Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 11
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(11): 168-174
XU Yi-wen, JIANG Jian-guo, MENG Yuan, YAN Wei-wei. EFFECTS OF PRETREATMENT ON ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION OF GARDEN WASTE AND OTHER SUBSTRATES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 168-174. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011028
Citation: XU Yi-wen, JIANG Jian-guo, MENG Yuan, YAN Wei-wei. EFFECTS OF PRETREATMENT ON ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION OF GARDEN WASTE AND OTHER SUBSTRATES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(11): 168-174. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011028
shu

EFFECTS OF PRETREATMENT ON ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION OF GARDEN WASTE AND OTHER SUBSTRATES

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202011028

  • School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

  • Received Date: 2019-10-15
    Available Online: 2021-04-23
  • Publish Date: 2021-04-23
    Abstract
  • Ultrasound, microwave and alkali-thermal pretreatment were applied for enhancing biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of garden waste, kitchen waste and fruit and vegetable waste. The experiment without pretreatment served as the control. The results showed that pH values of the four experiments rapidly decreased to 7.24~7.45 within 2 days and then increased to 7.7~8.0 at the end of reactions, indicating that anaerobic digestion systems were relatively stable. The concentrations of VFA reached the maximum within 2~4 days, of which acetic acid and propionic acid were the main components, accounting for more than 70%. After 13 days, VFA concentrations decreased to below 500 mg/L, and mainly acetic acid remained. There were some fluctuations of TAN concentrations during the first 4 days, which then gradually increased to 2190~2410 mg/L at the end. While the concentrations of FAN firstly decreased, then increased and stabilized to 144~209 mg/L after 13 days. The proportion of methane in biogas all exceeded 50% after the 2nd day and reached the maximum value of 61.4%~63.8% on the 11th~12th day. According to simulation results of the modified Gomperts model, pretreatments could shorten the adaption period and enhance gas production at early stage. Ultrasonic pretreatment and alkali-thermal pretreatment could significantly increase the methane yield, from 396 mL CH4/g VS to 601 mL CH4/g VS, 536 mL CH4/g VS, respectively, while microwave pretreatment slightly decreased the methane yield.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(32)
  • SHI Y, GE Y, CHANG J, et al. Garden waste biomass for renewable and sustainable energy production in China:Potential, challenges and development[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013,22:432-437.
    Brown S. Putting the landfill energy myth to rest[J]. Biocycle, 2010,51(5):23-35.
    ABREU A A, TAVARES F, ALVES M M, et al. Garden and food waste co-fermentation for biohydrogen and biomethane production in a two-step hyperthermophilic-mesophilic process[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019,278:180-186.
    CARDONA L, LEVRARD C, GUENNE A, et al. Co-digestion of wastewater sludge:choosing the optimal blend[J]. Waste Management, 2019,87:772-781.
    孙健, 万顺刚, 罗文邃. 堆肥预处理对园林废弃物厌氧消化的影响[J]. 环境工程, 2014,32(3):100-105.
    YANG L C, XU F Q, GE X M, et al. Challenges and strategies for solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015,44:824-834.
    BROWN D, SHI J, LI Y. Comparison of solid-state to liquid anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic feedstocks for biogas production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012,124:379-386.
    GE X M, XU F Q, LI Y B. Solid-state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass:recent progress and perspectives[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016,205:239-249.
    BROWN D, LI Y B. Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013,127:275-280.
    KANG X H, SUN Y M, LI L H, et al. Improving methane production from anaerobic digestion of Pennisetum Hybrid by alkaline pretreatment[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2018,255:205-212.
    PENG J J, ABOMOHRA A E, ELSAYED M, et al. Compositional changes of rice straw fibers after pretreatment with diluted acetic acid:towards enhanced biomethane production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,230:775-782.
    ZIELIŃSKI M, KISIELEWSKA M, DUDEK M, et al. Comparison of microwave thermohydrolysis and liquid hot water pretreatment of energy crop Sida hermaphrodita for enhanced methane production[J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2019,128:105324.
    DONG C Y, CHEN J, GUAN R L, et al. Dual-frequency ultrasound combined with alkali pretreatment of corn stalk for enhanced biogas production[J]. Renewable Energy, 2018,127:444-451.
    YUAN H R, SONG X C, GUAN R L, et al. Effect of low severity hydrothermal pretreatment on anaerobic digestion performance of corn stover[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2019,294:122238.
    MONLAU F, AEMIG Q, BARAKAT A, et al. Application of optimized alkaline pretreatment for enhancing the anaerobic digestion of different sunflower stalks varieties[J]. Environmental Technology, 2013,34(13/14SI):2155-2162.
    CHEN Y, CHENG J J, CREAMER K S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process:a review[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008,99(10):4044-4064.
    SILES J A, BREKELMANS J, MARTIN M A, et al. Impact of ammonia and sulphate concentration on thermophilic anaerobic digestion[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010,101(23):9040-9048.
    REN N Q, LIU M, WANG A J, et al. Organic Acids Conversion in Methanogenic-phase Reactor of the Two-phase Anaerobic Process[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2003,24(4):89-93.
    WANG Y Y, ZHANG Y L, WANG J B, et al. Effects of volatile fatty acid concentrations on methane yield and methanogenic bacteria[J]. Biomass & Bioenergy, 2009,33(5):848-853.
    BANKS C J, ZHANG Y, JIANG Y, et al. Trace element requirements for stable food waste digestion at elevated ammonia concentrations[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2012,104:127-135.
    SCHNURER A, NORDBERG A. Ammonia, a selective agent for methane production by syntrophic acetate oxidation at mesophilic temperature[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2008,57(5):735-740.
    何仕均, 王建龙, 赵璇. 氨氮对厌氧颗粒污泥产甲烷活性的影响[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2005,45(9):1294-1296.
    KAYHANIAN M. Performance of a high-solids anaerobic-digestion process under various ammonia concentrations[J]. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 1994,59(4):349-352.
    RAJAGOPAL R, MASSE D I, SINGH G. A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2013,143:632-641.
    KRAKAT N, DEMIREL B, ANJUM R, et al. Methods of ammonia removal in anaerobic digestion:a review[J]. Water Science and Technology, 2017,76(8):1925-1938.
    LAUTERBOECK B, ORTNER M, HAIDER R, et al. Counteracting ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion by removal with a hollow fiber membrane contactor[J]. Water Research, 2012,46(15):4861-4869.
    ALAGÖZ B A, YENIGÜN O, ERDINCLER A. Ultrasound assisted biogas production from co-digestion of wastewater sludges and agricultural wastes:comparison with microwave pre-treatment[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2018,40(Part B):193-200.
    WANG H, WANG H T, LU W J, et al. Digestibility improvement of sorted waste with alkaline hydrothermal pretreatment[J]. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2009,14(3):378-382.
    PAUDEL S R, BANJARA S P, CHOI O K, et al. Pretreatment of agricultural biomass for anaerobic digestion:current state and challenges[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2017,245(Part A):1194-1205.
    KWIATKOWSKA B, BENNETT J, AKUNNA J, et al. Stimulation of bioprocesses by ultrasound[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2011,29(6):768-780.
    HU Z H, WEN Z Y. Enhancing enzymatic digestibility of switchgrass by microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment[J]. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2008,38(3):369-378.
    MARIN J, KENNEDY K J, ESKICIOGLU C. Effect of microwave irradiation on anaerobic degradability of model kitchen waste[J]. Waste Management, 2010,30(10):1772-1779.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]HE Yan, YAN Xiaoxu, LI You, LIU Huhu, YANG Hui, DUAN Xiyu, LU Xiangyang, TIAN Yun, WANG Chong. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON EXOGENOUS ADDITIVES FOR ANAEROBIC DIGESTION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(4): 175-186. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202404021
    [2]ZHOU Peili, LIU Yimiao, PENG Zhimin. DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF AN IN-SITU PERMEATION TUBE PRETREATMENT DEVICE FOR GAS MONITORING[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 179-184,191. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303024
    [3]LI Ziyu, LI Zhenzhou, DOU Yuting, LUO Jingyang. INFLUENCES OF HETEROLOGOUS SUBSTANCES OCCURRED IN FOOD WASTE ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION AND REGULATION STRATEGIES: A REVIEW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(6): 222-232. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202306029
    [4]DONG Wenyi, DU Hong, ZENG Yuanxin, HUANG Xiao, WANG Hongjie, DAI Zhongyi. REVIEW OF PRETREATMENT PROCESS FOR MUNICIPAL SLUDGE FERMENTATION FOR PRODUCING VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(7): 241-251. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202307033
    [5]WANG Yongping, FANG Haojue, HUA Ruoting, HE Yuheng, ZHANG Yanqiong, ZHENG Yuyi, LIU Changqing, ZHEN Guangyin. COMPREHENSIVE INFLUENCE OF MULTIPLE FACTORS ON HYDROGEN PRODUCTION FROM COMBINED ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION OF SLUDGE AND KITCHEN WASTE UNDER MEDIUM TEMPERATURE CONDITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 103-110. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303014
    [6]JIANG Qiu-li, GUO Si-yan, GUO Hui-xuan, ZHANG Jia-qi, WANG Ning. ENVIRONMENT BIG DATA PREPROCESSING BASED ON OBJECT ORIENTED PETRI NET[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 178-183,140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205026
    [7]ZHA Wengui, WANG Xueye, WANG Zhiwei. PILOT-SCALE STUDY ON MEMBRANE-CATHODE ELECTRO-FENTON PROCESS FOR PRETREATMENT OF SEMICONDUCTOR WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(4): 153-158,208. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202204022
    [8]YANG Meng, JIANG Jian-guo, XU Yi-wen, LIU Nuo. EFFECT OF pH ON ANAEROBIC HYDROLYSIS ACIDIFICATION STAGE OF FRUIT AND VEGETABLE WASTES AND GARDEN WASTES[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(5): 103-108. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202205015
    [9]LI Qiushi, GUO Xiang, LIU Bin, LIN Fawei, ZHAO Yingxin. STUDY ON METHANE PRODUCTION BY THERMOPHILIC ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF MUNICIPAL SLUDGE AND CORN STRAW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 139-145. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207020
    [10]ZHOU Yu-qi, XU Jun-chao, ZHUO Gui-hua, CHEN Jian-yong, LIU Chang-qing. INFLUENCE OF SLUDGE INOCULATION VOLUME ON METHANOGENESIS OF RESIDUE FROM ANAEROBIC FERMENTATIVE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION USING COMBINED SLUDGE AND FOOD WASTE UNDER MEDIUM TEMPERATURE CONDITION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(6): 144-149. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202106021
    [11]FU Li-ya, LI Min, ZHOU Jian, WU Chang-yong, ZHU Chen, YU Yin, SONG Yu-dong. MICRO FLOCCULATING SAND FILTER-CATALYTIC OZONATION ENHANCED COD REMOVAL FROM BIO-TREATED PETROCHEMICAL WASTEWATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(11): 159-165. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202111021
    [12]HUANG Ru-yi, TANG Ping, LUO Tao, LI Jiang, LONG En-shen, MEI Zi-li, KONG Chui-xue. A CASE STUDY ON BIOGAS ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF DEXTRAN PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER USING CIRCULATING FLUIDIZATION[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(3): 48-53. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202103007
    [13]XU Yi-wen, YANG Guo-dong, WANG Feng-xia, CHEN Hui-ting, HUANG Ai-lian, LIU Li-ting, JIANG Yan-hang, SONG Ying-chun, JIANG Jian-guo. EFFECTS OF PRETREATMENTS AND SUBSTRATE COMPOSITIONS ON ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF ORGANIC WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(4): 100-106. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202104016
    [14]LI Hua-fan, KE Yi-hong, ZHANG Qing-yi, YANG Lin, ZHENG Yu-yi, LIU Chang-qing. EFFECT OF pH ON HYDROGEN PRODUCTION BY CODIGESTION OF SEWAGE SLUDGE AND LEACHATE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 58-64. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008010
    [15]ZHAO Jia-qi, FAN Xiao-dan, QIU Chun-sheng, WANG Chen-chen, LIU Nan-nan, WANG Dong, WANG Shao-po, SUN Li-ping. ANALYSIS ON DIFFICULTY AND CONTROL STRATEGY OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION TREATMENT OF FOOD WASTE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 143-148. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012024
    [16]ZHANG Jian-wei, HUANG Tao, PENG Dao-ping, JIANG Shuai, XIA Yu-yang. GAS PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE OF RICE STRAW ANAEROBIC FERMENTATION BY CRYOGENIC FREEZING PRETREATMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 217-221. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008036
    [18]Yang Penghui Wei Jun Qu Chengtun, . VACUUM PYROLYSIS OF OIL SLUDGE FROM YANCHANG OILFIELD[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(10): 101-103. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201510022
    [19]Li Wei Liang Meisheng Pei Xuqian Jiang Junjie, . RESEARCH ON APPLICATION OF PULSED ELECTRIC FIELD IN ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 106-109. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503022
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.515
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 16.9 %FULLTEXT: 16.9 %META: 79.9 %META: 79.9 %PDF: 3.2 %PDF: 3.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 17.8 %其他: 17.8 %其他: 1.4 %其他: 1.4 %Ban Bo: 0.5 %Ban Bo: 0.5 %China: 0.5 %China: 0.5 %Hong Kong, China: 1.4 %Hong Kong, China: 1.4 %Thailand: 3.7 %Thailand: 3.7 %[]: 1.8 %[]: 1.8 %上海: 2.7 %上海: 2.7 %临汾: 0.5 %临汾: 0.5 %佛山: 0.5 %佛山: 0.5 %北京: 3.2 %北京: 3.2 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %大庆: 0.5 %大庆: 0.5 %天津: 0.9 %天津: 0.9 %宁波: 0.5 %宁波: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %张家口: 0.9 %张家口: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %成都: 0.9 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %拉贾斯坦邦: 0.5 %新泽西: 1.4 %新泽西: 1.4 %昆明: 1.4 %昆明: 1.4 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %朝阳: 0.5 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %济源: 0.9 %济源: 0.9 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.9 %石家庄: 0.9 %芒廷维尤: 32.9 %芒廷维尤: 32.9 %芝加哥: 1.4 %芝加哥: 1.4 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %荆州: 0.9 %荆州: 0.9 %西宁: 6.4 %西宁: 6.4 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 4.6 %运城: 4.6 %遵义: 0.5 %遵义: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.9 %邯郸: 0.9 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %长春: 1.4 %长春: 1.4 %长治: 0.5 %长治: 0.5 %香港: 1.4 %香港: 1.4 %香港特别行政区: 1.4 %香港特别行政区: 1.4 %其他其他Ban BoChinaHong Kong, ChinaThailand[]上海临汾佛山北京南京大庆天津宁波常德张家口成都拉贾斯坦邦新泽西昆明晋城朝阳杭州济源深圳石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆州西宁贵阳运城遵义邯郸重庆长春长治香港香港特别行政区

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (174) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return