Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
ZHOU Yu-qi, CAO Qi, XU Jun-chao, LIU Chang-qing, ZHUO Gui-hua, CHEN Jian-yong, ZHENG Yu-yi. INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT SOURCE SUBSTRATE SYSTEMS ON METHANOGENESIS OF RESIDUE FROM ANAEROBIC FERMENTATIVE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION USING COMBINED SLUDGE AND FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 123-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109018
Citation: YANG Shu-jun, ZHANG Chen, HE Jun, XIONG Jian-ying, LI Xue-ting, HUANG Xiao-wen. ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF NANOFILTRATION & THREE-LEVELS REDUCTION OF NANOFILTRATION CONCENTRATE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADVANCED TREATMENT OF LANDFILL LEACHATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 81-87,114. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006013

ENGINEERING APPLICATION OF NANOFILTRATION & THREE-LEVELS REDUCTION OF NANOFILTRATION CONCENTRATE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADVANCED TREATMENT OF LANDFILL LEACHATE

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006013
  • Received Date: 2019-08-26
  • The design scale of the upgrading project of the fourth-stage leachate treatment plant of Shanghai Laogang Landfill is 3200 m3/d. The effluent from negative pressure steam-stripping pretreatment and MBR biological treatment adopted the advanced treatment technology of nanofiltration & three-levels reduction of nanofiltration concentrate, with an excellent recovery rate of clear water. The actual engineering operation showed that the effluent concentrations of COD, NH3-N and TN met the standard of Table 2 in GB 16889—2008 after the advanced treatment, on the premise of the influent concentrations of COD, NH3-N and NOx--N were lower than 800, 5, 15 mg/L, respectively. Meanwhile, clear water recovery rate of the system could reach 97%.
  • 杜昱. "厌氧氨氧化+ MBR"工艺处理老龄化垃圾渗滤液技术优势分析[J]. 给水排水, 2014, 40(10): 129.
    熊鸿斌, 崔蓓蓓. MBR+纳滤/反渗透处理生活垃圾填埋场渗滤液调整研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2015, 41(9): 110-115.
    尹文俊, 周伟伟, 王凯, 等. 垃圾渗滤液物化与生化处理工艺技术现状[J]. 环境工程, 2018,36(2): 83-87.
    黄皇, 李天, 唐佶. 原位生物反应池+ MBR+矿化床联合生物处理老龄渗沥液中试试验研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2019, 26(6): 34-37.
    班福忱,武玉萍,赵晓彤,等.生活垃圾卫生填埋场垃圾渗滤液处理工程改造实例[J].环境工程,2013,31(5):110-113.
    宋灿辉,胡智泉,肖波.UASB+A/O+UF+NF工艺处理生活垃圾焚烧厂渗滤液[J].环境工程,2010,28(1):40-42

    ,46.
    李芳, 沈耀良, 杨丽, 等. 饮用水深度处理技术研究进展[J]. 净水技术, 2008, 27(2):32-35.
    李昆, 王健行, 魏源送. 纳滤在水处理与回用中的应用现状与展望[J]. 环境科学学报, 2016, 36(8): 2714-2729.
    靳云辉,秦川,郝静,等.中温厌氧-MBR-NF/RO工艺处理垃圾渗滤液设计[J].给水排水,2018,54(9):46-48.
    王艳秋,廉昇阳,梁旭,等.生化和膜组合工艺在升级改造垃圾渗滤液处理工程中的应用[J].环境工程,2016,34(11):35-39

    ,89.
    吴凡,于钟元.垃圾填埋场纳滤浓缩液处理工艺运用及运行分析[J].环境卫生工程,2016,24(3):22-24.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]CAO Bofeng, LIU Zixin, WEI Cuiyu, TANG Yufei, SHI Yucui, JIANG Pingping. EFFECT OF Cr(Ⅵ) STRESS ON ROOT EXUDATES AND MICROBIAL COMPOSITION OF LEERSIA HEXANDRA SWARTZ[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 175-181. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402021
    [2]HAN Jianjun, CHAI Lujun, WANG Guojin, ZHANG Yu, QIN Kangjia, ZHOU Man, LIANG Xuejie, HAO Junpeng, WANG Hui. ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF A NEW SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIUM AND ITS IN SITU REMEDIATION EFFECT OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 192-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402023
    [3]TENG Hui, LI Dong, WU Junru. INTERFERENCE OF REMEDIATION AGENTS TO SOIL Cr(Ⅵ) DETERMINATION BY ALKALINE DIGESTION-FLAME ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 143-151. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211020
    [4]JIN Xiao-dan, TIAN Yong-qiang, WU Hao, CHEN He-xiao, WANG Xing-run, CHENG Jin-ping. CHARACTERISTICS OF CHROMIUM POLLUTION AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS IN LEATHER INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 206-211,219. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112031
    [5]HUANG Kai-you, SHEN Ying-jie, WANG Xiao-yan, WANG Xing-run, YUAN Wen-yi, ZHANG Cheng-long, BAI Jian-feng, WANG Jing-wei. REVIEW ON PREPARATION OF BIO-CARBON LOADED NANO ZERO-VALENT IRON AND ITS APPLICATION IN REMEDIATING Cr(Ⅵ)-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 203-210,195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011033
    [6]LAI Dong-lin, ZHANG Qi, CHEN Ting-ting, CHEN Hui-xia, TONG Xue-jiao, XU Hong-bin, LIU Xing-hai, ZHAO Cai-yun. REMEDIATION PRACTICE OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM AND CYANIDE CONTAMINATED SOIL AT THE ORIGINAL SITE OF A MACHINERY PLANT IN ZHANGJIAKOU,CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 75-80. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006012
    [7]XI Dong-dong, LI Xiao-min, XIONG Zi-xuan, JIANG Zhi, ZHANG Xiao-ming, YANG Wei-chun. SYNERGISTIC REMOVAL OF Cu, Co, Ni AND Cr FROM CONTAMINATED SOIL BY BIOCHAR-SUPPORTED NANOSCALE ZERO-VALENT IRON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 58-66. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006010
    [8]YANG Wen-xiao, ZHANG Li, BI Xue, LI Huan-ru, GU Qian. RESEARCH ADVANCEMENT OF STABILIZATION MATERIALS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM(Ⅵ) CONTAMINATED SITE SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 16-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006003
    [10]Zhang Qingle Dong Jian Zhang Liqing Wang Jixiang Li Zejiao Li Rui, . ADSORPTION CHARACTERISTICS OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM ON POPLAR LEAF MODIFIED BY OXALATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(5): 64-69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201505014
    [11]Zhao Ligang, Pu Shengyan, Yang Jinyan, Yu Jing, Wang Youle. THE Cr( VI) POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUNDWATER AND SOIL IN THE SURROUNDINGS OF A CHROMIUM SLAG SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 117-121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502026
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 田文娟,郭丽,杜维,郑丹. 柱后衍生-离子色谱法测定固废中的六价铬方法优化. 广州化工. 2024(20): 110-114 .
    2. 杨柳晨,王小钊,邢丹. 铬盐污染土壤六价铬标准物质不确定度评估. 福建分析测试. 2024(06): 53-59 .
    3. 吕旭,韩建. 碱消解-火焰原子吸收光谱法检测土壤中的六价铬方法改进. 山东化工. 2022(13): 89-91+97 .
    4. 褚琳琳,王静云,金晓霞,汪碧芬,孔翠羽. 碱溶液提取-离子交换-电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定土壤中六价铬. 岩矿测试. 2022(05): 826-835 .
    5. 陈秀梅,王靖宜. 碱性微波提取-ICP/MS法测定土壤中六价铬. 环境监测管理与技术. 2022(06): 56-59 .
    6. 邱沙,宋景鹏,陈志国,白鹤,曹文庆,刘艺芸. 原位化学还原技术修复铬污染土壤及其工程应用. 环境科学与技术. 2021(04): 131-139 .
    7. 王世悦. 工作场所中六价铬和总铬火焰原子吸收法的研究. 质量安全与检验检测. 2020(05): 138-139 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.2 %FULLTEXT: 14.2 %META: 81.7 %META: 81.7 %PDF: 4.0 %PDF: 4.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.3 %其他: 21.3 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 3.8 %上海: 3.8 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %丽水: 0.5 %丽水: 0.5 %北京: 4.4 %北京: 4.4 %台州: 3.8 %台州: 3.8 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %宣城: 1.1 %宣城: 1.1 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %张家口: 3.8 %张家口: 3.8 %成都: 1.6 %成都: 1.6 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %晋城: 1.1 %晋城: 1.1 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 2.2 %杭州: 2.2 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %汕头: 0.5 %汕头: 0.5 %沈阳: 2.7 %沈阳: 2.7 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %温州: 1.1 %温州: 1.1 %湖州: 2.2 %湖州: 2.2 %漯河: 1.6 %漯河: 1.6 %福州: 1.1 %福州: 1.1 %秦皇岛: 1.1 %秦皇岛: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 18.6 %芒廷维尤: 18.6 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %衢州: 1.1 %衢州: 1.1 %西宁: 8.7 %西宁: 8.7 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 6.0 %运城: 6.0 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %邯郸: 1.1 %邯郸: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %铁岭: 0.5 %铁岭: 0.5 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %其他[]上海临汾丽水北京台州哈尔滨天津宣城常德张家口成都昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉汕头沈阳济源温州湖州漯河福州秦皇岛芒廷维尤苏州衢州西宁贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铁岭长沙长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (307) PDF downloads(2) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return