Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 6
Aug.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(6): 195-201
WANG Wen-hui. DISTRIBUTION AND EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS, MIGRATION AND RELEASE REGULATION OF MERCURY IN A 600 MW COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 195-201. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006032
Citation: WANG Wen-hui. DISTRIBUTION AND EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS, MIGRATION AND RELEASE REGULATION OF MERCURY IN A 600 MW COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 195-201. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006032
shu

DISTRIBUTION AND EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS, MIGRATION AND RELEASE REGULATION OF MERCURY IN A 600 MW COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006032

  • Hulunbuir Enironmental Monitoring Center Station, Hunlunbeir 021008, China

  • Received Date: 2019-08-30
    Abstract
  • In order to characterize the Hg distribution characteristics, migration and its release rules of a 600MW unit ultra-low emission coal-fired power, field measurement research was conducted in this paper. The results showed that, the mean value of Hg content in coal was 310μg/kg, and the distribution coefficients of Hg in slag, fly ash, gypsum, waste water and flue gas were 1.9%, 37.5%, 34.6%, 0.8% and 24.8%, respectively. The removal efficiency of Hg in the whole flue gas treatment system was 74.7%, and final total Hg emission was 6.0 μg/m3. The conversion efficiency of SCR and flue gas cooler on Hg0 were 44.2% and 30.4%, respectively. The removal efficiency of HgP in LL-ESP was nearly 100%, and the removal efficiency of Hg2+ in WFGD was 80.7%. The primary release of Hg from the power plant was 783 kg/a (with atmospheric emission of 188 kg/a), and the secondary release was 334 kg/a. This paper could provide references for the release of Hg emission control standards and selection of control technologies for coal-fired power plants.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(35)
  • YANG Z D, ZHENG C H, ZHANG X F, et al. Highly efficient removal of sulfuric acid aerosol by a combined wet electrostatic precipitator[J]. RSC Advances, 2018, 8(1): 59-66.
    LIU J M, ZHU F H, MA X Y. Industrial application of a deep purification technology for flue gas involving phase-transition agglomeration and dehumidification[J]. Engineering, 2018, 4(3): 416-420.
    CAO R J, TAN H Z, XIONG Y B, et al. Improving the removal of particles and trace elements from coal-fired power plants by combining a wet phase transition agglomerator with wet electrostatic precipitator [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161: 1459-1465.
    王康,朱林,吴碧君,等. SO2对燃煤电厂选择催化还原脱硝催化剂性能的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2018,18(13): 323-327.
    孙雪丽, 朱法华, 王圣, 等.燃煤电厂颗粒物超低排放技术路线选择[J].环境工程技术学报,2018,8(2): 129-136.
    刘含笑,姚宇平,郦建国, 等. 低低温电除尘技术适用性及污染物减排特性研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2018, 38(8):650-657.
    周春霄,孙伊帆,蒋仁宝,等. 百叶窗对静电除尘器二次扬尘的抑制效应[J]. 科学技术与工程,2019,19(15): 365-371.
    全中国电力企业联合会规划发展部.国电力工业统计快报(2017年)[R].[2019-04-15].
    WANG S M, ZHANG Y S, GU Y Z, et al. Using modified fly ash for mercury emissions control for coal-fired power plant applications in China [J]. Fuel, 2016,181: 1230-1237.
    ZHANG Y S, SHANG P F, WANG J W, et al. Trace element (Hg, As, Cr, Cd, Pb) distribution and speciation in coal-fired power plants [J]. Fuel, 2017,208: 647-654.
    杨爱勇, 严智操, 惠润堂, 等. 中国煤中汞的含量、分布与赋存状态研究[J].科学技术与工程,2015,15(32): 93-100.
    WU Q R, WANG S X, LI G L, et al. Temporal trend and spatial distribution of speciated atmospheric mercury emissions in China during 1978-2014[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016,50(24): 13428-13435.
    LEE S H,RHIM Y J. Carbon-based novel sorbent for removing gas-phase mercury[J].Fuel,2006,85(2): 219-226.
    YAN R,LIANG D T,TSEN L,et al.Bench-scale experimental evaluation of carbon performance on mercury vapor adsorption[J].Fuel,2004,83(17/18): 2401-2409.
    SERRE S D,GULLETT B K,GHORISHI S B.Entrained-flow adsorption of mercury using activated carbon[J].Journal of the Air ＆ Waste Management Association, 2001,51(5): 733-741.
    SJOSTROM S,EBNER T,LEY T,et al. Assessing sorbents for mercury control in coal-combustion flue gas[J].Journal of the Air ＆ Waste Management Association,2002,52(8): 902-911.
    GHORISHI S B,KEENEY R M,SERRE S D, et al.Development of a Cl-impregnated activated carbon for entrained-flow capture of elemental mercury[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2002,36(20): 4454-4459.
    陈义珍, 柴发合, 薛志钢, 等. 燃煤火电厂汞排放因子测试设计及案例分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2006,19(2):49-52.
    张军, 郑成航, 张涌新, 等. 某1000 MW燃煤机组超低排放电厂烟气污染物排放测试及其特性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016,36(5):1310-1314.
    赵毅,韩立鹏. 超低排放燃煤电厂低低温电除尘器协同脱汞研究[J]. 动力工程学报, 2019,39(4):319-323.
    陈自祥,王儒威,孙若愚,等.淮南燃煤电厂汞分配、富集与释放通量[J].环境化学,2018,37(2): 193-199.
    固定污染源废气总汞的测定冰浴吸收瓶采样-冷原子吸收分光光度法(征求意见稿):HJ 543[S].
    LIU X L,WANG S X,ZHANG L,et al.Speciation of mercury in FGD gypsum and mercury emission during the wallboard production in China[J].Fuel,2013,111(9): 621-627.
    QUAN T,LIU G J,YAN Z C,et al. Distribution and fate of environmentally sensitive elements (arsenic,mercury,stibium and selenium) in coalfired power plants at Huainan,Anhui,China[J].Fuel,2012, 95(1): 334-339.
    程泓,刘丙祥,冯新斌,等.典型燃煤电厂汞的分布、迁移及释放特征研究[J].地球与环境,2018,46(1): 43-49.
    BURMISTRZ P,KOGUT K,MARCZAK M,et al.Lignites and subbituminous coals combustion in Polish power plants as a source of anthropogenic mercury emission[J].Fuel Processing Technology,2016,152: 250-258.
    PARK K S,SEO Y C,LEE S J,et al.Emission and speciation of mercury from various combustion sources[J].Powder Technology,2008,180(1): 151-156.
    RICHARDSON C, MACHALEK T, MILLER S, et al. Effect of NOx control processes on mercury speciation in utility flue gas[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2002, 52(8): 941-947.
    ZHANG Y, LAUMB J, LIGGETT R, et al. Impacts of acid gases on mercury oxidation across SCR catalyst[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 88(10): 929-934.
    刘玉坤, 禚玉群, 陈昌和, 等. 燃煤电站脱硫系统的脱汞性能[J]. 中国电力, 2011, 44(12): 68-72.
    中国环境保护产业协会电除尘委员会. 燃煤电厂烟气超低排放技术[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2015.
    赵毅,韩立鹏. 660 MW超低排放燃煤电站汞分布特征研究[J].环境科学学报,2019,39(3):853-858
    国家发展和改革委员会.中国资源综合利用年度报告(2014) [EB/OL].http://www.Sdpc.gov.cn/gzdt/201410/t20141009_628795.html[2014-10-09].
    梁红姬.燃煤飞灰中汞的赋存状态及其在热处理过程中释放特征的研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2014.
    刘青,石林.飞灰在热处理过程中汞的逸出特性[J].化工进展,2010,29(6): 1154-1158.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Haicheng, CHENG Cheng, CHEN Zhenglin, YANG Lixia, LUO Shenglian. SULFIDE ION DOPING PROMOTES EFFICIENT PHOTOCATALYTIC DEGRADATION OF TOLUENE BY WO3 NANOWIRES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(9): 201-210. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202409019
    [2]CHEN Acong, WEI Tuo, QIN Zhi, CHEN Yao, XU Rui, WU Haizhen, WEI Chaohai. SHIELDING EFFECT OF ZINC SULFATE ON CYANIDE COMPLEX DURING THIOCYANIDE DETECTION FOR COKING WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(5): 134-139. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202305018
    [3]ZHOU Lichang, LI Zhaoling, CHEN Lei, LIN Ya'nan, GONG Zhiwei, LIN Qingshan, MA Jie, WANG Zongping, GUO Gang. SHORT-TERM EFFECT OF THIOSULFATE ON COMPETITION BETWEEN SULFUR BACTERIA AND GLYCOGEN ACCUMULATING ORGANISMS IN SULFUR-CONTAINING WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 26-32. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308004
    [4]ZHANG Kui, WANG Xuemei, LI Yuhuan, ZHANG Yu, LIU Mengjuan, JIANG Xueping, JI Hongbing. HIGH EFFICIENCY ADSORPTION OF Hg2+ BY SULFUR-MODIFIED COW MANURE BIOCHAR AND ITS MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 79-88. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204012
    [5]DONG Wan-tao, WANG Ya-jun, LI Li, ZHANG Xing. REACTION KINETICS STUDY ON H2O2 AND Na2FeO4 REMOVING TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON FROM SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 178-184. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110025
    [6]WANG Yan, ZOU Lv-xi, MAO Lin-feng, CHEN Ya-li, LI Ji. EFFICIENCY AND MECHANISM OF UV/O3-Na2S2O8 IN TREATING ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION CONDENSATE WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 38-44. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007006
    [11]Zhang Jun, Xu Junyang, Wang Dunqiu, Yang Huiping, Wu Xiaohui. EFFECTS OF TYPES AND CONCENTRATIONS OF SULFUR SUBSTRATE ON BIOLEACHING HEAVY METALS FROM SEWAGE SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(4): 39-43. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201504009
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(8)

    1. 郭磊，黄黎明，韦振祖，刘艇安，王靓，吴玮. 非均匀边界条件下SCR脱硝系统数值模拟及改造效果分析. 洁净煤技术. 2024(S2): 272-278 .
    2. 张起，张福祥，李盛平，景浩林，杨锐涵，董志强，杨祖旺，田桦. 660 MW燃煤机组脱硝系统优化改造. 能源与节能. 2023(02): 99-104 .
    3. 韩冰，李清方，刘海丽，于惠娟，张舒漫，王辉. 百万吨级CO_2捕集烟气集成处理塔流场模拟及优化. 石油工程建设. 2022(04): 7-11+34 .
    4. 封例忠，丛日强，刘怡，齐艳芳. 基于CFD的某330MW燃煤机组SCR脱硝系统混合器优化与验证. 环境工程. 2022(10): 156-161 . 本站查看
    5. 韦振祖，赵宁波，李明磊，刘瑞敬，谢新华，周健，卢承政. 非均匀入口条件下SCR脱硝系统流场优化改造技术研究. 锅炉技术. 2021(04): 74-80 .
    6. 陶莉，肖育军. SCR区域喷氨的NH_3分布与均匀性调整. 环境工程技术学报. 2021(04): 663-669 .
    7. 张云雷，孙仲超，梁大明，熊银伍，李艳芳. 活性焦烟气净化反应器研究进展. 洁净煤技术. 2020(04): 21-30 .
    8. 王为，朱召平，张楚城，陈牧，苏寅彪，郑晓盼. 高温除尘脱硝一体化技术开发及流场模拟研究. 洁净煤技术. 2020(04): 154-161 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 6.5 %FULLTEXT: 6.5 %META: 93.5 %META: 93.5 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.5 %其他: 17.5 %Bulgaria: 0.5 %Bulgaria: 0.5 %Canada: 1.4 %Canada: 1.4 %China: 1.4 %China: 1.4 %Germany: 0.5 %Germany: 0.5 %Greece: 0.5 %Greece: 0.5 %Italy: 0.5 %Italy: 0.5 %Netherlands: 0.5 %Netherlands: 0.5 %Portugal: 0.9 %Portugal: 0.9 %Saudi Arabia: 0.5 %Saudi Arabia: 0.5 %Sweden: 0.9 %Sweden: 0.9 %United States: 4.1 %United States: 4.1 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %佛罗里达: 0.9 %佛罗里达: 0.9 %保定: 1.4 %保定: 1.4 %北京: 12.0 %北京: 12.0 %十堰: 0.5 %十堰: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %台州: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %大同: 0.5 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常德: 0.9 %常德: 0.9 %广州: 0.5 %广州: 0.5 %张家口: 1.8 %张家口: 1.8 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %晋城: 0.9 %晋城: 0.9 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %欧文: 0.5 %欧文: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %沈阳: 0.5 %泰安: 0.5 %泰安: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %济源: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.5 %湘潭: 0.5 %漯河: 1.8 %漯河: 1.8 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 22.1 %芒廷维尤: 22.1 %芝加哥: 3.7 %芝加哥: 3.7 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %萍乡: 0.5 %萍乡: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 5.1 %西宁: 5.1 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 3.7 %运城: 3.7 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 0.9 %郑州: 0.9 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.5 %铜陵: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %其他BulgariaCanadaChinaGermanyGreeceItalyNetherlandsPortugalSaudi ArabiaSwedenUnited States临汾佛罗里达保定北京十堰台州大同天津宣城常德广州张家口成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦晋城朝阳杭州欧文沈阳泰安济源温州湘潭漯河石家庄纽约芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州萍乡衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆铜陵长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (123) PDF downloads(0) Cited by(12)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return