Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 8
Nov.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(8): 236-243,206
CAO Li, LIAN Zi, HUANG Xue-min. CATALYTIC PERFORMANCE OF TYPICAL VOCs OVER MnCeOx/ZEOLITE CATALYST[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(1): 48-53. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202001007
Citation: LI Yong, CONG Yi, JIA Jia. FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF URBAN AIR QUALITY IN FENWEI PLAIN BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 236-243,206. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008039
shu

FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF URBAN AIR QUALITY IN FENWEI PLAIN BASED ON ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008039

  • School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou 450046, China

  • Received Date: 2019-10-09
    Abstract
  • In order to promote scientific emission reduction and precise prevention and control of air pollution, PM2.5, PM10, SO2, CO, NO2 and O3 were selected as evaluation factors, and the weight set of pollution factors was established by the entropy weight method. Based on the expanded environmental air quality standard, the membership degree of each evaluation factor was calculated, and the rings of 11 cities in Fenwei Plain in different seasons were determined. The ambient air quality was evaluated by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and the air pollution level and seasonal variation characteristics of each city were obtained. The results showed that the air quality of the cities in this area varied greatly with the season. The air quality in spring, summer and autumn was obviously better than that in winter. PM2.5, PM10, SO2 and O3 were the main pollutants. The evaluation results could objectively and comprehensively reflect the air quality in different seasons in this area.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(28)
  • 吕铃钥,李洪远.基于模糊综合评判的京津冀地区空气质量评价[J]. 南开大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,49(1):62-68.
    李成,李坤权.基于双权重模糊综合评判的南京空气质量评价[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(12):6386-6392.
    张惠娥,马敏泉,汪新.2001-2015年兰州市主城区环境空气质量变化的模糊评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(12):117-122.
    梁晶晶.环境空气质量指数在应用中存在的问题及建议[J].城市建设理论研究(电子版),2017(11):215.
    潘本锋,宫正宇,王帅,等.环境空气质量指数在应用中存在的问题及建议[J].中国环境监测,2015,31(1):64-67.
    YONG J S. A study of the assessment on air quality on fuzzy comprehensive index[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials,2014,602/605:3522-3525.
    张茹,张学杨,陆洪光,等.基于层次分析和主成分分析的城市空气质量评价:以徐州市为例[J].安全与环境工程,2017,24(3):103-107.
    潘本锋,杜丽,李莉娜.层次分析赋权法在城市空气质量排名中的应用[J].中国环境监测,2015,31(2):44-47.
    杨帆,杨士林.层次分析法的改进及其在环境空气质量评价中的应用[J].环境工程,2016,34(增刊1):887-889,930.
    丁卉,刘永红,曹生现.基于模糊-灰色聚类方法的城市空气质量评价研究[J].环境科学与技术,2013,36(增刊2):374-379.
    李祥,彭玲,邵静,等.基于小波分解和ARMA模型的空气污染预报研究[J].环境工程,2016,34(8):110-113

    ,134.
    谢超,马民涛,于肖肖.多种神经网络在华北西部区域城市空气质量预测中的应用[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(12):6005-6009.
    李章安,黄小珊.应用秩相关系数法和模糊综合评价法评价开县城区空气质量[J].环境科学导刊,2016,35(增刊1):151-154.
    罗运成.基于模糊综合评价模型的城市空气质量评价研究[J].环境影响评价,2018,40(5):79-83

    ,87.
    李雁宇,李杰,曾胜兰,等.2017年汾渭平原东部大气颗粒物污染特征分析[J].环境科学研究,2020,33(1):63-72.
    卫玮,王黎娟,靳泽辉,等.基于OMI数据汾渭平原大气SO2时空分布特征分析[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(12):2276-2283.
    王恒,颜斌,崔鑫,等.基于熵值多级模糊综合评判的空气质量综合评价[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,35(5):102-108.
    XU Y Z, DU P, WANG J Z. Research and application of a hybrid model based on dynamic fuzzy synthetic evaluation for establishing air quality forecasting and early warning system:a case study in China[J]. Environmental Pollution,2017,223:435-448.
    董胜伟,苏婷,黄玲玲,等.空气质量的模糊综合评价与曲线拟合预测模型[J].数学的实践与认识,2018,48(6):102-108.
    谢丽娟,陈俏.模糊综合评判中合成算子的选取[J].科协论坛(下半月),2012(9):103-104.
    赵和平.环境综合评价模糊数学方法中4个算子的比较[J].贵州环保科技,2001,7(3):28-32

    ,35.
    董霞,胡华,吕帆,等.平山县大气污染的原因分析[J].当代化工研究,2018(6):125-126.
    任浦慧,解静芳,姜洪进,等.太原市大气PM2.5季节传输路径和潜在源分析[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(8):3144-3151.
    黄小刚,邵天杰,赵景波,等.汾渭平原PM2.5浓度的影响因素及空间溢出效应[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(8):3539-3548.
    许燕婷,刘兴诏,王振波.基于AQI指数的中国城市空气质量时空分布特征[J].广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2019,37(1):187-196.
    陈强,刘晓,刘昭,等.熵值权重区域环境空气质量指数的建立及其应用[J].甘肃科技,2018,34(5):39-41.
    陈文花.城市尺度环境空气质量评价中AQI指数的确定[J].海峡科学,2013(12):20-21.
    陈怀宇,林奇,刘文伟,等.基于熵权的属性识别理论模型综合评价室内空气质量[J].环境工程,2019,37(9):205-209.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 陈东，陈军辉，姜涛，梅林德. 催化燃烧工艺在制药行业VOCs废气治理中的应用. 浙江化工. 2024(02): 48-54 .
    2. 邢欣，李娜，程杰. 不同Cu负载量Cu-ZSM-5催化剂上正丁胺的选择催化氧化性能. 环境工程. 2022(03): 51-58 . 本站查看
    3. 胡志斐，王振峰，汪思瀛，武文斐，侯丽敏，张凯，白心蕊. 矿物材料在催化脱硝方面的应用进展. 矿产保护与利用. 2021(01): 161-165 .
    4. 樊灏，沈振兴，逯佳琪，常甜，黄宇. 常温除甲醛催化剂Mn_1Ce_x/HZSM-5的活性位点与性能分析. 环境工程. 2021(06): 99-105 . 本站查看
    5. 隗晶慧，冯勇超，于庆君，易红宏，唐晓龙，张媛媛，孟宪政，袁雨婷. 餐饮油烟中典型VOCs催化氧化研究进展. 化工进展. 2021(10): 5730-5746 .
    6. 高齐，马建，胡吉国，盛守祥，陈琛，冯俊亭. TFT-LCD制造行业VOCs排放特征及减排效果. 液晶与显示. 2020(10): 1087-1094 .
    7. 唐振艳，刘锋，左川，侯文明. 挥发性有机物催化燃烧用贵金属催化剂的研究进展. 贵金属. 2020(03): 85-93 .

    Other cited types(4)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.1 %FULLTEXT: 14.1 %META: 81.4 %META: 81.4 %PDF: 4.5 %PDF: 4.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.5 %其他: 14.5 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %China: 0.3 %[]: 1.0 %[]: 1.0 %上海: 0.3 %上海: 0.3 %临汾: 0.7 %临汾: 0.7 %保定: 0.3 %保定: 0.3 %北京: 6.6 %北京: 6.6 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %南京: 1.7 %南京: 1.7 %南昌: 0.7 %南昌: 0.7 %南通: 1.0 %南通: 1.0 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.7 %哈尔滨: 0.7 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %安顺: 0.3 %安顺: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %广州: 1.0 %广州: 1.0 %张家口: 0.7 %张家口: 0.7 %徐州: 1.4 %徐州: 1.4 %成都: 0.3 %成都: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %昆明: 0.3 %晋城: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %沈阳: 0.3 %沈阳: 0.3 %泰安: 0.3 %泰安: 0.3 %济源: 0.7 %济源: 0.7 %湖州: 0.7 %湖州: 0.7 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %潍坊: 0.3 %潍坊: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 39.7 %芒廷维尤: 39.7 %芝加哥: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.3 %苏州: 0.7 %苏州: 0.7 %衢州: 1.4 %衢州: 1.4 %西宁: 9.7 %西宁: 9.7 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 2.1 %运城: 2.1 %遵义: 0.3 %遵义: 0.3 %邯郸: 1.0 %邯郸: 1.0 %郑州: 1.4 %郑州: 1.4 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %雅安: 0.7 %雅安: 0.7 %其他其他China[]上海临汾保定北京十堰南京南昌南通台州哈尔滨嘉兴天津安顺常州常德广州张家口徐州成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦昆明晋城朝阳杭州沈阳泰安济源湖州漯河潍坊石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆金华长治雅安

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (294) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(11)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return