuang Huisheng, . STUDY ON COMPREHENSIVE RISK ASSESSMENT OF BIOMASS GASIFICATION POWER GENERATION INDUSTRY IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 137-141. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504029
[12]	Qin Lanlan Wang Youle, . CASE STUDY ON THE INDICATOR SYSTEM OF PLANNED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 143-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502032
[13]	Wang Jiahui, Zhang Xuefeng, Deng Panbo. APPLICATION OF VICIA-MICRONUCLEUS TEST TO MONITOR THE UNDERGROUND WATER POLLUTION OF TAILINGS SURROUNDING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 117-120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510026
[14]	Huo Pan, Cao Liwen, Tian Yanfeng. APPLICATION AND COMPARISON OF AHP AND FUZZY EVALUATION METHOD IN LANDFILL SITING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 131-135. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503026

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(10)

1.	张继升，刘家琳，孟瑶，周剑锋. 湿塘生境质量特征与营建管理策略——以重庆海绵城市试点为例. 风景园林. 2024(09): 76-85 .
2.	曾朝旭，魏绪英. 2000–2023年中国植物景观研究热点与进展. 园林. 2024(12): 50-56 .
3.	张冬青，丁相毅，王佳，宋天旭，马梦阳. 基于多目标的海绵设施空间布局优化决策. 人民珠江. 2023(09): 7-14 .
4.	韩元，刘玲，姚一珍，吴斌. 北京市海绵城市试点区雨水花园植物群落生态适应性及其应用效果. 水土保持通报. 2023(04): 186-194 .
5.	杨一群，郝思文，张家琦. 我国植物景观评价研究进展分析. 内蒙古林业科技. 2023(03): 43-48 .
6.	蒲麟鑫，罗玲利，暴来安，李果，王书敏，潘伟亮. 不同植物栽种方式对生物滞留系统污染物去除的影响. 应用化工. 2023(11): 3090-3094 .
7.	陆莹，武文婷，方振军，隋艳. 杭州市湿塘植物资源应用现状调查与适宜性评价. 广东农业科学. 2022(03): 57-67 .
8.	杨洋，曹磊. 高校建成雨水花园植物景观综合评价与优化——以华北高校为例. 景观设计. 2021(04): 22-29 .
9.	严一鸣，左明明，管冰镜，张义悦，王鑫瑜，朱曙光. 基于SWMM和鸿业软件对种植屋面雨水管理模拟及评估. 净水技术. 2020(11): 152-158 .
10.	韩元，刘玲，赵利，孟莹莹，冯昶栋，李雨晴. 建筑与小区生物滞留设施植物群落景观评价与植物配置分析——以北京市通州区海绵城市试点区为例. 水土保持通报. 2020(05): 125-133 .

Other cited types(7)

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views (93) PDF downloads(3)