Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
LI Yong, CONG Yi, JIA Jia. FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF URBAN AIR QUALITY IN FENWEI PLAIN BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 236-243,206. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008039
Citation: LI Yong, CONG Yi, JIA Jia. FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF URBAN AIR QUALITY IN FENWEI PLAIN BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 236-243,206. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008039

FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF URBAN AIR QUALITY IN FENWEI PLAIN BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008039
  • Received Date: 2019-10-09
  • In order to promote scientific emission reduction and precise prevention and control of air pollution, PM2.5, PM10, SO2, CO, NO2 and O3 were selected as evaluation factors, and the weight set of pollution factors was established by the entropy weight method. Based on the expanded environmental air quality standard, the membership degree of each evaluation factor was calculated, and the rings of 11 cities in Fenwei Plain in different seasons were determined. The ambient air quality was evaluated by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and the air pollution level and seasonal variation characteristics of each city were obtained. The results showed that the air quality of the cities in this area varied greatly with the season. The air quality in spring, summer and autumn was obviously better than that in winter. PM2.5, PM10, SO2 and O3 were the main pollutants. The evaluation results could objectively and comprehensively reflect the air quality in different seasons in this area.
  • 吕铃钥,李洪远.基于模糊综合评判的京津冀地区空气质量评价[J]. 南开大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,49(1):62-68.
    李成,李坤权.基于双权重模糊综合评判的南京空气质量评价[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(12):6386-6392.
    张惠娥,马敏泉,汪新.2001-2015年兰州市主城区环境空气质量变化的模糊评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(12):117-122.
    梁晶晶.环境空气质量指数在应用中存在的问题及建议[J].城市建设理论研究(电子版),2017(11):215.
    潘本锋,宫正宇,王帅,等.环境空气质量指数在应用中存在的问题及建议[J].中国环境监测,2015,31(1):64-67.
    YONG J S. A study of the assessment on air quality on fuzzy comprehensive index[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials,2014,602/605:3522-3525.
    张茹,张学杨,陆洪光,等.基于层次分析和主成分分析的城市空气质量评价:以徐州市为例[J].安全与环境工程,2017,24(3):103-107.
    潘本锋,杜丽,李莉娜.层次分析赋权法在城市空气质量排名中的应用[J].中国环境监测,2015,31(2):44-47.
    杨帆,杨士林.层次分析法的改进及其在环境空气质量评价中的应用[J].环境工程,2016,34(增刊1):887-889,930.
    丁卉,刘永红,曹生现.基于模糊-灰色聚类方法的城市空气质量评价研究[J].环境科学与技术,2013,36(增刊2):374-379.
    李祥,彭玲,邵静,等.基于小波分解和ARMA模型的空气污染预报研究[J].环境工程,2016,34(8):110-113

    ,134.
    谢超,马民涛,于肖肖.多种神经网络在华北西部区域城市空气质量预测中的应用[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(12):6005-6009.
    李章安,黄小珊.应用秩相关系数法和模糊综合评价法评价开县城区空气质量[J].环境科学导刊,2016,35(增刊1):151-154.
    罗运成.基于模糊综合评价模型的城市空气质量评价研究[J].环境影响评价,2018,40(5):79-83

    ,87.
    李雁宇,李杰,曾胜兰,等.2017年汾渭平原东部大气颗粒物污染特征分析[J].环境科学研究,2020,33(1):63-72.
    卫玮,王黎娟,靳泽辉,等.基于OMI数据汾渭平原大气SO2时空分布特征分析[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(12):2276-2283.
    王恒,颜斌,崔鑫,等.基于熵值多级模糊综合评判的空气质量综合评价[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,35(5):102-108.
    XU Y Z, DU P, WANG J Z. Research and application of a hybrid model based on dynamic fuzzy synthetic evaluation for establishing air quality forecasting and early warning system:a case study in China[J]. Environmental Pollution,2017,223:435-448.
    董胜伟,苏婷,黄玲玲,等.空气质量的模糊综合评价与曲线拟合预测模型[J].数学的实践与认识,2018,48(6):102-108.
    谢丽娟,陈俏.模糊综合评判中合成算子的选取[J].科协论坛(下半月),2012(9):103-104.
    赵和平.环境综合评价模糊数学方法中4个算子的比较[J].贵州环保科技,2001,7(3):28-32

    ,35.
    董霞,胡华,吕帆,等.平山县大气污染的原因分析[J].当代化工研究,2018(6):125-126.
    任浦慧,解静芳,姜洪进,等.太原市大气PM2.5季节传输路径和潜在源分析[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(8):3144-3151.
    黄小刚,邵天杰,赵景波,等.汾渭平原PM2.5浓度的影响因素及空间溢出效应[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(8):3539-3548.
    许燕婷,刘兴诏,王振波.基于AQI指数的中国城市空气质量时空分布特征[J].广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,37(1):187-196.
    陈强,刘晓,刘昭,等.熵值权重区域环境空气质量指数的建立及其应用[J].甘肃科技,2018,34(5):39-41.
    陈文花.城市尺度环境空气质量评价中AQI指数的确定[J].海峡科学,2013(12):20-21.
    陈怀宇,林奇,刘文伟,等.基于熵权的属性识别理论模型综合评价室内空气质量[J].环境工程,2019,37(9):205-209.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]REN Jiahao, XIAO Bin, CHEN Yizhen, ZHANG Kai, ZHAO Yuxi. ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT OF STACK HEIGHT CHANGES OF COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS ON AIR QUALITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 66-73. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404008
    [2]ZHANG Jianqiao, CHI Huizhong, LI Linyu. ANALYSIS OF VARIATION CHARACTERISTICS OF AIR QUALITY IN LUOHU DISTRICT OF SHENZHEN IN 2019[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(2): 152-160. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202402018
    [3]YUAN Lei, YANG Zanxian, LONG Haixiao, CHEN Guoping, LI Qiangjun, WU Xiaowei. ANALYSIS OF SPATIOTEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF WATER RESOURCES CARRYING CAPACITY IN KUNMING BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD AND MARKOV MODEL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 202-209. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306027
    [4]KONG Lin, HU Ting-ting, NIU Zhi, ZHOU Meng-ge, RAO Pin-hua, GE Da-feng, PENG Wang-min-zi. CHARACTERISTICS AND CAUSES OF AIR CONDITION IN SHANGHAI DURING COVID-19 PREVENTION PERIODS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 110-116,198. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109016
    [5]YU Zhen-dong, XU Wei. CURRENT SITUATION AND COUNTERMEASURES OF AIR POLLUTION EMISSION CONTROL OF COKING INDUSTRY IN THE FENWEI PLAIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(1): 111-116,186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202101017
    [6]ZHAO Wen-cheng, WANG Fang. ANALYSIS OF URBAN AIR QUALITY INDEX BASED ON MULTISCALE CROSS TREND SAMPLE ENTROPY[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(2): 91-98. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202002013
    [7]SONG Jing-hui, LIU Han-hu, FU Bo, CHENG Han-yu, ZHANG Shuang-sheng. A SECONDARY COMPREHREHENSIVE FUZZY EVALUATION MODEL OF EUTROPHICATION BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD: A CASE STUDY OF JIULI WETLAND PARK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 126-132. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009021
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 沈利娟,刁一伟,王红磊,孙杰娟,刘诗云,刘焕武,赵天良. 西安市燃煤锅炉颗粒物中有机碳和元素碳的排放特征研究. 地球与环境. 2024(03): 343-353 .
    2. 李启蓝,郑荣周,唐韬,熊祎睿,邓尚丽. 2018—2023年重庆市荣昌区空气质量状况及变化趋势分析. 中国资源综合利用. 2024(08): 211-214+218 .
    3. 张泽桓,杨建中,陈义波,牛贺宇,宋航,蔡宇翔,陈海超. 基于熵权-TOPSIS法地下空间装修环境质量模糊评价. 河南大学学报(自然科学版). 2023(04): 496-504 .
    4. 周莹莹,张辉国,胡锡健. 基于支持向量机改进的克里金插值法——以汾渭平原PM_(2.5)数据为例. 科学技术与工程. 2023(24): 10575-10584 .
    5. 赵锐,刘婕,周宇羽,杨林川. 基于环境舆情文本挖掘的大气环境风险感知评价. 环境工程. 2022(04): 209-216 . 本站查看
    6. 温肖宇,赵文婷,罗淑贞,张强,王妘涛,马俊杰,刘新罡. 运城市区夏季大气挥发性有机物污染特征及来源解析. 环境科学. 2022(06): 2979-2986 .
    7. 陈旭东. 基于空气质量改善目标的产业园区选址研究. 资源节约与环保. 2022(06): 128-130+134 .
    8. 卞华民,李贺. 改进云模型在宜兴入太湖河流断面水质评价中的应用. 中国农村水利水电. 2022(07): 67-72+81 .
    9. Yang LIU,Zhaojun WANG,Kaizheng SUN,Xuejing DAI,Min ZHU,Shanshan MA,Hualing ZHANG. Evaluation of Ambient Air Quality and Its Changing Trend in Jinan City during 2013-2020. Meteorological and Environmental Research. 2022(04): 118-124 .
    10. 李静. 基于熵权法的城市周边乡村旅游竞争力评价. 九江学院学报(自然科学版). 2022(03): 74-79 .
    11. 廖秋虹,梁杰珍. 环境空气质量变化及其影响因素探讨. 资源节约与环保. 2021(09): 42-43 .
    12. 陈旭东. 基于熵权法的化工园区有毒有害大气污染物环境风险排序研究. 化工管理. 2021(29): 69-71 .
    13. 郭三党,李倩,荆亚倩. 基于改进TOPSIS法的城市空气质量综合评价. 河南科学. 2021(11): 1842-1849 .

    Other cited types(9)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 7.8 %FULLTEXT: 7.8 %META: 90.7 %META: 90.7 %PDF: 1.6 %PDF: 1.6 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 18.6 %其他: 18.6 %其他: 1.2 %其他: 1.2 %Austell: 0.6 %Austell: 0.6 %Austin: 0.3 %Austin: 0.3 %Ballwin: 0.6 %Ballwin: 0.6 %Canton: 2.2 %Canton: 2.2 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %Clemmons: 0.3 %Clemmons: 0.3 %Dracut: 0.3 %Dracut: 0.3 %Jamaica: 0.3 %Jamaica: 0.3 %Jonesboro: 0.3 %Jonesboro: 0.3 %Lewisburg: 1.6 %Lewisburg: 1.6 %Netherlands: 0.3 %Netherlands: 0.3 %Oakland: 0.3 %Oakland: 0.3 %Rochester: 0.6 %Rochester: 0.6 %Wixom: 0.3 %Wixom: 0.3 %上海: 1.2 %上海: 1.2 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %休斯敦: 0.6 %休斯敦: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %保定: 0.6 %内珀维尔: 0.6 %内珀维尔: 0.6 %凤凰城: 0.9 %凤凰城: 0.9 %北京: 1.2 %北京: 1.2 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %华盛顿: 0.3 %华盛顿: 0.3 %南京: 0.6 %南京: 0.6 %博因顿海滩: 0.9 %博因顿海滩: 0.9 %卡马里奥: 0.3 %卡马里奥: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %哥伦布: 0.3 %坦佩: 0.6 %坦佩: 0.6 %大同: 0.3 %大同: 0.3 %大理白族自治州: 3.1 %大理白族自治州: 3.1 %天津: 1.2 %天津: 1.2 %奥马哈: 0.9 %奥马哈: 0.9 %密蘇里城: 1.6 %密蘇里城: 1.6 %布雷登顿: 0.6 %布雷登顿: 0.6 %布鲁克林区: 0.3 %布鲁克林区: 0.3 %帕特森: 0.3 %帕特森: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %廊坊: 3.4 %廊坊: 3.4 %开罗: 0.6 %开罗: 0.6 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %成都: 0.6 %成都: 0.6 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %新布朗斯维克: 0.9 %新布朗斯维克: 0.9 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %杰斐逊城: 0.6 %杰斐逊城: 0.6 %格里利: 0.3 %格里利: 0.3 %森尼韦尔: 0.6 %森尼韦尔: 0.6 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %沃思堡: 0.3 %沃思堡: 0.3 %泰勒: 0.3 %泰勒: 0.3 %济源: 0.6 %济源: 0.6 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 0.6 %漯河: 0.6 %玉溪: 0.3 %玉溪: 0.3 %瑟普赖斯: 0.9 %瑟普赖斯: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.9 %科珀斯克里斯蒂: 0.9 %索非亚: 0.9 %索非亚: 0.9 %纳什维尔: 0.6 %纳什维尔: 0.6 %纽瓦克: 0.9 %纽瓦克: 0.9 %纽约: 0.3 %纽约: 0.3 %绍曾德奥克斯: 0.3 %绍曾德奥克斯: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 15.8 %芒廷维尤: 15.8 %芝加哥: 1.6 %芝加哥: 1.6 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 6.2 %西宁: 6.2 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %运城: 3.1 %运城: 3.1 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %都伯林: 0.6 %都伯林: 0.6 %重庆: 0.9 %重庆: 0.9 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %长治: 1.2 %长治: 1.2 %阿尔图纳: 0.3 %阿尔图纳: 0.3 %阿布奎基: 0.3 %阿布奎基: 0.3 %韦科: 0.3 %韦科: 0.3 %马德里: 0.3 %马德里: 0.3 %其他其他AustellAustinBallwinCantonChinaClemmonsDracutJamaicaJonesboroLewisburgNetherlandsOaklandRochesterWixom上海东莞临汾休斯敦保定内珀维尔凤凰城北京十堰华盛顿南京博因顿海滩卡马里奥台州哥伦布坦佩大同大理白族自治州天津奥马哈密蘇里城布雷登顿布鲁克林区帕特森常德广州廊坊开罗张家口成都拉贾斯坦邦新布朗斯维克昆明晋城朝阳杭州杰斐逊城格里利森尼韦尔武汉沃思堡泰勒济源湖州漯河玉溪瑟普赖斯石家庄福州科珀斯克里斯蒂索非亚纳什维尔纽瓦克纽约绍曾德奥克斯芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁西安运城遵义邯郸郑州都伯林重庆长沙长治阿尔图纳阿布奎基韦科马德里

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (291) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(22)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return