Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
SUI Ke-jian, LI Jia-ju, LI Peng-feng, ZHOU Yong, ZHENG Xing-can, SUN Yong-li, SHANG Wei, TANG Li. STUDY ON DEEP DEPHOSPHORIZATION OF EFFLUENT FROM URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT BY DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 66-70,65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007010
Citation: SUI Ke-jian, LI Jia-ju, LI Peng-feng, ZHOU Yong, ZHENG Xing-can, SUN Yong-li, SHANG Wei, TANG Li. STUDY ON DEEP DEPHOSPHORIZATION OF EFFLUENT FROM URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT BY DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION PROCESS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 66-70,65. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007010

STUDY ON DEEP DEPHOSPHORIZATION OF EFFLUENT FROM URBAN SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT BY DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION PROCESS

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007010
  • Received Date: 2020-04-30
  • In this paper, the secondary effluent of a municipal sewage treatment plant in Jiangsu Province was taken as the research object. Through the simulation test and the pilot test of coagulation+air flotation deep phosphorus removal, the deep phosphorus removal effect of air flotation process instead of filtration process was explored. The results showed that FeCl3 had the best phosphorus removal effect. When the molar ratio was 2.3, the TP of effluent could be reduced to 0.2 mg/L, and when the molar ratio was 7, the TP of effluent could be reduced to 0.05 mg/L; the process of air flotation had a strong dependence on PAM, so it was necessary to add PAM to ensure the effect of phosphorus removal and the stability of water quality up to standard. The concentration of PAM was 0.6 mg/L; when the reflux ratio was 20% and the dissolved gas pressure was about 0.6 MPa, the operation effect of the device was stable; through the analysis on the phosphorus components, it was found that the air floatation process had a good effect on the removal of suspended TP and phosphate, but no effect on the removal of non-coagulable phosphorus components.
  • 王华,陈华鑫,徐兆安,等. 2010-2017年太湖总磷浓度变化趋势分析及成因探讨[J]. 湖泊科学,2019,31(4):919-929.
    孙永利,郑兴灿,刘振江,等. 城镇污水厂化学协同除磷对生物除磷的影响[J]. 中国给水排水,2015,31(19):68-71.
    张鹤清,吴振军,吕志国,等. 絮凝快速分离水处理技术简介及发展趋势[J]. 环境工程,2018,36(7):56-61.
    北京市市政工程设计研究总院有限公司. 给水排水设计手册第5册城镇排水[M]. 3版. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.2.
    梁梓庆,柯水洲,袁辉洲,等. 三种典型混凝剂处理带正电胶粒絮体性能的影响因素[J]. 环境工程,2018,36(9):36-40

    ,45.
    崔朋,章诗璐,万年红,等. 高效气浮工艺深度除磷试验研究[J]. 住宅产业,2019(11):143-148.
    李泽敏,孔巧平,韦朝海.溶气过程原理、技术特征及其水处理工程应用[J].化学工业与工程,2019,36(2):1-14.
    李景明,樊玉光,韩健, 等. 基于压力溶气的微气泡生成实验研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2018,33(1):122-126.
    熊永磊,杨小丽,宋海亮. 微纳米气泡在水处理中的应用及其发生装置研究[J]. 环境工程,2016,34(6):23-27.
    李鹏峰,孙永利,郑兴灿,等. 太湖流域某污水厂工艺过程诊断及优化措施[J]. 中国给水排水,2014,30(17):109-112.
    李鹏峰,郑兴灿,李激,等. 城镇污水处理厂提标改造工作流程探讨[J]. 中国给水排水,2019,35(22):14-19.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]JIN Hongyi, Tang Xueping, Zhuang Mazhan, Gong Chunming, Wu Xiaohai, LI Fei, ZHOU Zhenming. PREPARATION OF PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL MATERIAL BY CALCINATION OF WATER TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE AND RIVER SILT AND ITS PERFORMANCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 209-217. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308027
    [2]NIU Yongjian, DONG Kun, NIU Hongliang, XIN Mingxing, LI Weiwei, SUN Hongwei. EFFECT OF FREE AMMONIA ON PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN AN EBPR SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 24-31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210004
    [3]JIA Kaixue, XU Shaoqi, WEI Zimin, CHEN Wenjie, ZHAN Yabin, SHI Xiong, LI Ji, WEI Yuquan. REVIEW ON PHOSPHORUS FRACTIONS TRANSFORMATION IN COMPOSTING ENHANCED BY PHOSPHORUS-SOLUBILIZING MICROORGANISMS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 89-97. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212012
    [4]PAN Jun, SUN Bo-yang, WEI Wei, ZHANG Jin, TAN Shuai-chen, LI Rui-fang. EXPERIMENT OF MICRO-POLLUTED WATER TREATMENT BY COMBINED TECHNOLOGY OF MICRO-NANO AERATION-ECOLOGICAL FLOATING WETLAND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 49-53,209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005009
    [11]Wang Yadong, Wang Shaopo, Zheng Shasha, Zhang Yan, Sun Liping, Du Jinshan. POLY-P ACCUMULATING MICROORGANISMS AND IDENTIFYING METHODS FOR BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL SYSTEM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 21-26. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502005
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 蔺鸿涛,龚为进,陶辰瀚,祁超智,黄磊,余正洋. 多金属改性生物炭磷吸附性能和动力学研究. 山东化工. 2025(03): 23-27 .
    2. 蔺鸿涛,龚为进,陶辰瀚,祁超智,黄磊,余正洋. 镧改性市政污泥生物炭制备及磷吸附性能研究. 中原工学院学报. 2025(01): 45-52 .
    3. 王凡滔,陈贇,魏璟馨,李世琦,刘亚佺,冯岩. 城市污水极限除磷研究现状. 工业用水与废水. 2024(04): 7-11 .
    4. 曾伟,吴幼娥,丁嘉培,王伟浩,赵会芳. 贵州某酱香型白酒废水尾水处理工程设计. 天津化工. 2024(05): 106-109 .
    5. 曾超,刘影,陈圆,陈积义,徐菡玲,刘阳,文宇鸿,杨淇椋,古伟,王文明. 某再生水厂两期脱氮除磷工艺设计及效能分析. 中国给水排水. 2024(18): 64-70 .
    6. 葛绍阳,陆宾,花发奇. 气浮工艺在工业废水处理中的应用研究. 山西化工. 2024(11): 265-267 .
    7. 尚雄,李正远,普家和,夏钰,周富聪. 昆明A污水处理厂气浮除磷技术提标改造项目试运行效果浅析. 广州化工. 2023(16): 106-109 .
    8. 陈奇良. 高效气浮在污水厂极限除磷提标设计中的应用. 广州化工. 2022(06): 124-126 .
    9. 杨璐阳,丁冠文,戴浩然,邱慧. 一种水热稳定的金属有机骨架UiO-66高效捕获水中磷酸盐的性能及机理. 环境化学. 2022(05): 1746-1756 .
    10. 吴晓波,雷文江,谭云鹏. 无锡市胡埭污水处理厂提标改造方案研究. 城市道桥与防洪. 2022(04): 119-121+129+17 .
    11. 沈怡,王佳音,陈冠辉. 溶气气浮技术在市政污水深度处理工程设计与应用. 辽宁化工. 2022(09): 1253-1256 .
    12. 谭心,邹晓凤,苏强,于军. 污水处理厂尾水深度除磷技术综述. 山东化工. 2021(16): 277-279 .
    13. 邸超. EBIS工艺在化工污水处理中的应用. 化学工程与装备. 2021(09): 255-256+51 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0401020304050
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.8 %FULLTEXT: 7.8 %META: 89.1 %META: 89.1 %PDF: 3.0 %PDF: 3.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 8.2 %其他: 8.2 %其他: 0.4 %其他: 0.4 %Canada: 0.5 %Canada: 0.5 %China: 2.5 %China: 2.5 %Czech Republic: 0.4 %Czech Republic: 0.4 %Netherlands: 0.2 %Netherlands: 0.2 %Spain: 0.2 %Spain: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %[]: 0.2 %上海: 2.0 %上海: 2.0 %东莞: 2.1 %东莞: 2.1 %临汾: 0.2 %临汾: 0.2 %保定: 0.7 %保定: 0.7 %六安: 0.4 %六安: 0.4 %北京: 6.6 %北京: 6.6 %十堰: 1.2 %十堰: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南充: 0.4 %南充: 0.4 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %吉安: 1.1 %吉安: 1.1 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼伦贝尔: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %呼和浩特: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大同: 0.2 %大连: 0.9 %大连: 0.9 %天津: 2.7 %天津: 2.7 %太原: 0.2 %太原: 0.2 %宁波: 0.4 %宁波: 0.4 %安庆: 0.2 %安庆: 0.2 %宣城: 0.7 %宣城: 0.7 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 2.1 %广州: 2.1 %廊坊: 0.4 %廊坊: 0.4 %张家口: 1.2 %张家口: 1.2 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 1.8 %扬州: 1.8 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %新乡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.5 %无锡: 0.5 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %晋城: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 2.0 %杭州: 2.0 %武汉: 0.4 %武汉: 0.4 %济源: 0.2 %济源: 0.2 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %漯河: 5.2 %漯河: 5.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %潍坊: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %美国: 0.2 %美国: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芒廷维尤: 15.9 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %苏州: 0.2 %苏州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 20.3 %西宁: 20.3 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.9 %贵阳: 0.9 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %连云港: 0.4 %连云港: 0.4 %遵义: 0.2 %遵义: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.4 %锡林郭勒盟: 0.4 %镇江: 0.4 %镇江: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长春: 0.4 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %长治: 0.4 %长治: 0.4 %阳泉: 1.2 %阳泉: 1.2 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %其他其他CanadaChinaCzech RepublicNetherlandsSpain[]上海东莞临汾保定六安北京十堰南京南充南宁南昌合肥吉安呼伦贝尔呼和浩特嘉兴大同大连天津太原宁波安庆宣城常州常德广州廊坊张家口徐州惠州成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦新乡无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济源深圳温州湖州漯河潍坊石家庄福州秦皇岛美国芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安贵阳运城连云港遵义邯郸郑州重庆锡林郭勒盟镇江长春长沙长治阳泉青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (499) PDF downloads(17) Cited by(16)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return