Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 6
Aug.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(6): 9-15
GUO Li-li, KANG Shao-guo, WANG Qi, XIONG Jing, LI Shu-peng, KONG Jiao-yan. PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION:AN OVERVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 9-15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006002
Citation: GUO Li-li, KANG Shao-guo, WANG Qi, XIONG Jing, LI Shu-peng, KONG Jiao-yan. PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION:AN OVERVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 9-15. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006002
shu

PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER FOR CHROMIUM CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION:AN OVERVIEW

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006002

  • 1. Beijing Construction Engineering Group Environmental Remediation Co., Ltd, Beijing 100015, China;

  • 2. National Engineering Laboratory for Site Remediation Technologies, Beijing 100015, China

  • Received Date: 2020-02-27
    Abstract
  • It is becoming increasingly prominent of the problem of chromium contaminated of groundwater in China. It is extremely urgent to remediate the chromium contaminated groundwater. Permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is a new type of in-situ contaminated groundwater remediation technology, which can implement continuous in-situ remediation of chromium contaminated groundwater. Important factors were summarized in this review, which included the commonly used reactive fillers, key design parameters and construction technologies of PRB for chromium contaminated groundwater remediation. Accordingly, the main problems and prospects in the process of engineering application of PRB technology were briefly analyzed.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(78)
  • 崔永高. 铬污染土壤和地下水的修复技术研究进展[J]. 工程地质学报, 2017, 25(4): 1001-1009.
    生态环境部和国家卫生健康委员会.有毒有害水污染物名录(第一批)[EB/OL]. http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/201907/t20190729_712633.html, 2019.
    中华人民共和国环境保护部. 中国环境统计年报·2015[M]. 北京:中国环境出版社, 2016.
    陈子方, 赵勇胜, 孙家强, 等. 铅和铬污染包气带及再释放规律的实验研究[J]. 中国环境科学,2014, 34(9): 2211-2216.
    宫志强, 陈坚, 杨鑫鑫, 等. 某铬污染场地地下水抽水方案优化[J]. 环境工程, 2019, 37(5): 1-3

    ,75.
    刘玉强, 李丽, 王琪, 等. 典型铬渣污染场地的污染状况与综合整治对策[J]. 环境科学研究,2009, 22(2): 248-253.
    Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. Permeable reactive barrier: technology update. PRB-5[M]. Washington, D. C: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, PRB: Technology Update Team, 2011.
    邓一荣, 林挺, 肖荣波, 等. EKR-PRB耦合技术在污染场地修复中的应用研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2015,32(10):157-162.
    钱程, 张卫民. PRB反应介质材料在地下水污染修复中的应用研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(6): 1-5

    , 11.
    李靖, 范明杰, 刘翔, 等. 双表面活性剂修饰下纳米零价铁对水中Cr(Ⅵ)污染去除研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2019, 39(10): 3402-3409.
    ZARIME N A, YAACOB W Z W, JAMIL H. Removal of heavy metals using bentonite supported nano-zero valent iron particles[C]//Ukm Fst Postgradute Colloquium: University Kebangsan Nalaysia, Faculty of Science & Technology Postgraduate Colloquium, 2018.
    刘剑, 黄莉, 彭钢, 等. 颗粒活性炭载纳米零价铁去除水中的Cr(Ⅵ)[J]. 过程工程学报, 2019, 19(4): 714-720.
    ZHAO N, YIN Z, LIU F, et al. Environmentally persistent free radicals mediated removal of Cr(Ⅵ) from highly saline water by corn straw biochars[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018, 260: 294-301.
    任域权, 孙仕勇, 马彪彪, 等. 硅藻土负载纳米零价铁对含Cr(Ⅵ)废水处理效能研究[C]//2018年全国矿物科学与工程学术会议, 2018.
    陈仲如, 张澄博, 李洪艺, 等. 可渗透反应墙的结构与设计研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2012, 12(4): 56-61.
    刘瑞, 高艳娇. PRB填料的研究进展[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2017, 43(6): 5-7

    , 72.
    张晓慧, 葛芳州, 董玉婧, 等. 可渗透反应墙原位修复污染地下水研究进展[J]. 工业用水与废水, 2015, 46(3): 1-5.
    李航彬. 铬渣中Cr(Ⅵ)溶解释放及其在土壤中迁移规律研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2011.
    王文婧, 卢松霖, 刘雪, 等. 包埋法固定钩状木霉孢子还原水体中六价铬的研究[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019(9): 70-74.
    杨胜男, 刘娜, 宋东辉. 菌藻混合体系去除Cr(Ⅵ)的条件优化及Cr(Ⅵ)还原酶活性的测定[J]. 生物技术通报, 2019(9): 83-92.
    李志红, 王广才, 史浙明, 等. 渗透反应格栅技术综述:填充材料实验研究、修复技术实例和系统运行寿命[J]. 环境化学, 2017, 36(2): 316-327.
    杨晓丹, 王玉如, 李敏睿. 纳米零价铁的制备、改性及对废水中重金属和有机污染物的去除[J]. 化工进展, 2019, 38(7): 3412-3424.
    周书葵, 张建, 刘迎九, 等. Fe0-PRB技术在铀污染地下水修复中的应用与展望[J]. 南华大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 32(6): 6-13.
    刘菲, 陈亮, 王广才, 等. 地下水渗透反应格栅技术发展综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(8): 863-877.
    卢欣, 李淼, 唐翠梅, 等. Fe0-PRB去除Cr(Ⅵ)反应动力学及影响机制[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(9): 3473-3479.
    阙家平, 张澄博, 黎嘉熙, 等. 零价铁可渗透反应墙材料的利用情况研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2018, 41(增刊1): 109-115.
    CHANG L Y. Chromate reduction in wastewater at different pH levels using thin iron wires:a laboratory study[J]. Environmental Progress, 2005, 24(3): 305-316.
    李雅, 张增强, 唐次来, 等. Fe0去除地下水中六价铬的研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2011, 16(2): 160-164.
    秦泽敏, 董黎明, 刘平, 等. 零价纳米铁吸附去除水中六价铬的研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2014, 34(12): 3106-3111.
    谢华俊, 陈华林, 张永普, 等. 纳米零价铁对水溶液中Cr(Ⅵ)的去除效果[J]. 环境监测管理与技术, 2018, 30(5): 72-75.
    LUO J H, SONG G Y, LIU J Y, et al. Mechanism of enhanced nitrate reduction via microelectrolysis at the powdered zero-valent iron/activated carbon interface[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2014, 435: 21-25.
    QU G Z, KOU L Q, WANG T C, et al. Evaluation of activated carbon fiber supported nanoscale zero-valent iron for chromium (Ⅵ) removal from groundwater in a permeable reactive column[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 201: 378-387.
    樊明德, 王睿哲, 贾时雨, 等. 蒙脱石负载型零价铁纳米颗粒吸附水体中Cr(Ⅵ)污染物实验研究[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 166-174.
    宋珍霞, 殷齐贺, 穆晓斐. 膨润土负载纳米零价铁去除废水中Cr(Ⅵ)的动力学特性研究[J]. 化工新型材料, 2018, 548(5): 205-209.
    袁飞, 冯雅丽, 王维大, 等. 碳纤维负载零价铁的制备及其去除水溶液中的六价铬[J]. 工程科学学报, 2015,37(5): 626-632.
    李晨桦, 陈家玮. 膨润土负载纳米铁去除地下水中六价铬研究[J]. 现代地质, 2012,26(5): 932-938.
    薛嵩, 钱林波, 晏井春, 等. 生物炭携载纳米零价铁对溶液中Cr(Ⅵ)的去除[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(6): 2895-2901.
    CHUN C L, BAER D R, MATSON D W, et al. Characterization and reactivity of iron nanoparticles prepared with added Cu, Pd, and Ni[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(13): 5079-5085.
    马少云, 祝方, 商执峰. 纳米零价铁铜双金属对铬污染土壤中Cr(Ⅵ)的还原动力学[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37(5): 363-369.
    郭金辉, 孟凡生, 王业耀, 等. Cu/Fe和Ni/Fe双金属处理模拟地下水中的铬[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(7): 3515-3521.
    张道萍, 孟凡生, 王业耀, 等. 双金属和多金属系统对零价铁利用效率的改进[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016, 29(9): 1362-1369.
    朱文会, 王兴润, 董良飞, 等. 海藻酸钠固定化Fe-Cu双金属去除Cr(Ⅵ)的作用机制[J]. 中国环境科学, 2013, 33(11): 1965-1971.
    章结焱, 周溶冰, 吴卫红, 等. 羟基磷灰石负载铁钯双金属对水中Cr(Ⅵ)的去除[J]. 杭州电子科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 38(4): 86-93.
    VIGNOLA R, BAGATIN R, ALESSANDRA D F D, et al. Zeolites in a permeable reactive barrier (PRB): one-year of field experience in a refinery groundwater. Part 2: zeolite characterization[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 178: 210-216.
    PAWLUK K, FRONCZYK J, GARBULEWSKI K. Removal of dissoval of dissolved metals from road runoff using zerolite PRBs[J]. Chemical Engineering Trans-actions, 2013, 32: 331-336.
    祁宝川, 韩志勇, 陈吉祥. PRB修复重金属污染地下水的反应介质研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2017,46(4): 749-754

    ,759.
    LI Z H, JONES H K, BOWMAN R S, et al. Enhanced reduction of chromate and PCE by pelletized surfactant-modified zeolite/zerovalent iron[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1999, 33(23): 4326-4330.
    薛美香, 郑文忠, 吴欣儒, 等. 改性沸石吸附废水中Cr(Ⅵ)的研究[J]. 宜春学院学报, 2017, 39(3): 33-35.
    DU G X, LI Z H, LI B L, et al. Cr(Ⅵ) retention and transport through Fe(Ⅲ)-coated natural zeolite[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 221/222: 118-123.
    黄玉洁, 张焕祯. 改性人造沸石处理含铬(Ⅵ)地下水的实验研究[J]. 环境工程, 2012, 30(4): 1-3.
    LV G C, LI Z H, JIANG W, et al. Removal of Cr(Ⅵ) from water using Fe(Ⅱ)-modified natural zeolite[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2014, 92: 384-390.
    PLAGENTZ V, EBERT M, DAHMKE A. Remediation of ground water containing chlorinated and brominated hydrocarbons, benzene and chromate by sequential treatment using ZVI and GAC[J]. Environmental Geology, 2006, 49(5): 684-695.
    张莹, 张玉玲, 张晟瑀, 等. 修复石油类污染地下水的PRB反应介质研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2010, 40(2): 399-404.
    DEMIRAL H, LKNUR D, FATMA T, et al. Adsorption of chromium(Ⅵ) from aqueous solution by activated carbon derived from olive bagasse and applicability of different adsorption models[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 144(2): 188-196.
    王红, 邹继颖, 那拉苏. 稻壳活性炭对废水中Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附[J]. 吉林化工学院学报, 2019, 39(9): 54-58.
    李山, 杜梅先. 活性炭表面改性及其对Cr(Ⅵ)的吸附性能[J]. 环境工程学报, 2012, 6(7): 2367-2372.
    徐华山, 贺玉晓, 王海邻, 等. 粉煤灰去除地下水中Cr(Ⅵ)的试验研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2007,1(1): 38-40.
    黄玉洁, 张焕祯, 刘光英. 改性粉煤灰处理含铬(Ⅵ)地下水的实验研究[J]. 环境工程, 2012,30(增刊2): 20-22.
    BLOWES D W, PTACEK C J, CHERRY J A, et al. Passive remediation of groundwater using in situ treatment curtains[J]. Geoenvironment 2000, Geotechnical Special Publication, ASCE, 1995,46:1588-1607.
    KAHNG H Y, KUKOR J J, OH K H. Characterization of strain HY99, a novel microorganism capable of aerobic and anaerobic degradation of aniline[J].FEMS Microbiology Letters, 2000, 190(2): 215-221.
    ARUN R, GAVASKA R. Design and construction techniques for permeable reactive barriers[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1999, 68: 41-71.
    US EPA. Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for Contaminant Remediation[R]. EPA 600/R-98/125,1998.
    沈前.铅锌矿多重金属污染地下水的原位渗透反应墙修复技术研究与示范[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2015.
    陈升勇, 王成端, 付馨烈, 等. 可渗透反应墙在土壤和地下水修复中的应用[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2015(3): 253-254.
    吴茜. 活性渗滤墙技术修复某垃圾填埋场地下水污染的研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2016.
    赵强, 王金生. 应用可渗透反应墙技术原位修复地下水污染[J]. 污染防治技术, 2003, 16(4): 94-97.
    刘国彬, 王卫东. 基坑工程手册[M]. 2版. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
    ARTIOLE J, WALLACE H F. Effect of crushed limestone barriers on chromium attenuation in soils[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1979, 8(4): 503-510.
    Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council. Permeable Reactive Barrier: Lessons Learned/new Directions. PRB-4[M]. Washington, D. C: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Permeable Reactive Barriers Team, 2005.
    HU G H, LIU F, LIU M Z, et al. Performance of a permeable reactive barrier for in situ removal of ammonium in groundwater[J]. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 2014, 14(4): 585-592.
    LI S P, HUANG G X, KONG X K, et al. Ammonium removal from groundwater using a zeolite permeable reactive barrier: a pilot-scale demonstration[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2014, 70(9): 1540-1547.
    李圣品, 刘菲, 黄国鑫, 等. 傍河型水源井氨氮阻断与去除工程设计案例分析[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015, 35(8): 2471-2480.
    任军. 南水北调中线总干渠水质健康风险与控制技术研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012,8(11): 202-204.
    李敬杰, 蔡五田, 张涛, 等. 铸铁和椰壳活性炭混合介质修复高浓度Cr(Ⅵ)污染地下水研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2019, 41(5): 54-58

    , 81.
    宋昕. PRB应用铁基复合功能材料的实验室模拟研究及工程示范[R].上海: 土壤修复功能材料研发及应用研讨会—第一届全国土壤修复大会第三次分会, 2019.
    陈梦舫. 稀土尾矿库地下水渗透性反应墙(PRB)技术修复技术研究与示范[R]. 北京: 国际棕地治理大会暨首届中国棕地污染与环境治理大会, 2016.
    龚璇, 刘红, 范先媛, 等. 凹凸棒土负载纳米铁/镍去除水中Zn(Ⅱ)的性能与机理研究[J]. 黑龙江大学自然科学学报, 2018,35(2): 200-205.
    颜湘华, 王兴润, 李丽, 等. 铬污染场地调查数据评估与暴露浓度估计[J]. 环境科学研究, 2013, 26(1): 103-108.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Haicheng, CHENG Cheng, CHEN Zhenglin, YANG Lixia, LUO Shenglian. SULFIDE ION DOPING PROMOTES EFFICIENT PHOTOCATALYTIC DEGRADATION OF TOLUENE BY WO3 NANOWIRES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 201-210. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409019
    [2]CHEN Acong, WEI Tuo, QIN Zhi, CHEN Yao, XU Rui, WU Haizhen, WEI Chaohai. SHIELDING EFFECT OF ZINC SULFATE ON CYANIDE COMPLEX DURING THIOCYANIDE DETECTION FOR COKING WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 134-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305018
    [3]ZHOU Lichang, LI Zhaoling, CHEN Lei, LIN Ya'nan, GONG Zhiwei, LIN Qingshan, MA Jie, WANG Zongping, GUO Gang. SHORT-TERM EFFECT OF THIOSULFATE ON COMPETITION BETWEEN SULFUR BACTERIA AND GLYCOGEN ACCUMULATING ORGANISMS IN SULFUR-CONTAINING WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 26-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308004
    [4]ZHANG Kui, WANG Xuemei, LI Yuhuan, ZHANG Yu, LIU Mengjuan, JIANG Xueping, JI Hongbing. HIGH EFFICIENCY ADSORPTION OF Hg2+ BY SULFUR-MODIFIED COW MANURE BIOCHAR AND ITS MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 79-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204012
    [5]DONG Wan-tao, WANG Ya-jun, LI Li, ZHANG Xing. REACTION KINETICS STUDY ON H2O2 AND Na2FeO4 REMOVING TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON FROM SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 178-184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110025
    [6]WANG Yan, ZOU Lv-xi, MAO Lin-feng, CHEN Ya-li, LI Ji. EFFICIENCY AND MECHANISM OF UV/O3-Na2S2O8 IN TREATING ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION CONDENSATE WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007006
    [11]Zhang Jun, Xu Junyang, Wang Dunqiu, Yang Huiping, Wu Xiaohui. EFFECTS OF TYPES AND CONCENTRATIONS OF SULFUR SUBSTRATE ON BIOLEACHING HEAVY METALS FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 39-43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504009
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 郭磊，黄黎明，韦振祖，刘艇安，王靓，吴玮. 非均匀边界条件下SCR脱硝系统数值模拟及改造效果分析. 洁净煤技术. 2024(S2): 272-278 .
    2. 张起，张福祥，李盛平，景浩林，杨锐涵，董志强，杨祖旺，田桦. 660 MW燃煤机组脱硝系统优化改造. 能源与节能. 2023(02): 99-104 .
    3. 韩冰，李清方，刘海丽，于惠娟，张舒漫，王辉. 百万吨级CO_2捕集烟气集成处理塔流场模拟及优化. 石油工程建设. 2022(04): 7-11+34 .
    4. 封例忠，丛日强，刘怡，齐艳芳. 基于CFD的某330MW燃煤机组SCR脱硝系统混合器优化与验证. 环境工程. 2022(10): 156-161 . 本站查看
    5. 韦振祖，赵宁波，李明磊，刘瑞敬，谢新华，周健，卢承政. 非均匀入口条件下SCR脱硝系统流场优化改造技术研究. 锅炉技术. 2021(04): 74-80 .
    6. 陶莉，肖育军. SCR区域喷氨的NH_3分布与均匀性调整. 环境工程技术学报. 2021(04): 663-669 .
    7. 张云雷，孙仲超，梁大明，熊银伍，李艳芳. 活性焦烟气净化反应器研究进展. 洁净煤技术. 2020(04): 21-30 .
    8. 王为，朱召平，张楚城，陈牧，苏寅彪，郑晓盼. 高温除尘脱硝一体化技术开发及流场模拟研究. 洁净煤技术. 2020(04): 154-161 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 6.5 %FULLTEXT: 6.5 %META: 93.5 %META: 93.5 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.5 %其他: 17.5 %Bulgaria: 0.5 %Bulgaria: 0.5 %Canada: 1.4 %Canada: 1.4 %China: 1.4 %China: 1.4 %Germany: 0.5 %Germany: 0.5 %Greece: 0.5 %Greece: 0.5 %Italy: 0.5 %Italy: 0.5 %Netherlands: 0.5 %Netherlands: 0.5 %Portugal: 0.9 %Portugal: 0.9 %Saudi Arabia: 0.5 %Saudi Arabia: 0.5 %Sweden: 0.9 %Sweden: 0.9 %United States: 4.1 %United States: 4.1 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %佛罗里达: 0.9 %佛罗里达: 0.9 %保定: 1.4 %保定: 1.4 %北京: 12.0 %北京: 12.0 %十堰: 0.5 %十堰: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常德: 0.9 %常德: 0.9 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %晋城: 0.9 %晋城: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %欧文: 0.5 %欧文: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %泰安: 0.5 %泰安: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.5 %漯河: 1.8 %漯河: 1.8 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 22.1 %芒廷维尤: 22.1 %芝加哥: 3.7 %芝加哥: 3.7 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %萍乡: 0.5 %萍乡: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 5.1 %西宁: 5.1 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 3.7 %运城: 3.7 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 0.9 %郑州: 0.9 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %其他BulgariaCanadaChinaGermanyGreeceItalyNetherlandsPortugalSaudi ArabiaSwedenUnited States临汾佛罗里达保定北京十堰台州大同天津宣城常德广州张家口成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦晋城朝阳杭州欧文沈阳泰安济源温州湘潭漯河石家庄纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州萍乡衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铜陵长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (463) PDF downloads(10) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return