DRY ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF KITCHEN WASTE AND FOOD WASTE AND ALLEVIATION OF ACID INHIBITION BY ACTIVATED CARBON

LI Tong; WANG Pan; CHEN Xi-teng; ZHAO Ze-xi; MA Li-juan; REN Lian-hai

doi:10.13205/j.hjgc.202009034

Volume 38 Issue 9

Nov. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING > 2020 > 38(9): 213-218

Ding Jing, Lei Yang. RESEARCH ON SEMI-AEROBIC BIOREACTOR LANDFILL SYSTEM:LEACHATE CHARACTERISTICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 6-10. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503002

Citation:

LI Tong, WANG Pan, CHEN Xi-teng, ZHAO Ze-xi, MA Li-juan, REN Lian-hai. DRY ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF KITCHEN WASTE AND FOOD WASTE AND ALLEVIATION OF ACID INHIBITION BY ACTIVATED CARBON[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(9): 213-218. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009034

Ding Jing, Lei Yang. RESEARCH ON SEMI-AEROBIC BIOREACTOR LANDFILL SYSTEM:LEACHATE CHARACTERISTICS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 6-10. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503002

Citation:

PDF( 2860 KB)

DRY ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF KITCHEN WASTE AND FOOD WASTE AND ALLEVIATION OF ACID INHIBITION BY ACTIVATED CARBON

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202009034

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Food Chain Pollution Control, School of Ecology and Environment, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China

Received Date: 2019-09-15

Abstract

Abstract

The dry anaerobic fermentation performance of kitchen waste and food waste to produce methane characteristics under mesophilic (35℃) and thermophilic (55℃) condition were studied respectively. The results showed that the cumulative gas production in the thermophilic fermentation were higher than that in 35℃ temperature groups. When the ratio of kitchen waste and food waste was 1:5 in the high temperature group, the cumulative gas production reached the highest level. The maximum cumulative gas production was 2492.5 mL, which was 1.4 times of the production of methane in the medium temperature group. In order to increase the yield of biogas, 4 kinds of activated carbon, such as sugarcane rind, straw, peanut vine and biogas residue, were prepared and the effects of different kinds of activated carbon on anaerobic fermentation were investigated. The experimental results showed that the 4 kinds of activated carbon had honeycomb shaped holes, especially the activated carbon produced from sugarcane rind had relatively higher regular and complete holes, which could provide larger area for microbes and improve the process of gas producing. When sugarcane rind activated carbon was added in the system, the cumulative gas production could reach 3410 mL, 20.1% higher than that of blank group.
- kitchen waste,
- food waste,
- dry anaerobic fermentation,
- methane,
- biomass activated carbon

FullText(HTML)

References(24)

References

郭香麟,左剑恶,史绪川,等.餐厨垃圾与秸秆混合中温和高温厌氧消化对比[J].环境科学, 2017,38(7):3070-3077.

刘会友,王俊辉,赵定国.国内外餐厨垃圾现状及其处理措施[J].新能源进展,2017,5(4):266-271.

王攀,邱银权,任连海,等.不同储存条件下餐厨垃圾的变化特征及其厌氧消化产气潜力[J].环境工程,2017, 35(8):108-111.

王攀,李冰心,黄燕冰,等.含盐量对餐厨垃圾干式厌氧发酵的影响[J].环境污染与防治,2015,37(5):27-31.

ALESSANDRO C, DA BORSO F,LIMINA S.Dry anaerobic digestion of cow manure and agricultural products in a full-scale plant Efficiency and comparison with wet fermentation[J].Waste Management,2018,71:704-719.

WANG P, WANG H T, QIU Y Q, et al. Microbial characteristics in anaerobic digestion process of food waste for methane production:a review[J].Bioresource Technology,2018,248:29-36.

LV F, LUO C H, SHAO L M, et al.Biochar alleviates combined stress of ammonium and acids by firstly enriching Methanosaeta and then Methanosarcina[J].Water Research,2016,90:34-43.

ZHAO Z Q,ZHANG Y B,WOODARD T L,et al.Enhancing syntrophic metabolism in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors with conductive carbon materials[J]. Bioresource Technology,2015,191:140-145.

张露思,郭婉茜,丁杰,等.活性炭载体对颗粒污泥形成及产氢的影响[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2010,31(11):1544-1548.

郑秋生,李龙,胡雪玉.农作物秸秆用于制备活性炭的研究进展[J].纤维素科学与技术,2010,18(3):69-71.

吴春,高彦杰,刘宁.玉米芯吸附处理工业废水中染料的方法研究[J].食品科学,2007,28(11):60-61.

崔家荣.水中氨氮纳氏试剂分光光度法测定[J].现代农业科技,2008(8):208-209.

CHEN W H,CHEN S Y,KHANAL S K,et al.Kinetic study of biological hydrogen production by anaerobic fermentation[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2006,31(15):2170-2178.

王金辉.餐厨垃圾固相物料干式厌氧消化处理研究[D].宁波:宁波大学,2017.

石利军,班立桐,刘惠芬,等.温度对畜禽粪便稻草混合干式厌氧发酵的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(4):782-786.

张希衡.废水的厌氧生物处理[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1995.

付胜涛,于水利,严晓菊,等.剩余活性污泥和餐厨垃圾的混合中温厌氧发酵[J].环境科学,2006,27(7):1459-1460.

李勇,顾广发,刘松华,等.餐厨垃圾与污泥共发酵脱氮技术的研究[J].可再生能源,2011,29(6):98-99.

曹先艳,赵由才,袁玉玉,等.氨氮对餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵产氢的影响[J].太阳能学报,2008,29(6):751-755.

李浩.温度及有机负荷对餐厨垃圾与剩余污泥共发酵特性的影响研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2017.

蒋建国,王岩,隋继超,等.厨余垃圾高固体厌氧消化处理中氨氮浓度变化及其影响[J].中国环境科学,2007,27(6):721-726.

GONG W J,LIANG H,LI W Z,et al.Selection and evaluation of biofilm carrier in anaerobic digestion treatment of cattle manure[J].Energy,2011,36(5):3572-3578.

王永泽,邵明胜,杨立,等.不同吸附剂对棉花秸秆沼气发酵效率的影响研究[J].现代农业科技,2008(23):178-179.

蒋凯凤,肖继波.水处理生物膜载体研究进展[J].浙江林学院学报,2010,27(3):451-455.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Da, LIN Qingshan, CUI Peng, CHENG Boyi, WANG Zongping, GUO Gang. EFFECTS OF MATERIAL RATIO ON VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS PRODUCTION FROM ANAEROBIC CO-FERMENTATION OF FOOD WASTE AND WASTE-ACTIVATED SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(8): 125-133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202408015
[2]	YANG Mengxia, SHEN Pengfei, CHEN Xiaohuan. ANALYSIS AND SUGGESTION OF PRODUCT-ORIENTED ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF KITCHEN WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(10): 140-146. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202410017
[3]	LIU Xiaoji, YAN Kun, XU Heng, WANG Yongqun, WANG Zhihua, ZHANG Dejia, CHANG Fengmin. COUPLING H₂-RICH SYNGAS BIOMETHANATION WITH ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE: A PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 131-137. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403016
[4]	YUE Liangchen, YU Miao, CHENG Jun, LIU Keliang, HUA Junjie, GUO Hao. INFLUENCE OF LIPID CONTENT AND ELECTRIC FERMENTATION VOLTAGE ON METHANE PRODUCTION FROM FOOD WASTE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 200-207. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407022
[5]	WANG Yongping, FANG Haojue, HUA Ruoting, HE Yuheng, ZHANG Yanqiong, ZHENG Yuyi, LIU Changqing, ZHEN Guangyin. COMPREHENSIVE INFLUENCE OF MULTIPLE FACTORS ON HYDROGEN PRODUCTION FROM COMBINED ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF SLUDGE AND KITCHEN WASTE UNDER MEDIUM TEMPERATURE CONDITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 103-110. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303014
[6]	LI Ziyu, LI Zhenzhou, DOU Yuting, LUO Jingyang. INFLUENCES OF HETEROLOGOUS SUBSTANCES OCCURRED IN FOOD WASTE ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION AND REGULATION STRATEGIES: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 222-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306029
[7]	SONG Na, ZHAO Pan, GUAN Weijie, CHEN Liwei, ZHANG Shuang, WANG Qunhui. EFFECT OF ELECTRO-FERMENTATION ON HIGH TEMPERATURE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF FOOD WASTE AND SPENT MUSHROOM SUBSTRATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 145-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307020
[8]	WANG Xinzi, WANG Pan, YANG Xinyu, LI Yingnan, REN Lianhai. EFFECT OF BIOCHAR-nZVI ON PERFORMANCE OF FOOD WASTE ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(8): 154-161. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202308019
[9]	HU Yadong, FAN Depeng, KONG Weijie, LEI Mingke, DU Qingping, QIAN Weiqiang, WANG Futao, LI Jing. IMPROVEMENT OF FOOD WASTE AEROBIC BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PERFORMANCE BY COMPOUND MICROBIAL AGENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 97-105. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204014
[10]	DING Zizhen, XU Xianbao, OUYANG Chuang, XUE Gang, LI Xiang. EFFECT OF BIOCHAR ON CAPROATE PRODUCTION DURING FOOD WASTE FERMENTATION AND THE MECHANISM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(12): 29-36. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202212005
[11]	MA Dachao, DENG Xiushan, DENG Xiuquan, ZHANG Xuan, LIANG Zhengwu, FENG Qingge. PROCESS PROPERTIES AND MICROBIAL COMMUNITY SUCCESSION DURING THE STATICAL BIO-DRYING OF FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 106-111,133. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204015
[12]	ZHAO Liya, LIN Peiru, ZHENG Yi, WANG Pan, REN Lianhai. INFLUENCING FACTORS OF SEMI-CONTINUOUS DRY ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF KITCHEN WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(11): 120-126. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202211017
[13]	XU Yi-wen, YANG Guo-dong, WANG Feng-xia, CHEN Hui-ting, HUANG Ai-lian, LIU Li-ting, JIANG Yan-hang, SONG Ying-chun, JIANG Jian-guo. EFFECTS OF PRETREATMENTS AND SUBSTRATE COMPOSITIONS ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF ORGANIC WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 100-106. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104016
[14]	CHEN Yi-shuang, WEI Tao-yuan, ZHOU Tao, DONG Ding-shuo, LIN Qing-shan, WANG Zong-ping, GUO Gang. EFFECT OF ELECTROCHEMICAL PRETREATMENT ON PRODUCTION OF VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS BY CO-ANAEROBIC FERMENTION OF FOOD WASTE AND SEWAGE SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 187-192. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109026
[15]	ZHAO Zi-xuan, QIU Wei-hua, WANG Pan. THE AEROBIC DEGRADATION OF NUTRITIONAL COMPLEXED KITCHEN WASTE BY MIXED MICROBIAL FLORA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 92-99. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104015
[16]	GUO Zhi-chao, XU Xian-bao, XU Ting-ting, ZHAO Ai-hua, TAI Jun, LIU Ya-nan, XUE Gang, LI Xiang. ANALYSIS ON FERMENTATION PATHWAY AND CAPROATE PRODUCTION FROM FOOD WASTE BY DIFFERENT INOCULUM[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(9): 160-168. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202109023
[17]	LI Xu-sheng, LU Sha-sha, JIANG Yuan-yan, WANG Li-ao. EFFECT AND MECHANISM OF BIOCHAR IN MITIGATING ACIDIFICATION OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PROCESS FOR FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 179-187. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112027
[18]	REN An-dong, ZHENG Yi, SUN Tian-zi, ZHAO Li-ya, WANG Pan, REN Lian-hai. EFFECT OF SLURRY RECIRCULATION TIME ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF KITCHEN WASTE WITH HIGH SOLID CONTENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 159-165,140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112024
[19]	ZHAN Ya-bin, WEI Yu-quan, LIN Yong-feng, ZHANG A-ke, TAO Xing-ling, REN Jian-guo, SHEN Wei-dong, LI Ji. EFFECTS OF AERATION MODES ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION, DEHYDRATION EFFICIENCY AND NITROGEN LOSS OF KITCHEN WASTE BIO-DRYING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 124-130. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105017
[20]	SUN Tian-zi, WANG Pan, CHEN Xi-teng, CAI Yu-xiao, REN Lian-hai, LV Zheng. EFFECT OF LIQUID BACTERIAL FERTILIZER PREPARED BY BIOGAS SLURRY FROM FOOD WASTE DIGESTING ON PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF FARMLAND SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 201-206. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008033

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(15)

1.	何雨桐，杜婷. 基于Citespace软件的国内厨余垃圾可视化分析. 上海轻工业. 2024(02): 177-179 .
2.	田启欢，高彦达，宫亚斌，杜睿，王立伦，姚建刚. 厨余垃圾中高温高效厌氧产沼中试研究. 环境卫生工程. 2024(02): 39-45 .
3.	屈阳，李小虎，金慧宁，杭建强，秦志超，毛金锋. HMD厌氧消化技术在餐厨废水处理中的应用. 水处理技术. 2024(05): 141-144 .
4.	常虹，苏小红，秦国辉，刘伟. 干式厌氧发酵失稳调控机制及策略研究进展. 中国沼气. 2024(03): 14-21 .
5.	秦胜男. 湿垃圾浆液制备碳源预处理组合技术研究. 环境卫生工程. 2024(06): 57-63 .
6.	吴健，胡念，华银锋，乐亮亮，陈卫华. 厨余垃圾残渣与芦笋秸秆协同干式厌氧消化产甲烷研究. 环境卫生工程. 2023(01): 22-32 .
7.	蓝苑瑗，吴松，王磊. 物料调理缓解餐厨垃圾厌氧发酵酸化效应及其机制研究. 环境卫生工程. 2023(04): 27-34 .
8.	王延凯，温宗国，何清玉，乔如林，薛心诚，陈磊，张佳乐，苗文青. 餐厨垃圾渣料与厨余垃圾联合厌氧研究及菌群结构分析. 环境工程. 2023(S2): 574-578 . 本站查看
9.	刘丽薇，旦增，周文武，孟德安，郭佳晨，朱赛红，支君傲. 餐厨垃圾协同其他有机废物处理研究现状及进展. 环境生态学. 2022(08): 91-96 .
10.	鲍安红，豆玉婷，彭和，刘柯伶. 基于Weibull分布函数的厨余垃圾干燥过程模拟研究. 西南大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(10): 173-180 .
11.	张彤，张立秋，封莉，刘永泽，杜子文，韩绮. 含固率和有机负荷对厨余垃圾厌氧消化性能及沼渣特性的影响. 环境科学研究. 2022(11): 2596-2607 .
12.	马宗虎，刘凡，吴宜蓁，张廷军. 雄安新区白洋淀芦苇和牛粪干式厌氧发酵制气研究. 中国沼气. 2021(02): 16-21 .
13.	宋云鹏，刘吉宝，陈梅雪，郑嘉熹，桂双林，魏源送. 餐厨垃圾干式厌氧消化工艺中甲烷转化率及其限制性因素. 环境工程学报. 2021(05): 1697-1707 .
14.	王炯科，汤晓玉，王文国. 餐厨垃圾干式厌氧发酵研究进展. 中国沼气. 2021(03): 35-41 .
15.	邓旺明. 厨余垃圾性质特征及其燃料化处理技术研究进展. 广东化工. 2021(23): 137-141+130 .