Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 8
Nov.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(8): 195-200
YE Yu, XU Wenyu, LU Chunhui, XIE Yifan, LUO Jian. IMPACT OF SURROUNDING HIGH-PERMEABLE POROUS MEDIA ON REMEDIATION EFFICIENCY OF MULTI-SCREEN WELLS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 43-49,146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204007
Citation: LIU Tong-li, ZHAO Li-xin, MENG Hai-bo, YAO Zong-lu, ZHANG Xi-rui, HUO Li-li. RESEARCH AND OPTIMIZATION OF EVALUATION METHODS FOR STRAW ENERGY UTILIZATION TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 195-200. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008032
shu

RESEARCH AND OPTIMIZATION OF EVALUATION METHODS FOR STRAW ENERGY UTILIZATION TECHNOLOGY

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008032

  • 1. College of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China;

  • 2. Key Laboratory of Energy Resource Utilization from Agricultural Residues, Ministry of Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Engineering, Beijing 100125, China;

  • 3. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100084, China

  • Received Date: 2019-08-15
    Abstract
  • Biomass energy is an important part of energy structure in the future, and crop straw is one of the main sources of biomass energy resources, thus its energy utilization technology deserves exploration and promotion. In order to evaluate the resource utilization, application benefits, economic benefits, environmental benefits and social benefits of straw energy utilization technology, based on the existing literature, this paper reviewed the research status of evaluation methods commonly used in straw energy utilization technology, analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of various technical evaluation methods, summarized the evaluation scope of different methods. It also proposed the method suitable for straw energy utilization technology, that was, the comprehensive evaluation method combining life cycle assessment and analytic hierarchy process. According to the existing literature references, the evaluation index system was established, which laid a foundation for the evaluation of the utilization model of straw energy utilization technology.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(36)
  • 石祖梁. 中国秸秆资源化利用现状及对策建议[J]. 世界环境,2018(5):16-18.
    李廉明,余春江,柏继松. 中国秸秆直燃发电技术现状[J]. 化工进展,2010,29(增刊1):84-90.
    郭凯,王秦. 江苏省生物质成型燃料发展现状概述[J]. 科技经济导刊,2017(6):60-62.
    陈羚,赵立欣,董保成,等. 我国秸秆沼气工程发展现状与趋势[J]. 可再生能源,2010,28(3):145-148.
    梁伟,许金花. 木质成型颗粒的能量和能值分析[J]. 可再生能源,2012,30(2):115-119.
    霍丽丽,田宜水,孟海波,等. 生物质固体成型燃料全生命周期评价[J]. 太阳能学报,2011,32(12):1875-1880.
    朱文. 江苏省秸秆能源化利用潜力和利用方式评价研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学,2016.
    李可心. 生物质发电产业的区域适宜性评价及能源环境经济效益实证研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2019.
    覃静.农村沼气新技术研究及综合评价[D]. 南宁:广西大学,2012.
    李伟.玉米秸秆气化集中供气技术分析与集成模式研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学,2015.
    CIOIOLA R J, LANSING S, MARTIN J F. Emergy analysis of biogas production and electricity generation from small-scale agricultural digesters[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2011, 37(11):1681-1691.
    王红彦,王亚静,王道龙,等. 基于沼肥不同利用情景的秸秆沼气工程能值分析:以河北省青县耿官屯为例[J]. 生态学杂志,2016,35(10):2814-2823.
    刘华财,阴秀丽,吴创之. 秸秆发电系统能值分析[J]. 农业机械学报,2011,42(11):93-98

    ,123.
    HIJAZI O, MUNRO S, ZERHUSEN B, et al. Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016,54:1291-1300.
    SOAM S, KAPOOR M, KUMAR R, et al. Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of conventional and modified dilute acid pretreatment for fuel ethanol production from rice straw in India[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018(197):732-741.
    冯超,马晓茜. 秸秆直燃发电的生命周期评价[J]. 太阳能学报,2008,29(6):711-715.
    王明新,夏训峰,柴育红,等. 农村户用沼气工程生命周期节能减排效益[J]. 农业工程学报,2010,26(11):245-250.
    刘黎娜. 可再生能源建设项目生命周期评价方法及其案例研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2008.
    霍丽丽,赵立欣,孟海波,等. 秸秆类生物质气炭联产全生命周期评价[J]. 农业工程学报,2016,32(增刊1):261-266.
    孟海波,赵立欣,徐义田,等. 用粗糙集理论评价生物质固体成型燃料技术的研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2008,24(3):198-202.
    田宜水,赵立欣,孟海波,等. 中国农村生物质能利用技术和经济评价[J]. 农业工程学报,2011,27(增刊1):1-5.
    王志伟,雷廷宙,岳峰,等. 秸秆成型燃料系统经济性分析[J]. 农机化研究,2012,34(2):203-206.
    王红彦. 基于生命周期评价的秸秆沼气集中供气工程能值分析[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2016.
    李欣,娄世玲,杨麒,等. 基于生命周期能值分析的秸秆能源化利用方式的对比评价[J]. 环境工程学报,2016,10(8):4607-4614.
    LIJÓ L, FRISON N, FATONE F, et al. Environmental and sustainability evaluation of livestock waste management practices in Cyprus[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2018, 634:127-140.
    WANG B, SONG J N, REN J Z, et al. Selecting sustainable energy conversion technologies for agricultural residues:a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based prioritization from life cycle perspective[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2019, 142:78-87.
    张震,刘铭,沈圆顺. 沼气对盾构施工影响的风险评估[J]. 低温建筑技术,2011,33(11):117-120.
    郝海,踪家峰. 系统分析与评价方法[M]. 北京:经济科学出版社,2007.
    朱春阳. 户用沼气新技术及区域适应性评价[D]. 南京:南京信息工程大学,2014.
    邱化蛟,常欣,程序,等. 农业可持续性评价指标体系的现状分析与构建[J]. 中国农业科学,2005,38(4):736-745.
    杨增玲,楚天舒,韩鲁佳,等. 灰色关联理想解法在秸秆综合利用方案优选中的应用[J]. 农业工程技术(新能源产业),2013,29(20):179-191.
    侯刚,李轶冰,杨改河. 基于秸秆生物质资源的户用沼气区域风险研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(9):139-148.
    包风霞. 农村户用沼气区域适宜性评价指标体系与应用研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008.
    陈豫,杨改河,冯永忠,等. "三位一体"沼气生态模式区域适宜性评价指标体系[J]. 农业工程学报,2009,25(3):174-178.
    刘萧凌. 辉县市农村户用沼气池利用效益评价研究[D]. 成都:四川农业大学,2012.
    李萍. 农村户用沼气池建设的能源、经济、环境效益研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2007.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]SONG Zhanlong, TAO Shuanghua, XU Baolin, ZHAO Xiqiang, SUN Jing, MAO Yanpeng, WANG Wenlong, YU Jun. HEAT TRANSFER SIMULATION AND ENERGY ANALYSIS OF RADIATIVE PYROLYSIS OF OILY SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 73-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402009
    [2]LEI Dapeng, SHAN Huifeng, YANG Deng, GE Chuanqin, LIU Shan. A DEMONSTRATION PROJECT OF OIL SLUDGE TREATMENT WITH ENGINEERED SMOLDERING TECHNOLOGY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(10): 150-155,168. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202210020
    [3]HUANG Ru-yi, TANG Ping, LUO Tao, LI Jiang, LONG En-shen, MEI Zi-li, KONG Chui-xue. A CASE STUDY ON BIOGAS ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF DEXTRAN PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER USING CIRCULATING FLUIDIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 48-53. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103007
    [4]WANG Jian-long, QIN Mei-na, HUANG Tao, TU Nan-nan. SEDIMENTATION CHARACTERISTICS OF PARTICULATE MATTERS IN RUNOFF DETENTION TANK VIA CFD METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 44-50. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112007
    [5]ZHOU Yuan, ZHI Li-ling, ZHENG Kai-kai, WANG Yan, LI Ji. INFLUENCING FACTORS AND OPTIMIZATION ANALYSIS OF DENITRIFICATION RATE IN URBAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(7): 100-108. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202007016
    [6]BAI Dong-rui, ZHANG Tao, ZHAN Yu-yu, YANG Ting, XIONG Ying, HU Xin-yi, LIU Yan-ting, CHEN Tan, WANG Hong-tao, JIN Jun, LIU Ying, WANG Ying. PROGRESS IN OILY SLUDGE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 207-212,146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008034
    [10]Yang Penghui Wei Jun Qu Chengtun, . VACUUM PYROLYSIS OF OIL SLUDGE FROM YANCHANG OILFIELD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 101-103. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510022
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 常少华，陈斌，杨陈，徐云峰. 不同表面结构叶片叶轮对搅拌流场特性的影响. 排灌机械工程学报. 2024(09): 921-927 .
    2. 时全，吴璇，申琳，魏家琦，王浩博，蒋越，张泽宇. 不同搅拌桨设计对立式饲料混合机内流场的影响. 南方农机. 2023(15): 1-5 .
    3. 杨一博，雷鹏威，沈伯雄，张芝昆. 含油污泥焚烧灰渣制备微晶玻璃的研究. 环境工程. 2023(S2): 612-617 . 本站查看
    4. 宋健斐，仝坤，聂凡，贾智凯，李思源. 基于水蒸气-含油污泥的水热反应器内气液两相流的数值模拟. 环境工程. 2023(S2): 1047-1051 . 本站查看
    5. 蔡子琦，马鑫，王江豪，王君豪，李志鹏，包雨云. 融合CFD方法的搅拌反应器气液传质实验教学. 广东化工. 2023(21): 149-153+148 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.8 %FULLTEXT: 9.8 %META: 85.0 %META: 85.0 %PDF: 5.2 %PDF: 5.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 13.5 %其他: 13.5 %China: 0.6 %China: 0.6 %Kao-sung: 3.7 %Kao-sung: 3.7 %Netherlands: 0.3 %Netherlands: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %上海: 4.3 %上海: 4.3 %东莞: 3.1 %东莞: 3.1 %临汾: 0.6 %临汾: 0.6 %保定: 0.9 %保定: 0.9 %北京: 8.6 %北京: 8.6 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %南昌: 0.9 %南昌: 0.9 %台州: 0.9 %台州: 0.9 %合肥: 0.6 %合肥: 0.6 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %天津: 1.2 %天津: 1.2 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %宜昌: 1.5 %宜昌: 1.5 %宿州: 0.3 %宿州: 0.3 %常州: 2.5 %常州: 2.5 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %广州: 0.3 %张家口: 3.1 %张家口: 3.1 %徐州: 0.3 %徐州: 0.3 %德州: 0.3 %德州: 0.3 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %扬州: 1.5 %扬州: 1.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %昆明: 1.5 %昆明: 1.5 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 2.1 %杭州: 2.1 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %济源: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %漯河: 2.1 %漯河: 2.1 %潍坊: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.3 %烟台: 0.6 %烟台: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 20.2 %芒廷维尤: 20.2 %芝加哥: 1.8 %芝加哥: 1.8 %苏州: 0.9 %苏州: 0.9 %衢州: 1.2 %衢州: 1.2 %西宁: 3.4 %西宁: 3.4 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 2.5 %运城: 2.5 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.9 %郑州: 0.9 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长春: 0.3 %长沙: 2.5 %长沙: 2.5 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阜阳: 0.3 %阜阳: 0.3 %雅安: 0.6 %雅安: 0.6 %马德里: 0.3 %马德里: 0.3 %其他ChinaKao-sungNetherlands[]上海东莞临汾保定北京十堰南京南昌台州合肥哈尔滨嘉兴大同天津太原宜昌宿州常州常德广州张家口徐州德州成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦昆明朝阳杭州武汉济源温州湖州漯河潍坊烟台石家庄福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长春长沙长治阜阳雅安马德里

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (277) PDF downloads(18) Cited by(10)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return