Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 5
Aug.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(5): 215-222
GENG Yi-cheng, ZHOU Wei-bo, SHI Fang-fang, DONG Yan-hui. STUDY ON GROUNDWATER POLLUTION RISK IN PLAIN AREA OF XI’AN CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 215-222. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005037
Citation: GENG Yi-cheng, ZHOU Wei-bo, SHI Fang-fang, DONG Yan-hui. STUDY ON GROUNDWATER POLLUTION RISK IN PLAIN AREA OF XI’AN CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 215-222. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005037
shu

STUDY ON GROUNDWATER POLLUTION RISK IN PLAIN AREA OF XI’AN CITY

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005037

  • 1. School of Water and Environment, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China;

  • 2. Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecology in Arid Areas of Ministry of Education, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China;

  • 3. Technical Advisory Center of Xi'an Water Resources Utilization, Xi'an 710016, China;

  • 4. School of Civil & Architecture Engineering, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, China

  • Received Date: 2019-10-10
    Abstract
  • Groundwater pollution risk assessment is important for the rational development and utilization of land and groundwater pollution prevention. By analyzing the characteristics of shallow groundwater in the plain area of Xi’an, a conceptual model of groundwater pollution risk assessment including groundwater vulnerability, pollution source load and water function value was established, and the groundwater pollution risk of the plain area of Xi’an was evaluated. The results showed that the high, medium and low risk areas of groundwater pollution in the plain area of Xi’an accounted for 0.2%, 28.8% and 71.1% of the total study area, respectively. The medium and above risk areas of groundwater pollution in the plain area were mainly distributed along the banks of the Weihe River in Zhouzhi County, along the Weihe River in Chang’an District, and along the Weihe River in Lantian County. The high groundwater vulnerability and relatively strong pollution source load were the main reasons for the relatively high pollution risk in the region.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(20)
  • 史方方.西安建设国际化大都市的水资源承载力浅析[J].陕西水利,2018(1):28-30.
    张欣莹,刘建林,李晓辉,等.西安市供用水现状及水资源供需平衡分析[J].水资源与水工程学报,2013,24(6):38-42.
    张圃轩.陕西关中平原地下水变化特征与监测考核研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2017.
    董艳慧.地下水保护理论及修复技术的研究[D].西安:长安大学,2010.
    史方方.西安市平原区地下水污染现状及对策探析[J].地下水,2018,40(4):101-103.
    李慧.城市化影响下西安市地下水流场演变及其机制[D].西安:长安大学,2018.
    董英,张茂省,刘洁,等.西安市地下水与地面沉降地裂缝耦合关系及风险防控技术[J].西北地质,2019,52(2):95-102.
    杨欢,石坚.西安市地面沉降机理分析[J].地下水,2013,35(4):60-62.
    杨悦锁,贾思齐,宋晓明,等.地下水脆弱性评价和污染风险管理[J].环境保护科学,2016,42(5):1-6.
    刘凡,孙继朝,张英,等.地下水污染风险评价研究综述[J].南水北调与水利科技,2014,12(3):127-132.
    董亮,朱荫湄,胡勤海,等.应用DRASTIC模型评价西湖流域地下水污染风险[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(2):217-220.
    ALLER L DRASTIC:A Standardized System for Evaluating Groundwater Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings[R].US Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK, EPA/600/2-87-036, 1987:445.
    张雪刚,毛媛媛,李致家,等.张集地区地下水易污性及污染风险评价[J].水文地质工程地质,2009,36(1):51-55.
    申利娜,李广贺.地下水污染风险区划方法研究[J].环境科学,2010,31(4):918-923.
    郭高轩,李宇,许亮,等.北京平原区第四系地下水污染风险评价[J].环境科学,2014,35(2):562-568.
    李志萍,谢振华,林健.地下水污染风险评价指标体系及方法探讨[J].黑龙江水专学报,2010,37(3):115-117.
    ZHANG J J, ZHAI Y Z, XUE P W, et al. A GIS-based LVF model for semi-quantitative assessment of groundwater pollution risk:a case study in Shenyang, NE China[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2016, 23(2):276-298.
    邰托娅,王金生,王业耀,等.我国地下水污染风险评价方法研究进展[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,48(6):648-653.
    吴晓娟,孙根年.西安市地下水污染广义/狭义脆弱性对比研究[J].地球学报,2007,28(5):475-481.
    孟东芳,童锋,王喜英.熵权扩展集对分析模型在西安市浅层地下水水质评价中的应用[J].中国煤炭地质,2018,30(11):55-60.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]YIN Leyi, HUANG Guoxin, NIU Haobo, CHEN Jian, XIE Yueqing, YANG Lihu, LIU Ling. GROUNDWATER POLLUTION DYNAMIC RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION AND RISK SCREENING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(1): 199-205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202401026
    [2]ZHANG Xiuhong, LI Renge, ZHAO Yueshuai, GAO Linting, NING Bo. ANALYSIS OF DIFFUSE POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS IN AGRICULTURAL SPACE IN XI'AN BASED ON DPeRS MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 142-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312017
    [3]ZHANG Tao, WANG Xiahui, BI Erping, HUANG Guoxin, YANG Ruijie. GROUNDWATER VULNERABILITY EVALUATION AND RISK CONTROL IN A CERTAIN AREA IN NORTHERN GUANGDONG PROVINCE BASED ON BP NEURAL NETWORK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 270-277. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312034
    [4]NIU Yi, LI Wei, LI Gongke, WANG Weixing, LI Mingming, CAO Shuping, LÜ Xiaowen. SIMULATION OF RESTORATION OF GROUNDWATER POLLUTION IN A LANDFILL IN COASTAL PLAIN AREA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 12-20. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303002
    [5]WANG Cheng, CHENG Jian, NIU Haobo, GONG Zhiqiang. DETERMINATION OF GROUNDWATER RISK CONTROL VALUE OF A POLLUTED LAND BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 159-164. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211022
    [6]XIANG Jia-jia. GROUNDWATER POLLUTION CONTROL BY CEMENT SOIL BARRIER WALL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 63-68,91. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109010
    [14]Wang Peng Wang Xiaofeng Wu Guiwu, . RESEARCH ON GROUNDWATER POLLUTION IN AN INDUSTRIAL SITE IN THE UPPER CAMBRIAN STRATA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(6): 35-38. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201506008
    [15]Wang Jiahui, Zhang Xuefeng, Deng Panbo. APPLICATION OF VICIA-MICRONUCLEUS TEST TO MONITOR THE UNDERGROUND WATER POLLUTION OF TAILINGS SURROUNDING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 117-120. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510026
    [16]Meng Ye Wang Daohan Wang Zhijiang Feng Sijing Li Xiaoxu He Yushu Wang Yonggang, . CASE ANALYSIS OF STREAM TEMPERATURE MANAGEMENT BASED ON TMDL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(1): 123-127. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201501029
    [17]VARIATION ANALYSIS OF NOISE IN XI'AN FUNCTIONAL AREA FOR YEARS AND RESEARCH ON CONTROL COUNTERMEASURE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 117-119. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412020
    [18]STUDY ON DYNAMIC EVALUATION ON SYNTHETIC VULNERABILITY TO POLLUTION OF SHALLOW GROUNDWATER IN THE CITY ZONE AND CLOSE SUBURB OF BEIJING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 109-112. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412018
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 王慧. 非均质含水层地下水资源脆弱性定量评价模型. 水利技术监督. 2022(04): 139-143 .
    2. 龚正，于琦，汪娴，史俊，邓慧萍. 西北地区地下水污染现状及风险调查. 净水技术. 2022(03): 118-133 .
    3. 张永三，刘静，王小玉，赵晓博，张扬，胡兆国，张保涛，龚甲桂，徐广东. 基于复合叠加模型的地下水污染风险区划研究——以山东省临淄区为例. 地球与环境. 2022(06): 876-883 .
    4. 张锦霞. 地下水污染风险区划及生物处理技术研究. 环境科学与管理. 2021(05): 84-87+98 .
    5. 王潇，马宝强，汤超，张伟涛，宋蓉，王彩彩. 基于评分指数法的地下水污染风险评价——以甘肃省嘉峪关市的平原区为例. 环境污染与防治. 2021(12): 1555-1561+1584 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 6.7 %FULLTEXT: 6.7 %META: 86.6 %META: 86.6 %PDF: 6.7 %PDF: 6.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 15.5 %其他: 15.5 %Bangladesh: 1.0 %Bangladesh: 1.0 %China: 2.1 %China: 2.1 %United States: 0.5 %United States: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 2.6 %上海: 2.6 %东莞: 0.5 %东莞: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %信阳: 0.5 %信阳: 0.5 %北京: 3.6 %北京: 3.6 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南昌: 1.5 %南昌: 1.5 %台州: 1.5 %台州: 1.5 %大同: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %宁波: 0.5 %宁波: 0.5 %常德: 1.0 %常德: 1.0 %广州: 1.0 %广州: 1.0 %延安: 0.5 %延安: 0.5 %张家口: 8.2 %张家口: 8.2 %成都: 1.0 %成都: 1.0 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 1.5 %昆明: 1.5 %晋城: 1.0 %晋城: 1.0 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 7.2 %杭州: 7.2 %洛阳: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.5 %济源: 1.0 %济源: 1.0 %海口: 0.5 %海口: 0.5 %温州: 1.0 %温州: 1.0 %湖州: 2.1 %湖州: 2.1 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %福州: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 16.0 %芒廷维尤: 16.0 %芝加哥: 1.0 %芝加哥: 1.0 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %莆田: 1.0 %莆田: 1.0 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 6.2 %西宁: 6.2 %西安: 4.1 %西安: 4.1 %运城: 4.1 %运城: 4.1 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %其他BangladeshChinaUnited States[]上海东莞临汾信阳北京南京南昌台州大同天津宁波常德广州延安张家口成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州洛阳济源海口温州湖州漯河石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州莆田衢州西宁西安运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (167) PDF downloads(13) Cited by(10)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return