Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
MAO Xu-hui, XU Lu-ping, LIU Zhe, LIU Hai-long, JIA Hai-feng. STORMWATER RUNOFF MANAGEMENT SCHEME USING LID-BMPs FOR A HISTORICAL SITE AND ITS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 158-163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004028
Citation: MAO Xu-hui, XU Lu-ping, LIU Zhe, LIU Hai-long, JIA Hai-feng. STORMWATER RUNOFF MANAGEMENT SCHEME USING LID-BMPs FOR A HISTORICAL SITE AND ITS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 158-163. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004028

STORMWATER RUNOFF MANAGEMENT SCHEME USING LID-BMPs FOR A HISTORICAL SITE AND ITS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004028
  • Received Date: 2020-01-17
  • Due to inadequate construction of drainage systems in the past and strict reconstruction limitation at present, historical cultural reservation sites were prone to flooding in a heavy storm. Under the background of sponge city constuction promotion in China, the scientific rain water runoff management for the historical reservation sites turned out to be a key subject for the authority and the specialists. In this paper, historical auditorium surrounding area in Tsinghua University was selected as the case site. Aiming at sponge campus construction, we studied the natural based stormwater management schemes after the detail analysis of site present situation. We selected, designed and built four types of LID-BMPs (i.e., cistern, bioretention basin, porous pavement and swale) schemes in the area. Then, we used SUSTAIN model to evaluate the LID-BMPs' performance in water quantity-quality control and cost-profit balance. Results showed that the LID-BMPs system was able to meet the runoff control target in a designed storm and showed significant reduction in flow volume and pollutant load throughout a typical year.
  • HAN Y, JIA H F. Simulating the spatial dynamics of urban growth with an integrated modeling approach:A case study of Foshan, China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2017, 353(10):107-116.
    汪慧贞, 李宪法. 北京城区雨水径流的污染及控制[J]. 城市环境与城市生态, 2002, 15(2):16-18.
    车伍, 刘燕, 李俊奇. 国内外城市雨水水质及污染控制[J]. 给水排水, 2003, 29(10):38-42.
    FLETCHER T D, SHUSTER W, HUNT W F, et al. SUDS, LID, BMPs, WSUD and more-The evolution and application of terminology surrounding urban drainage[J]. Urban Water Journal, 2015, 12(7):525-542.
    章林伟. 海绵城市建设概论[J]. 给水排水, 2015, 41(6):1-7.
    XU T, JIA H F, WANG Z, et al. SWMM-based methodology for block-scale LID-BMPs planning based on site-scale multi-objective optimization:a case study in Tianjin[J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2017, 11(4):48-59.
    YOU L D, XU T, MAO X H, et al. Site-scale LID-BMPs planning and optimization:A case study in a residential area[J]. Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment, 2019, 5(1):05018004.
    MAO X H, JIA H F, YU S L. Assessing the ecological benefits of aggregate LID-BMPs through modelling[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2017, 353(10):139-149.
    孙玉香, 杨艳玲, 李星, 等. 基于SUSTAIN模拟技术的低影响开发雨水设施规划应用研究[J]. 环境工程, 2016, (增刊1):167-171.
    陈韬, 李研, 曹凯琳, 等. 基于SUSTAIN的小区LID对径流污染控制效果评价[J]. 中国给水排水, 2016,32(9):144-148.
    JIA H F, YAO H R, TANG Y, et al. Development of a multi-criteria index ranking system for urban runoff best management practices (BMPs) selection[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2013, 185(9):7915-7933.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 海绵城市建设技术指南:低影响开发雨水系统构建(试行)[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2015.
    SHOEMAKER L, RIVERSON J, ALVI K, et al. Report on Enhanced Framework (SUSTAIN) and Field Applications for Placement of BMPs in Urban Watersheds[R]. EPA/600/R-11/144, USEPA, 2011.
    贾海峰, 姚海蓉, 唐颖, 等. 城市降雨径流控制LID BMPs规划方法及案例[J]. 水科学进展, 2014, 25(2):260-267.
    张胜杰. 北京市某住宅小区雨洪管理措施模拟研究[D]. 北京:北京建筑工程学院, 2012.
    戚海军. 低影响开发雨水管理措施的设计及效能模拟研究[D]. 北京:北京建筑大学, 2013.
    章林伟. 海绵城市建设典型案例[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]CAO Xiuqin, LI Songyue, YANG Chao, HONG Guoyuan. RESEARCH ON INTERCEPTING CAPACITY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF INTERCEPTING FACILITIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 51-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408007
    [2]YAN Cailian, LIN Xiuli, HU Longji, LIU Jingxian. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF FILTRATION VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION OF CYLINDRICAL AND PLEATED FILTER BAGS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 225-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403028
    [3]CEN Hailin, WANG Xihui, WANG Guoqiang. RESEARCH OF SPOILER IN THE CARTRIDGE DUST-COLLECTOR BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND ORTHOGONAL EXPERIMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 206-213,228. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307028
    [4]LIU Pengyu, LI Debo, LIU Yanfeng, QUE Zhengbin, MIAO Jianjie, CHEN Zhaoli. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SCR DENITRIFICATION SYSTEM IN A COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 224-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210029
    [5]GUO Zirui, CHI Riguang. OPTIMIZATION OF THE PHYSICS PRESSURE UNDER ADD MODE IN PHA PRODUCTION WITH CFD SIMULATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 38-44. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207006
    [6]FENG Lizhong, CONG Riqiang, LIU Yi, QI Yanfang. MICROMIXER IMPROVEMENT AND VERIFICATION FOR AN SCR DENITRATION SYSTEM OF A 330 MW COAL-FIRED POWER UNIT BASED ON CFD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 156-161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210021
    [7]CHENG Jiao, YANG Lu-lu, LIU Jing-xian. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON BAG DUST FILTER CLEANING AND REGENERATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 166-170,177. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205024
    [8]QI Ya-bing. HYDRODYNAMICS PROPERTIES OF A THREE-PHASE AIR-LIFT INTERNAL-LOOP REACTOR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 134-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010021
    [9]YUE Wen-yi, DUAN Chao-long, XIE Dong-ming. SIMULATION OF INTERIOR FLOW FIELD IN THE COMPOSITE BAG FILTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 120-125,95. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005021
    [15]Xie Lina, Zhou Jianwei, Xu Wen. CURRENT SITUATION AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES OF TAILINGS MANAGEMENT IN AUSTRALIA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 72-76. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510016
    [16]Mao Rui, Liu Genfan, Deng Xiang, Fan Ning. NUMERICAL SIMULATION STUDY ON STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF BAG FILTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 77-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503016
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 周良芹,王蓉,范金龙,王佳妮,许腾飞,谭文渊,付大友. NiMgAl-HTLC的制备及其对水体富营养化的抑制性能研究. 硅酸盐通报. 2024(02): 734-745 .
    2. 朱益萍. 青浦区白鹤镇村级河道底泥重金属污染调查与分析. 水资源开发与管理. 2024(04): 53-59 .
    3. 周大量,李柏霖,曾强,胡红娟,吴辰熙. 西凉湖沉积物重金属及营养元素分布特征及污染评价. 湖北农业科学. 2024(07): 53-59+66 .
    4. 张岚,李玲玲,孙士顺,王坤. 付疃河中下游表层沉积物污染状况评价. 环境科技. 2024(04): 51-57 .
    5. 宋炉生,孙振洲,胡晶,邓清海. 废弃铁矿及下游农田土壤重金属污染特征及来源解析. 环境工程. 2024(10): 155-164 . 本站查看
    6. 曾金凤,潘红,张立楠,钟建红,谢水石,周绍梅. 东江源头典型山区小流域农业面源污染解析——以定南县东江流域为例. 人民珠江. 2023(04): 1-9 .
    7. 田丰,邱春生,冯涛,姚慧,王晨晨,王少坡,孙力平. 环境因子对南水北调泵站调节池沉积物氮释放特征的影响研究. 环境污染与防治. 2023(05): 620-625 .
    8. 李文钰,侯精明,刘占衍,张松,栾广学,杜颖恩,韩占涛. 矿渣堆积对河网水质影响的数值模拟分析. 人民黄河. 2023(11): 95-99+105 .
    9. 马占琪. 小型河流典型重金属污染分布特征及风险评价研究. 绿色科技. 2022(18): 134-137 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 19.6 %FULLTEXT: 19.6 %META: 78.5 %META: 78.5 %PDF: 2.0 %PDF: 2.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 16.3 %其他: 16.3 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %上海: 7.9 %上海: 7.9 %东莞: 1.1 %东莞: 1.1 %临沂: 0.2 %临沂: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %北京: 1.8 %北京: 1.8 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 0.2 %南京: 0.2 %南通: 0.9 %南通: 0.9 %厦门: 1.1 %厦门: 1.1 %台州: 0.9 %台州: 0.9 %合肥: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %奥卢: 0.4 %奥卢: 0.4 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %安卡拉: 1.6 %安卡拉: 1.6 %宜春: 0.4 %宜春: 0.4 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %广州: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %徐州: 0.5 %徐州: 0.5 %德里: 1.1 %德里: 1.1 %德黑兰: 1.1 %德黑兰: 1.1 %惠州: 0.4 %惠州: 0.4 %成都: 0.5 %成都: 0.5 %扬州: 1.3 %扬州: 1.3 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 1.1 %昆明: 1.1 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 2.0 %杭州: 2.0 %榆林: 0.2 %榆林: 0.2 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.9 %沧州: 0.2 %沧州: 0.2 %河池: 0.5 %河池: 0.5 %泰州: 0.5 %泰州: 0.5 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %淮安: 0.2 %淮安: 0.2 %温州: 1.4 %温州: 1.4 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 8.6 %漯河: 8.6 %石家庄: 1.1 %石家庄: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 20.3 %芒廷维尤: 20.3 %芝加哥: 2.2 %芝加哥: 2.2 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 1.1 %西宁: 1.1 %西安: 0.9 %西安: 0.9 %辽阳: 0.5 %辽阳: 0.5 %运城: 1.4 %运城: 1.4 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %里昂: 4.3 %里昂: 4.3 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %银川: 0.2 %长沙: 3.2 %长沙: 3.2 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %马鞍山: 0.2 %鹰潭: 0.2 %鹰潭: 0.2 %龙岩: 0.5 %龙岩: 0.5 %其他其他上海东莞临沂保定北京十堰南京南通厦门台州合肥唐山嘉兴天津太原奥卢宁波安卡拉宜春宣城常州常德广州张家口徐州德里德黑兰惠州成都扬州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州榆林武汉沈阳沧州河池泰州济南济源淮安温州湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衡阳衢州西宁西安辽阳运城遵义邯郸郑州里昂重庆银川长沙长治马鞍山鹰潭龙岩

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (231) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return