Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
DONG Jin-chi, WANG Xu-ying, CAI Bo-feng, WANG Jin-nan, LIU Hui, YANG Lu, XIA Chu-yu, LEI Yu. MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES AND MARGINAL ABATEMENT COST FOR IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY IN CHINA[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(10): 23-31,40. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202110004
Citation: GE Jin-jin, ZHANG Wen-hai, YANG Yong, PENG Wen-qi, QU Xiao-dong. STUDY ON THE METHOD TO SOLVE WATER RESOURCE CONFLICTS: A CASE STUDY OF THE JINJIANG RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 47-52. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010008

STUDY ON THE METHOD TO SOLVE WATER RESOURCE CONFLICTS: A CASE STUDY OF THE JINJIANG RIVER BASIN

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010008
  • Received Date: 2020-05-25
  • With the rapid development of social economy, the contradiction of water resources has become increasingly prominent. Therefore, it is of great significance to coordinate water resources conflicts. Based on the analysis of river water resources conflicts, a coordinated framework of water resources conflicts in China is constructed. Taking the Jinjiang River Basin as an example, we classified the types of water resources conflicts in the the Jinjiang River Basin into water quality type and process type, analyzed and calculated the water ecdogical rigid water demand, rigid elastic water demand and elastic water demand, and adopted the multi-objective optimization method to determine the coordinated water quality water transfer scheme that contradicts the process. The water resources conflict coordination framework can provide theoretical basis and technical support for water resource conflict management.
  • 李原园, 曹建廷, 黄火键, 等. 国际上水资源综合管理进展[J]. 水科学进展, 2018, 29(1):127-137.
    王煜, 彭少明, 郑小康. 黄河流域水量分配方案优化及综合调度的关键科学问题[J]. 水科学进展, 2018, 29(5):614-624.
    HORA D, LEGEY L. Water resource conflict in the amazon region:the case of hydropower generation and multiple water uses in the tocantins and araguaia river basins[J]. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering, 2015, 21(1):18-24.
    邓坤, 张璇, 杨永生,等. 流域水资源调度研究综述[J]. 水制经济, 2011, 29(6):23-27.
    申林, 马罗扣, 王肇优. 梯级泵站引水多水库水资源联合优化调度研究[J]. 陕西水利, 2019(3):41-43,46.
    杨静灵, 王好芳, 傅川, 等. 胶东调水工程水资源优化调度研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2018, 40(5):58-62

    ,68.
    ATEF S S, SADEQINAZHAD F, FARJAAD F, et al. Water conflict management and cooperation between afghanistan and pakistan[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2019, 570:875-892.
    ZOMORODIAN M, LAI S H, MEHRAN H, et al. Development and application of coupled system dynamics and game theory:a dynamic water conflict resolution method[J]. Plos One, 2017, 12(12):1-24.
    梅超, 尹明万, 李蒙. 考虑不同生态流量约束的黔中水库群优化调度[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2017(5):174-180.
    曾春芬, 马劲松, 杨树滩, 等. 南水北调东线江苏段水资源优化调度与配置研究新探[J]. 江苏水利, 2019(5):43-46.
    ANGEL ALMAZAN-GOMEZ M, SANCHEZ-CHOLIZ J, SARASA C. Environmental flow management:an analysis applied to the Ebro River Basin[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 182(MAY 1):838-851.
    BHATTI E-U-H, KHAN M M, SHAH S A R, et al. Dynamics of water quality:impact assessment process for water resource management[J]. Processes, 2019, 7(2):102.
    CHENG K, YAO J P, REN Y T. Evaluation of the coordinated development of regional water resource systems based on a dynamic coupling coordination model[J]. Water Technology, 2019, 19(1/2):565-573.
    LIU J G, LIU Q Y, YANG H. Assessing water scarcity by simultaneously considering environmental flow requirements, water quantity, and water quality[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 60:434-441.
    吴玲玲, 闫中月, 阮晓红. 基于Tennant法改进的生态水位计算方法研究[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(5):51-55.
    郭文献, 陈鼎新, 李越,等. 基于IHA-RVA法金沙江下游生态水文情势评价[J]. 水利水电技术, 2018, 49(8):158-165.
    吉小盼. 基于湿周法的西南山区河流生态需水量计算与验证[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2018, 39(4):1-7.
    张远, 刘德虎, 张纯斌,等. 基于关键功能组的河道内生态需水计算[J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2018, 16(1):108-113.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]QIN Yaojun, ZHANG Xiangling, LI Xuhao, CAI Jixian, LI Yating, LEI Xiaoyun, LI Yifan. PERFORMANCE OF PHOSPHATE ADSORPTION BY MgFe-LDHs MODIFIED DREDGING SLUDGE PERMEABLE BRICK[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(3): 73-81. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202403009
    [2]ZHANG Yefan, ZHENG Zhiyong, CAO Qihao, ZHU Fukang, PAN Hui, LI Chong, YANG Hanwen, LIU He. A COLLABORATIVE TREATMENT PROCESS FOR MUNICIPAL SURPLUS SLUDGE AND THERMAL PRESS FILTRATE FROM CYANOBACTERIAL SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 24-29. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302004
    [3]ZHANG Dong, LONG Jun, YANG Wei, LI Long, CHEN Renpeng. SUBSTRATE AMELIORATION OF FLUORITE-TYPE LEAD-ZINC TAILINGS AND ITS APPLICATION IN MINE RESTORATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(2): 156-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202302021
    [4]ZHANG Yao, SUN Gang, WANG Qi, LING Haibo, HU Nan. INVESTIGATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF HEAVY METALS IN AGRICULTURAL LAND IN A LEAD-ZINC MINING AREA IN HUBEI PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(2): 139-145,205. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202202022
    [5]DU Xiaoli, CHI Zhongwen, YIN Zijie, ZHAO Meng. ATTENUATION ON CONTROL EFFECT OF HEAVY METALS IN RUNOFF BY PERMEABLE BRICK DURING THE WHOLE PROCESS OF BLOCKAGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 1-8. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207001
    [6]JIANG Xu-sheng, LIU Jie, LI Hai-xiang, WU Fu, ZHU Zhen, LI Xiang-min. VEGETATION RESTORATION AND SUBSTRATE AMENDMENT OF A RECLAIMED LEAD-ZINC MINE TAILINGS POND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(12): 220-226. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202112033
    [7]YU Bing-bing, YAN Xiang-hua, WANG Xing-run, ZHANG Yu-xiu. EFFECT OF DIFFERENT IMMOBILIZING MATERIALS ON ZN, CD AND AS IN LEAD-ZINC SMELTING SLAGS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 222-228,254. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008037
    [8]SUN Zhao-dong, SONG Hong-qing, XING Yi, LI Jie, LU Yu-chen, WANG Jiu-long. SIMULATION OF INFILTRATION AND HEAVY METAL POLLUTANTS MIGRATION FOR PERMEABLE BRICK PAVEMENT SYSTEM FOR SPONGE CITY CONSTRUCTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 46-52,100. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004009
    [9]XU Wei-tong, WANG Jian-long, WU Yan-jie, LV Yun-jie, LI Jun-qi. IMPACT OF PERMEABLE BRICK PAVEMENT ON STORMWATER RUNOFF THERMAL POLLUTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(6): 143-148,207. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202006023
    [10]GUO Xiao-peng, LI Jun-qi. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON FROST RESISTANCE PERFORMANCE OF PERMEABLE BRICK PAVEMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(4): 53-58. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202004010
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 肖保正. 对钢厂活性焦解析烟气制酸净化系统设计的探讨. 硫酸工业. 2025(01): 32-35+42 .
    2. 邢相栋,王宇星,郑建潞,惠佳豪,吕明. TiO_2对含氯高炉渣黏度和热力学性质的影响. 钢铁研究学报. 2024(01): 13-21 .
    3. 温慧敏,裴永彪,郭燕,鲍卫仁,廖俊杰. 羰基硫水解催化剂最新研究进展. 应用化工. 2024(02): 386-391+397 .
    4. 俞彩孟,张东明,李梦圆,严坤,杨晨,吕洪炳,田金平,陈亚林,陈吕军. 印染污泥焚烧过程氯元素代谢及调控. 环境工程学报. 2024(08): 2311-2318 .
    5. 梁宝瑞,马梦莹,苏伟,李伟,侯长江,汪群慧. SO_2对HCl在Ca(OH)_2表面脱除的影响. 环境工程. 2024(09): 222-228 . 本站查看
    6. 郑忆南,马飞跃. 转底炉处理冶金尘泥的分析检测工艺设计及试验室建设. 工业加热. 2024(12): 6-9+13 .
    7. 李潇娜,高岩,李新怀,李小定,章小林. 非贵金属抗氯催化剂的研究进展. 煤化工. 2024(06): 89-94 .
    8. 刘晓刚,易海涛. 双碳背景下钢铁企业超低排放改造中的几个问题及对策建议. 四川环境. 2023(02): 288-293 .
    9. 蒋心泰,鲁逢霖,施煌禹,王翠,张建良. 酒钢铁前系统氯元素迁移行为. 钢铁. 2023(06): 53-60 .
    10. 曹强,李玉然,王斌,王建成,朱廷钰. γ-Al_2O_3基COS水解催化剂在含HCl气氛的失活机理. 环境工程. 2023(12): 182-189 . 本站查看
    11. 周云花,王晓龙,甘敏,范晓慧,赵改革,汤乐云,何向宁. 铁矿烧结过程氯的反应行为及脱除规律. 烧结球团. 2022(04): 1-8 .
    12. 平晓东,王锋,王海风. 高炉喷吹垃圾焚烧飞灰预处理工艺分析. 中国冶金. 2022(10): 121-128 .
    13. 刘艳敏,辛渊,李保良,贾宪,耿军亮,贾玉波. 氯元素对高炉煤气管道的腐蚀与预防. 天津冶金. 2022(05): 8-10+14 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 3.8 %FULLTEXT: 3.8 %META: 96.2 %META: 96.2 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 22.6 %其他: 22.6 %China: 1.5 %China: 1.5 %上海: 3.0 %上海: 3.0 %东莞: 0.8 %东莞: 0.8 %临汾: 0.8 %临汾: 0.8 %保定: 0.8 %保定: 0.8 %北京: 3.0 %北京: 3.0 %台州: 1.5 %台州: 1.5 %合肥: 1.5 %合肥: 1.5 %咸阳: 2.3 %咸阳: 2.3 %大同: 0.8 %大同: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %张家口: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %扬州: 0.8 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.8 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %济源: 1.5 %济源: 1.5 %深圳: 0.8 %深圳: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %温州: 0.8 %湖州: 1.5 %湖州: 1.5 %漯河: 3.8 %漯河: 3.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %芒廷维尤: 29.3 %芒廷维尤: 29.3 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.8 %苏州: 0.8 %衢州: 0.8 %衢州: 0.8 %西宁: 3.8 %西宁: 3.8 %诺沃克: 0.8 %诺沃克: 0.8 %运城: 6.0 %运城: 6.0 %遵义: 0.8 %遵义: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %长沙: 0.8 %长沙: 0.8 %长治: 0.8 %长治: 0.8 %其他China上海东莞临汾保定北京台州合肥咸阳大同常德张家口成都扬州拉贾斯坦邦晋城朝阳武汉济源深圳温州湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州衢州西宁诺沃克运城遵义邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (235) PDF downloads(11) Cited by(18)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return