Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 6
Aug.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(6): 88-93
ZHOU Yu-qi, CAO Qi, XU Jun-chao, LIU Chang-qing, ZHUO Gui-hua, CHEN Jian-yong, ZHENG Yu-yi. INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT SOURCE SUBSTRATE SYSTEMS ON METHANOGENESIS OF RESIDUE FROM ANAEROBIC FERMENTATIVE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION USING COMBINED SLUDGE AND FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 123-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109018
Citation: ZHOU Wen-wu, CHEN Guan-yi, DAN Zeng, QIONGDA Zhuo-ma, ZHOU Peng, WANG Jing. COMPARISON AND SELECTION OF REHABILITATION SCHEMES FOR GROUNDWATER LEAD IN LANDFILL AREA: A CASE STUDY OF LHASA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 88-93. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006014
shu

COMPARISON AND SELECTION OF REHABILITATION SCHEMES FOR GROUNDWATER LEAD IN LANDFILL AREA: A CASE STUDY OF LHASA

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006014

  • 1. School of Science, Tibet University, Lhasa 850000, China;

  • 2. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China

  • Received Date: 2019-07-04
    Abstract
  • The content of lead in groundwater of Lhasa landfill was increased with the improvement of its service life. In order to protect groundwater, physical shielding method, extraction treatment method and in-situ remediation method were used as the candidate remediation schemes. The AHP-TOPSIS method was used to select the best restoration scheme. Firstly, the weights for all factors were determined by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The AHP model was established by selecting six indexes systems: construction conditions, economic conditions, technical conditions, environmental conditions, pollutant characteristics and hydrochemical characteristics. Then, the ranking method of TOPSIS close to the ideal goal was used to analyze the selection of final repair schemes. The results showed that the weight values obtained by the two methods were in the order of in-situ remediation, physical shielding and extraction. Finally, it was determined that in-situ remediation technology was the most suitable scheme for groundwater remediation in the site.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(24)
  • 周文武,陈冠益,周鹏,等.西藏拉萨市区餐厨垃圾现状分析及建议[J].环境与可持续发展,2019,44(1):60-63.
    拉萨市人民政府.2016年拉萨市固体废物管理及拉萨市固体废物污染防治信息公告[EB/OL].[2017-06/20

    ],http://www.lasa.gov.cn.
    中国膜工业协会.拉萨市生活垃圾填埋场建成膜法渗滤液处理站效果良好[EB/OL].[2015-06-16],http://www.membranes.com.cn.
    薛红琴, 速宝玉, 盛金昌,等. 垃圾填埋场渗滤液的防渗措施和地下水的污染防护[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2002, 2(4):18-22.
    袁宝珊,吴宜群.环境铅污染与儿童健康[J].国外医学(卫生学分册),1998(4):3-8.
    姜楠, 王鹤立, 廉新颖. 地下水铅污染修复技术应用与研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2008, 31(2):56-60.
    COULTHARD T L, SAMIA FADL. Adsorption of Water Pollutants by a Coal Sorption Process [R]. For presentation at the CSAE Annual Meeting, 1973,21(8).
    VIDIC R D, POHLAND F G. Treatment Walls Technology evaluation report TE-96-01[R]. Pittsburgh P A: Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, 1996.
    LEUSCH A, HOLAN Z R, VOLESKY B. Solution and particle effects on the biosorption of heavy metals by seaweed biomass[J]. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 1997, 61(3):231-249.
    RAHMUNI G N, H STEMBERG S P K. Bioremoval of lead from water using Lemna minor[J]. Bioresour Technol, 1999, 70(3): 225-230.
    胡宏韬, 侯玲娟. 铅污染地下水电动修复研究[J]. 水处理技术, 2009, 35(9):56-59.
    徐建华. 计量地理学[M]. 北京:等教育出版社, 2006.
    HWANG C L,YOON K S. Multiple Attribute Decision Making [M]. Berlin: Spring-Verlag,1981.
    张婧, 皮鎏, 崔佳鑫, 等. 垃圾填埋场区域氨氮污染地下水的修复方案比选[J]. 环境保护科学, 2017,43(3):125-131.
    王纪洋,张明广,王雪栋.基于AHP-TOPSIS模型的危险化工工艺风险等级评价研究[J].安全与环境工程,2016,23(6):100-105.
    张士宽,王月,安达,等. 垃圾填埋场地下水污染修复技术优选研究[J].环境工程技术学报,2017,7(4):463-469.
    霍攀,曹丽文,田艳凤. AHP与模糊评判法在垃圾填埋场选址中的应用对比[J].环境工程,2015,33(3):131-135.
    吴军年,张后辉,邢景敏. 基于层次分析法的危废渣库选址的环境经济适宜性分析[J].环境工程,2011,29(2):99-103.
    陈海滨,李文杰,杨龑,等. 基于节约法的村镇生活垃圾收运路线优化研究[J].环境工程,2016,34(12):122-125.
    李丹丹,周忠发,但雨生,等. 基于组合赋权TOPSIS模型的土壤养分空间分析及综合评价:以瓮安县为例[J].环境工程,2018,36(8):183-188.
    赵国存,刘占岭. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的装备保障信息定量评价研究[J].装备环境工程,2012,9(4):118-122.
    李君, 常莉. 我国城市地下水污染状况与治理对策[J]. 开封大学学报, 2006, 20(4):89-91.
    鄂佳楠, 周睿, 郑龙日,等. 基于蒙特卡罗法和层次分析法的污染场地地下水修复技术筛选方法研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2017, 39(5):499-503.
    张伯强,安达,王月,等.基于MCDA的沙漠地区污染场地地下水修复技术优化方法[J].环境工程学报,2016,10(10):5521-5527.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]CAO Bofeng, LIU Zixin, WEI Cuiyu, TANG Yufei, SHI Yucui, JIANG Pingping. EFFECT OF Cr(Ⅵ) STRESS ON ROOT EXUDATES AND MICROBIAL COMPOSITION OF LEERSIA HEXANDRA SWARTZ[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 175-181. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402021
    [2]HAN Jianjun, CHAI Lujun, WANG Guojin, ZHANG Yu, QIN Kangjia, ZHOU Man, LIANG Xuejie, HAO Junpeng, WANG Hui. ISOLATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF A NEW SULFATE-REDUCING BACTERIUM AND ITS IN SITU REMEDIATION EFFECT OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 192-198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402023
    [3]TENG Hui, LI Dong, WU Junru. INTERFERENCE OF REMEDIATION AGENTS TO SOIL Cr(Ⅵ) DETERMINATION BY ALKALINE DIGESTION-FLAME ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 143-151. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211020
    [4]JIN Xiao-dan, TIAN Yong-qiang, WU Hao, CHEN He-xiao, WANG Xing-run, CHENG Jin-ping. CHARACTERISTICS OF CHROMIUM POLLUTION AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS IN LEATHER INDUSTRY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 206-211,219. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112031
    [5]HUANG Kai-you, SHEN Ying-jie, WANG Xiao-yan, WANG Xing-run, YUAN Wen-yi, ZHANG Cheng-long, BAI Jian-feng, WANG Jing-wei. REVIEW ON PREPARATION OF BIO-CARBON LOADED NANO ZERO-VALENT IRON AND ITS APPLICATION IN REMEDIATING Cr(Ⅵ)-CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 203-210,195. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011033
    [6]LAI Dong-lin, ZHANG Qi, CHEN Ting-ting, CHEN Hui-xia, TONG Xue-jiao, XU Hong-bin, LIU Xing-hai, ZHAO Cai-yun. REMEDIATION PRACTICE OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM AND CYANIDE CONTAMINATED SOIL AT THE ORIGINAL SITE OF A MACHINERY PLANT IN ZHANGJIAKOU,CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 75-80. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006012
    [7]XI Dong-dong, LI Xiao-min, XIONG Zi-xuan, JIANG Zhi, ZHANG Xiao-ming, YANG Wei-chun. SYNERGISTIC REMOVAL OF Cu, Co, Ni AND Cr FROM CONTAMINATED SOIL BY BIOCHAR-SUPPORTED NANOSCALE ZERO-VALENT IRON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 58-66. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006010
    [8]YANG Wen-xiao, ZHANG Li, BI Xue, LI Huan-ru, GU Qian. RESEARCH ADVANCEMENT OF STABILIZATION MATERIALS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM(Ⅵ) CONTAMINATED SITE SOILS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 16-23. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006003
    [10]Zhang Qingle Dong Jian Zhang Liqing Wang Jixiang Li Zejiao Li Rui, . ADSORPTION CHARACTERISTICS OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM ON POPLAR LEAF MODIFIED BY OXALATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(5): 64-69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201505014
    [11]Zhao Ligang, Pu Shengyan, Yang Jinyan, Yu Jing, Wang Youle. THE Cr( VI) POLLUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF GROUNDWATER AND SOIL IN THE SURROUNDINGS OF A CHROMIUM SLAG SITE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 117-121. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502026
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 田文娟，郭丽，杜维，郑丹. 柱后衍生-离子色谱法测定固废中的六价铬方法优化. 广州化工. 2024(20): 110-114 .
    2. 杨柳晨，王小钊，邢丹. 铬盐污染土壤六价铬标准物质不确定度评估. 福建分析测试. 2024(06): 53-59 .
    3. 吕旭，韩建. 碱消解-火焰原子吸收光谱法检测土壤中的六价铬方法改进. 山东化工. 2022(13): 89-91+97 .
    4. 褚琳琳，王静云，金晓霞，汪碧芬，孔翠羽. 碱溶液提取-离子交换-电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定土壤中六价铬. 岩矿测试. 2022(05): 826-835 .
    5. 陈秀梅，王靖宜. 碱性微波提取-ICP/MS法测定土壤中六价铬. 环境监测管理与技术. 2022(06): 56-59 .
    6. 邱沙，宋景鹏，陈志国，白鹤，曹文庆，刘艺芸. 原位化学还原技术修复铬污染土壤及其工程应用. 环境科学与技术. 2021(04): 131-139 .
    7. 王世悦. 工作场所中六价铬和总铬火焰原子吸收法的研究. 质量安全与检验检测. 2020(05): 138-139 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.2 %FULLTEXT: 14.2 %META: 81.7 %META: 81.7 %PDF: 4.0 %PDF: 4.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.3 %其他: 21.3 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 3.8 %上海: 3.8 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %丽水: 0.5 %丽水: 0.5 %北京: 4.4 %北京: 4.4 %台州: 3.8 %台州: 3.8 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %哈尔滨: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %天津: 0.5 %宣城: 1.1 %宣城: 1.1 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %张家口: 3.8 %张家口: 3.8 %成都: 1.6 %成都: 1.6 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %晋城: 1.1 %晋城: 1.1 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 2.2 %杭州: 2.2 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %汕头: 0.5 %汕头: 0.5 %沈阳: 2.7 %沈阳: 2.7 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %温州: 1.1 %温州: 1.1 %湖州: 2.2 %湖州: 2.2 %漯河: 1.6 %漯河: 1.6 %福州: 1.1 %福州: 1.1 %秦皇岛: 1.1 %秦皇岛: 1.1 %芒廷维尤: 18.6 %芒廷维尤: 18.6 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %衢州: 1.1 %衢州: 1.1 %西宁: 8.7 %西宁: 8.7 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 6.0 %运城: 6.0 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %邯郸: 1.1 %邯郸: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %铁岭: 0.5 %铁岭: 0.5 %长沙: 1.1 %长沙: 1.1 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %其他[]上海临汾丽水北京台州哈尔滨天津宣城常德张家口成都昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉汕头沈阳济源温州湖州漯河福州秦皇岛芒廷维尤苏州衢州西宁贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铁岭长沙长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (218) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return