Source Journal of CSCD
Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in JST China
Volume 38 Issue 5
Aug.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Jing, TANG Min, LIANG Yi-xin. EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT EFFECT IN HAIHE RIVER BASIN IN HENAN PROVINCE FROM 2015 TO 2018[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 60-64,190. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005011
Citation: LI Jing, TANG Min, LIANG Yi-xin. EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT EFFECT IN HAIHE RIVER BASIN IN HENAN PROVINCE FROM 2015 TO 2018[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 60-64,190. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005011

EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT EFFECT IN HAIHE RIVER BASIN IN HENAN PROVINCE FROM 2015 TO 2018

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005011
  • Received Date: 2019-04-16
  • This paper evaluated and analyzed the water quality improvement effect in Haihe River Basin in Henan province during 2015—2018 using single factor evaluation method, comprehensive pollution index evaluation method, and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The results showed that the three evaluation methods were basically consistent, and the overall water quality in Haihe River Basin in Henan province showed a trend of improvement in 2015—2018. But the emphasis of each method was different. The results of single factor evaluation showed that the number of category Ⅰ—Ⅲ pollution factors of 21 pollution factors in Haihe River Basin increased from 69.63% in 2015 to 89.52% in 2018, and the number of category inferior Ⅴ pollution factors decreased from 15.13% in 2015 to 0.85% in 2018. The comprehensive pollution index of Haihe Basin in Henan province decreased from 0.89 in 2015 to 0.56 in 2018, and water quality grades were improved from moderate pollution to light pollution. The water quality grades of the eight rivers in 2015 were lower than moderate pollution, including Wei River, Communist Canal, Dasha River, Anyang River, Tang River, Majia River. The results of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation showed that the weights of ammonia nitrogen and total phosphorus were the largest among the nine evaluation factors, the main pollution factors in Haihe River Basin in Henan province. And the water quality of eight rivers was improved to category Ⅰ—Ⅲ by 2018. Single factor evaluation method, comprehensive pollution index evaluation method were more suitable for management analysis, while fuzzy comprehensive evaluation was prefered in research work.
  • loading
  • 李茜,张建辉,林兰钰,等. 水环境质量评价方法综述[J]. 现代农业科技,2011(19):285-287,290.
    王梦. 水环境质量评价中几种方法的比较[J]. 渤海大学学报(自然科学版),2008,29(1):34-37.
    封丽,张学睿,封雷,等.基于粗糙集的三峡库区支流水质富营养化模糊综合评价模型研究[J]. 环境工程,2015,33(12):105-110.
    马太玲,朝伦巴根,高瑞忠,等. 水环境质量综合评价方法的比较研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(4):138-142.
    赵颖,王建英,孙燕,等. 水环境质量评价:以河南部分河流断面为例[J]. 环境与发展,2018,30(2):17-18.
    黄珍慧. 习近平生态文明思想的制度建设:以"河长制"全面推行为例[J]. 长春市委党校学报,2018(2):23-27.
    刘思莹,刘俊文,赵婷婷,等. 水环境质量评价的研究进展[J]. 江西化工,2017(6):41-43.
    高学平,孙博闻,訾天亮,等. 基于时域权重矩阵的模糊综合水质评价法及其应用[J]. 环境工程学报,2017,11(2):970-976.
    秦雨,王兆波,张正,等. 基于改进的模糊综合评价法的饮马河水质综合评价研究[J]. 环境科学与管理,2017,42(3):169-173.
    钟文武,王文玉,孙昳,等. 模糊综合评价法在抚仙湖种质资源保护区水质评价中的应用[J]. 水产科学,2015,34(3):182-187.
    徐健,吴玮,黄天寅,等. 改进的模糊综合评价法在同里古镇水质评价中的应用[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(2):143-149.
    刘聚涛,高俊峰,姜加虎.不同模糊评价方法在水环境质量评价中的应用比较[J]. 环境污染与防治,2010,32(1):20-25.
    赵前信. 四种水环境质量评价方法在六安市水库中的应用[J]. 环境工程,2014,32(3):113-116

    ,120.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (118) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return