Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
LOU Di-ming, ZHANG Jiu-yang, TAN Pi-qiang, HU Zhi-yuan. TEST AND ANALYSIS ON FUELING EMISSION OF B10 KITCHEN WASTE GREASE BIODIESEL FOR SHIP[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 86-90,76. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002012
Citation: CUI Yong, BAI Lian-yang, LONG Yue-lin, YANG Kai-qin. ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOILS OF LIANHUA TOWN IN THE SUBURBS OF CHANGSHA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 202-209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005035

ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOILS OF LIANHUA TOWN IN THE SUBURBS OF CHANGSHA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005035
  • Received Date: 2019-03-24
  • In Lianhua Town, the suburb of Changsha, 54 soil samples were collected, and the contents of 5 heavy metal elements including Hg, Cd, As, Pb and Cr, were measured. A comprehensive ecological risk evaluation method was used to evaluate the pollution degree of heavy metal elements in soils and their harm to human health. The results were as follows: 1) The average contents of Cd, Hg and Pb exceeded more than 1 time of the soil background value in Hunan province, and the accumulation in the soil was more obvious; the spatial variation of Cd and Pb was significant, indicating that their sources were highly disturbed; and the pollution degree of the 5 heavy metal elements was in sequence of Cd>Hg>Pb>As>Cr. 2) The potential ecological hazard of the 5 kinds of heavy metals was in sequence of Cd>Hg>As>Pb>Cr, and Cd and Hg possessed strong ecological hazards. The average value of the comprehensive potential ecological risk index had reached strong level. Cd and Hg were the main contributors in the study regional soil pollution. 3) "Hand-mouth" intake was the main way of soil heavy metal exposure. The non-carcinogenic exposure dose for children was far greater than that of the adults; the non-carcinogenic risk were within the safe limits. 4) The risk index of Cr was as hjgh as 10-4 above, with carcinogenic risk; carcinogenic risk index of Cd and As ranged in 10-6~10-4, within an acceptable risk range. The pollution of As and Cr was found as the major factors affecting human health, and should be paid more attention to.
  • 朱永官,李刚,张甘霖,等.土壤安全:从地球关键带到生态系统服务[J]. 地理学报,2015,70(12):1859-1869.
    沈仁芳,滕应.土壤安全的概念与我国的战略对策[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2015,30(4):468-476.
    赵其国,沈仁芳,滕应. 中国土壤安全"一带一路"发展战略的思考[J].生态环境学报,2016,25(3):365-371.
    杨鑫荣.长沙市莲花镇土地利用变化对全态系统服务功能的影响研究[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2015.
    吴堑虹,戴塔根,方建武,等. 长沙、株洲、湘潭三市土壤中重金属元素的来源[J].地质通报,2007,26(11):1453-1458.
    陈肖胤,王永豪. 乔口镇土壤重金属Pb、Cd潜在生态风险评价[J].湖南工业大学学报,2016,30(2):63-67.
    雷鸣,曾敏,王利红,等.湖南市场和污染区稻米中As,Pb,Cd污染及其健康风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2010,30(11):2314-2320.
    郭笑笑,刘丛强,朱兆洲,等.土壤重金属污染评价方法[J]. 生态学杂志,2011,30(5):889-896.
    张菊,陈诗越,邓焕广,等.山东省部分水岸带土壤重金属含量及污染评价[J].生态学报,2012,32(10):3144-3153.
    石占飞,王力. 神木矿区土壤重金属含量特征及潜在风险评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(6):1150-1158.
    吕建树,张祖陆,刘洋,等.日照市土壤重金属来源解析及环境风险评价[J].地理学报,2012,67(7):971-984.
    况琴,黄庭,向京,等. 鄂西北某农田保护区土壤重金属分布特征及生态风险评价[J].环境工程,2019,37(5):45-49

    ,55.
    赵科理,傅伟军,戴巍,等. 浙江省典型水稻产区土壤-水稻系统重金属迁移特征及定量模型[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2016, 24(2):226-234.
    洪涛,孔祥胜,岳祥飞. 滇东南峰丛洼地土壤重金属含量、来源及潜在生态风险评价[J].环境科学,2019,40(10):4620-4627.
    秦顺超,张焕祯,郭伟,等. 土壤重金属污染评价方法研究进展[J].环境工程,2018,36(增刊):733-737,742.
    王小宇,周忠发,黄登红,等. 喀斯特山区茶园土壤重金属污染损失率模型评价研究[J].环境工程,2018,36(3):169-175.
    MULLER G. Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River[J]. Geojournal, 1969, 2(3):108-118.
    HAKANSON L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control: a sedimentological approach[J].Water Research, 1980, 14(8): 975-1001.
    USEPA. Environmental Protection Agency. Exposure Factors Handbook[M]. Washington,DC: National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development, 1997: 1-290.
    USEPA. Exposure Factors Handbook:2011 Edition[M]. Washington,DC: National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development, 2011.
    金艳,何德文,柴立元,等.重金属污染评价研究进展[J].有色金属工程,2007,59(2):100-104.
    吕悦风,孙华.浙北某县域耕地土壤重金属空间分异特征、污染评价及来源分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2019,38(1):95-102.
    潘佑民,杨国治.湖南土壤背景值及研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1988.
    国家环境保护局,国家技术监督局. GB 15618—1995土壤环境质量标准[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1995.
    李一蒙,马建华,刘德新,等.开封城市土壤重金属污染及潜在生态风险评价[J].环境科学,2015,36(3):1037-1044.
    马建华,王晓云,侯千,等.某城市幼儿园地表灰尘重金属污染及潜在生态风险[J].地理研究,2011,30(3):486-495.
    刘梦梅,王利军,王丽,等.西安市不同功能区土壤重金属含量及生态健康风险评价[J].土壤通报,2018,49(1):167-175.
    徐争启,倪师军,庹先国,等.潜在生态危害指数法评价中重金属毒性系数计算[J].环境科学与技术,2008,31(2):112-115.
    USEPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume Ⅲ-Part A, Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment[R]. USEPA, Washington, DC, EPA/540/R-02/002, 2001: 1-204.
    USEPA. Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites[M]. Washington,DC: National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development, 2002.
    环境保护部.中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2013.
    环境保护部.中国人群暴露参数手册(儿童卷0~5岁)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2016.
    环境保护部.中国人群暴露参数手册(儿童卷6~17岁)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2016.
    王永晓,曹红英,邓雅佳,等.大气颗粒物及降尘中重金属的分布特征与人体健康风险评价[J].环境科学,2017,38(9):3575-3584.
    陈莹,孙璐,云中来,等.西安市城市道路灰尘重金属污染及健康风险评价[J].安全与环境学报,2016,16(2):370-376.
    阿吉古丽·马木提,麦麦提吐尔逊·艾则孜,艾尼瓦尔·买买提.新疆喀什市城乡交错带耕地土壤重金属污染风险评价[J].环境工程,2018,36(4):160-164.
    冯乙晴,刘灵飞,肖辉林,等. 深圳市典型工业区土壤重金属污染特征及健康风险评价[J].生态环境学报,2017,26(6):1051-1058.
    毛小苓,刘阳生.国内外环境风险评价研究进展[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2003,11(3):266-272.
    WILDING L P. Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil surveys[A]. In: Nielsen D R, Bouma J (Eds.). Soil Spatial Variability[M]. Wageningen: PUDOC Publishers, 1985.166-194.
    李立.传统农区不同种植模式对土壤重金属污染的影响[J].生态环境学报,2012,21(10):1756-1762.
    李霞,张慧鸣,徐震,等.农田Cd和Hg污染的来源解析与风险评价研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(7):1314-1320.
    王存龙,曾宪东,刘华峰,等.烟台市土壤环境质量现状及重金属元素分布迁移规律[J].中国地质,2015,42(1):317-330.
    肖武,隋涛,王鑫,等.巢湖流域典型农田土壤重金属污染评价与地理探测分析[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(7):144-152.
    石占飞,王力.神木矿区土壤重金属含量特征及潜在风险评价[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(6):1150-1158.
    王丹丹,郑庆荣,侯艳军,等.五台山北麓土壤重金属含量的空间分布与污染评价[J].环境工程,2018,36(3):164-168.
    范明毅,杨皓,黄先飞,等.典型山区燃煤型电厂周边土壤重金属形态特征及污染评价[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(8):2425-2436.
    ELIZABETH A J, JONATHAN W, GLENN E R, et al. Metal exposures in an inner-city neonatal population[J]. Environment International,2010,36(7): 649-654.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]KONG Huimin, ZHAO Xiaohui, XU Wan, DAI Yuhan, ZHANG Jiayu. OCCURRENCE AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF ANTIBIOTICS IN GROUNDWATER ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 219-226. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302029
    [2]GUO Yake, GAO Yanyan, QIAN Hui, TANG Shunqi, WANG Haike, SHI Xiaoxin. SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN THE CHU RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 112-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301014
    [3]LI Ganyu, CUI Xingtao. CHARACTERISTICS OF HEAVY METAL ELEMENTS POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC DUST-FALL IN TANGSHAN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 278-287. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312035
    [4]TAN Hui, LIN Hua, DING Na, SHI En-ze, GAN Shu-ping. CHARACTERIZATION OF RHIZOSPHERE ENVIRONMENT OF LEERSIA HEXANDRA SWARTZ UNDER CONTAMINATION OF Ni AND Cr[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 109-116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205016
    [5]ZHANG Yao, SUN Gang, WANG Qi, LING Haibo, HU Nan. INVESTIGATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF HEAVY METALS IN AGRICULTURAL LAND IN A LEAD-ZINC MINING AREA IN HUBEI PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 139-145,205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202022
    [6]REN Jun, WANG Yirong, REN Hanru, TONG Yunlong, WANG Tongyu, TAO Ling. STABILIZATION REMEDIATION OF Cd-POLLUTED SOILS USING ATTALPULGITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 123-131. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207018
    [7]CHEN Rui, DU Shuangjie, XU Wei, ZHU Tao. CONCENTRATION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOIL OF A WITHDRAWAL CULTIVATED LAND IN SUBURB OF NANJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(3): 102-110,165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202203016
    [8]TU Degang, FENG Tao, YANG Guodong, LUO Weiwei, NIE Beili. POLLUTION ANALYSIS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AN ABANDONED MACHINERY PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 217-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204031
    [9]MENG Tingting, LIU Jinbao, DONG Hao, WANG Bo, ZHANG Guojian. SOIL HEAVY METAL POLLUTION AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT OF URBAN GREEN LAND UNDER DIFFERENT MANAGEMENT METHODS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 217-223. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212029
    [10]FANG Qing, XIAN Ping, MENG Zheng-cheng. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL OF AGRICULTURAL LAND BASED ON MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(2): 147-152. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202102024
    [11]LIU Zhao, ZHOU Hong, LIU Wei, CAO Wen-jia, LAN Sheng-tao. HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 196-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028
    [12]WU Xiang-yu, WANG Yi-tian, ZHANG Han, XU Hong-yong, CAI Lan-kun. LEACHING ENVIRONMENTAL RISK EVALUATION OF Pb IN SOLIDIFIED/STABILIZED MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE INCINERATION FLY ASH UNDER WETTING AND DRYING INTERMITTENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 135-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011022
    [13]LUO Qing, GU Lei-yan, SHAN Yue, SUN Li-na. HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN URBAN TOP SOIL OF SHENYANG BASED ON MONTE CARLO METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 196-201,222. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005034
    [15]Fan Shuanxi. POLLUTION AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN SOIL AROUND A SMELTER IN CHANGQING TOWN OF BAOJI CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 121-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504026
    [16]Deng Yirong, Lin Ting, Xiao Rongbo, Zhao Lu, Han Cunliang. RECENT ADVANCES IN THE APPLICATION OF EKR-PRB IN CONTAMINATED SITE REMEDIATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 152-157. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510034
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 杨鹏至,郭军,肖粤新,李聪,陈方伟,汤恒佳. 农耕区大气干湿沉降通量特征监测及人体健康风险评价. 安徽农业科学. 2024(09): 63-67+86 .
    2. 奉水东,曹梦悦,刘俊,唐艳,曾雨可,沈敏学,杨飞. 亚洲最大雄黄矿周围农田土壤的金属污染及风险评价. 环境与职业医学. 2023(08): 923-930+980 .
    3. 杜贯新,闫百泉,孙雨,钱程,秦涛,臧延庆,杜继宇. 松嫩平原黑土区西北部阿荣旗黑土重金属分布特征、评价及预警. 地质科学. 2022(02): 606-621 .
    4. 刘建华,顾振飞,曹见飞,徐明雪,王翠秀,吴泉源. 龙口市污灌区重金属污染影响因子分析. 环境污染与防治. 2022(04): 448-453 .
    5. 范晨子,刘永兵,袁继海,郭威,孙冬阳,刘成海. 滇中典型工矿业城市大气干湿沉降重金属等元素特征及健康风险评价. 环境科学. 2022(08): 3923-3933 .
    6. 申圆圆,王佩怡,王芝涵. 平原区农田重金属污染的综合生态风险评价方法. 陕西农业科学. 2022(09): 107-112 .
    7. 于沨,王伟,于扬,王登红,刘善宝,高娟琴,吕秉廷,刘丽君. 川西九龙地区锂铍矿区土壤重金属分布特征及生态风险评价. 岩矿测试. 2021(03): 408-424 .
    8. 刘媚媚,高凤杰,韩晶,王鑫,郭欣欣. 黑土区小流域土壤重金属生态危害与来源解析. 中国农业大学学报. 2020(11): 12-21 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 13.3 %FULLTEXT: 13.3 %META: 84.3 %META: 84.3 %PDF: 2.4 %PDF: 2.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.3 %其他: 11.3 %China: 0.8 %China: 0.8 %United States: 0.4 %United States: 0.4 %上海: 2.4 %上海: 2.4 %临汾: 0.4 %临汾: 0.4 %北京: 6.0 %北京: 6.0 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %台州: 1.6 %台州: 1.6 %嘉兴: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.4 %大同: 0.4 %大同: 0.4 %天津: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %张家口: 1.2 %张家口: 1.2 %张掖: 0.8 %张掖: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %扬州: 0.4 %扬州: 0.4 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.4 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.4 %无锡: 0.8 %无锡: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.4 %杭州: 2.4 %杭州: 2.4 %沈阳: 1.6 %沈阳: 1.6 %济源: 0.8 %济源: 0.8 %海口: 0.4 %海口: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 1.6 %湖州: 1.6 %湘潭: 0.4 %湘潭: 0.4 %漯河: 0.8 %漯河: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 34.7 %芒廷维尤: 34.7 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %衢州: 2.4 %衢州: 2.4 %西宁: 12.1 %西宁: 12.1 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %达州: 0.4 %达州: 0.4 %运城: 3.2 %运城: 3.2 %遵义: 0.4 %遵义: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %铁岭: 0.8 %铁岭: 0.8 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %香港: 0.8 %香港: 0.8 %其他ChinaUnited States上海临汾北京十堰南京台州嘉兴大同天津常州常德张家口张掖成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州沈阳济源海口温州湖州湘潭漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安达州运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铁岭长沙长治香港

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (208) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return