NUMERICAL SIMULATION FOR FGD WASTEWATER EVAPORATION IN THE FLUE DUCT OF A 2×350 MW COAL-FIRED UNIT

ZHOU Chuan; WU Qi-rong; YU Jiang-tao; QIN Fu-chu

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202005017

Volume 38 Issue 5

Aug. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2020 > 38(5): 96-101

FANG Qing, XIAN Ping, MENG Zheng-cheng. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OF AGRICULTURAL LAND BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 147-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102024

Citation:

ZHOU Chuan, WU Qi-rong, YU Jiang-tao, QIN Fu-chu. NUMERICAL SIMULATION FOR FGD WASTEWATER EVAPORATION IN THE FLUE DUCT OF A 2×350 MW COAL-FIRED UNIT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 96-101. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005017

Citation:

PDF( 6796 KB)

NUMERICAL SIMULATION FOR FGD WASTEWATER EVAPORATION IN THE FLUE DUCT OF A 2×350 MW COAL-FIRED UNIT

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005017

1. SPIC Yuanda Envirnoment-Protection Engineering Co., Ltd, Chongqing 401122, China;
2. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
3. School of Resource & Environmental Engineering, Yibin University, Yibin 644000, China

Received Date: 2019-05-14

Abstract

Abstract

A series of numerical simulations were conducted for FGD wastewater evaporation occurred in a flue duct of a 2×350 MW coal-fired unit. The evolution and distribution of gas-liquid was revealed and the dependence of residence time and required distance for evaporation on spray parameters and unit load was discussed. The results showed that the liquid droplet could evaporate completely as the droplet diameter was less than 80 μm; while the diameter of liquid droplet increased from 40 μm to 80 μm, the residence time for evaporation increased from 0.26 s to 0.62 s and the required distance for droplet evaporating completely increased from 6.15 m to 13.41 m; the residence time and required distance for evaporation had a linear relation with the droplet diameter. It also presented that enhancing the injection-angle decreased the residence time of evaporation; as the injection-angle was 90°, the required distance of evaporation was the largest; in contrast, when the injection-angle was 120°, the required distance of evaporation was the smallest; while the injection-direction was opposite to the flow direction of flue gas, the residence time of evaporation was the longest and required distance of evaporation was the shortest in the three cases; the residence time of evaporation was larger with a lower load; an obvious increase in the required distance of evaporation was observed with the load dropping from 75% to 50%.
- coal-fired unit,
- FGD wastewater,
- evaporation,
- numerical simulation

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

吴怡卫. 石灰石-石膏湿法烟气脱硫废水处理的研究[J]. 中国电力, 2006, 39(4): 75-78.

刘绍银. 火电厂湿法烟气脱硫废水处理若干问题的探讨[J]. 热力发电, 2008, 37(11): 121-122.

HIGGINS T E, THOMAS S A, GIVENS S W. Flue gas desulfurization wastewater treatment primer[J]. Power, 2009, 153(3): 40-43.

ENOCH G D, SPIERING W, TIGCHELAAR P, et al. Treatment of waste water from wet lime (stone) flue gas desulfurization plants with aid of crossflow microfiltration[J]. Separation Science, 1990, 25(13/14/15): 1587-1605.

李明波,范玺,孙克勤.利用烟道气处理火电厂WFGD废水的技术应用[J].电力科技与环保,2010, 26(2): 53-55.

刘海洋,江澄宇,谷小兵,等. 燃煤电厂湿法脱硫废水零排放处理技术进展[J].水污染防治, 2016, 34(4): 33-36.

王晓焙, 耿宣, 罗天翔, 等.330 MW机组脱硫废水旁路烟道喷雾干燥技术数值模拟与应用示范[J].热力发电, 2019,48(6):96-101.

马双忱, 柴峰, 吴文龙, 等. 脱硫废水烟道喷雾蒸发的数值模拟[J]. 计算机与应用化学, 2016,33(1): 47-53.

张子敬, 汪建文, 高艺, 等. 燃煤电厂脱硫废水烟气蒸发特性流场模拟[J]. 煤炭学报, 2015, 40(3): 678-683.

DENG J J, PAN L M, CHEN D Q, et al. Numerical simulation and field test study of desulfurization wastewater evaporation treatment through flue gas[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2014, 70(7): 1285-1291.

冉景煜,张志荣.不同物性液滴在低温烟气中的蒸发特性数值研究[J].中国电机工程学报, 2010, 30(26): 62-68.

晋银佳,王帅,姬海宏,等.深度过滤－烟道蒸发处理脱硫废水的数值模拟[J].中国电力, 2016, 49(12): 174-179.

PINTO M, KEMP I, BERMINGHAM S, et al. Development of an axisymmetric population balance model for spray drying and validation against experimental date and CFD simulation[J]. Chemical Enginerering Research & Design, 2014, 92(4): 619-634.

BORODULIN V Y, LETUSHKO V N, NIZOVTSEV M I, et al. Determination of parameters of heat and mass transfer in evaporating drops[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 109: 609-618.

RA Y, REITZ R D. A vaporization model for discrete multi-component fuel sprays[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2009, 35(2):101-117.

Relative Articles

[1]	LIN Huili, JIN Zhaodi, ZHANG Shuli, ZHANG Guangxue, YU Qun, ZHANG Min. NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND EVALUATION OF INDIRECT THERMAL DESORPTION EQUIPMENT FOR PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 261-267. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403032
[2]	YIN Leyi, HUANG Guoxin, NIU Haobo, CHEN Jian, XIE Yueqing, YANG Lihu, LIU Ling. GROUNDWATER POLLUTION DYNAMIC RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND RISK SCREENING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 199-205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401026
[3]	HU Yuanxiang, LI Yongli, ZHANG Hongjiang, CAO Yinhuan, GONG Yanzhe, CHEN Xi. ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS CONTENT AND BIOTOXICITY DURING TREATMENT PROCESS OF FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION WASTEWATER IN A COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 17-24. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406003
[4]	WANG Rui, LI Yongli, ZHANG Hongjiang, GONG Yanzhe, HU Bin, CHEN Xi. ENHANCEMENT OF SO₄^2- REMOVAL BY SODIUM ALGINATE IN LIME SOFTENING PROCESS OF DESULFURIZATION WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 26-33. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303004
[5]	BAI Yongfeng, WANG Zhengrong, ZHAN Guoxiong, CHEN Zhen, LI Junhua. SIMULATION AND OPTIMIZATION OF CARBON CAPTURE IN COAL-FIRED FLUE GAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(9): 61-71. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202309008
[6]	ZHANG You, ZHAO Tingting, DU Ranli, LI Huashan, KONG Xiangcheng, XUE Jianliang. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ANALYSIS OF FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF DESCENDING FILM EVAPORATION OF SALT-CONTAINING WASTEWATER IN COAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 17-22,31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306003
[7]	LI Debo, CHEN Zhaoli, CHEN Zhihao, FENG Yongxin, HUANG Zigan, WEI Chen, MA Xiaoqian. NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MIXED FIRING OF AGED REFUSE AND AIR DISTRIBUTION OPTIMIZATION IN A MSW INCINERATION FURNACE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 113-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211016
[8]	ZHENG Kaixuan, HUANG Junlong, LUO Xingshen, WANG Hongtao, CHEN Tan. APPLICATION PROGRESS OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION IN PERMEABLE REATIVE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 22-30. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206003
[9]	ZHANG Yun. ADVANCES IN NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF GROUNDWATER IN-SITE CHEMICAL REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 197-204,217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205029
[10]	WANG Hongliang, XU Yueyang, ZHONG Zhaoping, HAN Lei, HUANG Jiawei, XU Yuanqiang. EFFECT OF DESULFURIZATION WASTEWATER ADDITION ON MERCURY RELEASE CHARACTERISTICS DURING COAL COMBUSTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 69-77. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211010
[11]	LIU Pengyu, LI Debo, LIU Yanfeng, QUE Zhengbin, MIAO Jianjie, CHEN Zhaoli. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF SCR DENITRIFICATION SYSTEM IN A COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 224-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210029
[12]	LI Wenjun, ZHENG Chenghang, WANG Yifan, ZHAO Zhongyang, LIU Chang, WU Weihong, LIU Shaojun. NUMERICAL SIMULATION ON SPRAY EVAPORATION PROCESS FOR SMALL-SCALE QUENCH TOWER IN LIMITED SPACE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 50-56,78. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204008
[13]	XU Min, DU Hongyu, GUO Jiaming, ZHAO Xiaodan, LU Wei, SUN Chao, CHEN Yu, ZHOU Zhen. A PILOT-SCALE EXPERIMENT FOR ZERO LIQUID DISCHARGE AND RESOURCE RECOVERY OF FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION WASTEWATER IN COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 169-175. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210023
[14]	HAN Xiao-dong, SUN Ye. SITE SELECTION OF WASTE TRANSFER STATION BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF ODOR DISPERSION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 130-135. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103018
[15]	NIE Peng-fei, GAO Zhi, MENG De-run, ZHANG Hong-bo, ZHANG Qing. APPLICATION OF CFD IN A DOUBLE STAGE DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 119-124,130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108016
[16]	ZHAO Kun, LI Ruo-hua, CHENG Wen-long, YANG Yuan-ping, YUE Shu-bo. NUMERICAL SIMULATION STUDY ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF SEWAGE DISCHARGE ON ESTUARY WATER FUNCTIONAL AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 33-40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010006
[17]	QU Guang-fei, AN Zhi, NING Ping, XIE Ruo-song. GENERAL SURVEY ON APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL SIMULATION IN SEWAGE BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 99-104,179. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003017
[18]	SHEN Li. PREDICTION OF DUST MOVEMENT LAW IN COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS BASED ON GAS-PARTICLE TWO-PHASE FLOW MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 181-187,93. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006030
[19]	Ding Zhijiang Lu Mingyuan Xiao Lichun, . NUMERICAL SIMULATION METHOD OF GAS FLOW DISTRIBUTION IN ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR FOR CONVERTER GAS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 92-96. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504019
[20]	Mao Rui, Liu Genfan, Deng Xiang, Fan Ning. NUMERICAL SIMULATION STUDY ON STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF BAG FILTER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 77-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503016

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(18)

1.	郑立龙，张德程，郝连成，代友旭，张健康，李先锋，任开文，刘建，孔凡全，王勇峰. 广东雷州东部土壤重金属分布特征、来源分析及健康风险评价. 中国地质. 2025(01): 300-314 .
2.	王胜蓝，蒋月，马杰，王俭，刘萍，邓力，孙静，龚玲. 基于蒙特卡罗模拟的危险废物处置场地下水重金属健康风险评估. 有色金属(冶炼部分). 2024(01): 143-153 .
3.	马海珍，张振师，李权，许林，戈洋，杨贞. 某化工厂土壤与地下水Cr~(6+)污染分布及健康风险. 西北地质. 2024(01): 73-82 .
4.	周礼洋. 典型有机化工厂污染地块氯代烃分布特征及基于蒙特卡洛模拟的风险评估. 环境工程技术学报. 2024(01): 98-111 .
5.	李雨晨，郑刘根，陈星，陈永春，安士凯，安燕飞，李兵. 基于PMF模型的矿区土壤重金属来源解析. 环境监测管理与技术. 2024(01): 17-22 .
6.	张栋，李永春，苏日力格，袁国礼，邰苏日嘎拉，王永亮，陈国栋，周文辉，杜雨春子，杨建雨. 内蒙古五原县某地土壤重金属生态健康风险评价. 中国地质. 2024(01): 248-263 .
7.	袁帅，张思源，张雪琼，袁国礼，王永亮，边鹏，邰苏日嘎拉. 内蒙古乌拉特前旗大佘太地区农田表层土壤重金属生态安全风险评价. 中国地质. 2024(05): 1686-1700 .
8.	王红梅，吴健芳，田自强，李宇婷，龚斌. 土壤污染物健康风险评价技术现状及发展趋势. 环境工程技术学报. 2023(02): 778-784 .
9.	马杰，孙静，蒋月，陈召沪，刘萍. 某铅锌尾矿库周边土壤和底泥重金属铊污染特征及健康风险评估. 有色金属(冶炼部分). 2023(04): 140-147 .
10.	郑煜，罗杨，吴永贵，彭小裕，伍建业，彭子乐，罗鉴. 肠道微生物对蔬菜中铬生物可给性的影响及人体健康风险评价. 环境化学. 2023(04): 1097-1108 .
11.	郭志娟，刘飞，周亚龙，王乔林，王成文. 雄安新区土壤氟地球化学特征及健康风险评价. 环境科学. 2023(08): 4397-4405 .
12.	马杰，佘泽蕾，王胜蓝，邓力，孙静，刘萍，徐敏. 重庆市煤矸山周边农产品镉健康风险评价及土壤环境基准值推导. 环境科学. 2023(09): 5264-5274 .
13.	马杰，佘泽蕾，王胜蓝，邓力，刘萍，孙静. 基于蒙特卡罗模拟的煤矸山周边农用地土壤重金属健康风险评估. 环境科学. 2023(10): 5666-5678 .
14.	程全国，王浩东，李晔，高悦. 基于蒙特卡罗模拟的辽宁省某化工园区及周边地下水PAHs健康风险评价. 沈阳大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(03): 175-182 .
15.	栗钰洁，王贝贝，曹素珍，高菲，张力文，段小丽. 基于PMF的土壤多环芳烃致癌风险定量源解析方法研究：以太原市为例. 环境科学研究. 2022(08): 1996-2005 .
16.	石文静，周翰鹏，孙涛，黄金涛，杨文焕，李卫平. 矿区周边土壤重金属污染优先控制因子及健康风险评价研究. 生态环境学报. 2022(08): 1616-1628 .
17.	张怡萍，王哲，张振龙，罗莹，曾秋平，贾文静，王振雨，张家千，冯喜杨，黄凤羽，易发成. 基于蒙特卡洛模拟的土壤健康风险评价——以攀枝花某矿区小流域为例. 化工矿物与加工. 2022(12): 30-36+45 .
18.	徐文，朱士江，纪道斌，丁致玉，李虎，于颖，李凯凯. 基于Copula函数的区域氮代谢环境风险评价与分析：以北京市密云区为例. 环境科学与技术. 2022(12): 154-163 .