Source Jouranl of CSCD
Source Journal of Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers
Included as T2 Level in the High-Quality Science and Technology Journals in the Field of Environmental Science
Core Journal of RCCSE
Included in the CAS Content Collection
Included in the JST China
Indexed in World Journal Clout Index (WJCI) Report
Volume 38 Issue 12
Apr.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING  > 2020  >  38(12): 64-69,123
MI Yonglan, ZHANG Wenjie. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON EFFECT OF SOIL COLLOIDS ON MOBILITY OF NANOPLASTICS UNDER DIFFERENT HYDROCHEMICAL CONDITIONS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2024, 42(7): 98-105. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202407010
Citation: WANG Feng, DONG Wen-yi, WANG Hong-jie, LIU Tong-zhou, MAO Yan-qing, WU Hua-cai. EFFECTIVENESS OF IN SITU TREATMENT OF BLACK-ODOR RIVER SEDIMENT BY CaO2[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 64-69,123. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012012
shu

EFFECTIVENESS OF IN SITU TREATMENT OF BLACK-ODOR RIVER SEDIMENT BY CaO2

doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012012

  • 1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology(Shenzhen), Shenzhen 518055, China;

  • 2. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Water Resource Utilization and Environmental Pollution Control, Shenzhen 518055, China

  • Received Date: 2019-12-20
    Available Online: 2021-04-23
    Abstract
  • CaO2 has been widely used in the in-situ treatment of black-odor rivers sediment. However, most studies focused on the AVS (acidic volatile sulfide) removal effect from the sediment by CaO2, and those focused on other pollution indicators were rare. Through a pilot experiment, the effect of in situ treatment of AVS and organics in black-odor river sediment by CaO2 was investigated. Meanwhile, the color, ORP, pH, heavy metal content and morphology of the sediment were detected. The results showed that in situ treatment of black-odor river sediment pollutants by CaO2 had ideal performance, with the removal rate of AVS reaching 98% above and the content of TOC decreasing by about 0.4%. At the same time, the color of the sediment changed from black to earthen yellow, the ORP increased from -150 mV to about 100 mV, and the pH changed from neutral to alkaline (about pH=11). The addition of CaO2 had no effect on the change of heavy metal content in the sediment, but the heavy metals with relatively stable forms were converted into unstable forms.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(38)
  • LU S G, ZHANG X, XUE Y F. Application of calcium peroxide in water and soil treatment:A review[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2017, 337:163-177.
    宁梓洁,王鑫. 黑臭水体治理技术研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2018, 36(8):26-29

    ,73.
    周成,杨国录,陆晶,等. 河湖底泥污染物释放影响因素及底泥处理的研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(5):113-117.
    WANG Y, WANG W H, YAN F L, et al. Effects and mechanisms of calcium peroxide on purification of severely eutrophic water[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 650:2796-2806.
    WANG W H, WANG Y, FAN P, et al. Effect of calcium peroxide on the water quality and bacterium community of sediment in black-odor water[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2019, 248:18-27.
    杨华,席劲瑛,胡洪营,等. 投加化学药剂改善城市黑臭河流水质的研究[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2012, 35(增刊1):295-298.
    吴华财,刘彤宙,季冰,等. 原位生化处理感潮河道污染底泥磷存在形态变化研究[C]//中国水利学会2013年学术年会. 广州:中国水利学会, 2013:241-247.
    梅宝中. 采用过氧化钙对黑臭水净化的效果分析[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2018, 36(12):11-13.
    王兆珺. 过氧化钙对黑臭水体处理效果研究[D]. 芜湖:安徽工程大学, 2018.
    李亮,武成辉,陈涛,等. 过氧化钙在城镇黑臭水体修复中的作用[J]. 化工进展, 2016, 35(增刊2):340-346.
    徐恩兵,孙健,韦雷. 沸石粉联合过氧化钙对黑臭河道营养盐释放的影响作用[J].环境工程, 2018,36(增刊):142-144.
    王妙,张华俊,陈海峰,等. 沸石联合过氧化钙对黑臭河道底泥营养盐释放的作用研究[J]. 广东化工, 2017, 44(4):36-37.
    ZHOU J, LI D P, CHEN S T, et al. Sedimentary phosphorus immobilization with the addition of amended calcium peroxide material[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019, 357:288-297.
    徐垚,李大鹏,韩菲尔,等. CaO2不同投加方式对黑臭河道底泥内源磷释放抑制作用[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(7):2836-2842.
    王兆珺,徐建平. 过氧化钙对黑臭水净化效果的研究[J]. 安徽工程大学学报, 2018, 33(2):8-13.
    袁芬. 过氧化钙原位修复黑臭底泥对上覆水体的影响[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2019.
    张晓娇. 北运河底泥污染特征及内源污染控制技术研究[D]. 大连:大连海洋大学, 2018.
    林臻. 过氧化钙复合药剂原位修复黑臭水体底泥的研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2018.
    李津. 化学法对城市黑臭湖库水体及沉积物修复试验研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2017.
    BROUWER T M A M. In situ treatment of Hamilton Harbour sediment[J]. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 1995, 3(4):195-203.
    LIU T Z, ZHANG Z, MAO Y Q, et al. Induced metal redistribution and bioavailability enhancement in contaminated river sediment during in situ biogeochemical remediation[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2016, 23(7):6353-6362.
    国家质量技术监督局. GB 17378.5-2007海洋监测规范第5部分:沉积物分析[S] 北京:中国标准出版社. 2007.
    US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-Method 3052, Microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices. US Government printing office, Washington, DC. 1996.
    RAURET G, LOPEZ-SANCHEZ J F, SAHUQUILLO A, et al. Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials[J]. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 1999, 1(1):57-61.
    罗雅,董文艺,吴华财. 原位投加氧化剂去除河道污染底泥黑臭的研究[J]. 水利水电技术, 2012, 43(8):28-33.
    张亚雷,章明,李建华,等. CaO2不同投加方式对底泥磷释放的抑制效果分析[J]. 环境科学, 2006(11):2188-2193.
    孙远军. 城市河流底泥污染与原位稳定化研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2009.
    张丹. CaO2对控制河道底泥磷释放效果的研究[J]. 环境工程, 2012, 30(增刊2):532-534.
    傅翔宇,李亚峰,王群. 城市黑臭河道治理方法的研究与应用现状[J]. 建筑与预算, 2016(4):37-41.
    王旭,王永刚,孙长虹,等. 城市黑臭水体形成机理与评价方法研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(4):1331-1340.
    顾鹏飞. 城市黑臭河流的原位化学修复研究[D]. 山东:山东大学, 2018.
    国家市场监督管理总局. GB 15618-2018土壤环境质量农用地土壤污染风险管控标准[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2018.
    胡兰文,陈明,杨泉,等. 底泥重金属污染现状及修复技术进展[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35(12):115-118.
    于珊珊,高正捷,杨月红,等. 水体底泥对重金属的吸附机理研究进展[J]. 环境工程, 2015, 33(增刊1):1018-1020.
    周雪飞,张亚雷,章明,等. 金山湖底泥重金属稳定化处理效果及机制研究[J]. 环境科学, 2008,29(6):1705-1712.
    毛彦青. 河道污染底泥生物和化学修复对重金属形态分布影响研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2014.
    王乐乐. 微波协助双氧水对底泥重金属影响及底泥修复可行性分析[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2015.
    HOU X J, HUANG X P, LI M L, et al. Fenton oxidation of organic contaminants with aquifer sediment activated by ascorbic acid[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 348:255-262.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]ZHAO Chutong, GUAN Yanyan, ZHANG Ze, WANG Xiaona, GAO Ming, WU Chuanfu, WANG Qunhui. EFFECT OF FLY ASH INCORPORATION ON HYDRATION MECHANISM AND HEAVY METAL SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION EFFECT ON SLAG-BASED BACKFILLFING CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 213-220,189. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312026
    [2]LI Sha, WANG Zhaojia, WANG Mingwei, ZHENG Yongchao, ZHAN Jiayu. LONG-TERM LEACHING BEHAVIORS OF HEAVY METALS FROM STEEL SLAG IN CEMENT-BASED CEMENTITIOUS MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(3): 136-142. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202303018
    [3]XUE Chonghua, ZHAO Yimeng, SUN Jiarong, LUO Cheng, Li Wenhui, WANG Qing, LI Junqi, HUANG Xin. EFFECTS OF WATER ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS RELEASE FROM PIPELINE SEDIMENTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2023, 41(12): 89-98. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202312011
    [4]DING Jiamin, LU Shengyong, LIN Xiaoqing, PENG Yaqi, HE Yao. INFLUENCE OF S-N-P-INHIBITOR ON FLY ASH CHARACTERISTICS AND PCDD/Fs CONTENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 88-93,17. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207013
    [5]MA Weixing, ZOU Lihang, LI Xuan, LI Chaoxia, MA Zhiqiang, DU Hongqiu, DING Cheng, WU Xiangyang. SPECTRAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ORGANIC REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF TWO DIFFERENT WATER SOURCE PRETREATMENT PROJECTS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(8): 150-158,61. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202208021
    [6]WU Hao, JIANG Cheng, CAO Wenping, LI Zebing. ADSORPTION ACTIVITY AND MECHANISM OF POLLUTANTS REMOVAL BY SUBSTRATES UNDER THE DYNAMIC STRENGTHENING OF VERTICAL FLOW[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(7): 52-60,115. doi: DOI:10.13205/j.hjgc.202207008
    [7]CUI Feijian, QIN Guangxiong, ZENG Hailong, HUANG Zhiwei, LI Wenjing, YANG Hanjie, HU Yanfang, FANG Huaiyang, ZENG Fantang, DU Hongwei. SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS AND POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND HEAVY METAL IN SURFACE SEDIMENTS OF HEAVILY POLLUTED TRIBUTARIES OF SHAHE RIVER BASIN[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2022, 40(1): 110-116. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202201016
    [8]LIU Zhao, ZHOU Hong, LIU Wei, CAO Wen-jia, LAN Sheng-tao. HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION PROPERTIES ANALYSIS AND PRIMARY HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT IN GROUNDWATER IN THE QINGJIANG RIVER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2021, 39(5): 196-203. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202105028
    [9]DAI Liang, ZHAO Wei-fan, ZHANG Hong-wei, HAN Tao, ZHANG Kang. RESEARCH PROGRESS ON ADSORPTION OF HEAVY METALS BY SEWAGE SLUDGE-BASED BIOCHAR IN WATER[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(12): 70-77. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202012013
    [10]ZHANG Fu-xiang, CUI Song, ZHU Qian-de, GAO Shang, LI Kun-yang. POLLUTION CHARACTERISTIC AND RISK ASSESSMENT OF HEAVY METALS IN AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT OF QIXING RIVER WETLAND[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(10): 68-75. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202010011
    [11]XU Si-han, WANG Min-yan, ZHANG Jin, DIAO Han-jie, LI Yan-ming, SHAN Sheng-dao, CAO Yu-cheng. EFFECT OF PYROLYSIS TIME ON CHARACTERISTICS AND HEAVY METAL ECOLOGICAL RISKS IN BIOCHAR MADE FROM WASTEWATER SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(3): 162-167. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202003027
    [12]CHENG Shu-zhen, SUN Chang-shun, WANG Li-xiang, GUO Xin-chao, LI Yuan-han. ANALYSIS ON CONTENT CHARACTERISTICS OF NUTRIENTS AND HEAVY METALS IN URBAN SLUDGE OF SHAANXI PROVINCE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(5): 65-69. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202005012
    [13]YE Chun-mei, WU Jian-qiang, HUANG Shen-fa, SHA Chen-yan, XU Zhi-hao, WANG Jing, ZHOU Dong, SUN Hai-tong, HAN Li-ming. SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT BY COMPOUD MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2020, 38(8): 125-130,51. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.202008021
    [15]Xu Yanzhe Fang Zhanqiang, . ADVANCES ON REMEDIATION OF HEAVY METAL IN THE SOIL BY BIOCHAR[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 156-159. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502035
    [16]Sun Zijie Tian Kan Liu Tao Tian Honghai, . CURRENT SITUATION AND COUNTERMEASURES ON THE DEVELOPMENT ON HEAVY METAL REFERENCE MATERIALS[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(3): 136-140. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201503027
    [17]Yang Long Sun Changhong Li Shanshan Liu Guizhong, . COMPARATIVE STUDY ON HEAVY METAL POLLUTION OF SURFACE DUST IN TYPICAL INDUSTRIES ENVIRONMENT[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 122-125. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502027
    [18]Chen Yasong, Zhang Chao, Chen Zhenguo, Dong Wenjie, Xu Bingxin. EARLY WARNING OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE INHIBITORY ACTION BY HEAVY METALS BASED ON OXYGEN UPTAKE RATE INDEX[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2015, 33(2): 27-31. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201502006
    [19]SIMULATION EXPERIMENT OF SINTERING CEMENT USING HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATED SOIL[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 91-94. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412016
    [20]RESEARCH PROGRESS ON IMMOBILIZATION AND REMOVAL OF HEAVY METALS FROM MUNICIPAL SLUDGE[J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING , 2014, 32(12): 82-86. doi: 10.13205/j.hjgc.201412014
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.5 %FULLTEXT: 12.5 %META: 86.4 %META: 86.4 %PDF: 1.1 %PDF: 1.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 19.0 %其他: 19.0 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %China: 2.3 %China: 2.3 %Murfreesboro: 0.3 %Murfreesboro: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %上海: 3.7 %上海: 3.7 %东莞: 1.1 %东莞: 1.1 %临汾: 0.3 %临汾: 0.3 %乐山: 0.3 %乐山: 0.3 %九江: 1.7 %九江: 1.7 %伦敦: 0.3 %伦敦: 0.3 %信阳: 0.3 %信阳: 0.3 %北京: 5.9 %北京: 5.9 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %厦门: 0.6 %厦门: 0.6 %台州: 0.3 %台州: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %天津: 1.4 %天津: 1.4 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %张家口: 0.3 %徐州: 0.6 %徐州: 0.6 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %抚州: 0.3 %抚州: 0.3 %无锡: 1.1 %无锡: 1.1 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.3 %朝阳: 0.3 %杭州: 0.8 %杭州: 0.8 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %济源: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %湖州: 0.3 %漯河: 3.1 %漯河: 3.1 %芒廷维尤: 11.3 %芒廷维尤: 11.3 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.8 %苏州: 0.8 %蚌埠: 0.3 %蚌埠: 0.3 %衢州: 1.1 %衢州: 1.1 %西宁: 26.1 %西宁: 26.1 %西安: 0.6 %西安: 0.6 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 3.1 %运城: 3.1 %遵义: 0.6 %遵义: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %鄂州: 0.3 %鄂州: 0.3 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阳泉: 1.4 %阳泉: 1.4 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %香港: 0.3 %香港: 0.3 %其他其他ChinaMurfreesboro[]上海东莞临汾乐山九江伦敦信阳北京十堰南京厦门台州合肥哈尔滨天津常德张家口徐州成都扬州抚州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉济南济源湖州漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州蚌埠衢州西宁西安贵阳运城遵义邯郸郑州鄂州重庆长沙长治阳泉青岛香港

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (215) PDF downloads(10) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Authors' Center

    Links

    Copyright © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司 京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return