Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
DENG Lin-li, ZHANG Kai-shan. ANALYSIS OF CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTION OF METAL POLLUTION IN PM2.5 IN TYPICAL METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH HAZE POLLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 113-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005020
Citation: DENG Lin-li, ZHANG Kai-shan. ANALYSIS OF CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTION OF METAL POLLUTION IN PM2.5 IN TYPICAL METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH HAZE POLLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 113-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005020

ANALYSIS OF CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTION OF METAL POLLUTION IN PM2.5 IN TYPICAL METROPOLITAN CITIES WITH HAZE POLLUTION

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005020
  • Received Date: 2019-09-12
  • Metal elements adsorbed in PM2.5 imposed a great threat to the public health, due to its strong stability and enrichment. In order to characterize the metal elements absorbed in PM2.5, four metropolitan cities with severe haze pollution, i.e., Beijing, Chengdu, Shanghai and Guangzhou, were selected for this study. This paper summarized key studies from 2013 to 2017 related to air pollution, especially PM2.5 and its metal composition in the selected cities. Analysis showed that metal elements in PM2.5 of the selected cities varied both spatially and temporally due to regional meteorological conditions, industrial structures and pollution sources. Secondary aerosols, coal burning and biomass combustion were the three key sources to metal elements in PM2.5 for all the selected cities. While the contributions from other sources varied by cities. The findings implied that the impact of industrial structure on metal elements apportionment in PM2.5 should be further investigated, which would provide insights regarding policy making for effective air pollution control.
  • 吴兑.近十年中国灰霾天气研究综述[J].环境科学学报,2012,32(2):257-269.
    李岚淼,李龙国,李乃稳.城市雾霾成因及危害研究进展[J].环境工程,2017,35(12):92-97

    ,104.
    ZHOU L, ZHOU C H, YANG F, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and the influencing factors of PM2.5 in China between 2000 and 2015[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019,29(2):253-270.
    北京市统计局,国家统计局北京调查总队. 北京统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2018.
    成都市统计局,国家统计局成都调查队. 成都统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2018.
    上海市统计局,国家统计局上海调查队. 上海统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2018.
    广州市统计局,国家统计局广州调查队. 广州统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2018.
    张霖琳,王超,刀谞,等.京津冀地区城市环境空气颗粒物及其元素特征分析[J].中国环境科学,2014,34(12):2993-3000.
    乔宝文,刘子锐,胡波,等.北京冬季PM2.5中金属元素浓度特征和来源分析[J].环境科学,2017,38(3):876-883.
    贾岳清,殷惠民,周瑞,等.北京初冬季PM2.5中无机元素与二次水溶性离子浓度特征[J].环境化学,2018,37(12):2767-2773.
    徐静,李杏茹,张兰,等.北京城郊PM2.5中金属元素的污染特征及潜在生态风险评价[J].环境科学,2019,40(6):1-15.
    陈源,谢绍东,罗彬.成都市大气细颗粒物组成和污染特征分析(2012—2013年)[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(3):1021-1031.
    杨怀金,杨德容,叶芝祥,等.成都西南郊区春季PM2.5中元素特征及重金属潜在生态风险评价[J].环境科学,2016,37(12):4490-4503.
    林瑜,叶芝祥,杨怀金,等.成都市西南郊区春季大气PM2.5的污染水平及来源解析[J].环境科学,2016,37(5):1629-1638.
    张梦.成都市东区大气颗粒物源解析[D].成都:成都理工大学,2017.
    胡鸣,张懿华,赵倩彪.上海市冬季PM2.5无机元素污染特征及来源分析[J].环境科学学报,2015,35(7):1993-1999.
    王晓浩,赵倩彪,崔虎雄.基于在线监测的上海郊区冬季PM2.5来源解析[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),2015,51(3):517-523.
    吴云,叶玉龙,张亚宁,等.上海金山化学工业区周边PM2.5金属元素特征分析[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2017,27(5):698-701.
    TAO J, ZHANG L M, CAO J J, et al. Source apportionment of PM2.5 at urban and suburban areas of the Pearl River Delta region, south China: with emphasis on ship emissions[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016,574:1559-1570.
    李敏,高燕红,郭凌川,等.广州大气PM2.5中重金属污染的健康风险评价[J].环境与健康杂志,2016,33(5):421-424.
    环境保护部. 环境空气质量指数(AQI)技术规定(试行):HJ 633—2012[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012.
    环境保护部,国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 环境空气质量标准:GB 3095—2012[S].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012.
    WANG H B, QIAO B Q, ZHANG L M. Characteristics and sources of trace elements in PM2.5 in two megacities in Sichuan basin of Southwest China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018,242:1577-1586.
    林晓辉,赵阳,樊孝俊,等.南昌市秋季大气PM2.5中金属元素富集特征及来源分析[J].环境科学,2016,37(1):35-40.
    韩力慧,张鹏,张海亮,等.北京市大气细颗粒物污染与来源解析研究[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(11):3203-3210.
    张静,张衍杰,方小珍,等.道路扬尘PM2.5中金属元素污染特征及健康风险评价[J].环境科学,2017,38(10):4071-4076.
    乔宝文.京津冀地区PM2.5中金属元素污染特征和来源分析[D].北京:北京化工大学,2017.
    杨婧,郭晓爽,滕曼,等.我国大气细颗粒物中金属污染特征及来源解析研究进展[J].环境化学,2014,33(9):1514-1521.
    张智胜,陶俊,龙颖贤,等.成都城区PM2.5中有害微量元素的污染特征[J].中国科学院大学学报,2014,31(3):426-430

    ,438.
    周杨,张惠灵,汪茜,等.武汉市青山区冬季PM2.5的污染特征及源解析[J].环境科学与技术,2015,38(11):159-164.
    陈珂,窦筱艳,马伟,等.西宁市非采暖季和采暖季PM2.5中14种金属元素特征[J].中国环境监测,2018,34(2):28-34.
    郑玫,张延君,闫才青,等.中国PM2.5来源解析方法综述[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2014,50(6):1141-1154.
    方凤满.中国大气颗粒物中金属元素环境地球化学行为研究[J].生态环境学报,2010,19(4):979-984.
    孔祥宇.成都市中心城区大气重金属污染特征分析与区域扩散预测[D].成都:成都理工大学,2010.
    姚振坤,冯满,吕森林,等.上海城区和临安本底站PM2.5的物化特征及来源解析[J].中国环境科学,2010,30(3):289-295.
    李敏,连晓文,王静,等.广州两城区大气PM2.5金属成分的污染特征[J].环境与职业医学,2016,33(7):650-656.
    GAO J J, TIAN H Z, CHENG K, et al. Seasonal and spatial variation of trace elements in multi-size airborne particulate matters of Beijing, China:mass concentration, enrichment characteristics, source apportionment, chemical speciation and bioavailability[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2014,99: 257-265.
    WANG J, HU Z M, CHEN Y Y, et al. Contamination characteristics and possible sources of PM10 and PM2.5 in different functional areas of Shanghai, China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013:221-229.
    杨妍妍,李金香,梁云平,等. 应用受体模型(CMB)对北京市大气PM2.5来源的解析研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(9):2693-2700.
    LI Y Y, CHANG M, DING S S, et al. Monitoring and source apportionment of trace elements in PM2.5:implications for local air quality management[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017,196:16-25.
    陈锦超.北京市霾与非霾期间PM2.5中无及组分特征及源解析的研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2018.
    TAO J, GAO J, ZHANG L B, et al. PM2.5 pollution in a megacity of southwest China: source apportionment and implication[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2014,14(16):8679-8699.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]GUO Qianjin. COMPONENTS CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM2.5 IN AUTUMN AND WINTER IN JINCHENG[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 153-161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407017
    [2]LIU Haotian, TONG Jilong, YANG Hong, LIU Yongle, AO Congjie, WANG Shusu. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON VOCs POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE ANALYSIS BETWEEN LANZHOU DOWNTOWN AREA AND XIGU REFINING CHEMICAL INDUSTRY ZONE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 139-147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404017
    [3]SONG Lusheng, SUN Zhenzhou, HU Jing, DENG Qinghai. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED IRON ORE AND DOWNSTREAM FARMLAND SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 155-164. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410019
    [4]ZHAO Wanning, CUI Jijing, BAI Liyong, YU Xiaojing, DAI Jiulan. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON NITRATE SOURCE ANALYSIS METHODS FOR WATER ENVIRONMENT IN WATERSHEDS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 286-294. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308036
    [5]ZHANG Yibing, LIANG Yiqun, ZHANG Yuan, FANG Yinxiang, NIU Hongya, FAN Jingsen. SOURCE APPORTIONMENT AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN PM2.5 IN THE FENGFENG MINING AREA IN 2017—2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 242-250. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308031
    [6]LI Ganyu, CUI Xingtao. CHARACTERISTICS OF HEAVY METAL ELEMENTS POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST-FALL IN TANGSHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 278-287. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312035
    [7]GAO Wei, CHEN Yan, YAN Changan, LIU Yong. SOURCE IDENTIFICATION OF PHOSPHORUS IN VARIOUS DISTURBED RIVERS BASED ON LAM MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 55-62. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206007
    [8]ZHU Xue-tao, LIN Hai-ying, FENG Qing-ge, ZHAO Bo-han, ZHU Yi-fan, LAN Wen-lu, LI Tian-shen. POLLUTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT, SOURCE ANALYSIS OF HEAVY METALS IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF BEIBU GULF, GUANGXI[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(8): 69-76. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202108009
    [18]Wang Zaifeng, Zhang Shuiyan, Zhang Huaicheng, Zhao Hong, Ji Yaqin. SOURCE APPORTIONMENT TECHNOLOGY OF RIVER POLLUTION SOURCE BY WATER QUALITY MODEL COUPLING WITH CMB MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 135-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502030
    [19]Yang Long Sun Changhong Li Shanshan Liu Guizhong, . COMPARATIVE STUDY ON HEAVY METAL POLLUTION OF SURFACE DUST IN TYPICAL INDUSTRIES ENVIRONMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 122-125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502027
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 楚君,雷晓慧. 北方城市市区大气臭氧污染时空变化特征分析与协同治理策略研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(02): 125-128+138 .
    2. 谢勇,曹玲,姚瑶,姚宏伟,王爽. 持续性雾霾气象灾害风险预警方法研究. 环境科学与管理. 2023(04): 28-33 .
    3. 荣素英,刘佳佳,杨文琦,曾豪,张磊,方波,徐厚君,王茜. 大学生尿液金属水平与肺功能的关系. 中国学校卫生. 2022(02): 288-291 .
    4. 李强. 供热通风空调气体排放特征及污染趋势研究. 环境科学与管理. 2022(06): 129-133 .
    5. 范圣虎,张飞云. 利用大气超级站对乌鲁木齐市一次沙尘天气过程及组份的分析. 干旱环境监测. 2021(01): 15-22 .

    Other cited types(11)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 6.5 %FULLTEXT: 6.5 %META: 90.7 %META: 90.7 %PDF: 2.8 %PDF: 2.8 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 13.2 %其他: 13.2 %其他: 0.6 %其他: 0.6 %China: 2.0 %China: 2.0 %United States: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 2.0 %上海: 2.0 %东莞: 1.0 %东莞: 1.0 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %保定: 2.4 %保定: 2.4 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 11.6 %北京: 11.6 %南京: 3.2 %南京: 3.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.6 %南昌: 0.6 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %合肥: 1.0 %合肥: 1.0 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.4 %唐山: 0.4 %唐山: 0.4 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %天津: 1.2 %天津: 1.2 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %宁波: 0.6 %宁波: 0.6 %安阳: 0.2 %安阳: 0.2 %宿州: 0.8 %宿州: 0.8 %宿迁: 0.8 %宿迁: 0.8 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %广州: 2.8 %广州: 2.8 %开封: 0.6 %开封: 0.6 %张家口: 2.2 %张家口: 2.2 %徐州: 1.0 %徐州: 1.0 %德州: 0.4 %德州: 0.4 %成都: 2.0 %成都: 2.0 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %揭阳: 0.2 %揭阳: 0.2 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %昌吉: 0.2 %昌吉: 0.2 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 5.3 %杭州: 5.3 %柳州: 0.8 %柳州: 0.8 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.2 %泰安: 0.2 %泰安: 0.2 %济南: 0.8 %济南: 0.8 %济宁: 0.2 %济宁: 0.2 %济源: 0.4 %济源: 0.4 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.4 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %潍坊: 0.4 %潍坊: 0.4 %班加罗尔: 0.6 %班加罗尔: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.4 %福州: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %绵阳: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 12.6 %芒廷维尤: 12.6 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %荆州: 1.0 %荆州: 1.0 %菏泽: 0.6 %菏泽: 0.6 %衡水: 0.6 %衡水: 0.6 %衢州: 1.4 %衢州: 1.4 %西宁: 3.2 %西宁: 3.2 %西安: 1.2 %西安: 1.2 %达州: 0.2 %达州: 0.2 %运城: 1.6 %运城: 1.6 %连云港: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %长沙: 2.0 %长沙: 2.0 %长治: 0.2 %长治: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %青岛: 1.4 %青岛: 1.4 %其他其他ChinaUnited States[]上海东莞临汾佛山保定兰州北京南京南宁南昌南通厦门台州合肥呼和浩特唐山大同天津太原宁波安阳宿州宿迁常州常德广州开封张家口徐州德州成都拉贾斯坦邦揭阳昆明昌吉晋城朝阳杭州柳州格兰特县武汉沈阳泰安济南济宁济源深圳温州湖州漯河潍坊班加罗尔石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴绵阳芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州菏泽衡水衢州西宁西安达州运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治阳泉青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (446) PDF downloads(18) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return