Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
HUANG Chou, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, WANG Shuo, LI Ji. THE INFLUENCING FACTORS AND OPTIMAL OPERATION OF PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 58-65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007009
Citation: HUANG Chou, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, WANG Shuo, LI Ji. THE INFLUENCING FACTORS AND OPTIMAL OPERATION OF PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 58-65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007009

THE INFLUENCING FACTORS AND OPTIMAL OPERATION OF PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IN URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007009
  • Received Date: 2020-03-04
  • With the new round upgrading of urban sewage treatment plants in key river basins across China, some sewage treatment plants reduced their total effluent (TP) emission limit from 0.5 mg/L to 0.3 mg/L, and even to 0.2 mg/L, which posed a new challenge for phosphorus removal in urban sewage treatment plants. In this paper, by investigating and analyzing 58 urban sewage treatment plants that implement the Grade I-A Discharge Standard in China's national standard GB 18918-2002, we discussed the main problems of phosphorus removal in the actual production and operation of sewage treatment plants and gave corresponding countermeasures for future high-standard TP emissions, in order to provide technical guidance for the operation and management of the sewage treatment plant. The survey results showed that the phosphorus release potential of each sewage treatment plant was in the range of 0.01~23.98 mg/(g·h), and the average phosphorus release potential was 2.77 mg/(g·h). The phosphorus release potential was generally weak; insufficient carbon source in the feedwater, high concentration of nitrate nitrogen in the anaerobic zone, and the inhibition of simultaneous chemical phosphorus removal were the main reasons for the poor biological phosphorus removal effect, and specific control measures were proposed accordingly. In addition, it was recommended that the sewage treatment plant determined the best phosphorus removal agents and appropriate dosage by static experiments according to the quality of the incoming water, so as to achieve more reasonable control of the chemical phosphorus removal process, thereby achieving the purpose of saving phosphorus removal agents consumption.
  • 李佳琪.关于城镇污水处理厂提标改造的探讨[J].节能,2019,38(8):141-142.
    张亚勤.污水处理厂达到一级A排放标准中的化学除磷[J].中国市政工程,2009(5):40-41,55.
    何伶俊.太湖流域污水处理提标概况[J].城乡建设,2019(22):17-20.
    方金富,伍红森.城市污水处理厂化学强化生物除磷的试验研究[J].化工管理,2017(33):122-123,125.
    孙伟香,李淑栋,李慧.城镇污泥总磷测定条件的优化选择研究[J].环境科学与管理,2017,42(10):110-113.
    国家环境保护总局.《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会. 水和废水监测分析方法[M]. 4版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002.
    王进.生物除磷影响因素试验研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2011.
    邱慎初,丁堂堂.探讨城市污水生物处理出水的总磷达标问题[J].中国给水排水,2002,18(9):23-25.
    翁晟琳,李一平,卢绪川,等.台州市生活污水处理厂设计水量中雨水混入比例研究[J].水资源保护,2017,33(4):75-79

    ,94.
    尹军,王建辉,王雪峰, 等.污水生物除磷若干影响因素分析[J].环境工程学报,2007,1(4):6-11.
    王淑梅,刘俊新.厌氧-立体循环一体化氧化沟除磷脱氮工艺中影响厌氧释磷的因素研究[J].环境污染治理技术与设备,2006,7(5):48-53.
    贾艳萍,贾心倩,张兰河, 等.序批式生物反应器工艺脱氮除磷过程控制参数[J].化学反应工程与工艺,2015,(2):136-141.
    吴剑,王世和,杨小丽, 等.MB(A2/O)工艺处理城市污水厌氧释磷的影响因素分析[J].水处理技术,2008,34(5):15-19.
    李茂侨,陈志强,温沁雪.硝态氮及碳源浓度对A-AAO工艺厌氧释磷影响的研究[J].环境科学与管理,2018,43(2):107-111.
    BELLIER N, CHAZARENC F, COMEAU Y. Phosphorus removal from wastewater by mineral apatite[J]. Water Research, 2006, 40(15):2965-2971.
    孙永利,郑兴灿,刘振江, 等.城镇污水厂化学协同除磷对生物除磷的影响[J].中国给水排水,2015,31(19):68-71.
    高颖.同步化学除磷对活性污泥SBR生物除磷系统的影响研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2016.
    CLARK T, BURGESS J E, STEPHENSON T, et al. The influence of iron-based co-precipitants on activated sludge biomass[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2000,78(5):405-410.
    LIU Y C, SHI H C, LI W L, et al. Inhibition of chemical dose in biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal in simultaneous chemical precipitation for pHospHorus removal[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010,102(5):4008-4012.
    高颖,袁林江,吕景花.铁盐化学除磷对活性污泥生物除磷系统的影响[J].环境工程学报,2016,10(10):5366-5372.
    侯艳玲,刘艳臣,邱勇, 等.化学除磷药剂中三价铁铝对生物系统污泥活性影响的研究[J].给水排水,2010,36(6):38-41.
    姚婧梅,张智,任丽平, 等.化学除磷中Fe(Ⅲ)和Fe(Ⅱ)盐对活性污泥系统的影响[J].中国给水排水,2012,28(9):20-25.
    唐晓丹.对环境监测中水质总磷测定标准方法的探析[J].百科论坛电子杂志,2018(6):108.
    郑兴灿.太湖流域城镇污水处理厂执行一级A标准的问题讨论[J].建设科技,2008(14):8-12.
    王文文.有机磷化工废水治理方法探讨[J].化工管理,2018(24):200.
    PETZOLDT C S, LEZCANO J P, IVÁN L M. Removal of orthophosphate and dissolved organic phosphorus from synthetic wastewater in a combined struvite precipitation-adsorption system[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(4):103923.
    马宏涛,孙水裕,许明鑫.臭氧联合混凝沉淀法去除浮选废水中有机磷[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(1):285-290.
    许明鑫,孙水裕,戴文灿, 等.络合沉淀结合混凝法去除浮选废水中有机磷[J].环境工程学报,2014,8(12):5367-5371.
    胡冰.超声强化臭氧化处理水中有机磷农药的研究[D].大庆:东北石油大学,2006.
    陈群伟.高压电晕与臭氧联用技术处理有机磷农药废水的试验研究[D].杭州:浙江工业大学,2007.
    杨梅,徐小军,桂文君, 等.臭氧水对黄瓜和青菜中6种有机磷农药残留的去除效果[J].农药学学报,2013,15(1):85-90.
    潘灿平,孔祥雨,江树人.臭氧水对蔬菜中4种有机磷农药的去除效率研究[C]//北京农药学会.农药与环境安全国际学术研讨会论文集.2003:149-154.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]LI Denghui, HUANG Bangjie, ZHANG Zongyao, LIU Xiaochen, DU Hongwei, SUN Hongwei, FANG Huaiyang, FANG Xiaohang. A CASE STUDY ON URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL: THE HUIZHOU CHATING ECOLOGICAL REGULATION POND IN THE SHAHE RIVER BASIN OF THE DONGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(6): 35-42. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202406005
    [2]CHEN Yan, ZHAI Jun, YANG Min, ZHU Hanshou, JIN Diandian, GAO Haifeng, HOU Peng. ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL PROTECTION SITUATION AND ITS VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CHISHUI RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(4): 185-194. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202304026
    [3]PANG Bo, YANG Wenxin, CUI Baoshan, ZHANG Shuyan, XIE Tian, NING Zhonghua, GAO Fang, ZHANG Hongshan. EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF VEGETATION RESTORATION IN THE YELLOW RIVER DELTA WETLAND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION PROJECT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 213-221. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301026
    [4]GENG Zhi, DU Jizeng, LIU Hongxi, CAO Bo, LI Xinyu, ZHANG Yong, CUI Baoshan. EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL WATER REPLENISHMENT AMOUNT AND PATH FOR URBAN SMALL AND MICRO WETLANDS BASED ON HYDRODYNAMIC PROCESS: A CASE STUDY OF BEIJING HANSHIQIAO WETLAND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 51-60. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301007
    [5]WANG Chao, WANG Yuan, DOU Peng, WANG Zhenmei, MENG Qingyi, YANG Moyuan, TAO Haijun. SIMULATION OF WATER BLOOM CONTROL EFFECT OF LANDSCAPE SLOW-MOVING WATER BODIES BY VELOCITY UNDER ECOLOGICAL WATER REPLENISHMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 195-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301024
    [6]XU Cundong, REN Zihao, HUANG Song, ZHAO Zhihong, ZI Yahui, HU Xiaomeng. OPTIMIZATION OF MIKE21 RIVER NETWORK DRAINAGE SCHEME BASED ON DYNAMIC PLANNING THEORY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(1): 79-86. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202301010
    [7]LI Zhiyun, DENG Xiaoya, LONG Aihua, CHEN Fulong, ZHANG Lili, GAO Haifeng. EVALUATION OF SOIL,WATER RESOURCES AND ECOLOGICAL CARRYING STATUS OF THE TARIM RIVER BASIN FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 286-294. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206036
    [8]XIA Rui, JIA Ruining, CHEN Yan, WANG Lu, MA Shuqin, ZHANG Yuan. PROSPECTS OF SIMULATION METHODS FOR WATERSHED AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM INTEGRITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 241-252. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206031
    [9]PAN Ying, HAN Rui, ZHANG Yin, ZHANG Jin, YI Qitao, LI Ruonan. SCENARIO STUDY OF HYDROLOGICAL PROCESS IN COAL MINING SUBSIDENCE AREA BASED ON SWAT-FLUS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(6): 272-279. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202206034
    [10]XU Xiaomei, WANG Taishan, LIANG Ying, ZHANG Junlong, FENG Juan. UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION FOR TRADING RATE SYSTEM FOR EFFLUENT TRADING IN DAGU RIVER BASIN BASED ON SWAT MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 177-183. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202027
    [11]XU Hao, SUN Xiao-ling. THE INTERACTIVE MODELING AND JOINT PREVENTION OF WATER POLLUTION BETWEEN SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER IN MAOZHOU RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 21-26. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106004
    [12]LIU Jing-jing, XIE Wei-ke, ZHANG Bo, LI Chao, LI Yong-jian, DING Zhuo, CUI Hai-hang, WANG Yi. THROUGH-FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAVEL FILTER BED OF AN ACTUAL RIVER COURSE BASED ON NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF MIKE 21: A CASE STUDY OF ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION PROJECT IN A RIVER COURSE IN HANZHONG CITY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 47-50,147. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101006
    [13]LIU Qian, WANG Wei, LUO Bin, WANG Kang. CONTRIBUTION OF POLLUTION REDUCTION MEASURES AND METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS TO IMPROVEMENT OF WATER ENVIRONMENT OF THE MINJIANG RIVER BASIN IN THE MIDDLE OF THE 13TH FIVE-YEAR PLAN BASED ON SWAT MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 45-54. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105007
    [14]GAO Shang, HU Peng, CUI Song, ZHANG Zu-lin, XING Zhen-xiang, ZHANG Fu-xiang. NUMERICA SIMULATION AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF SURFACE RUNOFF IN NAOLI RIVER BASIN BASED ON SWAT MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 83-89. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010013
    [15]LI Bing, QIU Yong, TIAN Yu-xin, ZHU Yin, WANG Yan, ZHENG Kai-kai, LI Ji. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND SCENARIO SIMULATION FOR PROCESS RETROFITTING OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 93-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007015
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 金桂琴,黄俊雄,王军红,宋倩,李文忠,郭浩然. 基于水盐平衡的官厅水库氟化物达标途径研究. 环境工程. 2025(02): 148-156 . 本站查看
    2. 丁磊,陈黎明,王逸飞,缴健. 感潮河段城市湿地水动力模拟及改善方案研究. 水利水运工程学报. 2024(01): 35-45 .
    3. 吴悦,徐佳琪,仇文顺,王梦瑶,李述,时洋,魏加华. 潮白河北京段生态补水调度方案研究. 水利水电技术(中英文). 2023(09): 180-189 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 13.3 %FULLTEXT: 13.3 %META: 84.2 %META: 84.2 %PDF: 2.5 %PDF: 2.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 16.0 %其他: 16.0 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %China: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %United States: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 2.3 %上海: 2.3 %东莞: 3.1 %东莞: 3.1 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %亳州: 1.2 %亳州: 1.2 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %信阳: 0.6 %信阳: 0.6 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 4.7 %北京: 4.7 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 1.8 %南京: 1.8 %南充: 0.2 %南充: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %南通: 0.2 %厦门: 0.6 %厦门: 0.6 %台州: 0.2 %台州: 0.2 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %唐山: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %大同: 1.6 %大同: 1.6 %大连: 3.3 %大连: 3.3 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %宿迁: 0.2 %宿迁: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %延安: 0.2 %延安: 0.2 %张家口: 2.0 %张家口: 2.0 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %昆明: 1.6 %昆明: 1.6 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %杭州: 2.3 %杭州: 2.3 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济宁: 0.6 %济宁: 0.6 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %淄博: 0.2 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %湛江: 0.2 %漯河: 0.8 %漯河: 0.8 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 14.8 %芒廷维尤: 14.8 %芝加哥: 5.9 %芝加哥: 5.9 %衡阳: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 12.9 %西宁: 12.9 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %西雅图: 0.6 %西雅图: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.8 %贵阳: 0.8 %运城: 1.6 %运城: 1.6 %通辽: 0.2 %通辽: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 1.0 %郑州: 1.0 %鄂州: 0.6 %鄂州: 0.6 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %铁岭: 0.2 %铁岭: 0.2 %银川: 0.6 %银川: 0.6 %长春: 0.6 %长春: 0.6 %长沙: 0.8 %长沙: 0.8 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %黄石: 0.6 %黄石: 0.6 %齐齐哈尔: 0.2 %齐齐哈尔: 0.2 %其他其他ChinaUnited States[]上海东莞临汾亳州保定信阳兰州北京十堰南京南充南通厦门台州合肥呼和浩特唐山嘉兴大同大连太原宁波宜昌宣城宿迁常德广州延安张家口成都扬州昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉沈阳济南济宁济源淄博深圳湖州湛江漯河珠海石家庄福州秦皇岛芒廷维尤芝加哥衡阳衢州西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城通辽遵义邯郸郑州鄂州重庆铁岭银川长春长沙青岛黄石齐齐哈尔

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (361) PDF downloads(29) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return