Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
SUI Ke-jian, LI Jia-ju, LI Peng-feng, ZHOU Yong, ZHENG Xing-can, SUN Yong-li, SHANG Wei, TANG Li. STUDY ON DEEP DEPHOSPHORIZATION OF EFFLUENT FROM URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT BY DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 66-70,65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007010
Citation: LI Ji, WANG Yan, LUO Guo-bing, LI Bing-bing. OPERATION EVALUATION OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS IMPLEMENTING GRADE I-A STANDARD AND ANALYSIS ON EMPASSIS AND DIFFICULTIES IN UPGRADING THE STANDARD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 1-12. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007001

OPERATION EVALUATION OF URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANTS IMPLEMENTING GRADE I-A STANDARD AND ANALYSIS ON EMPASSIS AND DIFFICULTIES IN UPGRADING THE STANDARD

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007001
  • Received Date: 2020-02-10
  • By the end of 2019, a total of 2913 urban wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in China had implemented the Grade I-A Discharge Standard in China's national standard GB 18918-2002, which accounted for 53.2% of the total WWTPs in China. The Grade I-A Standard has become the most widely implemented discharge standard for WWTPs in China. Based on the deep investigation of 204 WWTPs implementing the Grade I-A Standard of Taihu Basin in recent 6 years, in combination with whole process analysis of more than 100 WWTPs in China, this paper firstly evaluated the operational performance of WWTPs implementing the Grade I-A Standard. Results showed that total amount of pollutants reduction of WWTPs in Taihu Basin had been significantly increased due to the continuous increase of water inflow, and the continuous decrease of effluent concentration after the upgrading of Grade I-A Standard, positively contributing to the emission reduction of organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus and the eutrophication control in Taihu Basin. Then the common problems in the operation process of WWTPs were summarized. Influent water quality, process design, selection and maintenance of equipment and facilities, as well as the performance control of functional bacterial group in activated sludge still had further improvement and optimization space. Meanwhile, targeted optimization operation measures were put forward. At last, key and difficult points and strategies in the new round of upgrading work were discussed. It is suggested that attention should be paid to improving the quality and efficiency of the wastewater collection system, and the quality and transmission efficiency of the pipe network. And the whole process analysis should be carried out before upgrading. Then the process optimization or engineering measures could be confirmed.
  • 郑兴灿.太湖流域城镇污水处理厂执行一级A标准的问题讨论[J].建设科技,2008(14):8-12.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.全国城镇污水处理厂信息管理系统[EB/OL].http://wsxm.cin.gov.cn/login.aspx.
    阮智宇,郑凯凯,苏挥,等.CAST工艺运行诊断和优化调控分析[J].中国给水排水,2015,31(20):50-54.
    陈明飞,郑凯凯,王燕,等.基于全流程分析的污水厂高硝态氮进水优化运行[J].中国给水排水,2019,35(17):118-122

    ,128.
    江苏省生态环境厅.江苏省环境状况公报(2007)[Z]. 江苏省人民政府公报,2007.
    江苏省生态环境厅.江苏省生态环境状况公报(2017)[Z]. 江苏省人民政府公报,2017.
    何伶俊,汪勇,黄皓,等.江苏太湖流域污水处理厂一级A提标改造技术总结[J].中国给水排水,2011,27(10):33-39.
    江苏省住房和城乡建设厅.江苏省太湖流域城镇污水处理厂提标建设技术导则[M].北京:光明日报出版社,2010.
    江苏省住房和城乡建设厅.江苏省太湖地区城镇污水处理厂DB 32/1072提标技术指引[M]. 江苏:江苏省住房和城乡建设厅,2018.
    邹吕熙,李怀波,郑凯凯,等.太湖流域城镇污水处理厂进水水质特征分析[J].给水排水,2019,55(7):39-45.
    熊鸿斌,吴胜方,赵娜娜.城市污水厂TN、TP达一级A标准的设计运行要点[J].中国给水排水,2011,27(18):96-99.
    郑兴灿,孙永利,尚巍,等.城镇污水处理功能提升和技术设备发展的几点思考[J].给水排水,2011,47(9):1-5.
    聂新宇,阮智宇,王燕,等.太湖流域市政污水处理厂一级A标准稳定运行存在问题探讨[J].环保科技,2016,22(5):46-50.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 室外排水设计规范(2014年版):GB 50014-2006[M]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2014.
    于莉芳,房平,万琼,等.西安市第六污水处理厂设计水质水量分析与确定[J].给水排水,2011,37(9):38-42.
    孙晶晶,羊鹏程,鲍立新,等.曝气强度对曝气沉砂池运行效果的影响分析[J].中国给水排水,2013,29(21):55-57

    ,64.
    王磊.市政污水管网改造工程施工管理策略[J].低碳世界,2018(2):21-22.
    翁晟琳,李一平,卢绪川,等.台州市生活污水处理厂设计水量中雨水混入比例研究[J].水资源保护,2017,33(4):75-79

    ,94.
    WEISS G, BROMBACH H, HALLER B. Infiltration and inflow in combined sewer systems:iong-term analysis[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2002, 45(7):11-19.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.城镇污水处理提质增效三年行动方案(2019-2021年)[R]. 建城[2019] 52号,2019.
    BOLTZ J P, MORGENROTH E, DAIGGER G T, et al. Method to identify potential phosphorus rate-limiting conditions in post-denitrification biofilm reactors within systems designed for simultaneous low-level effluent nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations[J]. Water Research, 2012, 46(19):6228-6238.
    王靖宇,付晓伟,韦凤密,等.基于O3-MBR工艺的焦化废水深度处理[J].工业安全与环保,2019,45(9):10-14.
    宋亚朋,王建兵,聂海峰,等.管式O3/UV-BAF处理印染生化尾水的中试实验[J].环境工程学报,2019,13(2):264-271.
    李鹏峰,郑兴灿,孙永利,等.高效初沉发酵池处理城市污水的中试研究[J].中国给水排水,2012,28(5):5-8.
    隋克俭,李鹏峰,郭亚琼,等.高效初沉发酵池装置在城市污水处理厂的应用[C]//中国土木工程学会水工业分会排水委员会:中国土木工程学会,全国排水委员会2015年年会论文集,2015:229-232.
    李激,陈明飞,王燕,等.高排放标准下市政污水处理厂反硝化脱氮影响因素及优化分析[J].环保产业,2019,29(2):38-43.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]JIN Hongyi, Tang Xueping, Zhuang Mazhan, Gong Chunming, Wu Xiaohai, LI Fei, ZHOU Zhenming. PREPARATION OF PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL MATERIAL BY CALCINATION OF WATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE AND RIVER SILT AND ITS PERFORMANCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 209-217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308027
    [2]NIU Yongjian, DONG Kun, NIU Hongliang, XIN Mingxing, LI Weiwei, SUN Hongwei. EFFECT OF FREE AMMONIA ON PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN AN EBPR SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 24-31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210004
    [3]JIA Kaixue, XU Shaoqi, WEI Zimin, CHEN Wenjie, ZHAN Yabin, SHI Xiong, LI Ji, WEI Yuquan. REVIEW ON PHOSPHORUS FRACTIONS TRANSFORMATION IN COMPOSTING ENHANCED BY PHOSPHORUS-SOLUBILIZING MICROORGANISMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 89-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212012
    [4]PAN Jun, SUN Bo-yang, WEI Wei, ZHANG Jin, TAN Shuai-chen, LI Rui-fang. EXPERIMENT OF MICRO-POLLUTED WATER TREATMENT BY COMBINED TECHNOLOGY OF MICRO-NANO AERATION-ECOLOGICAL FLOATING WETLAND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 49-53,209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005009
    [11]Wang Yadong, Wang Shaopo, Zheng Shasha, Zhang Yan, Sun Liping, Du Jinshan. POLY-P ACCUMULATING MICROORGANISMS AND IDENTIFYING METHODS FOR BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 21-26. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502005
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 蔺鸿涛,龚为进,陶辰瀚,祁超智,黄磊,余正洋. 多金属改性生物炭磷吸附性能和动力学研究. 山东化工. 2025(03): 23-27 .
    2. 蔺鸿涛,龚为进,陶辰瀚,祁超智,黄磊,余正洋. 镧改性市政污泥生物炭制备及磷吸附性能研究. 中原工学院学报. 2025(01): 45-52 .
    3. 王凡滔,陈贇,魏璟馨,李世琦,刘亚佺,冯岩. 城市污水极限除磷研究现状. 工业用水与废水. 2024(04): 7-11 .
    4. 曾伟,吴幼娥,丁嘉培,王伟浩,赵会芳. 贵州某酱香型白酒废水尾水处理工程设计. 天津化工. 2024(05): 106-109 .
    5. 曾超,刘影,陈圆,陈积义,徐菡玲,刘阳,文宇鸿,杨淇椋,古伟,王文明. 某再生水厂两期脱氮除磷工艺设计及效能分析. 中国给水排水. 2024(18): 64-70 .
    6. 葛绍阳,陆宾,花发奇. 气浮工艺在工业废水处理中的应用研究. 山西化工. 2024(11): 265-267 .
    7. 尚雄,李正远,普家和,夏钰,周富聪. 昆明A污水处理厂气浮除磷技术提标改造项目试运行效果浅析. 广州化工. 2023(16): 106-109 .
    8. 陈奇良. 高效气浮在污水厂极限除磷提标设计中的应用. 广州化工. 2022(06): 124-126 .
    9. 杨璐阳,丁冠文,戴浩然,邱慧. 一种水热稳定的金属有机骨架UiO-66高效捕获水中磷酸盐的性能及机理. 环境化学. 2022(05): 1746-1756 .
    10. 吴晓波,雷文江,谭云鹏. 无锡市胡埭污水处理厂提标改造方案研究. 城市道桥与防洪. 2022(04): 119-121+129+17 .
    11. 沈怡,王佳音,陈冠辉. 溶气气浮技术在市政污水深度处理工程设计与应用. 辽宁化工. 2022(09): 1253-1256 .
    12. 谭心,邹晓凤,苏强,于军. 污水处理厂尾水深度除磷技术综述. 山东化工. 2021(16): 277-279 .
    13. 邸超. EBIS工艺在化工污水处理中的应用. 化学工程与装备. 2021(09): 255-256+51 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.8 %FULLTEXT: 7.8 %META: 89.1 %META: 89.1 %PDF: 3.0 %PDF: 3.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.2 %其他: 8.2 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %Canada: 0.5 %Canada: 0.5 %China: 2.5 %China: 2.5 %Czech Republic: 0.4 %Czech Republic: 0.4 %Netherlands: 0.2 %Netherlands: 0.2 %Spain: 0.2 %Spain: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 2.0 %上海: 2.0 %东莞: 2.1 %东莞: 2.1 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %保定: 0.7 %保定: 0.7 %六安: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %北京: 6.6 %北京: 6.6 %十堰: 1.2 %十堰: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南充: 0.4 %南充: 0.4 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉安: 1.1 %吉安: 1.1 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大连: 0.9 %大连: 0.9 %天津: 2.7 %天津: 2.7 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安庆: 0.2 %安庆: 0.2 %宣城: 0.7 %宣城: 0.7 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 2.1 %广州: 2.1 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 1.2 %张家口: 1.2 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 2.0 %杭州: 2.0 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %漯河: 5.2 %漯河: 5.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %美国: 0.2 %美国: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 20.3 %西宁: 20.3 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.9 %贵阳: 0.9 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %连云港: 0.4 %连云港: 0.4 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.4 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.4 %镇江: 0.4 %镇江: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %阳泉: 1.2 %阳泉: 1.2 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %其他其他CanadaChinaCzech RepublicNetherlandsSpain[]上海东莞临汾保定六安北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌合肥吉安呼伦贝尔呼和浩特嘉兴大同大连天津太原宁波安庆宣城常州常德广州廊坊张家口徐州惠州成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦新乡无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济源深圳温州湖州漯河潍坊石家庄福州秦皇岛美国芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安贵阳运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆锡林郭勒盟镇江长春长沙长治阳泉青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (530) PDF downloads(35) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return