Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
DENG Lin-li, ZHANG Kai-shan. ANALYSIS OF CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTION OF METAL POLLUTION IN PM2.5 IN TYPICAL METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH HAZE POLLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 113-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005020
Citation: ZHANG Lei, WANG Zhong-yu, WANG Hua-lin, ZHONG Mei-fang, HUANG Hai, ZHANG Hua-yong. ANALYSIS ON THE DOMINANT GENERA AND NICHE OF SEDIMENT MICROORGANISMS IN FRESHWATER LAKES: A CASE STUDY IN LAKE BALIHE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 8-12,35. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005002

ANALYSIS ON THE DOMINANT GENERA AND NICHE OF SEDIMENT MICROORGANISMS IN FRESHWATER LAKES: A CASE STUDY IN LAKE BALIHE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005002
  • Received Date: 2019-04-15
  • Based on seasonal sampling and analysis on the sediment microorganisms in Lake Balihe from July 2017 to April 2018, the dominant generas of bacteria and archaea were identified by the dominance index. These dominant generas of bacteria and archaea were classified, respectively, and their development space were also analyzed by niche breadth, niche overlap index and ecological response rate. The results showed that 5 phyla, 13 dominant generas of bacteria mainly concentrated in ProteoBacteria and Firmicutes, while 4 phyla, 8 dominant generas of archaea mailly concentrated in Euryarchaeota. According to the survival and environmental adaptability, these dominant generas of bacteria and archaea were classified into 4 and 3 categories, namely. Besides, the majority of the dominant bacteria had development space in the seasons except spring, while most of the dominant archaea developed and inhibited alternately in four seasons.
  • 冯玉琦. 我国水环境的现状、存在问题及治理方略[J]. 农业与技术, 2003, 23(2): 12-15.
    马经安, 李红清. 浅谈国内外江河湖库水体富营养化状况[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2002, 11(6): 575-578.
    ANNA E, TERENCE S, SARA S L, et al. Microbial community structure in polluted Baltic Sea sediments[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2010, 8(2): 223-232.
    TANG X Q, WU M, YANG W J, et al. Ecological strategy for eutrophication control[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2012, 223(2): 723-737.
    张维理, 徐爱国, 冀宏杰, 等. 中国农业面源污染形势估计及控制对策Ⅲ. 中国农业面源污染控制中存在问题分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(7): 1026-1033.
    王佳. 浑河底泥微生物群落结构时空变化及其与水环境因子间的关联研究[D]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学, 2015.
    YANG J, ZHANG Y Y, LIU L M, et al. Microbial community and urban water quality[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012, 26(1): 76-83.
    李玫, 廖宝文, 章金鸿. 底泥微生物在红树林生态系统中的作用[J]. 广州环境科学, 2006(4): 21-25.
    WAINRIGHT S C. Sediment-to-water fluxes of particulate material and microbes by resuspension and their contribution to the planktonic food web[J]. Marine Ecology Progress, 1990, 62(3): 271-281.
    何晨凤, 张芳娟, 梁晓倩, 等. 添加酸改性赤泥对模拟人工湿地生态系统的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(7): 51-55

    ,61.
    徐春燕, 俞秋佳, 徐凤洁, 等. 淀山湖浮游植物优势种生态位[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(9): 2550-2558.
    李德志, 石强, 臧润国, 等. 物种或种群生态位宽度与生态位重叠的计测模型[J]. 林业科学, 2006, 42(7): 95-103.
    王翠红, 张金屯. 汾河水库及河道中优势硅藻生态位的研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(3): 58-62.
    艾士奇, 赵一全, 孙志远, 等. 复合菌系降解纤维素过程中微生物群落结构的变化[J]. 生物工程学报, 2018, 34(11): 1794-1808.
    郭坤, 杨德国, 彭婷, 等. 湖北省长湖浮游植物优势种生态位分析[J]. 湖泊科学, 2016, 28(4): 825-834.
    CHEN J, JIANG X W, GU J D. Existence of novel phylotypes of nitrite-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation bacteria in surface and subsurface ocean sediments of the South China Sea[J]. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2015, 32(1): 1-10.
    SAGAR T, WILSON P. Niches of common bryophytes in a semi-arid landscape[J]. The Bryologist, 2009, 112(1): 30-41.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]GUO Qianjin. COMPONENTS CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM2.5 IN AUTUMN AND WINTER IN JINCHENG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 153-161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407017
    [2]LIU Haotian, TONG Jilong, YANG Hong, LIU Yongle, AO Congjie, WANG Shusu. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON VOCs POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE ANALYSIS BETWEEN LANZHOU DOWNTOWN AREA AND XIGU REFINING CHEMICAL INDUSTRY ZONE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 139-147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404017
    [3]SONG Lusheng, SUN Zhenzhou, HU Jing, DENG Qinghai. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED IRON ORE AND DOWNSTREAM FARMLAND SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 155-164. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410019
    [4]ZHAO Wanning, CUI Jijing, BAI Liyong, YU Xiaojing, DAI Jiulan. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON NITRATE SOURCE ANALYSIS METHODS FOR WATER ENVIRONMENT IN WATERSHEDS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 286-294. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308036
    [5]ZHANG Yibing, LIANG Yiqun, ZHANG Yuan, FANG Yinxiang, NIU Hongya, FAN Jingsen. SOURCE APPORTIONMENT AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN PM2.5 IN THE FENGFENG MINING AREA IN 2017—2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 242-250. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308031
    [6]LI Ganyu, CUI Xingtao. CHARACTERISTICS OF HEAVY METAL ELEMENTS POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST-FALL IN TANGSHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 278-287. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312035
    [7]GAO Wei, CHEN Yan, YAN Changan, LIU Yong. SOURCE IDENTIFICATION OF PHOSPHORUS IN VARIOUS DISTURBED RIVERS BASED ON LAM MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 55-62. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206007
    [8]ZHU Xue-tao, LIN Hai-ying, FENG Qing-ge, ZHAO Bo-han, ZHU Yi-fan, LAN Wen-lu, LI Tian-shen. POLLUTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT, SOURCE ANALYSIS OF HEAVY METALS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF BEIBU GULF, GUANGXI[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 69-76. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108009
    [18]Wang Zaifeng, Zhang Shuiyan, Zhang Huaicheng, Zhao Hong, Ji Yaqin. SOURCE APPORTIONMENT TECHNOLOGY OF RIVER POLLUTION SOURCE BY WATER QUALITY MODEL COUPLING WITH CMB MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 135-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502030
    [19]Yang Long Sun Changhong Li Shanshan Liu Guizhong, . COMPARATIVE STUDY ON HEAVY METAL POLLUTION OF SURFACE DUST IN TYPICAL INDUSTRIES ENVIRONMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 122-125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502027
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 楚君,雷晓慧. 北方城市市区大气臭氧污染时空变化特征分析与协同治理策略研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(02): 125-128+138 .
    2. 谢勇,曹玲,姚瑶,姚宏伟,王爽. 持续性雾霾气象灾害风险预警方法研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(04): 28-33 .
    3. 荣素英,刘佳佳,杨文琦,曾豪,张磊,方波,徐厚君,王茜. 大学生尿液金属水平与肺功能的关系. 中国学校卫生. 2022(02): 288-291 .
    4. 李强. 供热通风空调气体排放特征及污染趋势研究. 环境科学与管理. 2022(06): 129-133 .
    5. 范圣虎,张飞云. 利用大气超级站对乌鲁木齐市一次沙尘天气过程及组份的分析. 干旱环境监测. 2021(01): 15-22 .

    Other cited types(11)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 6.5 %FULLTEXT: 6.5 %META: 90.7 %META: 90.7 %PDF: 2.8 %PDF: 2.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 13.2 %其他: 13.2 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %China: 2.0 %China: 2.0 %United States: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 2.0 %上海: 2.0 %东莞: 1.0 %东莞: 1.0 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %保定: 2.4 %保定: 2.4 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 11.6 %北京: 11.6 %南京: 3.2 %南京: 3.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %合肥: 1.0 %合肥: 1.0 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %唐山: 0.4 %唐山: 0.4 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %天津: 1.2 %天津: 1.2 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %宁波: 0.6 %宁波: 0.6 %安阳: 0.2 %安阳: 0.2 %宿州: 0.8 %宿州: 0.8 %宿迁: 0.8 %宿迁: 0.8 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 2.8 %广州: 2.8 %开封: 0.6 %开封: 0.6 %张家口: 2.2 %张家口: 2.2 %徐州: 1.0 %徐州: 1.0 %德州: 0.4 %德州: 0.4 %成都: 2.0 %成都: 2.0 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %揭阳: 0.2 %揭阳: 0.2 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %昌吉: 0.2 %昌吉: 0.2 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 5.3 %杭州: 5.3 %柳州: 0.8 %柳州: 0.8 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %泰安: 0.2 %泰安: 0.2 %济南: 0.8 %济南: 0.8 %济宁: 0.2 %济宁: 0.2 %济源: 0.4 %济源: 0.4 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %潍坊: 0.4 %潍坊: 0.4 %班加罗尔: 0.6 %班加罗尔: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 12.6 %芒廷维尤: 12.6 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %荆州: 1.0 %荆州: 1.0 %菏泽: 0.6 %菏泽: 0.6 %衡水: 0.6 %衡水: 0.6 %衢州: 1.4 %衢州: 1.4 %西宁: 3.2 %西宁: 3.2 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %达州: 0.2 %达州: 0.2 %运城: 1.6 %运城: 1.6 %连云港: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %长沙: 2.0 %长沙: 2.0 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %青岛: 1.4 %青岛: 1.4 %其他其他ChinaUnited States[]上海东莞临汾佛山保定兰州北京南京南宁南昌南通厦门台州合肥呼和浩特唐山大同天津太原宁波安阳宿州宿迁常州常德广州开封张家口徐州德州成都拉贾斯坦邦揭阳昆明昌吉晋城朝阳杭州柳州格兰特县武汉沈阳泰安济南济宁济源深圳温州湖州漯河潍坊班加罗尔石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州菏泽衡水衢州西宁西安达州运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治阳泉青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (240) PDF downloads(9) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return